Agenda Setting in Communication Theories

Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media

Chapter II: Agenda Setting

Overview of Agenda Setting
  • Definition of Agenda Setting: The media's capability, through repeated news coverage, to raise the importance of an issue in the public's mind.

  • Public Concern Data: From 1986 to 1989, polls indicated rising public concern about drug issues, despite a decline in reported illegal drug use during the same period.

  • Media's Role in Perception: During the Federal government's "war on drugs," the increasing frequency of media coverage altered public perception regarding the importance of drugs as an issue.

Historical Context and Examples
  • The "War on Drugs":

    • Significant increase in newspaper stories relating to the drug war during the late 1980s.

    • Public's misperception about the magnitude of drug issues significantly influenced by media reporting.

    • Key Takeaway: Reporters should focus on data over rhetoric to unveil actual trends and issues.

  • Lincoln Steffens Example (1931):

    • Muckraking journalist Lincoln Steffens highlighted unreported crime stories leading to a perceived "crime wave."

    • This resulted in increased media coverage of crime, which led to a heightened public concern about crime rates despite no actual increase in crime.

    • Public perception shaped by the media's selective coverage.

The Chapel Hill Study (1972)
  • Study Details: Conducted by McCombs and Shaw, focusing on undecided voters during the 1968 presidential campaign in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

  • **Methodology:

    • Sample size of 100 respondents.

    • Content analysis of local media coverage including newspapers and broadcast news.

  • Results:

    • Strong correlation (r = 0.967 for major issues; r = 0.979 for minor issues) between media coverage emphasis and public perception of issue importance.

Precursors of the Hypothesis
  • **Earlier Works:

    • Norton Long (1958):** Newspapers serve to set the territorial agenda and public discourse.

    • Kurt and Gladys Lang (1959):* Mass media focus attention on selected issues.

    • Bernard Cohen (1963):* Press successfully informs readers about what they should think about, not necessarily what to think.

Shift in Communication Research
  • Challenges to Limited-Effects Model (Klapper, 1960): The idea that mass communication has minimal effects was questioned. Researchers turned their focus from attitude change to the perceptions and importance assigned by the public.

  • Cognitive Psychology Influence:

    • Emerged in opposition to behaviorism, emphasizing active knowledge acquisition and problem-solving behavior as foundational to understanding human thought.

  • Agenda-setting hypothesis aligns with cognitive psychology, focusing on how people perceive issue importance.

Funkhouser Study (1973)
  • Objective: Investigated the relationship between media coverage and public perception in the 1960s.

  • Methodology:

    • Analyzed media content alongside Gallup poll data regarding perceived important issues.

  • Findings:

    • Established strong correlations between media coverage and public opinion regarding issue importance.

    • Discrepancies between media portrayal and reality were noted, suggesting media may not accurately represent the significance of issues on the ground.

Charlotte Study
  • Objective: Addressed prior questions about the causal relationship between media and public agendas during the 1972 election.

  • Methodology: Panel study design to assess changes over time.

  • Results: Indicated preliminary evidence that media had a significant influence on shaping public opinion regarding political issues.

Experimental Evidence of Agenda Setting
  • Iyengar et al. (1982): Conducted experiments altering televised news content, revealing how media manipulation can change perceptions of issue importance among viewers.

  • Priming Concept: Media influence that prepares voters to evaluate candidates based on highlighted issues rather than their overall performance.

The Role of Issue Perception
  • Obtrusive vs. Unobtrusive Issues:

    • Obtrusive Issues: Issues that people experience directly (e.g., unemployment) and typically are less influenced by media.

    • Unobtrusive Issues: Issues lacking direct public experience (e.g., pollution), where public perception is heavily influenced by media coverage.

  • Zucker's Hypothesis (1978): Proposed that media agendas are more influential for unobtrusive issues than obtrusive ones.

Time Lag in Agenda Setting
  • Research Findings:

    • Various studies indicate that the impact of media coverage on public perception may take weeks to months to be fully realized.

Exposure Effects
  • Wanta and Wu (1992): Studied the correlation between individual media exposure and increased public concern for heavily covered issues, confirming that higher exposure leads to increased issue salience.

Developing Agenda Building
  • Concept Expansion: Original agenda-setting theory expanded to include a process known as agenda-building, which outlines how media, government, and public influence each other in determining important issues.

Presidential Influence on Media Agenda
  • State of the Union Address Example:

    • Carter Study (Gilberg et al., 1980): Analysis showed weak correlations between the president's agenda and subsequent media coverage.

    • Nixon Replication Study: Found stronger support for presidential agenda-setting as compared to media agenda influence.

Mechanisms of Media Control
  • Five Mechanisms Influencing Media Attention (Funkhouser, 1973b):

    1. Adaptation to ongoing events.

    2. Over-reporting of significant events.

    3. Selective reporting of newsworthy aspects.

    4. Coverage of pseudoevents.

    5. Story presentations that amplify non-newsworthy events.

Intermedia Agenda Setting
  • Process Description:

    • Elite media can set agendas for other less prominent media sources.

Second Level of Agenda Setting
  • Definition: Focuses on how media influence public perception not only of issues but also of the sub-issues or attributes associated with issues (McCombs & Estrada, 1997).

Applications of Agenda Setting
  • Practical Implications: Understanding agenda-setting can aid journalists in making responsible choices about which issues to cover and how to present them for maximum public benefit.

  • Public Journalism: Encouraging journalists to focus on issues important to the public and fostering discussions rather than merely reporting.

Key Terms
  • Agenda Setting: The media's power in raising issue importance.

  • Priming: The alteration of evaluation standards based on media focus.

  • Obtrusiveness: The direct experience degree the public has with an issue.

  • Cognitive psychology: Exploration of how individuals perceive and interpret information.

  • Agenda Building: The collaborative process between media, public, and government in establishing important issues.

Discussion Questions
  1. Summarize the precursors of the agenda-setting hypothesis.

  2. Explain how agenda setting differs in obtrusive versus unobtrusive issues.

  3. What implications does agenda-setting research have for journalists today?