Detailed Lecture Notes on Earth’s Future in Cosmic Time
The Future is Here! ORC’s and other wonders of the universe
- Mysterious Odd Radio Circles (ORCs)
- Lord of the Rings
- Recollimators
- RARIGX (Radio Ring Galaxies)
- Pre-SN1987A Objects
- Potoroo
- Dancing Ghosts
Part 1: Can Humans Thrive on Planet Earth on Cosmic Time?
- Cosmic Day: 37.8 million years
- Earth's history is broadly understood, operating under physical laws.
- Volcanism is the biggest threat to life, but habitability could last hundreds of millions of years.
- Earth's cosmic future is bright and potentially rare in the galaxy.
Summary:
- Preserving Earth's future is a critical moral decision without global consensus on:
- A viable long-term economic system
- Basic principles for managing Earth and governing ourselves
- The importance of Earth's long-term health
- Contemplating Earth’s future on cosmic time puts these questions into a proper perspective.
Core Discussion Points:
- Astronomy/Cosmology
- Ethics (moral)
- Politics
- Economy
- Environment
Argument:
- Humans and technology control the planet, but ethics undervalue the future.
- The environmental movement lacks a moral compass rooted in a shared vision for humanity and Earth in cosmic time.
- Humans are currently writing Earth's story and need to consider the ending.
Cosmic Time & Space:
- Journey through Cosmic Time & Space.
- \Ālea Iacta Est (The die is cast) - Julius Caesar
- Early Universe: Simplicity immediately after the Big Bang.
- Density fluctuations at about 1 part in 100,000.
- Time = 10−35 seconds, Temperature = 1027.
Present-Day Cosmic Web:
- A view of the present-day cosmic web 300 million light-years across, as modeled by IllustrisTNG.
- Galaxies (gold) have blown off shocked gas (white).
New Discoveries:
The Dancing Ghosts:
- MeerKAT observations:
- Frequency: 1284 MHz
- Beam size: 7.5" x 7.1"
(Re)Collimation Shocks on Large-Scales:
- Pressure mismatch between the jet and the ambient medium (rarefied).
- Jet narrows and brightens up.
- NGC 2663, Distance = 28.5 Mpc
Rarigx (Radio Ring Galaxies):
PeVatrons at High Energies
Diprotodon SNR G278.9+1.3
- Size: D=200′x194′=3°33x3°23
- Distance: Dist=2700pc
- Diameter: D=157x152pc
Lollipop SNRs or Magellanic Stream SNR Candidates
LMC ORC! Intergalactic SNR J0624–6948 (Filipovic et al. 2022)
- MeerKAT
- XMM
- CTIO
- Radio
- Optical
- Soft
- Mid
Ancora SNR G288.8-6.3
- Size: D=107.6′x98.4′
- Beam Size: B.S.=30"
- Spectral Index: α=−0.41
- Surface Brightness: ∑=1.4×10−22Wm−2Hz−1sr−1
LBV? WR 16
- ASKAP EMU
- WISE 12 microns
- superCosmos Halpha
PRE-SN1987A????
New (The Youngest) Galactic SNR G329.9-0.5
- Distance ~ 19 kpc?
- Age ~ 100 years
- Diameter ~ 70"
Multimessenger Astronomy
- Photons γ
- Cosmic Rays P
- Neutrinos ν
- Gravitational Waves GW
- Born: 24th February 1987
Origin of Life
- How life started on Earth
Diversity of Life
Extinction Rate
- Major Extinction Events
- A mass extinction is defined by the loss of at least 75% of species within a short period of time (geologically, this is around 2 million years).
'Big Five' Mass Extinctions in Earth's History
- End Ordovician (444 Mya)
- 86% species, 57% genera, 27% families extinct
- Late Devonian (360 Mya)
- 75% species, 35% genera, 19% families extinct
- End Permian (250 Mya)
- 96% species, 56% genera, 57% families extinct
- End Triassic (200 Mya)
- 80% species, 47% genera, 23% families extinct
- End Cretaceous (65 Mya)
- 76% species, 40% genera, 17% families extinct
- Extinctions are a natural part of evolution, but background rates are typically less than 5 families extinct per million years
- Future near-term extinction rates are driven by human actions today
Galactic Structure
- 62 Myr Cycle of Extinction
Marine Families
- End-Cambrian Explosion
- End-Late Ordovician
- End-Devonian
- End-Triassic
- End-Permian
- Cretaceous
Diversity is Essential!
- Massive Earth Extinctions like Fertilizers?
- Cataclysm is the engine of evolution!
- Diversity & evolution are based on and depend on errors!
- A trillion evolutionary divisions are needed to achieve one error
- Without errors/diversity, no future?
- in varietate concordia
Two Options for Earth's Prevalence:
- Earths are common
- Rare Earth
Earths Are Common - Drake Equation
- N=R∗×f<em>p×n</em>e×f<em>l×f</em>i×fc×L
- N = The number of technologically advanced civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy
- R∗ = The rate of formation of stars in the galaxy
- fp = The fraction of those stars with planetary systems
- ne = The number of planets, per solar system, with an environment suitable for life
- fl = The fraction of suitable planets on which life actually appears
- fi = The fraction of life-bearing planets on which intelligent life emerges
- fc = The fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
- L = The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space
- Alternative Drake Equation:
- Nast = The number of technological species that have formed over the history of the observable universe
- Nhp = The number of habitable planets in a given volume of the universe
- fbt = The likelihood of a technological species arising on one of these planets
The Rare Earth Equation
- \"all things were ordered in measure, number and weight.\"
- $N = N* \cdot ne \cdot fg \cdot fp \cdot f{pm} \cdot fl \cdot fm \cdot fj \cdot f{me}<ul><li>f_{pm}−isthefractionofhabitableplanetswithalargemoon.</li><li>IfthegiantimpacttheoryoftheMoon′soriginiscorrect,thisfractionissmall.</li><li>f_j−isthefractionofplanetarysystemswithlargeJovianplanets.</li><li>Thisfractioncouldbelarge.</li><li>f_{me} - is the fraction of planets with a sufficiently low number of extinction events.
- Ward & Brownlee (2000) argue that the low number of such events the Earth has experienced since the Cambrian explosion may be unusual, in which case this fraction would be small.
Requirements for an Earth-like Planet
- MWay habitable zone: Enough metals, far from central black hole & SNae.
- Circular Galactic orbit, no mergers: Avoid SNae and high central radiation.
- Mass and luminosity of star (F7 to M): Minimize UV, allow time for life.
- Metal-rich star: Needed for a rocky planet.
- No tidal locking: Minimize strong planetary winds (hence no M dwarfs?).
- Planet migration: Clear out super-earths from inner solar system.
- Stable planetary system, circular orbits: Avoid ejection into outer space.
- Stellar habitable zone: Water must be liquid on planet surface.
- Jupiter-size planet orbiting exterior: Ward off comets and asteroids?
- Right mass and radius of planet: Retain atmosphere.
- Large moon: Stabilize axis tilt, moderate climate and day length.
- Right atmosphere mass: Enough greenhouse warming but transparent.
- Plate tectonics: Bury carbon to permit O_2.Stableclimate(weathering).</li><li>Continents:Stabilizeclimatethroughweathering.Hostland−basedlife.</li><li>Water:Forlife.Oceanslubricateplatetectonics(butnotawaterworld).</li><li>Magneticfield:Shieldfromdamagingstellarflareparticles.</li><li>RightU/Th:HeatFecorefordynamobutnottoomuch(volcanism).</li><li>With17factors,eachwithaprobabilityof0.1,theprobabilityofEarthis10^{-6}.</li></ul><h4id="earthscosmicprospects">Earth′sCosmicProspects</h4><ul><li>SolarSystemorbits:Stableforbillionsofyears.</li><li>Solarwarming:RemovesCO_2 via rock weathering; end of photosynthesis. 600 Myr.
- Nearby supernova explosion: Few hundred Myr.
- Comet/asteroid impact: Need to find and divert down to 100 meters. Feasible.
- Ice ages: An inconvenience but not life-threatening.
- Supervolcanoes: The biggest threat, due to mass extinction. Last one was 250 Myr ago. Needs further study!
Lessons from Cosmology:
- Lesson #1: We got here according to the laws of physics. We are subject to those laws and must live within them. There were no miracles in our past and there will be none in the future.
- Lesson #2: Earth will provide a livable home for at least 100 million years, perhaps longer. We have been given the gift of cosmic time. Will we use it well, or will we squander it? We are the first generation of human beings to know and face this challenge.
Part 2: Three Things We Need to Be Talking About But Aren't
- Homo Homini Lvpvs -Man is wolf to man.
What is this number?
- 1.0000007 = ???
- 1.00000071,000,000 = 2 The amount of annual growth if total growth in 1,000,000 years = x2
- 1. 031,000,000 = 10^{12837}Today′starget3</ul><h4id="capitalism">Capitalism</h4><ul><li>Capitalismentailsconstantmotion,growth,andprogress.</li><li>InterestanddividendsarePonzischemesbothpremisedonfuturegrowth.</li><li>Capitalismneedsgrowthandthusdevourstheplanet.</li></ul><h4id="ponzischeme">PonziScheme</h4><ul><li>Afraudulentschemethatinvolvespayingexistinginvestorsinanonexistententerprisewiththefundscollectedfromnewinvestors.</li><li>Capitalismis<em>not</em>aPonzischeme,andinsteadaschemeoffreemarkets.</li></ul><h4id="productionvstime">Productionvs.Time</h4><ul><li>Annualcopperproductionhasgrownat3.3<li>Plasticwastehasgrownat7.3</ul><h4id="misconceptions">Misconceptions:</h4><ul><li>Misconception1:Technologywillsaveus.</li><li>Misconception2:Dematerialization(economics):thereductioninthequantityofmaterialsrequiredtoserveeconomicfunctions(doingmorewithless)</li><li>Misconception3:Cosmologicallithiumproblem</li></ul><h5id="dematerializationtheory">DematerializationTheory:</h5><ul><li>Noneofthe57sectorsstudiediswithinthedematerializingzone.Mostarefar,faraway.</li><li>k_i=technicalperformance</li><li>\epsilon_i=</ul><h4id="theinterconnecteddisasterrisksreport2023">TheInterconnectedDisasterRisksReport2023:</h4><ul><li>Acceleratingextinctions</li><li>Groundwaterdepletion</li><li>Mountainglaciersmelting</li><li>Spacedebris</li><li>Unbearableheat</li><li>Uninsurablefuture</li></ul><h5id="risktippingpoints">RiskTippingPoints:</h5><ul><li>Therateofspeciesextinctionisatleast10to100timesEarth’snaturalrateduetointensehumanactivities.Therisktippingpointiswhenanecosystemloseskeyspeciesthatarestronglyconnectedwhichtriggerscascadingextinctionsofdependentspecies,whichcaneventuallyleadtothecollapseofanentireecosystem.</li><li>Freshwaterresourcesinaquiferssupplydrinkingwatertoover2billionpeopleandareusedforagriculture.However,morethanhalfoftheworld’smajoraquifersarebeingdepletedfasterthantheycanbenaturallyreplenished.Therisktippingpointiswhenthewatertablefallsbelowalevelthatexistingwellscanaccess,puttingentirefoodproductionsystemsatriskoffailure.</li><li>Glaciersstorelargeamountsoffreshwaterandtheirmeltwaterisusedfordrinking,irrigation,hydropower,andecosystems.Butglaciersarenowmeltingfasterthantheicecanbereplacedbysnow.Therisktippingpointis“peakwater”–thepointwhenaglacierproducesthemaximumvolumeofwaterrun−offduetomelting.Afterthispoint,freshwateravailabilitywillsteadilydecline.</li><li>Spacedebristravelsatmorethan25,000kmperhourandcancausesignificantdamageifitcollideswithsomething,creatingevenmoredebris.TherisktippingpointiswhentheEarth’sorbitbecomessocrowdedwithdebristhatacollisionsetsoffachainreaction,whichwouldthreatenourabilitytooperatesatellites.</li><li>Human−inducedclimatechangeiscausingaglobalriseintemperatures.Thetippingpointisa“wet−bulbtemperature”–ameasurementwhichcombinestemperatureandhumidity–above35°C.Highhumidityworsenstheeffectsofheatasitimpedestheevaporationofsweat,whichisneededtomaintainastablecorebodytemperatureandavoidorganfailureandbraindamage.</li><li>Climatechangeisincreasingthedamageasaresultofweather−relateddisastersandthenumberandsizeofat−riskareasareexpectedtoexpand.Thetippingpointisreachedwheninsurancebecomesunavailableorunaffordable,leavingpeoplewithoutaneconomicsafetynetwhendisastersstrike,whichopensthedoortoincreasingsocioeconomicconsequences.</li></ul><h5id="howtoavoidtippingpoints">HowtoAvoidTippingPoints:</h5><ul><li>Twocategoriesofsolutions:Avoidsolutions,andAdaptsolutions</li><li>Twokindsofactionscanbetaken:Delayactionsworkwithintheexistingsystemandaimtoslowdowntheprogressiontowardrisktippingpointsortheirworstimpacts.Theideal,Transformaction,involvesfundamentallychangingasystemtobestrongerandmoresustainable.</li></ul><h4id="earthsystemmodels">EarthSystemModels:</h4><ul><li>ThingOne:Thereisnoglobaldiscussiontakingplaceonthenatureofcapitalismandwhereitistakingus</li><li>ThingTwo:ThereisnoglobalunderstandingofEarthasasystemforharboringcomplexintelligentlife:Theinstabilitiesthatareinherentinacomplexsocio−economicsystemandhowtotamethemandEarth’sultimatecarryingcapacity</li><li>ThingThree:ThereisnocollectiveunderstandingoftheoriginofhumanethicsanditsrelationtoplanningEarth’sfuture.</li></ul><h4id="physicalmodels">PhysicalModels:</h4><ul><li>Physicalmodelsareimprovingbutlackhumans</li><li>Missing…People!</li><li>HANDY(HumanandNatureDynamicalModel)withRichandPoorforthoughtexperiments<ul><li>Totalpopulationx=xc+xE(Elite+Commoners).NatureequationLogisticRegeneration−ProductionbyCommoners:y = Regeneration - y(2-y) - Production - xcyWealthismanagedbytheElitesInequalityfactorK 100W = Production - Commoner consumption - Elite consumption = 6xcy - \delta xc - K\delta xE
Population equations: death rate & depends on whether there is enough food: famine or healthy
dc = \alphacxc + \betacx_c$$
The rich Elite accumulates wealth from the work of everyone else (here referred to as the Commoners). When there is a crisis (e.g., famine) the Elite can spend the accumulated wealth to buy food and survive longer.
- Two factors oppose a stable equilibrium:
- The existence of Wealth, which allows Elites to ignore the plight of Commoners and deny the prospect of impending doom. Wealth creates a time delay!
- Inequality factor (K) representing Elites/Commoners consumption. If > 10, collapse is inevitable. Commoners starve first, but Elites starve later.
- Revolution is not included in the model…
Ethics of the Future
- Why do we care about Earth's future or anything?
- Where do human ethical principles come from?
- Good Guys VS Bad Guys
Sources of Human Ethical Principles:
- Religious Belief:
- Moral Absolutism:
- Natural Selection:
- Ethics as a Pragmatic Tool:
- Feelings Drive Compliance:
- Feelings are the carrot and stick that compel compliance. When I do good, I feel good. When I do bad, I feel bad. That's my religion.
How We Value the Future:
- There is (probably) more future than past. Since the future is big, there could be far more people in the future than in the present….If you want to help people…, your key concern [should be] to ensure that the future goes well for all generations to come.
Exponential Discount Rate:
- Interest rates determine the Time Value of Money
- At a discount rate of 2%, at age 20 you are valuing your retirement years at only 1/3 the value of your current year.
- At a discount rate of 2%, future generations have essentially zero value, even though there may be a lot of them.
Hyperbolic Discount Rate:
- Steeper in the short term, shallower in the long term but the net extreme devaluation of the future is similar
- Humans have a weak moral organ for the far future because having one was not necessary for our evolutionary success to this time.
Caring About Earth's Future:
- Humans intuitively respect low entropy and its creative possibilities. We feel awe and wonder at the complexity of Earth's biosphere. The goal of creation myths is to explain. The losses that we mourn are increases in entropy. We understand intuitively how improbable Earth is… and therefore how precious.
- Low entropy is actually the ultimate human value.
- Do we need a new religion that worships Earth's spectacular ability to generate low-entropy enclaves where ever more complex (and beautiful) phenomena can grow?
Conclusion:
- Earth system models showing Earth's long-term carrying capacity. If too small, why bother? What are the choke points, and can they be worked?
- Economic systems that do not depend on growth.
- Socio-economic systems that damp instabilities.
- Humanity's moral compass for the future: Teach from birth where human values come from Finding out whether human ethics can grow
*Can we love Earth enough to save it?
To consider SETI activities from a bioethical standpoint.
- In particular, there is a moral duty to search for other intelligent beings in the Universe.
- Some of them could – and are likely to be – morally enhanced in the sense that they are not only capable of unmistakable moral reasoning but are also capable of consistently acting upon the results of such deliberations.
- Even if the probability of finding such morally superior beings is small,
it is higher than zero in any case; in fact, our astrobiological knowledge suggests that this probability is significant. - Hence, there are both deductive and inductive arguments for the proposition that our duty is to search for such morally superior extraterrestrial beings.
- In other words, there is a duty to undertake and support our SETI efforts.