zarcone (2015) ethics
Purpose of the Discussion
The article "Ask the Experts: How Can New Students Defend Behavior Analysis from Misunderstandings?" by Jennifer Zarcone, published in 2015, addresses how students in behavior analysis programs can respond to inaccuracies and misrepresentations about their field. It emphasizes the importance of effectively communicating and clarifying misunderstandings, while maintaining a professional demeanor.
Addressing Misrepresentations
Zarcone articulates that at any career stage, it is crucial to address misrepresentations about behavior analysis. The context is key, as responses need to be tailored to the situation. When misstatements arise in private conversations, students can challenge them on-the-spot with clarifying comments. This allows for immediate dialogue and an opportunity to inform others present about the accurate perspectives of the field.
However, the author indicates greater concern for misrepresentations that occur in public forums, such as media outlets. For instance, she cites a specific example where a Time magazine article suggested that using time-outs as a disciplinary measure could be harmful to children. In this case, Zarcone recommends a collective professional response with the help of colleagues and professors to ensure a well-rounded and factual rebuttal.
Example of Professional Response
The Behavior Analysis Practice Board of ABAI attempted to respond to the aforementioned article with a well-structured and non-threatening message that included:
A rationale for why time-outs can be effective when applied correctly, and
Resources for readers who want further information.
Despite the response not being published, the original authors amended their position after encountering this discourse and acknowledged that while time-outs could be used ineffectively, they might also serve as a viable technique when used properly. This scenario illustrates a successful outcome resulting from professional engagement with misrepresentations.
Importance of Professionalism
Zarcone stresses that clarifying misconceptions should be done in a non-adversarial manner. Graduate students, while often passionate advocates for behavior analysis, need to avoid sounding argumentative, as this can alienate audiences and hinder behavior change. The goal of addressing misconceptions is ultimately to influence public perception and promote an understanding of behavior analysis as a credible academic and practical field.
Conclusion
In sum, the article highlights that students can serve as active defenders of the field of behavior analysis against misunderstandings through informed and respectful interactions. Engaging with misrepresentations calls for patience, clarity, and professionalism, embodying the principles that behavior analysts strive to instill in others.