Ch 8

PSY 323: Psychometrics

Introduction

Structured Interview

  • Definition: A structured interview involves the interviewer asking a specific set of questions.
  • Characteristics: Standardized interviews include printed questions that are asked in a specific order.

Unstructured Interview

  • Definition: In an unstructured interview, there are no specific questions or guidelines to follow.
  • Characteristics: Each unstructured interview is unique and flexible.

The Interview as a Test

  • Definition: The interview serves as a method of gathering data or information analogous to a psychological test.
  • Psychometric Properties: Reliability and validity are reflective of the interview as a testing method.
  • Need for Supplemental Data: Tests often require supplemental interview data for comprehensive assessment, while interviews can sometimes provide a singular source of information.
  • Applications: Interview skills are essential in a variety of occupations and settings, indicating broad applicability.

Method of Gathering Data

  • Used for making predictions.
  • Evaluated in terms of:
    • Reliability: How consistent the results are.
    • Validity: The degree to which the interview measures what it purports to measure.
  • Can be conducted in a group or individual format.
  • Classified as structured or unstructured.

Reciprocal Nature of Interviewing

  • Common Features: Different types of interviews share interdependence among participants.
  • Mood Influence: Interview participants can affect each other's moods significantly.
  • Social Facilitation: This phenomenon suggests that individuals may behave similarly to the influence of those around them.
  • Atmosphere: Effective interviewers create a relaxed and safe environment.
  • Control: Despite the interview being reciprocal, the interviewer maintains control and sets the tone.

Principles of Effective Interviewing

  • Interpersonal Influence: The effectiveness of interviewing can be linked to interpersonal attraction.
  • Important Attitudes:
    • Warmth
    • Genuineness
    • Acceptance
    • Openness
    • Honesty
    • Fairness
  • Patient Perception: An interviewee’s evaluation is significantly impacted by their perception of the interviewer’s attitudes.

Responses to Avoid

  • Stress Interviews: To promote relaxation, interviewers aim for interviewees to feel at ease.
  • Judgmental Remarks: Statements that may induce anxiety or inhibit communication are discouraged.
  • Probing Statements: While sometimes necessary, these should be used cautiously.
  • Hostile Statements: They should be avoided unless a specific purpose is served.
  • Reassurance: Should only be offered if it is genuine.

Better Alternative Responses

Poor ResponseBetter Responses
Why did you yell at him?1. Tell me more about what happened.
2. How did you happen to yell at him?
3. What led up to the situation?
Why did you say that?4. Can you tell me what you mean?
5. I’m not sure I understand.
6. How did you happen to say that?
Why can’t you sleep?7. Tell me more about your sleeping problem.
8. Can you identify what prevents you from sleeping?
9. How is it that you are unable to sleep?

Effective Responses

Open-ended Questions

  • Definition: Questions that cannot be answered with a simple “yes” or “no.”
  • Purpose: They allow interviewees to express what they deem important, thereby providing richer information.

Closed-ended Questions

  • Consequences: These can halt the interview and may not facilitate ongoing interaction.

Responses to Keep the Interaction Flowing

  • Interviewers should practice silence while responses are given and use small prompts for encouragement.
  • Probes may be needed for deeper responses.
  • Types of Responses:
    • Verbatim Playback: Repeating the interviewee’s exact words.
    • Paraphrasing and Restatements: Using different words to repeat the interviewee’s response.
    • Summarizing: Condensing the meaning from several responses.
    • Clarification Response: Helps to clarify the interviewee's previous statements.
    • Empathy and Understanding: Demonstrates an understanding of the interviewee's feelings.

Measuring Understanding

  • Five-point Scoring System of Empathetic Responses:
  1. Level-one: Unrelated response e.g., patient discussing an aunt; clinician expresses unrelated curiosity.
  2. Level-two: Superficial response reflecting an awareness of the patient’s statement.
  3. Level-three: Interchangeable response where clinician reflects the patient’s sentiment.
  4. Level-four: Accurate empathy, going beyond mere reflection.
  5. Level-five: Responses that significantly elaborate on the initial statement given.

Active Listening

  • Emphasizing the importance of listening effectively during interviews, ensuring the patient feels heard and understood.

Mental Status Examination

  • Purpose: Used to diagnose psychosis, brain damage, and other significant mental health problems.
  • Evaluative Areas Include:
    • Appearance
    • Attitudes
    • General behavior
    • Emotions
    • Attentional skills
    • Sensory factors

Developing Interviewing Skills

  • Debate on Skill Acquisition: There is ongoing discussion about the learnability of interviewing skills.
  • Steps for Learning:
    1. Learn the research and theory on interviewing skills.
    2. Engage in supervised practice.
    3. Make a conscious effort to apply learned practices, along with ongoing evaluation.

Knowledge Check

  • Scenario Example: Dr. Zayas, a family therapist, queries a mother about her shouting at her son.
  • Question Rewording Options:
    1. I’m not sure I understand.
    2. Why did you say that?
    3. Tell me what you mean.
    4. What led up to the situation?

Sources of Error in the Interview

  • Interview Validity Issues: Concerns regarding the halo effect, standoutishness, and cultural misunderstandings can introduce bias into interviews during selection processes.
  • Reduction Method: The implementation of structured interviews may reduce these biases.
  • Tentative Character of Interview Validity: Interview validity may be questionable but offers a significant volume of unique data that should be validated by supplementary sources.

Interview Reliability

  • Reliability Coefficients: Interviewer reliability coefficients can show variability.
  • Unstructured Interviews: These generally show the lowest reliability but might lead to fairer outcomes compared to other assessments.
  • Interview Standardization Variance: Interviews can differ in their focus areas, affecting reliability.
  • Structured Interviews: Provide higher reliability estimates but may lack the richness of information found in unstructured or semi-structured interviews.