Developmental & Life-Course Theories Notes
Developmental & Life-Course Theories
- Objective: To understand the patterns of criminal behavior over time.
- Research Findings:
- Crime Peaks in Adolescence: Criminal activity is observed to peak during adolescence and declines as individuals age (Blumstein et al., 1986; Farrington et al., 2013).
- Consistent Behavior: Some individuals exhibit a consistent level of criminal or conforming behavior throughout their lives.
- Variable Criminality: Others show variability in criminal behavior as they age (Laub & Sampson, 2003; Sampson & Laub, 1993).
Age-Crime Debate
- Age-Crime Curve: Shows an increase in crime rates during early adolescence, peaking in mid to late teenage years, and decreasing through early adulthood (Farrington, 1986).
- Emerging Adults: Defined as individuals aged 18 to 25 (Arnett, 2000).
- Critiques of Age-Crime Distribution:
- Misapplications may arise from advocating longitudinal studies over cheaper cross-sectional studies (Hirschi & Gottfredson, 1983).
- Age-crime curve may reflect changes in opportunity rather than changes in criminal propensity (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990).
Criminal Careers
- Research Basis: Informed by early life-history and longitudinal data (Shaw, 1930; Glueck & Glueck, 1950; Wolfgang et al., 1972).
- Key Factors in Criminal Careers:
- Onset: Initiation of criminal activity.
- Continuity: Persistence and escalation of criminal activity.
- Change: Can involve desistance or termination of criminal activity.
- Five Dimensions:
- Prevalence: Number of individuals involved at any level.
- Frequency: Number of offenses committed by active offenders.
- Age of Onset: Age at which the first crime is committed.
- Age of Desistance: Age at last crime committed.
- Criminal Career Length: Calculated as age of desistance minus age of onset.
Prevalence, Frequency, Age of Onset, & Desistance
- Prevalence Statistics:
- By age 30, up to 96% of self-reported criminal involvement and 40% in official records (Farrington, 2002).
- Crime Frequency: Peaks at age 16 for self-reports and ages 17-20 for convictions, followed by a decline (Piquero et al., 2003).
- Age of Onset: Peaks for minor crimes at ages 13-14 and for serious crimes at ages 17-19 (Farrington, 1990).
- Desistance: Average age of last crime ranges from 20-29 years (Farrington, 1992).
- Career Length:
- Average of 10.4 years from first to last conviction (Farrington, 1992).
- Includes one-time offenders averages 7.1 years.
- For all crimes, the average is 25.6 years (Laub & Sampson, 2003).
Key Theories in Developmental & Life-Course Criminology
- Self-Control Theory: (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990)
- Developmental Pathways Model: (Loeber et al., 1993)
- Integrated Cognitive Antisocial Potential Theory: (Farrington, 2005)
- Developmental Taxonomy: (Moffitt, 1993)
- Age-Graded Theory of Informal Social Control: (Sampson & Laub, 1993, 2003)
- Life-Course Perspective on Social Learning: (Giordano, 2010)
Developmental Taxonomy: Terrie Moffitt
- Background: Schmidt-Nielsen Professor at Duke University and King's College London.
- Contributions: Noted for work identifying patterns of criminality at different developmental stages.
Dual Taxonomy of Offending
- Moffitt's Proposition: Two distinct groups of offenders:
- Adolescence-Limited (AL):
- Engage in delinquency during adolescence, cease as they transition to adulthood.
- Motivated by social factors and maturity gaps.
- Life-Course Persistent (LCP):
- Develop conduct disorders early in life, continuing criminality into adulthood.
- Associated biological and psychological deficits leading to chronic behavior.
Life-Course Persistent Offenders (LCP)
- Characteristics:
- Small percentage of total youth; their deviance has biological roots linked to neuropsychological deficits.
- These deficits can result in lower verbal ability and executive functioning, leading to a higher likelihood of antisocial conduct.
Adolescence-Limited Offenders (AL)
- Characteristics:
- Represent the majority of youth delinquents.
- Rebellion linked to a maturity gap; no significant deficits compared to LCPs.
- Tend to conform to social norms as they mature, leading to natural desistance from criminal behavior.
- Processes of Social Mimicry: AL youth often imitate behaviors from LCP youth, leading to initial delinquency but eventually adhere to societal norms as they age.
Summary of Empirical Evidence
- Significant support for the distinctions between AL and LCP groups, including various subgroups like chronic and sporadic offenders.