Consumer Protection Part 2
FDA's Regulatory Powers
The FDA operates under three main categories:
Surveillance and protection of the public
Focuses on both human and veterinary health
Pharmaceutical Industry and Political Influence
The pharmaceutical industry's economic power translates into significant political influence.
Lobbyists often transition between governmental roles and pharmaceutical companies.
Substantial contributions to political campaigns enhance industry influence.
Changes in Drug Review Process
Political pressure has reshaped the drug review process.
Designed to ensure drug safety, the process traditionally requires several years.
Pharmaceutical companies' objections led to calls for expedited approvals.
The 1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act was a direct result of these pressures.
Shortened the FDA's approval timeline.
AIDS activists joined forces with pharmaceutical companies to accelerate drug approvals in the 1980s due to urgent health needs.
Impact of Legislative Changes
2002 amendments further modified FDA monitoring:
Limited monitoring timelines and exempted existing drugs from re-evaluation.
Shifted post-approval monitoring responsibility to the pharmaceutical companies.
Negative outcomes identified:
Shortening review time correlated with increased adverse drug reactions:
1% increase in hospitalizations for each month cut from review time.
2% increase in mortality rates due to adverse effects.
Drug Pricing and Accessibility Issues
Rising drug prices significantly surpass inflation rates.
Limited accessibility to essential medications.
Despite claims of R&D expenses, large marketing and sales budgets exist within the industry.
75% of innovative drugs originate from taxpayer-funded research (e.g., NIH contributions).
The high cost of drugs escalates healthcare expenses and worsens access to medicines:
58% of Americans rely on prescription medications but face affordability issues.
Opioid Crisis Overview
The pharmaceutical industry's power exacerbated the opioid crisis.
OxyContin was misbranded as suitable for chronic pain despite FDA's limited approval for short-term use.
Legal actions resulted in fines without substantive penalties for companies involved.
Dramatic rise in opioid overdose deaths from 1999 to 2017:
Increased five-fold to 218,000 deaths by 2017.
DEA and Industry Interactions
The industry’s lobbying efforts have weakened the DEA’s regulatory capabilities:
Suspensions on suspicious shipments challenged due to political pressure.
High-salaried attorneys from the industry obstruct DEA investigations.
Recent legislative actions (2016) favored the pharmaceutical industry over DEA recommendations:
Affected ongoing strategies to regulate painkiller distribution.
Congress facilitated these changes with significant campaign contributions.
Legislation passed without recorded votes under President Obama, reflecting a lack of transparency.