Agenda Setting in Communication Theories
Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media
Chapter II: Agenda Setting
Overview of Agenda Setting
Definition of Agenda Setting: The media's capability, through repeated news coverage, to raise the importance of an issue in the public's mind.
Public Concern Data: From 1986 to 1989, polls indicated rising public concern about drug issues, despite a decline in reported illegal drug use during the same period.
Media's Role in Perception: During the Federal government's "war on drugs," the increasing frequency of media coverage altered public perception regarding the importance of drugs as an issue.
Historical Context and Examples
The "War on Drugs":
Significant increase in newspaper stories relating to the drug war during the late 1980s.
Public's misperception about the magnitude of drug issues significantly influenced by media reporting.
Key Takeaway: Reporters should focus on data over rhetoric to unveil actual trends and issues.
Lincoln Steffens Example (1931):
Muckraking journalist Lincoln Steffens highlighted unreported crime stories leading to a perceived "crime wave."
This resulted in increased media coverage of crime, which led to a heightened public concern about crime rates despite no actual increase in crime.
Public perception shaped by the media's selective coverage.
The Chapel Hill Study (1972)
Study Details: Conducted by McCombs and Shaw, focusing on undecided voters during the 1968 presidential campaign in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
**Methodology:
Sample size of 100 respondents.
Content analysis of local media coverage including newspapers and broadcast news.
Results:
Strong correlation (r = 0.967 for major issues; r = 0.979 for minor issues) between media coverage emphasis and public perception of issue importance.
Precursors of the Hypothesis
**Earlier Works:
Norton Long (1958):** Newspapers serve to set the territorial agenda and public discourse.
Kurt and Gladys Lang (1959):* Mass media focus attention on selected issues.
Bernard Cohen (1963):* Press successfully informs readers about what they should think about, not necessarily what to think.
Shift in Communication Research
Challenges to Limited-Effects Model (Klapper, 1960): The idea that mass communication has minimal effects was questioned. Researchers turned their focus from attitude change to the perceptions and importance assigned by the public.
Cognitive Psychology Influence:
Emerged in opposition to behaviorism, emphasizing active knowledge acquisition and problem-solving behavior as foundational to understanding human thought.
Agenda-setting hypothesis aligns with cognitive psychology, focusing on how people perceive issue importance.
Funkhouser Study (1973)
Objective: Investigated the relationship between media coverage and public perception in the 1960s.
Methodology:
Analyzed media content alongside Gallup poll data regarding perceived important issues.
Findings:
Established strong correlations between media coverage and public opinion regarding issue importance.
Discrepancies between media portrayal and reality were noted, suggesting media may not accurately represent the significance of issues on the ground.
Charlotte Study
Objective: Addressed prior questions about the causal relationship between media and public agendas during the 1972 election.
Methodology: Panel study design to assess changes over time.
Results: Indicated preliminary evidence that media had a significant influence on shaping public opinion regarding political issues.
Experimental Evidence of Agenda Setting
Iyengar et al. (1982): Conducted experiments altering televised news content, revealing how media manipulation can change perceptions of issue importance among viewers.
Priming Concept: Media influence that prepares voters to evaluate candidates based on highlighted issues rather than their overall performance.
The Role of Issue Perception
Obtrusive vs. Unobtrusive Issues:
Obtrusive Issues: Issues that people experience directly (e.g., unemployment) and typically are less influenced by media.
Unobtrusive Issues: Issues lacking direct public experience (e.g., pollution), where public perception is heavily influenced by media coverage.
Zucker's Hypothesis (1978): Proposed that media agendas are more influential for unobtrusive issues than obtrusive ones.
Time Lag in Agenda Setting
Research Findings:
Various studies indicate that the impact of media coverage on public perception may take weeks to months to be fully realized.
Exposure Effects
Wanta and Wu (1992): Studied the correlation between individual media exposure and increased public concern for heavily covered issues, confirming that higher exposure leads to increased issue salience.
Developing Agenda Building
Concept Expansion: Original agenda-setting theory expanded to include a process known as agenda-building, which outlines how media, government, and public influence each other in determining important issues.
Presidential Influence on Media Agenda
State of the Union Address Example:
Carter Study (Gilberg et al., 1980): Analysis showed weak correlations between the president's agenda and subsequent media coverage.
Nixon Replication Study: Found stronger support for presidential agenda-setting as compared to media agenda influence.
Mechanisms of Media Control
Five Mechanisms Influencing Media Attention (Funkhouser, 1973b):
Adaptation to ongoing events.
Over-reporting of significant events.
Selective reporting of newsworthy aspects.
Coverage of pseudoevents.
Story presentations that amplify non-newsworthy events.
Intermedia Agenda Setting
Process Description:
Elite media can set agendas for other less prominent media sources.
Second Level of Agenda Setting
Definition: Focuses on how media influence public perception not only of issues but also of the sub-issues or attributes associated with issues (McCombs & Estrada, 1997).
Applications of Agenda Setting
Practical Implications: Understanding agenda-setting can aid journalists in making responsible choices about which issues to cover and how to present them for maximum public benefit.
Public Journalism: Encouraging journalists to focus on issues important to the public and fostering discussions rather than merely reporting.
Key Terms
Agenda Setting: The media's power in raising issue importance.
Priming: The alteration of evaluation standards based on media focus.
Obtrusiveness: The direct experience degree the public has with an issue.
Cognitive psychology: Exploration of how individuals perceive and interpret information.
Agenda Building: The collaborative process between media, public, and government in establishing important issues.
Discussion Questions
Summarize the precursors of the agenda-setting hypothesis.
Explain how agenda setting differs in obtrusive versus unobtrusive issues.
What implications does agenda-setting research have for journalists today?