The Extent and Correlates of Public Support for Deterrence Reforms and Hot Spots Policing
Content Retrieval and General Information
Source: Law & Society Review, Vol. 52, No. 2 (June 2018)
Authors: Christi Metcalfe and Justin T. Pickett
JSTOR Details: Article accessed on 04 June 2022.
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/45093916
Publisher: Wiley on behalf of the Law and Society Association
Introduction to Policing Reforms
Current Approach to Reform:
The recommendation is to downsize prison populations.
Shift focus toward policing strategies emphasizing preventative measures.
Key Strategies: Reallocation of resources to focus on sentinel patrols and hot spots interventions.
Public Attitudes Toward Policing Reforms
Study Objective: Evaluate public support for suggested reforms in policing during the current crisis.
Key Findings:
Majority of the population perceives policing as more cost-effective than incarceration.
Support for sentinel and hot spots policing strategies exists but varies by demographic groups.
Lower support for hot spots policing among blacks, Hispanics, and lower-income individuals.
Theoretical Background
Context of Criminal Justice System
For decades, reliance on incarceration as a primary crime-control method.
Issues highlighted:
Economic burdens of high incarceration rates.
Limited crime prevention efficacy and disproportionate impacts on communities of color.
Key Research Insights:
Diminishing returns observed with increased imprisonment.
Increased imprisonment sometimes leads to minimal crime reduction or even criminogenic effects.
Shift towards prison downsizing and new approaches to crime control is suggested due to political changes.
Citing Bushway (2016); Petersilia and Cullen (2015); Durlauf and Nagin (2011).
Resource Allocation and Policing Strategies
Recommended Changes in Policing
Focus on Preventive Patrols:
Sentinel-style police work is proposed.
Involves increased preventive patrols, especially in high-crime areas (hot spots).
Hot spots interventions include:
Increased police presence, offender-focused policing, and situational prevention.
Deterrence Doctrine
Premise of crime prevention through perceived risk of apprehension, rather than punitive severity (citing Nagin et al. 2015).
Advocates view reform as an organizational challenge for police agencies.
Lack of research focusing on public receptivity to these suggested changes is acknowledged.
The Influence of Public Opinion
Importance of Public Support
Recent events (e.g., Ferguson incident, Black Lives Matter movement) influence public confidence in policing.
Public attitudes may impact police legitimacy and community relations.
Disfavored policies can create distrust and damage police-community relations.
Demographic Variances in Support
Evidence shows that the public broadly supports prison downsizing but not all demographics support the same changes in policing.
Implications: Policy changes, especially those targeting low-income and minority neighborhoods, may be met with resistance and distrust.
Survey Design and Methodology
Data Collection
Research Method: Nationally representative survey administered by GfK Group.
Sample of adult Americans (18+ years).
Utilized an internet panel for data collection to ensure broad representation.
Survey’s total sample consisted of close to 1,000 respondents, adjusted for demographic benchmarks.
Survey Questions
Cost-effectiveness Judgment:
Perceptions of cost-effectiveness of policing versus incarceration.
Asked respondents: Which prevents more crime per dollar spent?
Focus of Police Work:
Preferences for police to be apprehension agents versus preventive patrols.
Support for Hot Spots Policing:
Overall support for concentrating police resources in identified hot spots.
Ranking of Policing Strategies:
Respondents ranked hot spots policing strategies, including aggressive policing, offender monitoring, increased patrols, and situational prevention.
Results and Findings
Public Evaluations of Cost-effectiveness
Key Findings:
68% of Americans believe policing is more effective at preventing crime per dollar than incarceration.
Support exists across demographics: blacks, Hispanics, Whites, differing ages and income levels.
Public Preferences for Police Focus
76% of participants prefer police focus on patrolling over solving past crimes.
Preferences stable across demographic splits in most groups.
Hot Spots Policing Preferences
61% support policing hot spots rather than equally distributing policing resources.
Notably, some demographic groups (like blacks and Hispanics) showed lower support for hot spots policies.
Most Supported Hot Spots Strategies
Preferred Strategy: Situational interventions (41%) vs. aggressive order-maintenance policing (8%).
This aligns with research indicating situational prevention is more effective.
Discussion and Conclusion
Overall Public Sentiment
Majority support for shifts to crime-control policy focused primarily on policing strategies that emphasize situational prevention.
Cautions raised concerning differentiation in support across racial and socioeconomic lines.
Considerations for Policymakers
Policymakers should heed community perceptions to maintain police legitimacy.
Misinformed or resisted shifts may exacerbate community relations and perpetuate cycles of distrust.
A Call for Further Evaluation Studies
Emphasize the need for rigorous analysis of hot spots policing's effectiveness and community impact to inform future policies.
Previous studies show limitations in existing data, reiterating the need for future research.