Psychology 120
Research Methods in Psychology
Three Research Methods
Method 1: Experimental Research
Strengths:
Allows researchers to determine cause-and-effect relationships by manipulating independent variables.
High control over extraneous variables enhances internal validity.
Limitations:
May lack ecological validity due to artificial settings.
Ethical concerns can limit the feasibility of certain experiments.
Example:
A researcher tests the effect of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance by randomly assigning participants to a sleep-deprived group and a control group.
Method 2: Observational Research
Strengths:
Provides insights into natural behaviors in real-world environments.
Useful for generating hypotheses that can later be tested experimentally.
Limitations:
Observer bias can influence results.
Cannot establish cause-and-effect relationships.
Example:
A psychologist observes children's interactions during recess to note social behaviors without intervening.
Method 3: Survey Research
Strengths:
Can gather data from large samples quickly and efficiently.
Useful for collecting self-reported data on attitudes, opinions, and behaviors.
Limitations:
Responses can be influenced by social desirability bias.
Surveys may not accurately capture complex behaviors or thoughts.
Example:
A researcher uses an online questionnaire to assess college students' stress levels during finals week.
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Data
Qualitative Data:
Refers to non-numerical data that describes characteristics or qualities.
Examples:
Open-ended interview responses about personal experiences.
Observational notes describing the behavior of a group during a therapy session.
Quantitative Data:
Involves numerical data that can be quantified and analyzed statistically.
Examples:
Scores on a standardized test (e.g., SAT scores).
The number of therapy sessions attended by patients over a month.
Strengths and Limitations of Data Types
Qualitative Data:
Strengths:
Provides in-depth insight into participants’ experiences and perspectives.
Captures context and complexity of emotions or social phenomena.
Limitations:
Difficult to analyze statistically and generalize findings.
Time-consuming to collect and interpret.
Quantitative Data:
Strengths:
Easier to analyze statistically and draw generalizable conclusions.
Can handle larger sample sizes and is often more objective.
Limitations:
May not capture the richness of human experience.
Risk of oversimplifying complex phenomena into numerical form.
Research Designs
Qualitative Designs:
Focus on understanding experiences (e.g., case studies, focus groups).
Strengths: Rich, detailed information; captures participant voice.
Limitations: Limited generalizability; potential for bias in interpretation.
Quantitative Designs:
Focus on numerical data and statistical analysis (e.g., experiments, surveys).
Strengths: High reliability; results can be replicated.
Limitations: May ignore context and rely on rigid structures.
Research Design Types
Experimental Design:
Involves conducting tests to determine if manipulating an independent variable causes changes in a dependent variable.
Key Components:
Hypothesis: A testable statement predicting the outcome (e.g., "Sleep deprivation reduces cognitive performance.").
Independent Variable (IV): The variable manipulated (e.g., hours of sleep).
Dependent Variable (DV): The variable measured (e.g., cognitive performance scores).
Confounding Variables: Extraneous variables that could affect the DV (e.g., age, prior knowledge).
Operational Definitions: Clear definitions of how variables will be measured (e.g., cognitive performance measured by a standardized test).
Cross-Sectional Design:
Observes different subjects at one point in time to compare different variables (e.g., testing the knowledge of various age groups in one session).
Longitudinal Design:
Observes the same subjects over a period to detect changes or developments (e.g., studying a group of children until adulthood).
Research Types
Case Study:
An in-depth examination of a single subject or group, often used to explore rare phenomena or complex issues (e.g., studying a patient with a unique psychological disorder).
Key Organizations in Psychology
CPA: Canadian Psychological Association
Supports the advancement, communication, and application of psychology in Canada.
APA: American Psychological Association
Promotes the discipline of psychology and works to advance research, education, and practice in multiple areas.
CCAC: Canadian Council on Animal Care
Oversees the ethical use and care of animals in research and teaching.
Tri-Council Funding Agencies
The Tri-Council consists of:
CIHR: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
NSERC: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
SSHRC: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Ethical Principles in Psychology
The CPA outlines four principles of ethics:
Respect for the Dignity of Persons: Prioritizing the rights and dignity of individuals.
Integrity in Relationships: Fostering honesty and transparency in research and professional relationships.
Responsibility to Society: Contributing positively to society through research and practice.
Professional Competence: Ensuring qualified professionals provide services to those in need.