Ch 8
PSY 323: Psychometrics
Introduction
Structured Interview
- Definition: A structured interview involves the interviewer asking a specific set of questions.
- Characteristics: Standardized interviews include printed questions that are asked in a specific order.
Unstructured Interview
- Definition: In an unstructured interview, there are no specific questions or guidelines to follow.
- Characteristics: Each unstructured interview is unique and flexible.
The Interview as a Test
- Definition: The interview serves as a method of gathering data or information analogous to a psychological test.
- Psychometric Properties: Reliability and validity are reflective of the interview as a testing method.
- Need for Supplemental Data: Tests often require supplemental interview data for comprehensive assessment, while interviews can sometimes provide a singular source of information.
- Applications: Interview skills are essential in a variety of occupations and settings, indicating broad applicability.
Method of Gathering Data
- Used for making predictions.
- Evaluated in terms of:
- Reliability: How consistent the results are.
- Validity: The degree to which the interview measures what it purports to measure.
- Can be conducted in a group or individual format.
- Classified as structured or unstructured.
Reciprocal Nature of Interviewing
- Common Features: Different types of interviews share interdependence among participants.
- Mood Influence: Interview participants can affect each other's moods significantly.
- Social Facilitation: This phenomenon suggests that individuals may behave similarly to the influence of those around them.
- Atmosphere: Effective interviewers create a relaxed and safe environment.
- Control: Despite the interview being reciprocal, the interviewer maintains control and sets the tone.
Principles of Effective Interviewing
- Interpersonal Influence: The effectiveness of interviewing can be linked to interpersonal attraction.
- Important Attitudes:
- Warmth
- Genuineness
- Acceptance
- Openness
- Honesty
- Fairness
- Patient Perception: An interviewee’s evaluation is significantly impacted by their perception of the interviewer’s attitudes.
Responses to Avoid
- Stress Interviews: To promote relaxation, interviewers aim for interviewees to feel at ease.
- Judgmental Remarks: Statements that may induce anxiety or inhibit communication are discouraged.
- Probing Statements: While sometimes necessary, these should be used cautiously.
- Hostile Statements: They should be avoided unless a specific purpose is served.
- Reassurance: Should only be offered if it is genuine.
Better Alternative Responses
| Poor Response | Better Responses |
|---|---|
| Why did you yell at him? | 1. Tell me more about what happened. |
| 2. How did you happen to yell at him? | |
| 3. What led up to the situation? | |
| Why did you say that? | 4. Can you tell me what you mean? |
| 5. I’m not sure I understand. | |
| 6. How did you happen to say that? | |
| Why can’t you sleep? | 7. Tell me more about your sleeping problem. |
| 8. Can you identify what prevents you from sleeping? | |
| 9. How is it that you are unable to sleep? |
Effective Responses
Open-ended Questions
- Definition: Questions that cannot be answered with a simple “yes” or “no.”
- Purpose: They allow interviewees to express what they deem important, thereby providing richer information.
Closed-ended Questions
- Consequences: These can halt the interview and may not facilitate ongoing interaction.
Responses to Keep the Interaction Flowing
- Interviewers should practice silence while responses are given and use small prompts for encouragement.
- Probes may be needed for deeper responses.
- Types of Responses:
- Verbatim Playback: Repeating the interviewee’s exact words.
- Paraphrasing and Restatements: Using different words to repeat the interviewee’s response.
- Summarizing: Condensing the meaning from several responses.
- Clarification Response: Helps to clarify the interviewee's previous statements.
- Empathy and Understanding: Demonstrates an understanding of the interviewee's feelings.
Measuring Understanding
- Five-point Scoring System of Empathetic Responses:
- Level-one: Unrelated response e.g., patient discussing an aunt; clinician expresses unrelated curiosity.
- Level-two: Superficial response reflecting an awareness of the patient’s statement.
- Level-three: Interchangeable response where clinician reflects the patient’s sentiment.
- Level-four: Accurate empathy, going beyond mere reflection.
- Level-five: Responses that significantly elaborate on the initial statement given.
Active Listening
- Emphasizing the importance of listening effectively during interviews, ensuring the patient feels heard and understood.
Mental Status Examination
- Purpose: Used to diagnose psychosis, brain damage, and other significant mental health problems.
- Evaluative Areas Include:
- Appearance
- Attitudes
- General behavior
- Emotions
- Attentional skills
- Sensory factors
Developing Interviewing Skills
- Debate on Skill Acquisition: There is ongoing discussion about the learnability of interviewing skills.
- Steps for Learning:
- Learn the research and theory on interviewing skills.
- Engage in supervised practice.
- Make a conscious effort to apply learned practices, along with ongoing evaluation.
Knowledge Check
- Scenario Example: Dr. Zayas, a family therapist, queries a mother about her shouting at her son.
- Question Rewording Options:
- I’m not sure I understand.
- Why did you say that?
- Tell me what you mean.
- What led up to the situation?
Sources of Error in the Interview
- Interview Validity Issues: Concerns regarding the halo effect, standoutishness, and cultural misunderstandings can introduce bias into interviews during selection processes.
- Reduction Method: The implementation of structured interviews may reduce these biases.
- Tentative Character of Interview Validity: Interview validity may be questionable but offers a significant volume of unique data that should be validated by supplementary sources.
Interview Reliability
- Reliability Coefficients: Interviewer reliability coefficients can show variability.
- Unstructured Interviews: These generally show the lowest reliability but might lead to fairer outcomes compared to other assessments.
- Interview Standardization Variance: Interviews can differ in their focus areas, affecting reliability.
- Structured Interviews: Provide higher reliability estimates but may lack the richness of information found in unstructured or semi-structured interviews.