Surprising salmonid response to water diversion at four run-of-river hydroelectric projects in British Columbia
Abstract
Run-of-river (RoR) hydroelectric power is considered a renewable energy source with potentially fewer impacts on fish habitats compared to large reservoir-storage projects.
This study observes the abundance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in four streams in British Columbia using a before–after control–impact design.
Despite a 63% to 70% reduction in flow at diversion reaches, rainbow trout biomass increased by 35% to 157%.
Responses to water diversion varied by age class:
Adult biomass increased with reduced flows during the growing season.
Juvenile biomass increased during winter with reduced flows, higher stream conductivity, and increased summer flows.
Fry biomass increased with higher conductivity and temperatures.
Explores carrying capacity and growth/survival through a size–density approach.
Introduction
Importance of understanding how changes in flow due to hydroelectric projects impact river ecosystems and fish abundance.
Previous studies indicate harmful ecological effects from large dams on fish habitats, particularly salmonids.
The study focuses on RoR projects which divert water but maintain flow to downstream reaches.
Background
RoR projects typically generate less than 25 MW and significantly reduce flows typically to 10% or lower of the natural mean annual discharge (MAD).
This study analyzes four projects (Tipella, Lower Fire, Douglas, and Stokke) located within a 12 km radius in the Harrison watershed.
All projects constructed simultaneously, affecting similar small streams with steep gradients.
Methodology
Monitoring Design
The study used a before-after control-impact (BACI) design, monitoring:
Two years before project commencement (2006-2008) and five years during operation (2010-2014).
Each stream had an impact reach downstream of the diversion and a control reach upstream.
Data Collection
Collected water flow, temperature, water quality, invertebrate density, and rainbow trout density using closed-site electrofishing methods.
Additional measures of water quality included conductivity, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and chemical analyses.
Invertebrates were sampled using drift nets in riffle habitats.
Analytical Techniques
Analyzed data using linear mixed-effects modeling to test for changes in fish density and biomass.
Examined key fixed effects (reach, period) and random effects (site nested within year).
Utilized size-density analyses to explore production across age classes relative to environmental conditions.
Results
Flow Regime Characteristics
Flows in the control reach were initially consistent with diversion reaches but changed over the monitoring period.
Compliance monitoring confirmed consistent instream flow requirements were met during project operation.
Rainbow Trout Response
Post-diversion:
Increased rainbow trout population density (11% to 115%) and biomass (35% to 157%), with notable increases in all age classes, excluding fry in Tipella Creek.
Flows during both growing and winter conditions were pivotal in shaping biological responses.
Age Class Differences
Responses varied; adult trout density correlated positively with lower mean growing season discharge.
Fry biomass was influenced by stream productivity and degree days above 5°C but not by flow metrics.
Juvenile biomass was affected by winter flows and required more stable conditions for growth.
Discussion
Positive fish responses to flow diversion at RoR projects differ from most documented negative responses in the literature.
Possible reasons for the observed increases in biomass could involve maintained high habitat suitability in steep streams, where natural habitats were preserved even at low flows.
Suggested that lower proportions of water diverted may lead to improved fish biomass and community structure.
Conclusion
The increase in rainbow trout biomass associated with flow diversion at RoR sites in BC presents a significant finding that contrasts with existing literature.
The results highlight the importance of hydrological management in balancing energy production with the need to maintain aquatic ecosystems.
Recommendations for further studies on long-term effects of RoR projects on fish communities and associated habitats.
Acknowledgements
Funding and support were provided by Innergex Renewable Energy and constructive feedback from various ecological and fisheries management professionals.
References
Extensive literature cited throughout the study focusing on hydrology, fisheries management, ecological assessment.
Documentation of previous studies suggests variations in fish population dynamics associated with flow management.