Final Test
Judiciary
Hamilton described as least dangerous branch
Cases
Marbury v. Madison (1803): judicial review
McCulloch v. Maryland (1857): federal law prevails
Dred Scott v. Stanford (1857): legalized slavery across the US
Slaughterhouse Cases (1873): plaintiffs asked SC to apply the limitations on govt power in federal bill of rights to the states, such as taking private property without compensation
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896): does 14A allow for segregation in public accommodations? PAIRED W BROWN
Lochner v. New York (1905): are business regulations allowed? (14A does not allow for business regulations) PAIRED W CAROLENE PRODUCTS
US v. Carolene Products (1938): allows for business regulations allowed PAIRED W LOCHNER
Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer (1952): supreme courts say no to
Brown v. Board of Education (1954): 14A is not okay with segregation PAIRED W PLESSY
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): constitution says someone has the right to the assistance of an attorney when under arrest PAIR W MIRANDA
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965): right to privacy
Miranda v. Arizona (1966): if a person is arrested, they must be read their rights out loud PAIR W GIDEON
Loving v. Virginia (1967): removed laws making it illegal for interracial relationships
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969): “three prong test”,” if a speaker advocates imminent, violent, and illegal action that is carried out, they can be punished for it
Roe v. Wade (1973):
US v. Nixon (1974): Nixon tried to use executive power to avoid a court sobpoena
McDonald v. Chicago (2010): INCORPORATED part of BOR to limit power of states.
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012): example of continued arguments about what the commerce clause means
New York State Rifle and Pistol v. Bruen (2022): more details on how 2A limits the power of the states
Dobbs v. Jackson (2022): overruled Roe v. Wade
! Know number of courts
Difference between original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction (only hears case on appeal)
6th circuit court of appeals oversees Michigan
Rule of 4
9 total justices, if 4 or more think a case is worth hearing, court issues writ of certiorari (letter SC sends when it accepts an appeal)
Article 3
S1: