Operations Management Notes
Operations Management: Basic Terms and Concepts
Operations Management:
- Definition: The design, control, and coordination of resources and processes to provide customer and stakeholder value.
Input-Transformation-Output Model:
- Transformed Resources: Input resources that undergo change in the process.
- Examples: Materials, information, and customers.
- Transforming Resources: Resources used to transform input resources.
- Examples: Facilities and staff.
- Transformed Resources: Input resources that undergo change in the process.
Coffee Shop Example: Input-Transformation-Output Model
- Inputs/Transformed Resources:
- Coffee beans
- Milk
- Sugar
- Customers
- Transforming Resources:
- Coffee machines
- Personnel
- Outputs:
- Prepared coffee
- Satisfied customers
- Money
Operation Characteristics (Four V's)
- Volume of Output: How much output is created through the process.
- Variety of Output: How varied are the outputs of a process.
- Example: Using container ships to reduce output variety.
- Note: Reducing variety without demand will not be successful (e.g., squared watermelons).
- Variation in Demand for Output: How elastic or conditions-related is demand?
- Example: Ice cream factory during summer and winter.
- Visibility of Creation of Output to Customers:
- Example: If the kitchen is visible, how long is the customer willing to wait for food?
- Operations must align with the culture and environment of its regional location (success of Dabbawallas in Mumbai).
Four V Profile
- Note: Volume is reversed in contrast to the rest of the V's.
Five Performance Objectives of Operations
- Quality of Output:
- Reduces costs
- Increases dependability
- Improves customer satisfaction
- Leads to a price premium
- Speed of Production and Delivery:
- Reduces inventories
- Mitigates risks from demand variability
- Can be a competitive advantage
- Dependability of Timing:
- Saves time and money
- Provides stability
- Flexibility of Operations:
- Speeds up response to customer needs and demand
- Saves time
- Maintains dependability
- Cost of Production:
- Measurement of operations
- Profit
- Affected by other objectives
Types of Quality
- Conformance to basic requirements
- Specification – Added custom value
Types of Flexibility
- Product/service
- Mix of products and services
- Volume
- Delivery
Polar Diagram of Performance Objectives
- Within circle = Internal traits
- Outside circle = External traits
- Cost benefits are only achievable through investment in the other objectives
Case Study – Concept Design Services
- Advantages:
- Previous experience in making aerospace products
- Capital for changing operations
- An untapped market for a b2b design product manufacturer offering full service from manufacture to distribution and marketing
- Standardization of machines, same resources could be used to create different products, leading to customization
- Challenges:
- Subcontracting of focus products difficult, problems with scheduling and quality standards
- Lacking communication between the design department and the rest of the company
- Promises to customers that are hard to keep
- Causing logistical issues with designs
- Due to the added stress of the design department being responsible for the company’s growth
- Sales forecast is extremely difficult and causes last-minute changes that disrupt the manufacture and distribution
- Wildly changing consumer demand is the nature of the business
- Changing into a b2b company brings its own challenges and requires a skillset that the organization does not necessarily possess
- Unclear future plans
- Advice for CDS:
- Have a meeting with the board of directors and determine a mutually agreed strategy and direction for the company
- Hire a consultancy firm to help with subcontracting
- Hire a communications expert to reform communications networks in the company and train personnel in honing proper communication channels between departments
- Subcontract UK delivery
- Gain market intelligence from customers (deeper market analysis)
- FROM PROFESSOR: Separate Focus and Concept into different units (“plant within plant”), and provide different operations systems as above
- Better sales forecasting system
- Revised scheduling system
- Involve the manufacturing department in product development and design (manufacturability to be considered)
- Tighter control of inventory
- Investment in smaller machines
Process Design
- About process design
- Process types:
- Project:
- E.g.: Water dam/other big structures
- Clear start and finish
- Resources organized for each specific project
- Jobbing:
- E.g.: Cake shop
- Low volumes with often smaller items
- Specially made, high variation
- Each product shares resources of the production system
- Wide competence required
- Batch:
- E.g.: Agriculture, harvested foods
- Large volumes, lower variety
- Products in batches, repetitive
- Mass:
- E.g.: Candy bars
- High volume, narrow variety, repetitive
- Low and focused competence in those adding value
- Synonymous with line
- Continuous:
- E.g.: Oil and gas production
- Highest volumes, lowest variety, often only one product
- Capital-intensive, fully automated
- Expensive, difficult to start and stop the process
- Project:
Volume and Variety in Process Types
- Project: low volume, high variety
- Jobbing: low volume, high variety
- Batch: medium volume, medium variety
- Mass: high volume, low variety
- Continuous: highest volume, lowest variety
- More process flexibility than necessary = high cost
- Less process flexibility than necessary = high cost
Services
- Professional Services:
- E.g.: Lawyers, doctors
- Service Shop:
- E.g.: Banks
- Mass Service:
- E.g.: Police
Layout Types
- Fixed Position:
- Project and professional services processes (high variety, very low volume)
- Transformed resource not possible to move
- Transforming resources come to the inputs
- Usually always very expensive
- Functional:
- Low volumes, some variety
- E.g.: Library
- Transformed resources go their related transforming resources
- Easy to supervise, high flexibility
- Low utilization (pileup of inventory and other disruptions)
- Cell:
- E.g.: Department store
- A collection of functional layouts
- Costly to rearrange and to maintain
- Product:
- Synonymous with line layout
- Greatest volume for low unit cost
- A single disruption in the line will cause the whole process to stop
- Same process types can have different layouts
- A single organization often has several different layouts
Examples of Process Types and Layouts
- NASA probe: Project process with professional service, project and service in fixed position layout
- Furniture maker: Jobbing process with functional layout
- Bakery: Batch process with functional layout
- Gym: Service shop with functional layout
- Rolls Royce Jet Engine Production: Mass production with professional service, all in Cell layout
- Tesco Mega Store: Mass Service with Cell layout
- Petrochemical Refinery: Continuous production with line layout
- Utility Services: Mass service with line layout
Line Balancing
- Line Balancing = Assigning tasks to transforming resources to optimize work flow and reducing idle time
- Specialist recruitment
- Generalist recruitment
- The layout and design of any operation is detrimental to its effectiveness
Case Study – North West Bank
- Consolidation of three separate regional departments into one central department
- Due to regional variance in demand, and because of bad average turnaround times
- Problems:
- New change has caused uncertainty
- Last minute rush of discounted rate products came during the time or reorganization (missed profits)
- Problems with the new layout:
- Filing room is now further away from most staff, meaning more unnecessary moving about
- Consequently, staff keep files on desks for use longer than usual, resulting in them being unavailable for use to others
- The location of the scanning machines causes additional moving about for most teams
- The flow of the process was muddled, and the high amount of partially processed applications keep getting lost
- Options:
- Keep the system as it is with a common data entry stage and region-specific offer and underwriting stages
- Organizational coherence
- Allow teams to develop their own cultures
- Cell layout
- Reform into a functional layout
- Fits the higher volume
- Eliminates the problem of departments wandering around through each other for scanning and files
- Specialization and skill development
- Hurts morale
- Region-specific knowledge is still required, meaning that the offer team would need a cell layout
- Same as 2; reform into a functional layout, except that the offer and underwriting stages would operate in parallel
- Dramatically improves the turnaround times
- A clear flow of the process should eliminate the problem of disappearing partially processed applications therefore taking away the perceived risk of this change
- Proven to work in many other banks
- Data of applicants and surveys is required by law to be saved to an extent, so applications being rejected or flagged isn’t nearly as big of a problem as it seems
- Works best for a high volume
- Keep the system as it is with a common data entry stage and region-specific offer and underwriting stages
- Notes on case work from lecture:
- Keeping option 1 in the short-term is the best option, because introducing massive reforms one after another in a short sequence is catastrophic for operations
- In the long-term options 2 and 3 are necessary
- Notes from review
- Process and service design should always be coordinated with product design
- The design of any process should be governed by the volume and variety it is required to produce
- Process types are a spectrum, as portrayed in the product- process matrix
- Process mapping is the second stage of process design after deciding the overall process type and potentially layout
- Example:
Line of Visibility
- Line of visibility describes the point in which a service turns from a back office process to one that the customer can see
- Example:
- Designing a service that deals with customers should consider the touchpoints of the process, as in the points where the customer can be engaged in the process
- Throughput time = Time between an item entering the process and leaving it (the time it spends in the system)
- Cycle time = Avg. time to complete one unit
- Work-in-progress = Number of items within the process at any given time
- Throughput time = WIP x Cycle time (Little’s Law)
- Throughput efficiency =
Planning, Control & Management
- Little’s Law:
- Work-in-progress (WIP) = Number of units waiting to be processed further
- Cycle time = Avg. time between units of output emerging from a process
- Throughput time = Total amount of time it takes for a product to enter a process and exit it
Inventory Management
- Inventories = accumulations of transformed resources
- Stock = Physical items
- Queues = People
- Databases = Information
- Managing databases is more about organization of the data, its storage, security, and retrieval
- Information can also often turn from a transformed resource into a transforming resource (e.g.: customer data being used to target ads for similar groups)
- The task of operations management is to allow inventory to accumulate only when its benefits outweigh its disadvantages
- Uses for physical inventory:
- Can be used as buffer inventory for unexpected fluctuations in demand, essentially protection against uncertainty
- Countering lack of flexibility with cycle inventory (There is a demand-sufficient inventory of item A while production of item B takes up all product processes)
- Taking advantage of opportunities, e.g.: a supplier offers a special deal to reduce their own inventories
- Anticipation inventory for large but mostly predictable demand fluctuations
- Some products can increase in value while in inventory, for example wine
- Pipeline inventory = Inventory awaiting distribution or locked down from other customers by an order
- Use for queues:
- Queues of customers enable prioritization (e.g.: hospital queues with separate emergency lines)
- A queue gives customers time to choose (e.g.: restaurants)
- A queue can enable efficient use of resources (e.g.: elevator)
- Use for databases:
- Efficient multi-level access to data
- No need to capture data at every transaction (aside from checks)
- Can speed up processes (e.g.: cookies on websites)
- Inventory management affects return on assets:
- Inventory may become obsolete or lose value over time
- Storage costs
- Administrative and insurance costs
- Ties up money (working capital) leading to an opportunity cost
- Inventory contracts affect the timing of payment to suppliers
- How much should be ordered?
- When order size increases:
- Cost of placing the order (all transactions related to making the order from suppliers) decreases
- Price discounts are often given for big orders
- Stock-out costs (opportunity costs) decrease when there is buffer inventory
- Working capital costs = Lag between paying suppliers and receiving payment from customers
- Storage costs = Rent, heating, lighting
- Obsolescence costs = With large orders, some items will inevitably sit in storage longer than others, potentially losing value
- Operating inefficiency costs = High inventory levels disrupt understanding of organizational flaws
- When order size increases:
Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Formula
- How much of a specific item to order?
- Q = Items ordered
- D = Demand rate (units demanded per month)
- Ch = Total cost of holding one unit in stock for a period of time
- CO = Total cost of placing an order
- Small errors in estimating holding or ordering costs are not going to affect total costs much
Economic Batch Quantity (EBQ)
- Takes into account that even when produced in batches, items are added to and sold from the inventory continuously
- (The Derivation of the formula is omitted here)
- P = Rate at which items are made and put into inventory
- D = Rate at which demand is depleting inventory
- Both models are generally applicable and functional but do make certain unrealistic assumptions (e.g. stable demand). Regardless, this doesn’t diminish the value of the models, but does restrict them
- The models are also meant to optimize the order quantity for a specific system, NOT THE SYSTEM
- Lean philosophies argue for different methods to reduce costs
When Should the Order Be Placed?
- Lead time = The time between ordering a product and it arriving
- Re-order point = Point at which stock will fall to zero minus the order lead time
- Re-order level = The level of inventory when a replenishment order needs to be made
- Because both order lead times and demand are not easily predictable, replenishment orders need to be done a bit before the re-order point
- Safety / Buffer stock = The stock that is still in inventory the moment the replenishment order arrives
- Due to lead time (t) and demand (d) being fluctuating variables, the level of buffer stock is always less or above the average Continuous review (orders placed at re-order level and the order quantity is constant) System for determining reorder timing
- Lead-time usage = How many products are taken out of the inventory during order lead time (d1 and d2 in the picture)
- Setting the re-order level at 600 would mean that there is only a 0,08% chance of a stockout occurring Periodic review (Orders placed at regular intervals and at quantities that help reach a certain point every time).
Time Interval Between Orders in Periodic Review
- Uncertain demand and lead time can be compensated by setting the maximum quantity Qm higher
Controlling Inventory
- Inventory has to be prioritized and discriminated to be tracked and controlled
- Usage value = Usage rate X Individual value
- Higher usage values are to be controlled more carefully
- Pareto law (or 80/20 law) = A relatively small proportion of the total range of items in an inventory will account for a large proportion of the total usage value
- ABC Inventory control = Controlling stock according to the Pareto law
- Class A items = The 20% of items that contribute 80% of usage value
- Class B items = The next 30% of items that contribute 10% of usage value
- Class C items = The last 50% of items that contribute 10% of usage value
- Other criteria for classifications of items:
- Consequence of stock-out
- Uncertainty of supply
- High obsolescence or deterioration risk
- The ABC system can mislead one into interpreting that class C and B items are not important and need little control or monitoring, however:
- Excess stock of class A items can be sold relatively quickly, whereas an excess stock of class C items move slowly and can incur big costs
- Class C items, or ‘slow-moving stock’, require significantly bigger investment in stock
- Most managers deem controlling class B and C items more difficult
- The monetary value of inventory is often calculated like this = Number of specific items X their value (the cost of purchasing them)
- However, this tells nothing of the size of the investment relative to the throughput of the operation (is the stock sitting on its ass or being sold/used)
Ways to Compare Total Number of Stock Against Rate of Usage
- Calculate how long the inventory would last without replenishment = Cover of the stock
- Calculate how often the stock is used within a period (often a year)
- The biggest problem in inventory management
- Most inventory management is done through computerized inventory management systems with sophisticated algorithms
- The systems follow a principle called the perpetual inventory principle
- Any error in recording transactions results in a perpetually greater discrepancy between recorded and actual inventory
- Entering wrong products or codes, miscounting transferred items, not recording damaged stock, etc.
Planning, Control & Capacity
- Planning is just a formalization of intended events in the future
- Control is the process of coping with any changes that affect the plan
- Dependent demand
- Dependent on other products or variables (e.g.: car tires in an automobile plant are dependent on cars)
- Independent demand
- Dependent on random factors that are very difficult to predict
- The type of demand is a spectrum
Key Planning & Control Activities
- Scheduling
- When to do things
- Sequencing
- In what order should things be done?
- Loading
- How much to do?
- Monitoring and control
- Is everything going according to the plan?
- Capacity = Scale of an operation
- Not necessarily reflective of processing capability
- Always requires a time dimension for appropriate measurement
- Aggregate numbers ignore details:
- E.g.: Rooms per night ignores number of guests in each room
- E.g.: Aluminum tons per month ignores types of alloy, gauge and batch variations
- The purpose of capacity management is to determine an appropriate amount of capacity for an operation
- Additionally: Special events (e.g.: Finland winning world cup suddenly increases Finnish demand for alcohol, hotels, etc.)
Good Demand Forecasting
Three strategies for capacity management:
- Chase demand plan
- Adapting to demand and trying to stay above it
- High turnover
- Worktime flexible
- Subcontracting
- Manage demand plan
- Affecting demand with marketing efforts
- Flexible operation, least wastage
- Reduced quality control
- Most difficult to plan & control
- Level capacity demand
- Keep capacity at a constant level despite of demand (e.g.: luxury products or petrochemical [capacity hard to change])
- Can cause big queues and backlogs
- To change demand one can also develop alternative products/services