Applied Calculus – Comprehensive Exam Study Notes Exam Context & Administrative Details Course: Applied Calculus Code: BUM2123 Faculty: Industrial Sciences & Technology Session/Semester: 2018/2019 Semester I Date/Duration: 2 Jan 2019 – 3 hours Programmes Sitting: BAA, BCG, BEE, BEP, BFF, BFM, BHA, BHM, BKC, BMA, BMM, BPS, BSB, BSK, BSP, BTC, BTF, BTP, FBAA, FBMM \text{BAA, BCG, BEE, BEP, BFF, BFM, BHA, BHM, BKC, BMA, BMM, BPS, BSB, BSK, BSP, BTC, BTF, BTP, FBAA, FBMM} BAA, BCG, BEE, BEP, BFF, BFM, BHA, BHM, BKC, BMA, BMM, BPS, BSB, BSK, BSP, BTC, BTF, BTP, FBAA, FBMM Paper Structure: 9 questions, 5 printed pages (+ appendix) Instructions: Answer all questions & start each on new page. Show every calculation & assumption. Formula sheet provided (trig identities, polar/cylindrical/spherical conversions, multiple‐integral Jacobians, surface‐area formulas, second‐derivative test, etc.) Q1 – Chain-Rule Differentiation (5 marks) Given composite variable dependencies: w = x e y , x = ln t 2 , y = sin t w = x e^{y}, \quad x = \ln t^{2}, \quad y = \sin t w = x e y , x = ln t 2 , y = sin t Objective: find d w d t \dfrac{dw}{dt} d t d w using chain rule. Chain Rule in multivariable form: d w d t = ∂ w ∂ x d x d t + ∂ w ∂ y d y d t \frac{dw}{dt}=\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}\frac{dx}{dt}+\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}\frac{dy}{dt} d t d w = ∂ x ∂ w d t d x + ∂ y ∂ w d t d y Derivative components: ∂ w ∂ x = e y \frac{\partial w}{\partial x}=e^{y} ∂ x ∂ w = e y ∂ w ∂ y = x e y \frac{\partial w}{\partial y}=x e^{y} ∂ y ∂ w = x e y d x d t = d d t ( ln t 2 ) = 2 t \frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}\big(\ln t^{2}\big)=\frac{2}{t} d t d x = d t d ( ln t 2 ) = t 2 d y d t = cos t \frac{dy}{dt}=\cos t d t d y = cos t Substitution yields answer (paper’s numeric simplification not shown here): d w d t = e sin t ( 2 t + x cos t ) \frac{dw}{dt}=e^{\sin t}\left(\frac{2}{t}+x\cos t\right) d t d w = e s i n t ( t 2 + x cos t ) where x = ln t 2 x=\ln t^{2} x = ln t 2 . Pedagogical notes: Emphasises multivariable chain rule ; crucial in physics (e.g.
thermodynamic state functions) & engineering (automatic differentiation of nested formulas). Q2 – Implicit Differentiation of F ( x , y , z ) = 0 F(x,y,z)=0 F ( x , y , z ) = 0 (8 marks) Function: F = 2 x 2 y 2 − y 2 + x z − sin ( 2 x − 5 z ) + cos ( 6 y ) = 0 F=2x^{2}y^{2}-y^{2}+xz-\sin(2x-5z)+\cos(6y)=0 F = 2 x 2 y 2 − y 2 + x z − sin ( 2 x − 5 z ) + cos ( 6 y ) = 0 Task: compute ∂ z ∂ x \dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x} ∂ x ∂ z and ∂ z ∂ y \dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y} ∂ y ∂ z (implicitly) and then evaluate at ( x , y , z ) = ( 5 π 12 , 5 π 12 , 5 π 2 ) \bigl(x,y,z\bigr)=\left(\tfrac{5\pi}{12}, \tfrac{5\pi}{12}, \tfrac{5\pi}{2}\right) ( x , y , z ) = ( 12 5 π , 12 5 π , 2 5 π ) . General implicit‐differentiation formula for z z z : ∂ z ∂ x = − F < e m > x F < / e m > z , ∂ z ∂ y = − F < e m > y F < / e m > z \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}=-\frac{F<em>{x}}{F</em>{z}}, \qquad \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}=-\frac{F<em>{y}}{F</em>{z}} ∂ x ∂ z = − F < / e m > z F < e m > x , ∂ y ∂ z = − F < / e m > z F < e m > y (holding other variables constant). Compute partials:
\begin{aligned}
F{x}&=4xy^{2}+z-2\cos(2x-5z)\cdot(2) \
&=4xy^{2}+z-4\cos(2x-5z)\[4pt]
F {y}&=4x^{2}y-2y-6\sin(6y)\[4pt]
F_{z}&=x+5\sin(2x-5z)
\end{aligned} Substitute numerical coordinates (paper’s worked value ≈ 1.3579 \approx1.3579 ≈ 1.3579 supplied for ∂ z / ∂ x \partial z/\partial x ∂ z / ∂ x ; symmetrical method for ∂ z / ∂ y \partial z/\partial y ∂ z / ∂ y ). Key concept: gradient vector ∇ F = ( F < e m > x , F < / e m > y , F z ) \nabla F=(F<em>{x},F</em>{y},F_{z}) ∇ F = ( F < e m > x , F < / e m > y , F z ) is orthogonal to implicit surface; directional rates follow from gradient ratios. Q3 – Relative Extrema via Second-Derivative Test (15 marks) Function: f ( x , y ) = 4 x 4 − 2 x 2 y 2 + x 2 y − y 3 − 8 x 2 + 12 y f(x,y)=4x^{4}-2x^{2}y^{2}+x^{2}y- y^{3}-8x^{2}+12y f ( x , y ) = 4 x 4 − 2 x 2 y 2 + x 2 y − y 3 − 8 x 2 + 12 y Steps: Find critical points by solving f < e m > x = 0 , f < / e m > y = 0 f<em>{x}=0,\;f</em>{y}=0 f < e m > x = 0 , f < / e m > y = 0 . Build Hessian: H=\begin{bmatrix}f{xx} & f {xy}\f{yx} & f {yy}\end{bmatrix}; compute D = det H D=\det H D = det H at each point. Classification: D > 0 , f x x > 0 D>0, f_{xx}>0 D > 0 , f xx > 0 → local min. D > 0 , f x x < 0 D>0, f_{xx}<0 D > 0 , f xx < 0 → local max. D < 0 D<0 D < 0 → saddle. Supplied results: ( 0 , 2 ) \bigl(0,2\bigr) ( 0 , 2 ) → D = 64 , f x x = − 16 D=64, f_{xx}=-16 D = 64 , f xx = − 16 ⇒ relative maximum . ( 2 , 2 ) \bigl(2,2\bigr) ( 2 , 2 ) & ( − 2 , 2 ) (-2,2) ( − 2 , 2 ) → D = − 128 D=-128 D = − 128 ⇒ saddle points . Practical relevance: design optimisation (finding maxima/minima of multivariable cost); economic surfaces; machine‐learning loss landscapes. Q4 – Cardioid r = 3 + 3 cos θ r=3+3\cos\theta r = 3 + 3 cos θ (Polar) (9 marks) (i) Sketch (2 marks)
Cardioid symmetric about polar axis (θ = 0 \theta=0 θ = 0 line). Maximum radius r max = 6 r_{\max}=6 r m a x = 6 at θ = 0 \theta=0 θ = 0 ; cusp at origin when θ = π \theta=\pi θ = π .
(ii) Area via single polar integral (7 marks) Formula: A = 1 2 ∫ α β r 2 d θ A=\dfrac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}r^{2}\,d\theta A = 2 1 ∫ α β r 2 d θ . Full cardioid: α = − π , β = π \alpha=-\pi,\;\beta=\pi α = − π , β = π (or 0 → 2 π 0\to2\pi 0 → 2 π ). Computation leads to paper’s answer A ≈ 42.4115 A\approx 42.4115 A ≈ 42.4115 (units$^{2}$). Exact symbolic value: A = 27 π 2 A=\frac{27\pi}{2} A = 2 27 π . Concept: single‐integral polar area avoids double‐integral set-up; crucial in antenna lobe plots, orbital paths etc. Q5 – Double Integral over Region Bounded by Two Parabolas (14 marks) Curves: y = 2 − x 2 , y = − x 2 + 4 y=2-x^{2}, \qquad y=-x^{2}+4 y = 2 − x 2 , y = − x 2 + 4 Region R: vertical “lens” intersection (sketch & shading worth 3 marks). Limits: solve equality 2 − x 2 = − x 2 + 4 ⟹ x = ± 2 2-x^{2}=-x^{2}+4\implies x=\pm\sqrt{2} 2 − x 2 = − x 2 + 4 ⟹ x = ± 2 . Integral: ∬ R y d A \displaystyle\iint_{R}y\,dA ∬ R y d A . Typical evaluation: integrate with x x x outer; yields answer 125 6 ≈ 20.8333 \frac{125}{6}\approx20.8333 6 125 ≈ 20.8333 . Learning point: choosing order d y d x dydx d y d x vs d x d y dxdy d x d y can simplify algebra; visual sketching is pivotal. Q6 – Common Region of Circle & Cardioid in First Quadrant (16 marks) Circle: r = 2 sin θ r=2\sin\theta r = 2 sin θ (radius 2, centred on y y y -axis). Cardioid: r = − 2 + 2 sin θ r=-2+2\sin\theta r = − 2 + 2 sin θ (left-shifted, cusp on negative x x x ).
(i) Combined sketch (3 marks): first‐quadrant snippet.
(ii) Intersection angle (2 marks): 2 sin θ = − 2 + 2 sin θ ⇒ sin θ = 1 ⇒ θ = π 2 2\sin\theta=-2+2\sin\theta\;\Rightarrow\;\sin\theta=1 \Rightarrow \theta=\frac{\pi}{2} 2 sin θ = − 2 + 2 sin θ ⇒ sin θ = 1 ⇒ θ = 2 π . Reported answer: θ = π 6 \theta=\dfrac{\pi}{6} θ = 6 π ? (Paper lists “1 sin θ / 2 1\sin\theta/2 1 sin θ /2 ” then θ = π / 6 \theta=\pi/6 θ = π /6 ; interpretation: likely other intersection solving 2 sin θ = − 2 + 2 sin θ 2\sin\theta = -2+2\sin\theta 2 sin θ = − 2 + 2 sin θ + domain restrictions → cross-check in class.)
(iii) Area via polar double integral (11 marks): integrate 1 2 r 2 \dfrac12 r^{2} 2 1 r 2 from lower curve to upper, θ \theta θ bounds 0 → θ int 0\to\theta_{\text{int}} 0 → θ int ; answer in sheet A = 7 π 6 − 2 3 ≈ 0.2011 A=\dfrac{7\pi}{6}-\dfrac{2}{3}\approx0.2011 A = 6 7 π − 3 2 ≈ 0.2011 . Q7 – Triple Integral Volume in First Octant beneath Plane (9 marks) Region: bounded by coordinate planes x = 0 , y = 0 , z = 0 x=0,y=0,z=0 x = 0 , y = 0 , z = 0 and plane 6 x + 6 y + 3 z = 6 ⇒ z = 2 − 2 x − 2 y 6x+6y+3z=6 \;\Rightarrow\; z=2-2x-2y 6 x + 6 y + 3 z = 6 ⇒ z = 2 − 2 x − 2 y . First octant ⇒ x , y , z ≥ 0 x,y,z\ge0 x , y , z ≥ 0 ; projection onto x y xy x y plane is triangle with intercepts x = y = 1 x=y=1 x = y = 1 . Volume: V = ∫ < e m > 0 1 ∫ < / e m > 0 1 − x ∫ 0 2 − 2 x − 2 y d z d y d x V=\int<em>{0}^{1}\int</em>{0}^{1-x}\int_{0}^{2-2x-2y}dz\,dy\,dx V = ∫ < e m > 0 1 ∫ < / e m > 0 1 − x ∫ 0 2 − 2 x − 2 y d z d y d x . Paper’s answer: V = 1 V=1 V = 1 . Interpretation: tetrahedral volume verification (classic exam favourite; showcases transforming planes to limits). Q8 – Spherical-Coordinate Evaluation of a Symmetric Solid (12 marks) Rectangular description: G = ( x , y , z ) : x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ≤ 4 , x , y , z ≥ 0 G={(x,y,z):x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\le4,\;x,y,z\ge0} G = ( x , y , z ) : x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ≤ 4 , x , y , z ≥ 0 (first-octant quarter-ball of radius 2). Given integral ∭ G ( 4 − x 2 − y 2 − z 2 ) d V \displaystyle\iiint_{G}(4-x^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2})\,dV ∭ G ( 4 − x 2 − y 2 − z 2 ) d V . Spherical substitution: x = ρ sin ϕ cos θ , y = ρ sin ϕ sin θ , z = ρ cos ϕ x=\rho\sin\phi\cos\theta,\;y=\rho\sin\phi\sin\theta,\;z=\rho\cos\phi x = ρ sin ϕ cos θ , y = ρ sin ϕ sin θ , z = ρ cos ϕ .
Jacobian ρ 2 sin ϕ \rho^{2}\sin\phi ρ 2 sin ϕ . Limits: ρ : 0 → 2 , θ : 0 → π 2 , ϕ : 0 → π 2 \rho:0\to2, \theta:0\to\frac{\pi}{2}, \phi:0\to\frac{\pi}{2} ρ : 0 → 2 , θ : 0 → 2 π , ϕ : 0 → 2 π . Integral in spherical: ∫ < e m > 0 π / 2 ∫ < / e m > 0 π / 2 ∫ 0 2 ( 4 − ρ 2 ) ρ 2 sin ϕ d ρ d ϕ d θ \int<em>{0}^{\pi/2}\int</em>{0}^{\pi/2}\int_{0}^{2}(4-\rho^{2})\rho^{2}\sin\phi\,d\rho\,d\phi\,d\theta ∫ < e m > 0 π /2 ∫ < / e m > 0 π /2 ∫ 0 2 ( 4 − ρ 2 ) ρ 2 sin ϕ d ρ d ϕ d θ . Evaluate: Radial: ∫ < e m > 0 2 ( 4 ρ 2 − ρ 4 ) d ρ = ( 4 ρ 3 3 − ρ 5 5 ) < / e m > 0 2 = 32 3 − 32 5 = 64 15 \int<em>{0}^{2}(4\rho^{2}-\rho^{4})d\rho=\Bigl(\tfrac{4\rho^{3}}{3}-\tfrac{\rho^{5}}{5}\Bigr)</em>{0}^{2}=\tfrac{32}{3}-\tfrac{32}{5}=\tfrac{64}{15} ∫ < e m > 0 2 ( 4 ρ 2 − ρ 4 ) d ρ = ( 3 4 ρ 3 − 5 ρ 5 ) < / e m > 0 2 = 3 32 − 5 32 = 15 64 . Angular product: ∫ < e m > 0 π / 2 sin ϕ d ϕ = 1 , \int<em>{0}^{\pi/2}\sin\phi\,d\phi=1, ∫ < e m > 0 π /2 sin ϕ d ϕ = 1 , and ∫ < / e m > 0 π / 2 d θ = π 2 \int</em>{0}^{\pi/2}d\theta=\tfrac{\pi}{2} ∫ < / e m > 0 π /2 d θ = 2 π . Result: V = 64 15 ⋅ π 2 = 32 π 15 ≈ 6.702 V=\frac{64}{15}\cdot\frac{\pi}{2}=\frac{32\pi}{15}\approx6.702 V = 15 64 ⋅ 2 π = 15 32 π ≈ 6.702 (paper shows symbolic triple integral template; final answer not printed). Key learning: spherical coordinates simplify radially symmetric integrands; especially 3-D probability densities, gravitational potentials. Q9 – Surface Area of Paraboloid z = 4 − x 2 − y 2 z=4-x^{2}-y^{2} z = 4 − x 2 − y 2 in First Octant (12 marks) First octant rules: x ≥ 0 , y ≥ 0 , z ≥ 0 x\ge0,y\ge0,z\ge0 x ≥ 0 , y ≥ 0 , z ≥ 0 ; projection onto x y xy x y plane is quarter of disk x 2 + y 2 ≤ 4 x^{2}+y^{2}\le4 x 2 + y 2 ≤ 4 (radius 2). Surface-area formula (from appendix): A = ∬ R 1 + ( ∂ z ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ z ∂ y ) 2 d A . A=\iint_{R}\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right)^{2}+\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}\right)^{2}}\,dA. A = ∬ R 1 + ( ∂ x ∂ z ) 2 + ( ∂ y ∂ z ) 2 d A . Gradients: z < e m > x = − 2 x , z < / e m > y = − 2 y z<em>{x}=-2x, z</em>{y}=-2y z < e m > x = − 2 x , z < / e m > y = − 2 y → integrand 1 + 4 x 2 + 4 y 2 \sqrt{1+4x^{2}+4y^{2}} 1 + 4 x 2 + 4 y 2 . Switch to polar: x = r cos θ , y = r sin θ , r : 0 → 2 , θ : 0 → π 2 x=r\cos\theta,y=r\sin\theta, r:0\to2, \theta:0\to\tfrac{\pi}{2} x = r cos θ , y = r sin θ , r : 0 → 2 , θ : 0 → 2 π . A = ∫ < e m > 0 π / 2 ∫ < / e m > 0 2 1 + 4 r 2 r d r d θ . A=\int<em>{0}^{\pi/2}\int</em>{0}^{2}\sqrt{1+4r^{2}}\,r\,dr\,d\theta. A = ∫ < e m > 0 π /2 ∫ < / e m > 0 2 1 + 4 r 2 r d r d θ . Evaluate: Inner: set u = 1 + 4 r 2 ⇒ d u = 8 r d r u=1+4r^{2} \Rightarrow du=8rdr u = 1 + 4 r 2 ⇒ d u = 8 r d r . After substitution & limits u : 1 → 17 u:1\to17 u : 1 → 17 , get 1 8 ∫ 1 17 u 1 / 2 d u = 1 8 ⋅ 2 3 ( 17 3 / 2 − 1 ) \tfrac{1}{8}\int_{1}^{17}u^{1/2}du=\tfrac{1}{8}\cdot\tfrac{2}{3}(17^{3/2}-1) 8 1 ∫ 1 17 u 1/2 d u = 8 1 ⋅ 3 2 ( 1 7 3/2 − 1 ) . Multiply by angular π 2 \tfrac{\pi}{2} 2 π . Paper’s numeric: A = π 24 ( 17 17 − 1 ) ≈ 9.0442 A=\dfrac{\pi}{24}\bigl(17\sqrt{17}-1\bigr)\approx9.0442 A = 24 π ( 17 17 − 1 ) ≈ 9.0442 . Applications: manufacturing cost of parabolic dishes; surface coating. Trig identities (excerpts): sin 2 x + cos 2 x = 1 , sin 2 x = 2 sin x cos x , cos 2 x = cos 2 x − sin 2 x \sin^{2}x+\cos^{2}x=1, \quad \sin2x=2\sin x\cos x, \quad \cos2x=\cos^{2}x-\sin^{2}x sin 2 x + cos 2 x = 1 , sin 2 x = 2 sin x cos x , cos 2 x = cos 2 x − sin 2 x . Polar conversions: x = r cos θ , y = r sin θ , r 2 = x 2 + y 2 , tan θ = y x x=r\cos\theta,\;y=r\sin\theta,\;r^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2},\;\tan\theta=\frac{y}{x} x = r cos θ , y = r sin θ , r 2 = x 2 + y 2 , tan θ = x y . Polar area: A = 1 2 ∫ α β r 2 d θ A=\tfrac12\int_{\alpha}^{\beta}r^{2}\,d\theta A = 2 1 ∫ α β r 2 d θ . Multiple‐integral Jacobians: Cylindrical: d V = r d r d θ d z dV=r\,dr\,d\theta\,dz d V = r d r d θ d z . Spherical: d V = ρ 2 sin ϕ d ρ d ϕ d θ dV=\rho^{2}\sin\phi\,d\rho\,d\phi\,d\theta d V = ρ 2 sin ϕ d ρ d ϕ d θ . Second-derivative test in R 2 \mathbb R^{2} R 2 : D = f < e m > x x f < / e m > y y − f x y 2 D=f<em>{xx}f</em>{yy}-f_{xy}^{2} D = f < e m > xx f < / e m > y y − f x y 2 (see classification earlier). Surface area of graph z = f ( x , y ) z=f(x,y) z = f ( x , y ) : A = ∬ < e m > R 1 + f < / e m > x 2 + f y 2 d A A=\iint<em>{R}\sqrt{1+f</em>{x}^{2}+f_{y}^{2}}\,dA A = ∬ < e m > R 1 + f < / e m > x 2 + f y 2 d A . Conceptual Connections & Practical/Philosophical Notes Differentiation rules extend to automatic differentiation in machine learning, enabling gradient‐based optimisation. Implicit‐surface methods underpin level‐set modelling in computer graphics and fluid interfaces. Polar & spherical integrals illustrate value of choosing coordinates matching symmetry —key ethical lesson: proper modelling reduces computational waste (energy, time). Optimisation (Q3) governs allocation of scarce resources; need awareness of assumptions in modelling human systems. Surface‐area calculations (Q9) directly feed sustainable material‐usage forecasts in engineering.