Các dạng writing task 2
1) ARGEE OR DISAGREE
Có thể viết partly agree => thành discuss both view để đỡ trùng ý.
Đề: Some people think that the government should provide free education to students in university. What extent do you agree or disagree.
Some individuals are of the claim that providing university education without any cost which students must bear is highly beneficial and should be implemented by the government. Personally, I partly agree with this suggestion based on some major reasons that are explained in this essay.
Body 1: Tại sao nên miễn phí giáo dục đại học? - Nguyên nhân.
Help poor students, more access to education, encourage people to learn more, alleviate financial burden on students, finding talented individuals, foster a sense of equality which gives poor students a chance,…
Topic sentence: nên là 1 câu chung chung, định hướng định nói gì thôi, không cần quá cụ thể.
Thực trang → lý do/ ví dụ của thực trạng → hậu quả (phải có background để làm rõ những gì mình đang nói).
stagnant inflation: lạm phát trì trệ.
socio-economic: related to the differences between groups of people caused mainly by their financial situation.
higher demand for quality, teaching facilities, human resources.
prohibiting, forbidding students with lower means of living from entering university.
On the one hand, there are some persuasive rationales/ reasons that support the claim that university education should be free of charge. In this day age, due to stagnant (not developing) inflation, the cost of education has increased significantly, causing problems for individuals to make a university entry if they are come from disadvantageous socio-economic backgrounds. This would result in their inability to contribute to the workforce, making the country fail to develop effectively. If university education can be given to students for free, many talented individuals can contribute to the workforce, boosting economic development and transforming the quality of the whole population.
Body 2: Tại sao đôi khi cách này lại không ổn?
Điều kiện cần → đưa ra khẳng định.
Ví dụ: Chính phủ không đủ tiền → Số lượng học sinh lớn, chi phí giáo dục mắc, ngân khố ít.
expenditure: the act of spending money.
proposal: formal suggestion.
obligation: duty (because of law).
require massive amounts of financial resources.
On the other hand, despite the idealistic nature of making university education free of charge, its actual application could bring many obstacles and problems. The coverage of such an expenditure means that the government is required to handle an increasing amount of tuition fee and a large number of students. Also, some nations, especially developing ones, may not have a flexible budget that can be spent on such a large expense. As a result, if the proposal of removing the financial obligation for students is implemented, many governments would not manage to complete such task.
In conclusion, although there are mixed opinions on determining whether the cost of university education should be taken by all students, I reckon that the governments still need to provide financial aid on a casa-by-case basis. While students with disadvantageous socio-economic backgrounds should receive support, ones who can pay still need to follow through with their financial obligations to ensure the function of the university.
2) DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS, GIVE OWN OPINION
Đề: Some people indicate that apartments are the best types of housing, while others argue that private houses in the street are better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some individuals are of the opinion that the optimal type of accommodation is apartments. In contrast, others think that residing in a private house one the street is a superior option. Although both schools of thought offer merit, (I agree more with the former/ latter perspective.) I agree more with the view that the final decision should be made based on the actual needs of each household./ I would evaluate the persuasiveness of each school of thought before proposing my personal opinion.
Khổ 1 - view 1.
Khổ 2 - view 2.
Phải đưa ra lý do cụ thể để giải thích cho luận điểm, lý lẽ.
On the one hand, there are some major rationales that explain why some people think that apartments have the potential to be the best accommodation type. On the same area of land, the construction of apartments would generally yield a larger number of housing units compared to what can be achieved if private houses are built. Also, the shared facilities and amenities would reduce the demand for travel, further cutting down the cost of living. Thus, the affordability makes apartments suitable to people with lower means of living, which generally makes up the largest parts of our population.
On the other hand, opponents of the previous view claim that private houses on the street are a better form of accommodation. The close proximity with other people, which is common in apartment complex, may disrupt the personal living space. For houses on the street, such an issue could be mitigated/ alleviated better due to better insulation from the outside environment. Besides, the value of private houses on the street has been proven to increase better compared to apartments, making them a worthy form of investment that yields more value in the future.
In conclusion, although there are mixed opinions on determining the best forms of accommodation, I believe that the ultimate decision needs to be made according to the demand and financial conditions of each household. If a family values privacy and has an interest in investment, a private house on the street is a superior option. In contrast, the lower cost of living associated with apartments is inevitably the best option for people with lower levels of income.
3) ADVANTAGES - DISADVANTAGES
Đề: Nowadays, some nations tax sugar more heavily to help citizens eat healthily. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Benefit: sugar có những đặc điểm gì problematic? → gây ra hệ quả gì? → nói rõ cho ví dụ → chính vì vậy, tăng giá sugar, ít ăn, ăn healthy hơn → mang lại benefit gì.
Disadvantages:
C1: trực tiếp → nói thẳng measure này dẫn đến problem gì.
C2: vẫn thừa nhận hiệu quả, nhưng việc áp dụng sẽ không thực tế hoặc khó khăn.
In this day and age, taxing sugar more heavily to make people’s diets healthier has become an approach that some nations have adopted. In this essay, I would evaluate both pros and cons before proposing whether or not the positive aspect overperform its drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are some benefits associated with imposing a higher tax level on sugar to improve the diets of citizens. As sugar is highly affordable and can enhance the taste of many dishes, it is virtually present in many parts of our our diets, causing excessive accumulation of fats that lead to health problems, ranging from obesity to cardiovascular diseases. If the price of sugar is made more expensive, its consumption may plunge, helping people eat better and avoid health issues. This would relive a lot of burden on each citizen and the whole healthcare system.
On the other hand, this measure would have some problematic implications that should receive more attention. Sugar has been an important part of our diets for many centuries as it exits in various forms and in many types of food, which ultimately gives us energy to function. When the price of sugar increases, many food that has moderate amounts of it would have the price surged according, causing problem for people’s accessibility to food and prompting backlash from general consumers.
In conclusion, after assessing both positive and negative implication of the measure that imposes higher tax on sugar to improve people’s diets, I reckon that the benefits outweigh the negative aspects. As many food producers over-utlize sugar and are directly responsible for causing more health problems for consumers, sugar has long been a part of our diets. As a result, imposing higher tax should only be applied for food that has unacceptable sugar content.