In-Depth Notes on Governing British India
Governing British India
EIC Commercial Structure
The East India Company (EIC) initially operated under the Mughal imperial system, ensuring a secure framework for trade.
Europeans could impose their trade terms only at sea or with smaller Asian regimes. (Marshall, p.489)
Josiah Child (1630-99), the Governor of the EIC, aimed to establish permanent colonial settlements.
Indian Imports Over Time
1697: £263,000
1712: £457,000
1744: £743,000
1748: £1,098,000
1760: £1,786,000
1763: £1,059,000
1776-80: £1,303,000
1781-85: £2,030,000
1791-95: £4,024,000
1795-1800: £4,834,000
The 'Nabobs' and Corporate Influence
The British Parliament had significant interests in the EIC's operations.
The Deregulating Act of 1694 allowed English companies to trade with India, nullifying the EIC's monopoly.
A 'parallel' EIC was approved in 1698, which the original company later dominated.
Both companies merged in 1702, forming a tripartite indenture involving both companies and the state.
Key Figures: Thomas ‘Diamond’ Pitt
President of Fort St George (Madras) from 1698-1709.
Member of Parliament.
Acquired a diamond (410 carats) around 1701, which he sold to Duke Philippe II of France.
The sale financed his estate and linked to the Pitt political legacy.
Commerce to Conquest
Battle of Plassey (1757)
Led by Robert Clive, the British reclaimed Calcutta from Siraj-ud-Daula.
Bengal became a client state with a new Nawab under British protection.
Battle of Buxar (1764)
The EIC secured civil administration over Bengal and surrounding provinces.
Established British dominion over 20 million people and received a revenue of £3 million after the 'Diwani' was granted in 1765 (the right to tax).
The Regulating Act of 1773
Lord North aimed to reform EIC management.
Key Provisions:
Establishment of a Governor-General and a council of four for the presidency of Fort William in Bengal.
Creation of a Supreme Court in Fort William for all British subjects in Bengal.
Prohibition for British officials in India from accepting gifts or financial advantages.
Adam Smith's Critique
Adam Smith noted the contradiction between the trading role and sovereign power of the EIC, implying neither was performed well due to conflicting interests.
Sir William Jones' Perspectives
Advocated for collaborative efforts in research and improvement in India, emphasizing the diverse cultural landscape and the need for scientific and social progress.
The India Act of 1784
Key provisions separated trading from governance:
Established a Board of Control to oversee Company activities.
The Crown obtained veto power over Company appointments.
The Governor-General held absolute power over presidencies.
Established English Courts for crimes committed in India.
Corporations returned 'nabobs' had to declare their profits.
This dual control system persisted until the Indian Mutiny, after which Parliament assumed full responsibility for India.
The Impact of Famine
Description of severe famine conditions by William Roxburgh highlighting the dire need for agricultural development and humanitarian aid.
Emphasized the profitability and social benefits of shifting to indigo production to provide employment during times of scarcity.
James Mill and Economic Philosophies
Connected with the Ricardian school of political economy.
Authored "History of British India" (1817).
Father of prominent philosopher John Stuart Mill.
Thomas Macaulay’s Vision
Suggested that good governance could educate Indians for better self-governance potentially aligning with European institutions, highlighting a long-term vision for India.
The Opium Wars
Opium history: Used traditionally as medicine, later cultivated for trade.
The EIC monopolized opium from Bengal by 1773, selling it in Calcutta and exporting it to China, fueling the opium trade.
Resulting in two major conflicts:
First Opium War (1839-42): Britain seized Hong Kong and opened Chinese markets to British drug trade.
Second Opium War (1856): A joint victory of Britain and France against China.
Challenges of Governance
The EIC struggled to govern the large area of British-controlled territories.
Increasing military and administrative costs due to a decline in productive labor in Bengal, influenced by both economic and social reforms initiated post-Industrial Revolution.