Power point slides- Positive Accounting Theory Part 1
DISCOVERERS WELCOME
Murdoch UNIVERSITY
Accounting Theory
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) Part 1
Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this lecture, you should have an appreciation of:
The principal arguments of a positive accounting theory
Links between accounting information and share markets
How contractual relationships impact on managerial accounting policy choice
How principals curb opportunistic behaviour by managers
The incentives that induce managers to contract
Institutional theory, Legitimacy theory and Stakeholder theory
Types Of Theories
Positive Theories
Describe, explain or predict activities
Help us understand what happens in the world
Example: Agency theory
Positive Accounting Theory
Used to explain and predict accounting practice.
Examines a range of relationships between:
Entity and suppliers of equity capital (owners)
Managerial labour (management)
Debt capital (lenders or debt holders)
Based on the ‘rational economic person’ assumption
Contracting Theory
Suggests that the organization is characterized as a legal ‘nexus of contracts’.
Contracting parties have rights and responsibilities under these contracts.
Focuses on:
Managerial contracts
Debt contracts
These contracts help manage relationships where there is a separation between management and capital providers.
Agency Theory
Understands relationships where a principal employs an agent and delegates decision-making authority.
Creates a moral hazard.
Leads to three ‘costs’:
Monitoring costs: Cost of observing agent’s behavior (e.g. Auditing)
Bonding costs: Costs borne by the agent to align interests with the principal (e.g. preparing financial reports)
Residual loss: Loss associated with not fully aligning interests of principal and agent
Agency Relationships – Outcomes of Agency Theory
Agency Costs of Equity
Risk-Aversion: Limited incentive to increase firm value through risky investments
Dividend Retention: Reduced incentive to pay dividends or optimally leverage debt
Horizon Problem: Short-term focus on performance
Over-consumption of Perquisites
Agency Relationships – Manager-Shareholder Implication
Reducing agency costs of equity:
Bonuses tied to firm performance to motivate managers:
Bonuses can be in cash and/or shares/share options
Tied to accounting numbers (net income, sales) or share price (market-based performance measures)
Agency Relationships – Shareholder-Debtholder Dilemma
Agency costs of debt:
Excessive dividend payments: Reduces debtholder security
Asset substitution: Investing in higher risk projects, benefiting managers not debtholders
Under-investment: Lack of incentive to invest in positive NPV projects
Claim dilution: Issuing higher priority debt
Minimising Shareholder-Debtholder Dilemma
Reducing agency costs of debt:
Price Protection: Debtholders may increase interest charges or reduce loans
Align interests of shareholders and debtholders through lending restrictions (Loan Covenants)
Covenants rely on numbers in financial statements and usually restrict managers' behavior.
DISCOVERERS WELCOME
Murdoch UNIVERSITY
Accounting Theory
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) Part 1
Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this lecture, you should have an appreciation of the principal arguments of positive accounting theory, the links between accounting information and share markets, how contractual relationships impact managerial accounting policy choice, the ways principals curb opportunistic behavior by managers, the incentives that induce managers to contract, as well as institutional theory, legitimacy theory, and stakeholder theory.
Types Of Theories
There are two main categories of theories: Positive Theories and Positive Accounting Theory. Positive Theories describe, explain, or predict activities and help us understand what happens in the world, with agency theory as an example. Positive Accounting Theory, on the other hand, is used to explain and predict accounting practice by examining various relationships between entities and their suppliers of equity capital, managerial labor, and debt capital, all based on the assumption of the ‘rational economic person.’
Contracting Theory
Contracting Theory suggests that an organization is characterized as a legal ‘nexus of contracts,’ wherein contracting parties have rights and responsibilities defined by these contracts. This theory focuses on managerial contracts and debt contracts, helping to manage relationships where there is a separation between management and capital providers.
Agency Theory
Agency Theory helps us understand relationships where a principal employs an agent and delegates decision-making authority, which can create a moral hazard. This leads to three types of agency costs: monitoring costs, which are the costs of observing the agent’s behavior (like auditing); bonding costs, incurred by the agent to align interests with the principal (such as preparing financial reports); and residual loss, the loss associated with the misalignment of interests between the principal and agent.
Agency Relationships – Outcomes of Agency Theory
In terms of agency costs of equity, issues such as risk aversion limit incentives for managers to increase firm value through risky investments. There are also factors like dividend retention, which reduces the incentive to pay dividends or optimally leverage debt, and the horizon problem, which results in a short-term focus on performance that can lead to over-consumption of perquisites.
Agency Relationships – Manager-Shareholder Implication
To reduce agency costs of equity, bonuses tied to firm performance can motivate managers. These bonuses may be in cash or involve shares/share options and can be linked to accounting numbers (like net income and sales) or share price (using market-based performance measures).
Agency Relationships – Shareholder-Debtholder Dilemma
In the context of agency costs of debt, several issues arise such as excessive dividend payments that reduce debtholder security, asset substitution, wherein managers may invest in risky projects to benefit themselves rather than the debtholders, and under-investment, where there is a lack of incentive to pursue positive NPV projects. Claim dilution, from issuing higher priority debt, is another concern.
Minimising Shareholder-Debtholder Dilemma
To reduce agency costs of debt, debtholders may increase interest charges or reduce loans as a form of price protection. Additionally, aligning the interests of shareholders and debtholders is essential and can be accomplished through lending restrictions, or loan covenants, which typically rely on financial statement numbers and restrict managerial behavior.