AVBS3004 Behavioural Ecology in Conservation Notes
AVBS3004: Behavioural Ecology in Conservation
Animal Behaviour – A Recap
Animal behaviour broadly refers to everything animals do, including movement, other activities, and underlying mental processes (Britannica).
Includes:
Individual behaviour
Intraspecific interactions
Interspecific interactions
Behaviour as a Conservation Goal
Conserving specific, sometimes unique, behaviours of wildlife might be the primary conservation goal.
Examples:
Unusual or unique mating systems
Spectacular migrations
Communication
Animal cultures
Behaviour as an Ecological Indicator
Conservation problems are essentially population-level issues.
Collecting population-level information (population size, survival rates, etc.) is difficult and costly.
Behaviour can help provide indicators.
Elephant Population Example
Illustrates behaviour as problem indicators.
Data showing the number of adult elephants killed by humans and elephants before and after park fencing.
Before fencing:
Males: 5 killed by humans, 0 by elephants
Females: 6 killed by humans, 0 by elephants
After fencing:
Males: 1 killed by humans, 14 by elephants
Females: 1 killed by humans, 1 by elephants
Reference: Whitehouse, A.M. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2002) Oryx, 32, 243-248.
Orca Behavioural Indicators
Using orca behavioural indicators for marine protected area (MPA) selection.
Numbers of whale-watching vessels approximately the same as the population size of Vancouver Island orcas.
Individuals were most vulnerable to disturbance while feeding.
Led to a focus on protecting feeding grounds from boats.
Orca Behavioural Typology to Define Feeding Grounds
Observations and behaviours used to define feeding grounds:
Rest: Slow with predictable coordinated short dives.
Travel: Consistent group heading with long independent dives.
Social: Tight-knit groups with irregular dives and breaching etc.
Feed: Group spread out, no consistent heading, long independent dives.
Reference: Ashe et al. 2010 Anim. Cons. 13: 196-203
Tinbergen's Framework
Framework for understanding behaviour from both proximate (individual level) and ultimate (evolutionary level) perspectives.
Proximate:
Cause (Mechanism): Immediate drivers.
Development (Ontogeny): How the behavior develops over a lifetime
Ultimate:
Function (Adaptive value): Survival or reproductive advantage.
Evolution (Phylogeny): How the behaviour evolved over time.
Includes understanding of constraints and predictive tools.
Tinbergen’s Framework Explained
Mechanism (Causation): Immediate physiological or environmental triggers (hormones, neural circuits, sensory inputs).
Development (Ontogeny): How behaviour develops over an animal’s lifetime; influence of genetics and experience.
Function (Adaptive Value): Behaviour’s survival or reproductive advantage; evolutionary purpose and fitness.
Evolution (Phylogeny): How behaviour evolved over time in the species’ lineage; evolutionary history and related species.
Behavioural Mechanisms: Songbirds and Traffic
Reduced abundance of songbirds near roads.
Potential reasons: collision, pollution, less food, visual disturbance, noise.
Dominant song frequency changes with distance and age.
Mechanisms: Captive Breeding of Giant Pandas
Sexual selection and captive breeding challenges.
Pandas are notoriously difficult to breed.
Traditionally, males were assumed to be the choosy sex.
Behavioural observation indicated mating occurs only when both sides show high levels of courting.
Behavioural Ontogeny: Captive Rearing and Release of Whooping Cranes
Down to around 20-30 individuals in the 1940s.
Protection introduced, but slow recovery.
New population deemed necessary, leading to a reintroduction program.
Behavioural Ontogeny: Whooping Crane Attempts
First attempt (1970s): Cross-fostered with sandhill cranes; migration established, but no breeding.
Second attempt: Hand-rearing; migration not established; population not viable.
Third attempt:
Hand-rearing with puppets
Predator aversion training
Trained to follow microlite to establish migration
Successful population establishment due to:
Avoiding inappropriate imprinting
Learning on non-innate behaviours
Maintenance of social structure
Function - Behavioural Science as a Conservation Tool
Interest areas don't apparently overlap, but are linked in principle
Genes Individuals Populations Species Communities
Behaviour
Conservation
Ultimate Function (Behavioural Ecology)
Understanding behaviour from an evolutionary perspective
Key principle: individuals behave so as to maximise their own fitness, not for the benefit of the population or species
e.g. swallow’s tails resulting from sexual selection – increased individual fitness but reduced overall survival. Long-forked tail streamers preferred by females, but longer tails inhibit survival by slowing flight
Tail trait evolved to give individual males a reproductive edge, even if it makes them (or population) more vulnerable
Conservation-Related Examples
Kakapo sex ratio problems with supplementary feeding
Critically endangered conservation programs using supplementary feeding lead to females producing more male offspring (potential to pass on more genes)
More males in population reduced population growth overall
Infanticide in brown bears
Male bears kill cubs they don’t sire to limit competitor males passing on genes and allow females re-enter oestrus cycle, increasing individual reproductive success
Loss of cubs reduces juvenile survival rate and damages population growth
Human disturbance impacting bear movements can influence this behaviour
Allee Effects and Behaviour
Individual fitness decreases as population density or size drops.
Being rare or in a small population is detrimental to survival.
Consequences include:
Difficulty finding mates
Breakdown of social behaviours
Loss of learned or cultural behaviours
Reduced mate choice
Allee Effect Mechanisms in Wild Dog Packs
Mechanisms include:
Foraging – defence and efficiency
Breeding – pup care and defence
Survival – defence and food sharing
Reference: Courchamp, F. & Macdonald, D.W. (2001) Anim Cons, 4, 169-174.
Allee Effect Mechanisms in Vancouver Island Marmots
Population decline and “social meltdown”.
Reference: Brashares et al (2010) J. Anim. Ecol. 79: 965-973
Phylogenetic Patterns
Can behaviour help explain variation in extinction risk between species?
Some evidence suggests that more strongly sexually-selected species (most birds) are more prone to extinction (Doherty et al. 2003).
Obvious changes in vulnerability based on behaviours as environments change (particularly with increased human impacts).
Broader Phylogenetic Patterns
Behavioural Trait | Linked to Extinction Risk | Example |
|---|---|---|
Strong sexual selection | Yes | Birds with elaborate courtship displays (such as peacocks) |
Specialized foraging/habitat use | Yes | Koala, panda |
Complex social systems | Sometimes | African wild dogs, elephants |
Migration/large home ranges | Yes | Monarch butterflies, caribou, raptors |
Low behavioral flexibility | Yes | Many island birds, corals |
Behavioural Constraints as Conservation Problems
Some behaviours are maladaptive under new or human-altered conditions (even if they evolved adaptively).
Examples:
Mate-finding failure
Fixed migration patterns (populations can’t adjust under human pressures and/or climate shifts)
Anti-predator behaviours not suited to introduced predators (Australian invasives and CWR mammals)
Inflexible diets preventing adjustment to shifting habitats
Protected areas not always designated around animal behaviours
Integrating Behaviour into Conservation Planning
Using behavioural ecology is key to inform protected area size and design.
Monitoring wildlife behaviour as a conservation indicator (e.g. vigilance, stress, courtship, etc.).
Managing and maintaining key behaviours (e.g. migration routes).
Cultural conservation: preserving learned traditions and social structures.