Describe the nature of predictable / pharmacological adverse effects
Describe the nature of unpredictable / non-pharmacological adverse effects
Describe the nature of idiosyncratic / dose-independent adverse effects
Define the therapeutic index (TI) and outline management of drugs with a low TI
• Formula: TI = \frac{TD{50}}{ED{50}}
• Low TI ⇒ narrow safety window, mandates therapeutic drug monitoring, individualised dosing & patient education
Identify the two major causes of drug–drug interactions (DDIs)
• Plasma-protein displacement
• Cytochrome P450 (CYP)–mediated interactions
List populations needing special prescribing consideration & explain why (children, women, pregnancy, elderly, ethnic groups, co-morbid, poly-pharmacy)
82\% of American adults take ≥1 medication; 29\% take ≥5 (poly-pharmacy)
Annual burden (USA)
• 1.3\,\text{million} emergency-department visits
• 350{,}000 hospitalisations
• \$3.5\,\text{billion} in additional medical costs
• ≈40\% deemed preventable
Overall ADE incidence ≈ 4/1000 prescriptions
Antibiotics (≈16\% of ADEs)
• Risk of ADE ≈1/1000 (allergy most common)
• Benefit (prevent serious URTI complication) ≈1/4000
Anticoagulants (≈32\% of patients >65 y)
• Warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran in top-10 ADE causes
Opioid analgesics
• Prescription-opioid death rate > heroin death rate
Insulin – high-alert drug for hypoglycaemia & dosing errors
Opiates
• Pain therapy → constipation unwanted
• Diarrhoea therapy → constipation desirable
H1 antihistamines
• Allergy treatment → drowsiness unwanted
• Motion-sickness prophylaxis → drowsiness useful
Pharmacological (predictable)
• Excess of intended action (class-wide)
• Alternative receptor / pathway within same class
– Aspirin: anti-inflammatory vs bleeding
– H1 antihistamines: multiple receptor blockade (H1, mACh, 5-HT)
Non-pharmacological (unpredictable)
• Specific agents within class
• Distinct mechanism, e.g. ACE-inhibitor–induced cough (bradykinin)
Overdose toxicity – dose dependent
Idiosyncratic – dose independent, genetically or immunologically determined
Organ-specific categorisation
• Hepatotoxic, nephrotoxic, neurotoxic, etc.
Thalidomide
• Introduced 1957 (sedative/anti-emetic)
• Withdrawn 1961 after limb malformations
• Key whistle-blowers: William McBride, Widukind Lenz
Diethylstilbestrol (DES)
• Synthetic estrogen (FDA 1941) for miscarriage prevention & others
• 1971: linked to clear-cell adenocarcinoma (CCA) of vagina/cervix in “DES daughters” & pregnancy complications
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)
• Well-characterised pre-approval; toxicity may be
– Species-specific
– Metabolite-mediated (often uncharacterised pre-marketing)
Contaminants
• Synthetic by-products or degradation products
• Often batch-specific; may cause rare cancers or acute poisoning
Excipients – generally regarded as safe (GRAS) but can trigger hypersensitivity in susceptible patients
Many clinically significant toxicities stem from reactive metabolites formed post-approval
Major biotransformation enzymes (approximate share of marketed drugs’ metabolism)
• \text{CYP3A} ≈30\%
• \text{CYP2D6} ≈20\%
• \text{CYP2C9} ≈15\% etc.
Toxic metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI)
Detoxified by conjugation with glutathione (GSH)
Overdose depletes GSH
• Antidote: N-acetylcysteine (orally active GSH precursor)
Phase III trials usually test 1 background standard therapy → limited interaction data
Phase IV (post-marketing) expands permissible combinations
Clinician approach
• Identify typical co-medications for disease
• Map metabolic pathways (CYPs, UGT, transporters)
• Monitor pharmacovigilance alerts
Inducers (↑ enzyme expression)
• Rifampicin, carbamazepine, barbiturates, dexamethasone, tobacco smoke
Inhibitors (↓ clearance)
• Ketoconazole (3A4), fluconazole (2C9), quinidine (2D6), macrolides, grapefruit juice
Substrate examples
• 3A4: midazolam, nifedipine, cyclosporin, atorvastatin, warfarin
• 2D6: debrisoquine, codeine, tamoxifen
• 2C9: phenytoin, warfarin, tolbutamide, NSAIDs
Interaction schema (PXR-RXR activation → ↑CYP3A transcription) affects oral contraceptives, immunosuppressants etc.
Drugs compete for albumin / α1-acid glycoprotein sites
• Displacement ↑ free (active) fraction
Example table (binding 95%→90% doubles unbound from 5\% to 10\%; 50%→45% only 10% relative change) → clinically relevant when drug A has high binding & narrow TI
Manufacturing variations & storage (heat, light, humidity) generate carcinogenic nitrosamines (e.g. NDMA in ranitidine, ARBs; NTTP in sitagliptin)
Global incidents:
• Maiden Pharmaceuticals cough syrup – 60 paediatric deaths (Gambia 2022)
• Diethylene/ethylene glycol contamination – India & Indonesia
Patent expiry (20 y) → multiple generic manufacturers
• Different synthetic routes, salt forms, excipients, impurity profiles, GMP standards
FDA definition of bioequivalence: 0.80 \le CI \le 1.25 for C_{max} & AUC
Clinical caveat
• Brand = AUC 1.0; Generic B = 0.8; Generic C = 1.25
• Switching C→B ⇒ dose drop of \approx37\% → possible therapeutic failure
Ranbaxy case: widespread GMP violations, \$500\,\text{million} felony fine, API import ban (2014)
Designed for success → recruit ‘ideal’ patients
• Clear diagnosis, early disease, age 18–70, no co-morbidities, no poly-pharmacy
Under-representation of
• Children, elderly, pregnant women, ethnic minorities, co-morbidities
Hepatic impairment
• ↓ CYP activity → ↑ half-life, require dose reduction or longer interval
Renal impairment
• ↓ GFR → accumulate renally cleared drugs/metabolites
Racial / Ethnic variability
• Genetic polymorphisms in CYP2D6, NAT2, HLA, etc.
• Under-representation in trials (e.g. Asians 1.6% vs 5.9% census)
Debate on race as surrogate biomarker
• Social construct vs genotype correlation
• Ideal: pharmacogenetic testing; pragmatic: race-informed dosing where high risk
Variants affect pharmacodynamics, PK, toxicity (e.g. HLA-B*57:01 & abacavir hypersensitivity)
Personalised medicine tailors dose/drug to individual genotype/phenotype
Challenges: cost, reduced market size, statistical validity (post-hoc subgroup claims)
Detects ADEs with incidence <0.1\% (rare but serious)
Pharmacovigilance workflow
• Spontaneous reporting: Yellow Card (UK 1964), FDA MedWatch
• Prescription Event Monitoring (via national health systems) → true incidence estimates
Prescriber factors: inadequate pharmacology training, limited patient knowledge, risk mis-perception, fatigue/stress, poor communication
SmPC (EU) – definitive source for indications, dosing, ADEs, special populations
• Sections 1–6 cover product data, benefits, risks, administration, special warnings
Risk-Mitigation Frameworks
• EMA Risk Management Plan (RMP) utilises SmPC
• FDA Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategy (REMS) – company specific (black-box warnings, registries, certification)