Chapter 7 Suicide and Self Injury

Page 1

Tragic Life Stories

• Jonathan's Story

  • At age 19, Jonathan ended his own life with a shotgun.

  • Despite being handsome, popular, and athletic, he faced bullying from his father.

  • After a year in college, he traveled to Europe and found happiness in a romantic relationship with a man in Paris.

  • This happiness faded when his father discovered the relationship and publicly shamed him.

  • Overwhelmed by guilt, Jonathan felt he could not cope and chose to end his life.

• Phoebe Prince's Story

  • At 15, Phoebe Prince had aspirations of becoming a journalist.

  • After moving from Ireland to Massachusetts, she faced bullying at her new high school.

  • Phoebe briefly dated the school football star, leading to anger from other girls, resulting in harassment.

  • On a particularly difficult day, she was attacked and later took her own life.

U.S. Suicide Statistics

• Suicide is a significant cause of death in the U.S.

  • Ranks twelfth among all adults.

  • Second among ages 10-14 and 25-34, and third among ages 15-24.

  • Approximately 48,000 Americans die by suicide annually (NIMH, 2022).

Methodology of Suicide

• Gender Differences:

  • Historically, women often used overdoses while men used lethal means.

  • Recent trends show an increase in firearm use among women.

Causes of Suicide

• Common misconception: Severe depression is the primary cause.

• Reality: Lack of coping mechanisms, often exacerbated by social forces, is a crucial factor.

  • The majority of depressed individuals do not die by suicide; the key issue is the impact of social influences.

Differentiating Approaches of Suicidal Individuals

1. Gender Differences:

   • Historically, women have often used overdoses as a method of suicide.

   • Men have typically employed more lethal means, such as firearms.

   • Recent trends indicate a rise in firearm use among women, reflecting changing patterns in methods used.

2. Causes of Suicide:

   • There is a common misconception that severe depression is the primary cause of suicide.

   • The reality is that a lack of coping mechanisms plays a crucial role, often exacerbated by social influences.

   • Most individuals who are depressed do not die by suicide; the significant factor is how social forces impact their ability to cope.

Self-injury, also known as self-harm, refers to the intentional act of causing harm to one's own body. This practice is often used as a coping mechanism to manage emotional distress, such as feelings of sadness, anger, or anxiety. Individuals who self-injure might do so to express pain that is difficult to articulate verbally, to regain a sense of control during turbulent emotional times, or to feel something physically when they are emotionally numb. Self-injury is commonly associated with mental health conditions, such as depression or borderline personality disorder, and it is important to approach the subject with sensitivity and understanding.

Social factors involved in self-injury or self-harm often include:

• Stigma and Isolation: Individuals may feel marginalized or stigmatized due to their mental health struggles, leading to isolation and worsening of emotional distress.

• Peer Influence: The presence of friends or peers who engage in self-injury can influence individuals to adopt similar behaviors as a means of coping or seeking acceptance.

• Bullying and Harassment: Experiencing bullying, as seen in the stories of Jonathan and Phoebe Prince, can significantly impact an individual's emotional well-being, sometimes leading to self-harm as a coping mechanism.

• Societal Expectations: Pressures stemming from societal norms regarding mental health, masculinity, and femininity can exacerbate feelings of inadequacy and distress, prompting some to self-harm as a way to express internal pain.

• Lack of Support Systems: When individuals do not have access to supportive relationships or mental health resources, they may resort to self-harm as a way to manage overwhelming feelings or as a call for help.

Demographic Trends Associated with Suicide

• Age Factors:

  • Suicide ranks as the twelfth leading cause of death among all adults in the U.S.

  • It is the second leading cause of death among individuals aged 10-14 and 25-34.

  • Among ages 15-24, it is the third leading cause of death.

• Gender Differences:

  • Historically, women have often used overdoses while men have employed more lethal means, such as firearms for suicide.

  • Recent trends indicate a rise in firearm use among women.

• Geographical Variations:

  • Rates of suicide can vary significantly based on geographic locations, with rural areas often recording higher rates compared to urban settings.

• Ethnic and Racial Considerations:

  • Different racial and ethnic groups may exhibit varying suicide rates influenced by cultural, social, and economic factors.

The social profile of suicide bombers can vary widely, but some common characteristics noted in various studies include:

1. Demographics:

   • Many suicide bombers are often young adults, typically ranging from late teens to early 30s.

   • Both men and women have been involved in suicide bombing, though the majority are male.

2. Psychological Factors:

   • Some individuals may experience feelings of marginalization, hopelessness, or extreme nationalism.

   • Mental health issues or a lack of coping mechanisms may also play a role in their decision to carry out such acts.

3. Social Environment:

   • Many come from conflict zones or areas with significant political instability, which can contribute to extremist beliefs.

   • A communal or familial influence, often through radical groups, can lead individuals to adopt ideologies that support such actions.

4. Education and Socioeconomic Status:

   • Some studies indicate that many suicide bombers have a lower level of education and come from impoverished backgrounds.

   • However, there are cases of educated individuals who become involved in radicalization.

5. Relational Dynamics:

   • Close relationships with group members or charismatic leaders can play a crucial role in an individual’s radicalization process.

   • Peer pressure and social belonging are significant factors in motivating individuals to participate in suicide bombings.

Social Influences on Suicide

1. Stigmatization of Mental Health:

   • The stigma surrounding mental health issues can lead individuals to suffer in silence, feeling isolated and misunderstood. This often hinders their willingness to seek help, increasing the risk of suicide.

2. Bullying and Harassment:

   • Victims of bullying, like Jonathan and Phoebe Prince, face significant emotional distress, which can lead to suicidal thoughts or actions. The social impact of harassment can be devastating.

3. Peer Influence:

   • Social environments can create pressures where individuals feel compelled to conform, particularly in the context of self-injury or suicidal behavior. Peers engaging in self-harm can influence others to adopt similar methods as coping mechanisms.

4. Social Isolation:

   • A lack of supportive relationships and social networks can exacerbate feelings of loneliness and hopelessness. Those who feel disconnected may have a higher risk of suicide.

5. Societal Norms and Expectations:

   • Cultural pressures regarding masculinity, femininity, and success can lead individuals to feel inadequate. These pressures can intensify feelings of distress and contribute to suicidal thoughts.

6. Access to Resources:

   • Societal structures that limit access to mental health resources can prevent individuals from receiving the necessary help, increasing the likelihood of suicide in affected populations.

Social Influences on Suicide

1. Stigmatization of Mental Health:

   • The stigma surrounding mental health issues can lead individuals to suffer in silence, feeling isolated and misunderstood. This often hinders their willingness to seek help, increasing the risk of suicide.

2. Bullying and Harassment:

   • Victims of bullying, like Jonathan and Phoebe Prince, face significant emotional distress, which can lead to suicidal thoughts or actions. The social impact of harassment can be devastating.

3. Peer Influence:

   • Social environments can create pressures where individuals feel compelled to conform, particularly in the context of self-injury or suicidal behavior. Peers engaging in self-harm can influence others to adopt similar methods as coping mechanisms.

4. Social Isolation:

   • A lack of supportive relationships and social networks can exacerbate feelings of loneliness and hopelessness. Those who feel disconnected may have a higher risk of suicide.

5. Societal Norms and Expectations:

   • Cultural pressures regarding masculinity, femininity, and success can lead individuals to feel inadequate. These pressures can intensify feelings of distress and contribute to suicidal thoughts.

6. Access to Resources:

   • Societal structures that limit access to mental health resources can prevent individuals from receiving the necessary help, increasing the likelihood of suicide in affected populations.

Social Responses to Suicide

1. Public Awareness Campaigns:

   • Initiatives aimed at reducing stigma associated with mental health and suicide have been implemented, focusing on education and encouraging open discussions about mental health issues.

2. Crisis Intervention Services:

   • Organizations such as suicide hotlines and counseling services offer immediate support to individuals in crisis, helping to connect them with mental health resources.

3. Policy Changes:

   • Governments and organizations may enact policies to improve mental health care access, funding for mental health services, and training for professionals in recognizing and responding to warning signs of suicide.

4. Support Groups and Community Resources:

   • Community-based support groups provide a space for individuals affected by suicide, whether survivors or those struggling with suicidal thoughts, to share their experiences and gain support.

5. Education and Training Programs:

   • Training programs for educators, healthcare providers, and first responders aim to equip them with the skills to identify risk factors and provide appropriate interventions for individuals at risk of suicide.

6. Research and Data Collection:

   • Ongoing research efforts are vital to understanding suicide's causes and demographics, helping to inform effective prevention strategies and tailored interventions.

Sociological Theories of Suicide

1. Durkheim's Theory:

   • Emile Durkheim proposed that suicide rates are influenced by social integration and regulation. He categorized suicide into four types:

     • Egoistic Suicide: Occurs when individuals feel detached from society due to lack of social ties.

     • Altruistic Suicide: Happens when individuals are overly integrated into a group, leading them to sacrifice themselves for the group's benefit.

     • Anomic Suicide: Results from the breakdown of social norms and values, often during rapid social changes, such as economic crises.

     • Fatalistic Suicide: Arises in situations of excessive regulation, where individuals feel oppressed and see no way out.

2. Merton's Strain Theory:

   • Robert K. Merton suggested that individuals experience strain when they cannot achieve culturally approved goals through legitimate means, which may lead some to turn to suicide as a way to escape or cope with frustration.

   • Strain theory emphasizes the societal pressures that can push individuals towards suicide when they feel they cannot meet societal expectations.

3. Symbolic Interactionism:

   • This approach focuses on the meanings individuals attach to their experiences and how social interactions shape these meanings.

   • It suggests that suicide can be understood through the lens of individual perceptions of their social situation, the social reactions to suicide, and the meanings ascribed to death.

   • The significance of social support and the role of communication in understanding and addressing suicidal thoughts are emphasized in this theory.

Social integration refers to the degree to which individuals feel connected and engaged within their communities and social networks. According to Emile Durkheim's theory of suicide, a person's level of social integration significantly impacts their risk of suicide.

1. Egoistic Suicide: When individuals feel disconnected or detached from society, they are more likely to experience feelings of hopelessness and loneliness, leading to increased vulnerability to suicidal thoughts and actions. This detachment can stem from a lack of social ties, support, or meaningful relationships.

2. Altruistic Suicide: Conversely, individuals who are excessively integrated into a group may also be at risk of suicide if they feel compelled to sacrifice themselves for the group's goals or values. For example, this can be observed in individuals who may engage in self-destructive behaviors for the perceived benefit of their community or allegiance.

Overall, low social integration can result in a lack of support during difficult times, decreasing individuals' coping mechanisms and increasing the risk of suicide.

The issue of physician-assisted suicide, particularly for individuals suffering from terminal illness or unrelievable pain, is a complex and deeply personal topic. Supporters argue that patients facing incurable conditions should have the right to choose how and when to end their suffering, promoting autonomy and dignity in the face of terminal illness. They assert that physician-assisted suicide can provide a compassionate option for those who want to avoid prolonged agony and have a say in their end-of-life decisions.

On the other hand, opponents raise concerns about the potential for abuse, the moral implications of allowing physicians to facilitate death, and the value of palliative care. They argue that rather than focusing on ending life, society should prioritize improving pain management and mental health support for those in distress.

In my opinion, supporting physician-assisted suicide could be justified in circumstances where patients have made an informed decision and are experiencing significant suffering with no hope of recovery. It is crucial, however, to have robust safeguards in place to prevent misuse and ensure that patients receive comprehensive care and support during their end-of-life journey.

The Internet has significantly impacted self-injury practices in several ways:

1. Access to Information: Individuals can easily find information regarding self-injury, including methods, causes, and coping strategies. This can lead to increased awareness but may also normalize or trivialize the behavior.

2. Online Communities: Social media and online forums provide platforms for individuals who self-injure to connect, share experiences, and offer support. While this can reduce feelings of isolation, it can also create echo chambers that may encourage self-injurious behavior.

3. Peer Influence: The presence of peers discussing self-injury online can influence individuals, especially vulnerable adolescents, to engage in similar behaviors as a means of coping or seeking acceptance.

4. Stigma and Secrecy: The Internet can both reduce and reinforce stigma. While online communities can provide support, they may also perpetuate harmful stereotypes that contribute to feelings of shame and isolation.

5. Mental Health Resources: Online resources, including helplines and mental health organizations, can offer immediate support for those struggling with self-injury. However, the quality and reliability of these resources can vary significantly.

The potential for pro-ana (pro-anorexia) and fat advocacy groups to garner public support can vary significantly depending on community values and perceptions surrounding body image, mental health, and social acceptance.

1. Social Awareness: In communities where there is a strong awareness of mental health issues and a push for body positivity, fat advocacy may find support as it promotes acceptance and challenges weight stigma. This could lead to an environment that prioritizes health over appearance and encourages diverse body representations.

2. Cultural Norms: Conversely, if the community holds traditional views regarding body image and beauty standards, pro-ana groups may find limited support due to the negative health implications associated with anorexia and similar disorders. The risk of promoting unhealthy behaviors could result in community pushback.

3. Public Health Initiatives: Communities focused on public health may prioritize initiatives that promote healthy living rather than groups perceived as glorifying unhealthy body images, which could limit the support for such advocacy.

4. Youth Influence: If there's a strong presence of youth culture within a community that resonates with the ideals of body neutrality or activism against body shaming, there may be more openness to fat advocacy. However, pro-ana groups may face significant resistance due to overarching awareness of the harms of eating disorders.

Ultimately, while fat advocacy might find some support based on shifts towards body positivity, pro-ana groups are likely to face skepticism or outright opposition due to the health risks associated with endorsing eating disorders.