Consumer Theory: Utility, Maximization, and Demand Elasticity
Consumer Theory: Introduction and Paradox of Value
Goal: Understand the foundation of demand to build the supply and demand model.
The Paradox of Value (Adam Smith):
Observation: Water is extremely useful (high "value in use"), but its price (value in exchange) is very low. Diamonds have scarcely any use value but a very high price.
Modern terms:
"Value in use" = Total Utility
"Value in exchange" = Price
Adam Smith's Stance (Objective Theory of Value): Believed things have intrinsic value based on production inputs (labor, capital). Diamonds were more valuable due to higher production costs.
Issue with Objective Theory: Value is context-dependent.
Example: In a desert, a glass of water is more valuable than all diamonds. The paradox reverses.
This context dependency cannot be explained by an objective theory of value.
Subjective Theory of Value: Value depends on individual preferences, which can change with context.
This theory is part of the "Marginal Revolution" in economic thought.
Utility: Total and Marginal
Total Utility (TU):
Definition: The total satisfaction a person gets from consuming a given quantity of a good.
Subjective: Difficult to quantify across individuals.
Units: Does not have a specific unit of measurement.
Marginal Utility (MU):
Definition: The increase in total utility from consuming an additional unit of a good.
Key Concept: "Marginal" in economics always refers to an "additional unit."
Significance: Marginal utility, not total utility, determines a good's value (price).
Explaining the Paradox of Value with MU:
Under normal conditions: Marginal utility of water is low (as we have a lot of it), marginal utility of diamonds is high. This explains their relative prices.
In the desert: Marginal utility of water is extremely high, marginal utility of diamonds is very low, reversing their relative values.
The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility
Origin: Introduced by Carl Menger, an Austrian economist, as part of the Marginal Revolution.
Definition: As you consume more of a good, the additional utility (marginal utility) from each successive unit decreases.
Note: Total utility still increases, but at a decreasing rate.
Example (Water Glasses):
Quantity (Q): 1, 2, 3
Total Utility (TU):
Q = 1: TU = 100
Q = 2: TU = 150 (Extra 50)
Q = 3: TU = 175 (Extra 25)
Marginal Utility (MU):
1st unit: MU = 100
2nd unit: MU = 50 (150 - 100)
3rd unit: MU = 25 (175 - 150)
Total utility increases, but marginal utility decreases with each additional unit.
Application to Water vs. Diamonds: The marginal utility of water decreases much faster than that of diamonds because water is abundant, while diamonds are scarce.
Consumer Utility Maximization
Assumptions:
Consumers aim to maximize their utility.
Consumers have a limited income (budget) and face given prices for goods.
Decision Rule: Consumers allocate their income to buy goods that provide the highest marginal utility per dollar until their budget is exhausted.
Initially: Choose the good that gives the highest MU per dollar.
Outcome: At the optimal consumption bundle, the marginal utility per dollar will be equal for all goods (or as close as possible in discrete units).
Output: This process helps derive individual demand curves.
Example of Utility Maximization
Scenario: Income (M) = 4, Price of good 1 (P1) = 1, Price of good 2 (P2) = 1.
Good 1 = Water, Good 2 = Diamonds.
Data (Total Utility):
| Quantity | TU1 (Water) | MU1 (Water) | MU1/P1 | TU2 (Diamonds) | MU2 (Diamonds) | MU2/P2 |
|:--------:|:----------------:|:-----------------:|:------------:|:--------------------:|:--------------------:|:------------:|
| 0 | 0 | - | - | 0 | - | - |
| 1 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| 2 | 180 | 60 | 60 | 120 | 60 | 60 |
| 3 | 220 | 40 | 40 | 180 | 60 | 60 |
| 4 | 250 | 30 | 30 | 240 | 60 | 60 |
| 5 | 274 | 24 | 24 | 300 | 60 | 60 |Maximization Process (M = $4, P1 = $1, P2 = $1):
Dollar 1: Buy 1 unit of Good 1 (MU/\$ = 120).
Dollar 2: Buy 1 unit of Good 1 (MU/\$ = 60 for Good 1, MU/\$ = 60 for Good 2. Indifferent, choose Good 1).
Dollar 3: Buy 1 unit of Good 2 (MU/\$ = 60 for Good 2, MU/\$ = 40 for Good 1).
Dollar 4: Buy 1 unit of Good 2 (MU/\$ = 60 for Good 2, MU/\$ = 40 for Good 1).
Optimal Solution (at P1 = $1, P2 = $1):
Quantity of Good 1 (Q_1) = 2 units
Quantity of Good 2 (Q_2) = 2 units
At this point, MU1/P1 = 60 (for the 2nd unit) and MU2/P2 = 60 (for the 2nd unit).
Deriving a Demand Point: This gives one point on the demand curve for Good 1: (Q1 = 2, P1 = $1).
Impact of Price Change (e.g., P_1 = $0.50):
New MU1/P1 values for Good 1 (original MU_1 divided by 0.50):
1st unit: 120/0.50 = 240
2nd unit: 60/0.50 = 120
3rd unit: 40/0.50 = 80
4th unit: 30/0.50 = 60
5th unit: 24/0.50 = 48
Maximization Process (with M = $4, P1 = $0.50, P2 = $1):
Follow the highest MU/[Dollar] values.
Optimal solution becomes Q1 = 4 units (4 imes $0.50 = $2.00) and Q2 = 2 units (2 imes $1.00 = $2.00).
Total spent: 2 + 2 = $4.00.
New Demand Point: (Q1 = 4, P1 = $0.50).
Observation: A lower price for Good 1 leads to a higher quantity demanded for Good 1, consistent with the law of demand.
Income Effect (Specific to this Example): In this specific example, if income increases from 4 to 6, the consumer doesn't buy more water (Good 1) because its marginal utility per dollar drops quickly after 4 units. They would spend the extra money on diamonds (Good 2) where MU2/P2 remains high. This shows Good 1 (water) in this model has no "income effect" within the range of initial consumption satisfaction.
Marginal Utility per Dollar Rule: At optimal choice, MU1/P1 = MU2/P2 = … = MUN/PN. Also, the consumer must spend all their money (budget).
Budget Constraint
Definition: Represents all combinations of goods that a consumer can afford given their income and the prices of the goods.
Equation: For two goods: P1 Q1 + P2 Q2 = M
Example (Plotting for M=$4, P1=$1, P2=$1):
Axes: Q1 (horizontal), Q2 (vertical).
If all money spent on Q1: Q1 = M/P_1 = 4/1 = 4 (x-intercept).
If all money spent on Q2: Q2 = M/P_2 = 4/1 = 4 (y-intercept).
This creates a straight line between (4, 0) and (0, 4).
Slope: -P1/P2
Interpretation: The rate at which the consumer must give up units of Good 2 to obtain one additional unit of Good 1 (opportunity cost in terms of other goods).
Changes to the Budget Constraint:
Change in Price (e.g., P_1 decreases to 0.50):
The budget line pivots. The y-intercept (M/P2) remains the same (4 units of Q2) because P_2 and M are unchanged.
The x-intercept (M/P1) changes: 4/0.50 = 8 units of Q1. The line pivots outwards on the Q_1 axis.
Slope changes to -0.50/1 = -0.5.
Change in Income (e.g., M increases):
The budget line shifts outwards in a parallel fashion.
Both x-intercept (M/P1) and y-intercept (M/P2) increase proportionately.
The slope (-P1/P2) remains unchanged.
Indifference Curves
Definition: A curve that shows all combinations of two goods (Q1 and Q2) that yield the consumer the same level of total utility.
Construction (Example from prior utility data):
Target TU = 300:
(Q1=0, Q2=5) -> TU_2=300 (from table)
(Q1=1, Q2=3) -> TU1=120, TU2=180 (total = 300)
(Q1=2, Q2=2) -> TU1=180, TU2=120 (total = 300)
Connecting these points creates an indifference curve.
Higher indifference curves correspond to higher levels of total utility (e.g., TU = 300 is higher than TU = 180).
Properties of Indifference Curves:
Negative Slope: To maintain the same utility, if you have less of one good, you must have more of the other.
Convex Shape ("bowed inward"): Reflects the law of diminishing marginal utility. As you consume less of a good, it becomes more valuable to you, so you demand more of the other good to compensate.
Do Not Cross: If they crossed, it would imply that a single consumption bundle yields two different levels of utility, which is impossible.
Grow to the Northeast: Indifference curves further from the origin represent higher levels of total utility.
Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS):
Definition: The absolute value of the slope of the indifference curve at any given point.
Interpretation: The rate at which a consumer is willing to trade one good for another while maintaining the same level of utility.
Relation to Diminishing MU: The MRS changes along the curve due to diminishing marginal utility.
Steep slope (top-left): Consumer has little Q1 and a lot of Q2. They are willing to give up a lot of Q2 for an extra unit of Q1 (high MU1 relative to MU2).
Flat slope (bottom-right): Consumer has a lot of Q1 and little Q2. They are only willing to give up a little Q2 for an extra unit of Q1 (low MU1 relative to MU2).
Formula (for small changes): MRS = MU1/MU2
Utility Maximization with Budget Constraint and Indifference Curves
The Optimal Choice: The consumer maximizes utility by choosing the consumption bundle where the highest attainable indifference curve is tangent to the budget constraint.
Point of Tangency: This is the single point where the slopes of the indifference curve and the budget line are equal.
Condition for Optimality:
Slope of Indifference Curve = Slope of Budget Constraint
MRS = P1/P2
This implies: MU1/MU2 = P1/P2 which can be rearranged to MU1/P1 = MU2/P2.
Significance: This tangency point defines the optimal quantities (Q1^, Q2^) the consumer will demand.
The price ratio (P1/P2) in a market economy reveals significant information about consumer preferences (their MRS) at the optimal consumption point.
Deriving the Demand Curve Graphically
Process:
Start with an Initial Budget Constraint and Indifference Curve: Plot the budget constraint for a given income (M) and initial prices (P1, P2). Find the tangency point with an indifference curve (point 'A'), which gives the optimal quantity Q1 for price P1. Record this point on a separate P1 vs. Q1 graph (demand curve).
Change the Price: Decrease P1. The budget constraint pivots outwards (x-intercept increases, y-intercept stays fixed). Find the new tangency point with a higher indifference curve (point 'B'), yielding a new optimal quantity Q1' for the lower price P_1'. Record this new point on the demand curve graph.
Construct the Demand Curve: Connect these points (and more, if desired). This forms the individual's demand curve for Good 1, showing the inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded.
Classification of Goods
Based on Price Changes:
Typical Goods: When price increases, demand decreases (due to diminishing marginal utility and substitution effect).
Giffen Goods: A rare exception where, if price increases, demand also increases.
Conditions: Must be an inferior good and constitute a significant portion of the consumer's budget, leading to a strong income effect that outweighs the substitution effect.
Example: Historical potato consumption during famine in Ireland.
Based on Income Changes:
Normal Goods: When income increases, demand increases (e.g., brand-name products).
Inferior Goods: When income increases, demand decreases (e.g., generic or cheaper supermarket brands).
Based on Relationship to Other Goods:
Substitutes: Goods that can be consumed instead of each other (e.g., coffee and tea). An increase in the price of one leads to an increase in demand for the other.
Complements: Goods that are consumed together (e.g., coffee and doughnuts). An increase in the price of one leads to a decrease in demand for the other.
Income and Substitution Effects
When the price of a good changes, it affects consumers through two distinct mechanisms:
Substitution Effect (Direct Mechanism):
Definition: The change in quantity demanded due to a change in relative prices, holding utility constant.
Direction: Consumers always substitute away from relatively more expensive goods and towards relatively cheaper goods.
Impact: If price decreases, the substitution effect always leads to an increase in demand for that good.
Income Effect (Indirect Mechanism):
Definition: The change in quantity demanded due to a change in the consumer's real income (purchasing power), holding relative prices constant.
Direction: Depends on the type of good:
Normal Good: If price increases, real income decreases, leading to a decrease in demand.
Inferior Good: If price increases, real income decreases, leading to an increase in demand.
Total Effect: The sum of the substitution and income effects.
For Normal Goods: Substitution and income effects work in the same direction. (Price increase
ightarrow substitution effect decreases demand, income effect decreases demand). Result: Demand curve slopes downward.For Inferior Goods: Substitution and income effects work in opposite directions. (Price increase
ightarrow substitution effect decreases demand, income effect increases demand).For Giffen Goods: An inferior good where the income effect (increasing demand) is so strong that it outweighs the substitution effect (decreasing demand), resulting in a net increase in demand when the price rises.
Graphical Illustration (Normal Good):
Point B (Before): Initial tangency point between the original budget constraint and an indifference curve.
Price Increase for Good 1: Budget constraint pivots inwards.
Point A (After): New tangency point on a lower indifference curve with the new budget constraint. The movement from B to A represents the Total Effect.
Point C (Compensated): A hypothetical point. To isolate the substitution effect, we give the consumer enough additional income (shifting the new budget line outwards in parallel) so they can reach the original utility level (on the original indifference curve) at the new relative prices. This new dashed budget line is tangent to the original indifference curve at point C.
Substitution Effect: The movement from point B to point C (change in quantity demanded when only relative prices change).
Income Effect: The movement from point C to point A (change in quantity demanded due to the change in real income, after compensating for the price change).
For a normal good, both effects lead to a decrease in quantity demanded for the good whose price increased.
Graphical Illustration (Inferior Good):
Similar setup for B and A.
Point C is established similarly (compensatory income to reach original utility level). The substitution effect (B to C) would still be a decrease in quantity demanded for the good whose price increased.
However, for an inferior good, the income effect (C to A) causes an increase in quantity demanded when real income falls. This counteracts the substitution effect. The final demand change (total effect) is smaller, or, in the case of a Giffen good, even reversed.
Application: Labor Market
Budget Constraint Redefined: Consumer theory can be applied to labor supply decisions.
Consumption (C): Quantity of goods and services purchased (vertical axis).
Leisure (H): Hours not worked (horizontal axis). Total hours in a day = 24.
Wage Rate (W): Price of leisure (opportunity cost of leisure is the wage not earned). Price of consumption is normalized to 1.
Equation: C = W(24 - H) or C + WH = 24W
If W=1: C + H = 24
Plotting: If leisure (H) = 0 (work all 24 hours), consumption (C) = 24W
If leisure (H) = 24 (don't work at all), consumption (C) = 0 (no income).
Optimal Choice: The consumer chooses a combination of leisure and consumption that maximizes their utility, given their wage rate, represented by the tangency of an indifference curve (between leisure and consumption) and the budget constraint.
Backward-Bending Labor Supply Curve: The income and substitution effects can explain why, at very high wages, people might choose to work less.
Substitution Effect: A higher wage makes leisure more expensive (higher opportunity cost), incentivizing individuals to work more (substitute away from leisure).
Income Effect: A higher wage increases real income. If leisure is a normal good, higher income leads to an increased demand for leisure (i.e., working less).
At lower wages, the substitution effect tends to dominate, so people work more as wages rise. At very high wages, the income effect can dominate, leading to a backward-bending labor supply curve where further wage increases lead to less work (more leisure).
Elasticity
Price Elasticity of Demand (E_d):
Definition: A measure of the responsiveness (sensitivity) of the quantity demanded to a change in its price.
Expressed in percentage terms to avoid unit dependency.
Formula (Midpoint Method): Ed = rac{( rac{Q2 - Q1}{(Q1 + Q2)/2})}{( rac{P2 - P1}{(P1 + P_2)/2})}
Example Calculation: Demand curve Q = 12 - P
Initial Price (P1) = 9, Initial Quantity (Q1) = 3
New Price (P2) = 10, New Quantity (Q2) = 2
Change in Quantity ( riangle Q) = 2 - 3 = -1
Midpoint Quantity (Q_M) = (3+2)/2 = 2.5
Change in Price ( riangle P) = 10 - 9 = 1
Midpoint Price (P_M) = (9+10)/2 = 9.5
E_d = rac{(-1/2.5)}{(1/9.5)} = rac{-0.4}{0.105} hickapprox -3.8
Interpretation: If the price increases by 1%, the quantity demanded falls by 3.8%.
Classification of Demand Elasticity:
Elastic Demand (|Ed| > 1): Quantity demanded is very responsive to price changes (e.g., Ed = -3.8). Graphically, demand curve is relatively flat.
Inelastic Demand (|Ed| < 1): Quantity demanded is not very responsive to price changes (e.g., Ed = -0.5). Graphically, demand curve is relatively steep.
Unit Elastic Demand (|E_d| = 1): Quantity demanded changes by the same percentage as the price.
Determinants of Elasticity: The primary factor is the availability of substitutes.
More Substitutes: More elastic demand (e.g., blue pens).
Fewer Substitutes: More inelastic demand (e.g., life-saving medicine).
Total Revenue (TR):
Definition: The total amount of money received from the sale of a good or service. TR = P imes Q
Graphical Representation: For a given price and quantity on the demand curve, TR is the area of the rectangle formed by the price, quantity, and the axes.
Relation to Elasticity (to be covered in detail later): Total revenue changes differently depending on whether demand is elastic or inelastic when prices change.
If demand is elastic, a price decrease increases total revenue.
If demand is inelastic, a price decrease decreases total revenue.
Total revenue is maximized at the point of unit elasticity (|E_d| = 1).
Conclusion and Next Steps
Homework is due Friday.
Office hours available.