TB1+W9+Who+Becomes+Antisocial+Slides
Who Becomes Antisocial? AKA do I have to worry about the person sitting next to me? PS4005 Week 4
Check In
Initial interaction points to discuss participants' understanding and feelings about the topic.
Outline of Discussion Topics
Social and familial influences
Media influences
Types of violence
Risk and protective factors
Assessments
Prevention
Learning Objectives
Personal Characteristics Influence: Explore how individual traits affect behavior.
Parenting Styles Impact: Connect different parenting approaches with child development and behavior.
Good Lives Model: Utilize reframing techniques to understand incidents of offending behavior.
Prevention Programs: Develop structured programs aimed at decreasing criminal behavior in targeted groups.
Ecological Systems Theory
Urie Bronfenbrenner (1977): Introduced a framework that depicts the complexity of child development as influenced by various interacting environments.
Five Systems Overview:
Microsystem: Immediate environment (Parents, siblings, teachers—relationships are bi-directional).
Mesosystem: Interconnections between microsystems (e.g., teachers communicating with parents).
Exosystem: Larger social systems that indirectly affect child (e.g., the impact of media on parenting).
Macrosystem: Broad cultural elements (e.g., socioeconomic status, race).
Chronosystem: Life transitions and historical factors that affect development over time.
Parenting Styles
Types and Characteristics
Authoritative:
Combines limits and emotional support; encourages autonomy with boundaries.
Authoritarian:
Emphasizes strict discipline, may lack emotional warmth; assertive parenting.
Permissive:
Minimal rules; treats children more as friends; low control.
Neglectful:
Lack of emotional and physical support; children often fend for themselves.
Outcomes of Parenting Styles
Authoritative:
Results in better adjustments, increased self-sufficiency, and positive emotional states.
Authoritarian:
Associated with frustration, withdrawal, and distrust.
Permissive:
Linked to poor self-regulation, higher levels of depressive symptoms, and risk of criminal behavior.
Neglectful:
Leads to poor mental health, antisocial behavior, and substance abuse.
Media Influence on Behavior
Effects of Violent Media Consumption:
Questions raised about its influence on empathy, emotional responses, and aggression levels.
Types of Violence
Reactive Violence
Definition: Impulsive actions in response to provocation; typically driven by emotional responses.
Instrumental Violence
Definition: Premeditated aggressive acts used to achieve a specific outcome; emotional response is secondary.
Case Examples
Jeffrey: Robs a store at gunpoint (instrumental).
Joey: Punches peer over insults (reactive).
Jack Bauer: Uses extreme measures for specific information (instrumental).
Reactive vs. Instrumental Offenders
Reactive offenders often experience high emotional arousal and rejection.
Instrumental offenders may demonstrate psychopathic traits and less emotional regulation.
Risk Factors and Assessments
Identifying Risk Factors
Use Paul's case study to understand history and impact including PTSD and violence.
Generations of Risk Assessment
1st Generation: Clinical assessments based on professional judgment; subjective.
2nd Generation: Statistical methods deriving scores from past behaviors; more objective.
3rd Generation: Integrates dynamic and clinical factors with structured professional judgment.
4th Generation: Includes treatment readiness and dynamic assessments.
Good Lives Model
A strengths-based approach to offender treatment; advocates for fulfilling life goals through prosocial means.
Prevention Strategies
Types of Strategies
Primary Prevention: Focus on social factors to prevent the emergence of risky behaviors.
Secondary Prevention: Provides social and clinical support for youth exhibiting behavioral issues.
Tertiary Prevention: Aim focuses on treating identified individuals and addressing risk factors.
Risk Factor Domains
Youth and Adult Factors
Youth: Individual traits, familial relationships, school connections, peer influence, and community context.
Adult: Major factors include criminal history, attitudes, peers, and varying degrees of substance use and familial networks.
Protective Factors
Significant domains that can mitigate risk: Individual, Family, Peer, School, and Community contexts.
Conclusion
Risk assessments, though imperfect, remain valuable in predicting and addressing the likelihood of future criminal behavior. Emphasis should be on developing individualized treatment and prevention strategies.