Compiled Biological Invasions
Module 1
The Importance of Invasive Species to Florida’s Natural Areas
Invasion Terminologies
- Alien species - A species not native to the area under consideration. Synonymous with “exotic”, “non-native”, and “introduced”
- Adventive species - A species that has arrived in a new locality but is not yet established there
- Established species - A species that has arrived in a new locality and has one or several reproducing, self-sustaining populations in the new locality
- Executive Order 13112, signed by Bill Clinton in 1992, defined invasive species
- An alien species whose introduction does or is likely to cause harm to the economy, environment, or human health
- Not all introduced/exotic species are invasive
- Executive Order 13112
- Established National Invasive Species Council. Currently 13 departments and agencies involved
- Purpose: To prevent the introduction of invasive species and provide for their control, and to minimize the economic, ecological, and human health impacts that invasive species cause
- The council wrote the National Invasive Species Management Plan
- Invasive has been used to describe a species that presents at least one of the following characteristics
- Inhabits an area outside of its current or historical range of distribution
- Reaches high abundances and dominates space
- Competes with native species for limited resources
- Has “recently” or is currently increasing its range size
- Causes or is likely to cause harm to human health, econoics, or the environment
Stages in Invasion
- Transport
- Species needs to be transported beyond the boundaries of its native range
- Florida examples include Burmese Pythons (pet trade), Asian green mussels (travelling on the outside of ships)
- Species needs to be transported beyond the boundaries of its native range
- Introduction
- Can be intentional or accidental
- Intentional: On purpose
- Live bait releases
- Discarded plants in aquated or terrestrial areas
- Accidental
- Horiculture
- Pet trade
- Agriculture
- Intentional: On purpose
- Can be intentional or accidental
- Establishment
- Repeated reproduction and survival of individuals
- Depends on biotic, abiotic factors
- Brazilian Peppertree
- Relies on characteristics of non-native species
- Argentine black and white tegu
- Depends on biotic, abiotic factors
- Repeated reproduction and survival of individuals
- Spread
- Range or area occupied increases
- Depends on species reproductive success, localized dispersal of offspring or propagules, and long-distance aided by humans
- Species with high reproductive rates have an advantage
- Species with efficient natural dispersal mechanisms can spread further
- Range or area occupied increases
- Impact
- Negative
- Ecological
- Fire regimes, changes in watershed and nutrient cycling, reductions in biodiversity, increased soil erosion
- Melaleuca fire in Everglades National Park
- Economic
- Costs to control invasive species, lost yield of crops, lost revenue in recreational activities
- Human Health
- Mild allergies, spreading diseases
- Diseases from Asian Tiger Mosquito
- Ecological
- Negative
Pathways of Entry
- Natural invasion - Plant seeds, animal larvae, eggs or microorganisms carried by air, wind, water, insects or birds
- Intentional introduction - Countries introduce the alien species to promote agriculture, forestry and fishery, but they finally invaded local environments due to poor management
- Unintentional introduction - The most frequent invasion route, usually caused by international travelers or parcels
Why is Florida being Invaded?
- Florida pathways
- Fish farms and nurseries
- Pet trade
- Tourists
- Ballast water
- Culturla introductions
- Factors that make Florida more likely to be invaded
- Florida’s unique geography, tropical climate, insularity, and extensive aquatic habitats
- The destruction or disturbance of native habitats for the creation of novel habitats
- Examples of invasive species
- Redbay Ambrosia Beetle
- Burmese Python
- Hydrilla
- Asian Clams
- Nutria
- Channeled Apple Snail
Impact of Invasive Species
- Recent estimates show invasive species cost the US nearly 120 billion annually
- Magnitude of threat of invasive species in Florida is of critical concern
- South Florida’s habitats are prone to the establishment of non-native aquatic plants
- Florida is dominated by novel habitats created by human disturbance
Non-Native Species in the World
Introduction
- Global perspective of the world’s biota
- Less than 0.01% of known plants feed about 90% of world population
- Only 8 domesticated animals provide most of our meat, milk, eggs
- Many invasive species result from increased human mobility
- Inpact of invasive species is second only to human-induced habitat destruction
- In the US, invasive species responsible for about 40% of threatened and endangered species, leading to loss of biodiversity
- Competition/Displacement of native species
- Predation
- Hybridization
- Clarles Elton - Father of invasive species awareness
- The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants - Published in 1948
- First to investigate problem worldwide
- Difficulty in controlling invasive species
Australia
- Relative isolation - NOT protecting from isolation
- Plants
- # introduced plants = # native plants
- Weeds hurt crop systems, pastures, horticulture
- Costs AU$150
- Australia initial starting place for discipline of biological control of weeds
- In 1920s, prickly pear covered thousands of acres of rangeland, displacing native species
- Australia used cactus moth, which feeds on prickly pear pads
- Within a few years, threat of invasion of prickly pear diminished
- Cactus moth worked in Australia because they only had a few invasive cacti species
- Cactus moth threatens native populations of Opuntia in Florida, the Southwestern US, and Mexico
- Vertebrates
- Invasive species are about 40% of established species
- Cost about AU$48 billion
- Invertebrates
- Bees, wasps, ticks and flies cause human, livestock, and wildlife injuries and death
- Mosquitoes transmit diseases
- Mites and wood wasps damage crops and forests
Brazil
- Vertebrates
- Only 2% invasive, impacts substantial
- Fish and mammals
- Rats
- Cats
- Pigs
- Amphibians
- Reptiles
- Birds
British Isles
- Invasive species have cost UK economy between USD $6.9 and $17.6 billion since 1976
- Vertebrates have cost about 4.7 billion
- Plants have cost about 1.3 billion
- Fungi have cost about 206.7 million
- Plants
- Alien species outnumber native species
- About 24% of established species cost crop systems
- Vertebrates
- Alien vertebrates harm native organisms and environment
- Importance: Mammals most important, followed by birds, fish, reptiles and amphibians
- E.g. US grey squirrel displacing red squirrel
Europe
- Vertebrates
- About 33% of non-native species cause economic, biodiversity, human health impacts
- Canada geese
- Arthropods
- Non-native insects equal about 94%
- Introduced from ornamental plants
- Human disturbed environment
- 14% negatively impact environment
- Plant pathogens
- Non-native fungi - Most important group
- 77% plant pathogens
- Most damaging pathogens attack grapes and potatoes
- Grape industry: American downy and powdery mildews
- Social impact of potato late blight in Ireland
- Potatoes have low genetic diversity (clonal), meaning blight was super bad
- Non-native fungi - Most important group
India
- Plants
- Invasive species threaten native ecosystems
- Alter plant composition, reduce biodiversity, change soil structure, affect public health
- Despite these problems, growing Jatropha curcas for biofuel
- Jatropha curcas are poisonous and potentially invasive
- Invertebrates
- Major impacts on crop production
- Mites attack coconuts
- Mealy bugs attack cotton and papaya
- Golden apple snail attacks rice
- Golden apple snail threatens public health because they are an intermediate host for human parasitic nematode
- Major impacts on crop production
New Zealand
- Plants
- Approximately equal number of native and non-native species
- Vertebrates
- Ecological catastrophe following human arrival in New Zealand
- Maori settlers introduced dogs and cats
- Approximately 60 native bird species are extinct
- European settlers added over 90 alien species
- Cattle and sheep beneficial to New Zealand’s economy
- Ecological catastrophe following human arrival in New Zealand
United States
- In the United States, approximately 50,000 plants, animals, and microbes considered adventive during the last century
- Plants
- Many exotic plants in Port of Miami and Jacksonville
- Weeds of agricultural or horticultural significance
- Cogongrass
- Melaleuca
- Cost about 34 billion dollars annually
- Impacts
- Direct: Displacing native plants
- Indirect: Reduce fauna associated with natives
- Most damage in Southern and Western US
- Vertebrates
- Cost about 47 billion annually
- Rodents, cats, feral hogs, pigeons, starlings, Burmese python, coqui frog, European carp, Asian carp
- Invertebrates
- Cost about 15 billion annually
- Florida gets one potentially invasive insect per month
- Pathogens
- Citrus canker and laurel wilt
- Mosquito-transmitted diseases
Summary
- 120k non-native organisms in 7 countries
- Invasive species and disease spread
- Alien species invasions are an ongoing problem
- Globalization of people and products
Module 2
Impacts of Alien Plants in Australia
Introduction
- Number of alien plant species unknown
- Estimated at 27k
- 10% to 15% naturalized
- Regional variation in alien plant species
- Offshore islands especially vulnerable, over 50% have become invaded
- Consistent with island biogeography theory
- Number of naturalized alien plant species increasing
- About 5 species per year
Impacts on Agricultural Systems
- Crops and pastures
- Crop species mostly alien
- Pasture grass species in South Australia also alien
- Origin - Mediterranean Europe
- Some pasture species negatively impact crops
- Example is clover, Trifolium subterraneum
- Economic aspects - Presence of alien plant species entails control costs (Bottom is prevention/benign, top is intervention/toxic)
- Cultural - Resowing pastures
- Mechanical - Cultivation of crop lands
- Biological - Host specific natural enemies
- Chemical - Spraying of herbicides
- Various combinations: Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
- Alien plant species lower crop and pasture yields
- Contaminate agricultural products
- Negatively impact livestock
- Direct: Poisoning
- Indirect: Poor performance
- Negatives outweigh positives
- All aspects lead to revenue losses
- Crop examples: Wild oats, Skeleton weed, Mexican feather grass, Spanish thistle
- Pasture examples: Serrated tussock, Paterson’s curse/Salvation jane, Blackberry
- Some people say invasive plants are good
- Invasive plants can create conflicts of interest
- Cattle owners don’t want Salvation Jane controlled
- Resolving conflicts of interest led to the Biological Control Act
- Invasive plants can create conflicts of interest
Biodiversity Impacts
- Complex, variable, often highly subjective
- Alien plant species may impact both agro- and natural systems
- Effects can be positive, negative, or neutral
- Catclaw mimosa
- Athel tree (Tamarix)
- Alien plant species may provide food and refuge for other alien organisms
- Complex, variable, often highly subjective
- 1, 2 bad, 3 good, 4 neutral
- Typically, cost-effectiveness of control programs assessed
- Bitou Bush: Cost.benefit is 20:1
- Strategic use of chemica, mechanical, biological, and cultural control
- Need to make every effort early to remove invasive plants
Case Study
- Prickly Pear Cactus
- Example of positive outcome from introduction of a plant brought in for biological control
- Prickly pear cactus in Australia started discipline of biological weed control
- 1700s, prickly pear cactus introduced for red dye from Brazil
- Early 1900s, prickly pear invaded
- 1925 cactus eating moth introduced, helped a ton
Positive
- St John’s Wort: Antidepressant, first plant targeted for classical biological control in the US
- Paterson’s Curse: High in omega-3 acids
Negative
- Parthenium weed: Causes contact dermatitis, especially in men
- Paterson’s Curse: Causes skin irritation, allergic rhinitis (hay fever)
- Peruvian peppertree: Causes allergic bronchitis (asthma)
- Brazilian peppertree: Causes skin irritation, allergic rhinitis (hay fever)
- Thorn apples, Hemlock: Death from eating
- When an animal ingests these, it can become sick, have reproductive problems, or die
- Acute effects: Animal drops to ground almost immediately after ingesting
- Chronic effects: Animal experiences poor performance
- When an animal ingests these, it can become sick, have reproductive problems, or die
- Subterranean Clover: Estrogens cause abortions and infertility in sheep
- Phalaris: Alkaloids cause staggers or death
- Ryegrasses: Alkaloids cause staggers or death
- Sylibum thistle: Nitrate ions cause blood poisoning
- St. John’s Wort: Hypericin causes photosentisization and poor condition in sheep
- Paterson’s Curse: Alkaloids interfere with liver function
- Brassicaceae: Contains cyanogenic compounds
- Oxalidaceae: Produce highly toxic oxalates
- Polygonaceae: Produce highly toxic oxalates
Environmental and Econoomic Costs of Invertibrate Invasions in Australia
Introduction
- Big numbers of devastating adventive invertebrates in Australia
- Transportation of goods
- Human and animal migration
- Weather patterns
- Invertebrate invaders began with human colonization in the 1780s
- Ships bringing people brought mosquitoes, lice, stored food insects
- Today, globalization worsens the problem
- Shorter travel times increase vector survival
- Despite barriers, humans contribute to homogenizing the world’s biota
- Annual costs estimated at 5 to 8 billion dollars
Invasive Arthropods
Aedes Mosquitoes
- Vectors of dengue, yellow fever, Aika, Chikungunya
- Economic impacts
- Medical and vector control costs
- Worker absence
- Lost tourism
- A. aegypti - Annually 2-17 million dollars
- Dengue unlikely to become endemic
- Lack of reservoir hosts
- Outbreaks are importations of the virus by tourists or returning residents
- Cost estimation
- Pre 1990, cost of work lost to Dengue outbreaks: 2 billion in US
- Annual total cost for above species in US is 17 million a year since 1990
- Since 2000, increased Dengue outbreaks thanks to airport construction in Cairns
- Difficult to justify that Dengue is not endemic in Australia
- Government recommendation - Collect rainwater in containers will like increase the problem
Culex Gelidus Mosquitoes
- Breeds near livestock pens for high nutrient loads
- Vector of Japanese Encephalitis and other flaviviruses in the Northern Territory
- Symptoms: Headache, fever, convulsions, and in serious cases, coma and death
- Hospitalization: 14 days
- Mortality rate: 50%
- About 40% of survivors have permanent mental or physical problems
- Requires chronic care
- Vaccine: 95% effective
- Horses and pigs also infected
Apis Mellifera
- Introduced in 1822
- Commercial honey production
- Bee (and wasp) stings are second leading cause of death from venomous organisms in Australia
- Hospitals code wasp and bee stings together
- US 10 million dollars in annual hospital expedentures
- Economic impact - Overwhelmingly positive
Vespula Germanica
- Exotic wasps inflict damage with no benefit
- Introduced in 1954
- Established in Tasmania in 1959
- Established in mainland Australia in 1977
- National Control Strategy implemented from 1997-1998
- Increased costs for horticulture, healthcare, tourism, and nest destruction
- No human fatalities directly attributable to this species
- Social wasps as invaders
- Queens seek refuge in transported goods
- Globaliztation of trade
- Production of 1000s of workers following single mating
- Short generation time and high reproductive rate
- High dispersal capacity
- Survival in range of habitats and climates
- Lack of natural enemies
- Absence of competing queens during invasion process
Solenopsis Fire Ants
- The effects of S. geminata are limited to northern territories
- S. invicta was discovered in the southern Queensland in 2001
- Suspected origin is US or South America
- Both single and multiple queen colonies are present
- US experience is cause for concern for Australia
- Resistance to natural and chemical controls
- Ecological, agricultural, health problems
- Ecological - Sea turtles and bobwhite quails
- Health - Sting over 50% of endemic human population annually
- Production and control costs in US about 250 million sollars
- USDA bio-based area-wide control program
- Decapitating fly
Boophilus Microplus
- Most costly invasive arthropod (134 million dollars)
- Introduced in 2972 from Batavia (Jakarta)
- Distribution determined by low temperature and relative humidity
- Not established in Victoria, Tasmania, and the South
- Calves are weakened and can die from loss of blood
- Vector of protozoan parasites and bacterium
- Impacts
- Direct
- Loss of condition, anemia, death, damaged hides
- Loss of milk production, calves
- Control costs
- Stock handling, acaricides, toxicity, quarantine
- Indirect (Tick-borne diseases)
- Vaccines, treatment, and handling costs
- Direct
Old World Screwworm Fly
- As of 2011, this was restricted to Papua New Guinea, only 3 km from Australia
- It is capable of dispersing approximately 11 km
- Intercepted on boats in Darwin Harbor
- Obligate parasites of mammals
- Cause cutaneous myiasis
- Cuases wounds to contain numerous larvae, injuring the host
- Direct effects
- Damaged hides and muscle
- Declines in production
- Death of animals
- Treatment costs
- Changes in livestock production practices
- Sterile insect technique
- Sterile males can’t mate to make larvae
- Technology already developed
- Large numbers of flies needed
- Sterile insect technique
Papaya Fruit Fly
- First detected in 1995
- Attackes wide variety of fruit and vegetables
- Presence resulted in trade bans
- Successful eradication program in 1996
- Surveillance and toxic bait
Citrus Canker
- Causative agent bacterium
- Xanthomonas axonopodis (Hasse)
- Native to Asia on citrus and its relatives
- Spread to New World, Middle East, and Pacific region
- Affects oranges, grapefruit, limes, etc.
- Unsightly fruit edible but unsalable
- Symptoms include lesions on stems, leaves, and fruits, premature leaf drop, and loss of plant vigor
- Dispersal via infected plant material, wind, contaminated equipment
- First detected in Northern Territory in the 1900s
- New outbreak in 2004
- Central Queensland - 3 orchards
- Eradication in February 2009
- Response program implemented
- Removal of commercial and non-commercial citrus and native hosts
- Restructions on replanting and introduction of potential hosts
- Intensive surveillance program
- Since 2005, costs for responses to exotic pests causes government and private sector programs
Banana Skipper
- Cause production losses (about 70 million dollars)
- Biological control program implemented in Papua New Guinea (about 700K dollars)
- Successful biocontrol program could reduce losses to 3 million dollars annually
- Example of a “Short Route” biocontrol program
- Transferring a successful program to a new area
- Reduced costs because research and development already done
European House Borer
- Destructive timber pest
- First detected in Perth in 2004
- National Control Campaign implemented in 2007
Honey and Leafcutter Bees
- Honeybee beneficial
- Benefits of honeybees in Australia
- Beekeeping industry makes 60-65 million dollars annually
- Production of honey, wax, queen bees
- Crop and plant pollination
- Apples, cotton, citrus, onions, mangoes
- Approximately 1.2 billion dollars generated
- Beekeeping industry makes 60-65 million dollars annually
- Nitrogen enrichment of soil by bee-pollinated pasture legumes (about 1.9 billion dollars)
- Benefits not without costs if parasite invades
- Varroa mite
- Can destroy entire bee colonies
Marine Invaders
- International shipping
- Discharge of ballast water
- Attaching to vessel hulls
- Importation for aquarium trade
- Deliberate introduction
- Transport fishing equipment
- 1995 - National Introduced Marine Species Port Survey program made
- 170 exotic species discovered
Black Striped Mussels
- First detected in Darwin marinas in 1999
- First recorded marine pest
- Closely related to zebra mussels in US
- In Australia, predicted to invade oyster farms, marine pumping facilities, recreational/inshore vessels, all port facilities
- Potential environmental and economic impact could be substantial
Northern Pacific Sea Star
- 1986 - First discovered near Hobart, Australia
- Predator of shellfish, consumes any animal tissue
- Tremendous reproductive potential
- 1998 - 50 specimen in Port Philip Bay
- 1999 - Increased to 12 million in 1 year
- In 1999, pollution of Derwent Estuary led to high sea star population
- Recognized worldwide as a significant pest of aquaculture, commercial, recreational fisheries
- Threat to matine environment
European Fan Worm
- 1965 - First discovered in western Australia in Ballast water suspected vector
- Dominant species in Port Philip Bay
- Threat to scallop beds
- Efficient phytoplankton filter feeder
- Allows seagrass beds to overgrow
- Intense food competition detrimental to native shellfish
- 1998 - International Maritime Organization (IMO) made international framework for ballast water management
- 2002 - National system for prevention and management of marine pest incursions adopted
New Zealand Screw Shell
- Inadvertently introduced into southeastern Tasmania in 1920s
- Colonized more territory in Australia than any other exotic or benthic pest because it tolerates a wide range of temperatures and depths
- Has a hard shell that makes it immune to predation
- Because it is so prolific, native scallops and screw shells are at risk of displacement
- Live and dead shells can cover the sea floor to depths of 80 meters
- Dead shells are detrimental to other seafloor-inhabiting animals
Module 3
Non-Indegineous Vertebrates in Australia
Introduction
- Large land masses less susceptible to invasion
- Australia exception
- Since 1800s, vertebrates imported for food, clothing, pest control, pets
- Rats and mice adventive
- About 80 species of exotic vertebrates established, over 30 considered pests
- Short-term economic impacts
- Losses to agriculture about 420 million dollars
- Control and R and D about 80 million dollars
- Environmental impacts, loss of biodiversity
- Attributes of adventive vertebrates
- Good climate match
- History of establishment outside Australia
- High reproductive rate
- Generalist diet
- Ability to thrive in disturbed habitats
- Law mandates pest control
- Private landowners and agriculture pests
- Government agencies are responsible for native species and communities
- Direct impacts on livestock
- Predation
- Pasture competition and rainfall dependent
- Permanent degradation of soil and pastures
- Indirect impacts
- Reservoirs and vectors of diseases affecting native wildlife, domestic animals and humans
- Hosts for new diseases entering Australia
- Rabies in wild canines
- Foot and mouth disease in feral hogs and goats
- Strategies for prevention costly
- Enviornmental costs difficult to quantify
- Changes in vegetation cover and composition
- Changes in soil - inhabiting arthropod fauna
- Changes in soil structure
- Hybridization with native species
- Exotic vertebrates are valuable resource
- Hunting, fishing
- Feral animals harvested for meat and hides
- 10 to 30 million dollars per year export industry
- Rabbits and cats are food source for aborigines
- Trout and carp harvested for consumption, pet food, fertilizer
Damage and Control Costs
- Estimates for annual expenditures based on several assumptions
- Average landowner spends 250 dollars per year
- Not all farms have problems
- Pest damage and control activity vary yearly
- Economic and social factors may preclude any pest control
- Some pest control actions expensive initially with low maintenance costs
- Examples: Exclusion fences and nets
- Reported control and research cost estimates conservative
Rabbit
- Introduced by Europreans for food, fur, skins
- Most widespread and significant pest
- Scale of impact unprecedented until RHD
- Impacts
- Reduced carrying capacity, wool production, weight gain, increased mortality
- Pasture degradation, crop damage
- Threaten native plants, shrubs and trees
- Competition with native birds and animals (direct)
- Maintain high predator populations (indirect)
Fox
- Impacts
- Lamb predation (7-30%)
- Calf, goat kit, and poultry losses
- Prey on native wildlife, especially threatened and endangered species
- Limiting factor for successful endangered mammal reintroductions
- Loss in ecotourism from decline in native animals in wildlife parks
Feral Goat
- Impacts
- Overgrazing alters long-term composition of perennial vegetation
- Interbreed with valuable domestic goats
- Interfere with seedling tree production
- Damage fences
- Contaminate water bodies
- Reservoir for exotic livestock diseases
- Compete with native fauna via resource competition
- Alter ecosystem function
Feral Pig
- Impacts
- Lamb predation (19-32%)
- Root up quality pasture for livestock
- Damage water control structures
- Contaminate ponds and waterholes
- Destroy fences
- Reduce crop yields
- Native habitat degradation
- Predation on native animals
- Harbor and spread plant and animal disease
Wild Dog
- Impacts
- Livestock predation
- Determine sheep and cattle distribution
- Kill more sheep than they can eat
- Affect native fauna populations
- Hybridization threatens survival of Dingoes
- Attacks on humans, especially Dingoes
- Outbreaks of diseases linked to wild dogs
- Hydatidosis - Parasite fatal to humans
- Potential vectors of rabies bacterium
Feral Cats
- Impacts
- Cause major decrease in small vertebrate population
- Reservoir host for several diseases
- Carnivore tapeworm, Toxoplasmosis (native species)
- Scarcosporidiosis (sheep)
- Major problem on Florida Keys
- Threat to endangered rodent populations
Feral Donkeys and Horses
- Impacts
- Compete with livestock for water and pasture
- Habitat destruction and contribute to erosion
- Destroy fences
- Contaminate watering holes
- Potential for spreading diseases
Feral Buffalo and Camel
- Impacts
- Harbor and spread livestock diseaseses
- Brucellosis and Tuberculosis
- Damage freshwater swamps
- Trails cause saltwater intrusion, which kill Melaleuca forests
- Trample nesting sites of rare turtle
- Grazing reduces shelter for small desert mammals
- Damage fences
- Harbor and spread livestock diseaseses
Black Rat
- Impacts
- Destroy 30% of Macademia nut crop
- Damage citrus, avocado, and banana crops
- Indirectly influence owl populations via use of anti-coagulant rodenticides
- Prey on native birds, reptiles inhabiting offshore islands
- Compete with island inhabiting small mammals
Cane Toad
- Impacts
- Consumes native arthropods, affecting invertebrate communities
- Prey on and compete with native amphibians
- Anectodal evidence toxins poison native predators
- Examples include native cat and lizard
Starling and Sparrow
- Impacts
- Damage fruit and grain crops (about 10%)
- Consume and spoil grain in cattle, pig and poultry feedlots
- Potential to spread salmonella and tuberculosis
- Nesting in buildings leads to fire hazards, parasites, and cosmetic damage
Myna, Blackbird and Mallard
- Impacts
- Compete with native birds for nesting sites
- Pests of fruit crops
- Nesting in buildings causes fire hazards, parasites, and cosmetic damage
- Harbor parasites
- Disperse seeds of invasive weeds (Lantana)
- Hybridize with native species like Mallard and Pacific Black Duck
European Carp
- Impacts
- Increase nutrient, algae, and suspended sediment concentrations
- Reduce water quality, increase pump wear
- May make aquatic habitats less suitable for other fish
- No evidence of native fish declines
- Few recreational anglers target carp
- May cease fishing activities in some areas
Trout, Mosquitofish, and Tilapia
- Impacts
- Adversely affect native fish via predation, competition for food and habitat
- Trout displace some native species
- Reduce invertebrate and amphibian populations
- Especially mosquitofish
- Plant removal by Tilapia reduces habitat quality
- Adversely affect native fish via predation, competition for food and habitat
Summary
- Overall costs about 500 million dollars
- Safer BioTech controls on the horizon
- Viral vectored immunocontraception
Economic Impacts of Weeds in New Zealand
Introduction
- New Zealand is one of the most invaded areas
- About 500 adventive plant species threaten agricultural industries or biodiversity
- One speices/month over past 150 years
- Brief overview for New Zealand
- Total costs of weeds to economy
- Cost of weed management on public lands
- Economic costs of example weed species
National Total
- Two components proposed by Bertram
- Defensive Expidenture (DE): Costs for prevention and control
- Loss of Economic Output (LEO): Annual production losses due to current infestations
- Total cost = Defensive Expidenture (DE) + Loss of Economic Output (LEO)
- 1980s - Development of Biosecurity Act
- Adopted 1993, defined role of governments
- Total DE for all pests - 419 million New Zealand dollars
- DE for weeds - About 276 million New Zealand dollars (65%)
- Total LEO for all pests - 1.3 billion New Zealand dollars
- LEO for weeds - 302 million New Zealand dollars (24%)
- National total for weeds in New Zealand
- 578 million New Zealand dollars annually
Public Conservation Land
- Natural areas about 30% of land
- 17% threatened by weed invasions
- Weeds constitute risk to 49% of native species
- Department of Conservation (DOC) charged with weed management
- All costs in DE category only
- Excludes value of biodiversity loss
- Estimated at 4.42 billion New Zealand dollars
- Analysis of 58 weed control projects
- Light infestations - NZ$11/ha
- Moderate - NZ$11-225/ha
- Dense - NA$1150-2800/ha
- Exponential increases occur in 5-8 years
Gorse
- Arrived with umans in early 19th century
- Spiny (deters grazing), persistent seed bank, and fire adapted
- Major weed problem for about 100 years
- Impacts survival of threatened and endangered species
- Major weed of pine plantations
- High DE for site preparation and over-sowing with “introduced” grases and legumes for Gorse suppression
- DE and LEO costs - NZ$14.7 million + NA$23.3 million = Total NA$38 million
Scotch Broom
- 2nd most important woody weed
- Candidate for classical biological control
- Introduced beetle Gonioctena olivacea
- On-farm benefits from biocontrol
- NA$1.8 million (DE) + NZ$4.8 million (LEO) = NZ$6.6 million
- Impact on forestry - 1.5 million
- Costs for both Gorse and Broom additive despite similar ecologies and control programs
- Impacts conservation lands
- Across all sectors, NZ$5.3 million for control (DE) annually
Old Man’s Beard
- Destructive vine of forests
- Damages revegetation plantings and potential problem for pine plantations
- Biocontrol program costs 1-2 million dollars over 6 years
- DOC DE - 4.3 million/year
- Would biocontrol be a better investment than the current defensive expenditures?
- Calculated contingency valuation: The willingness to fund research for expected benefits
- Results of postal survey - 50-124 million dollars
- Amount projected by survey contrasted sharply with amount spent
- Take home message is New Zealanders value their native forests and biodiversity
Thistles
- Bull thistle, Cirsium vulgare
- Major problem for agriculture, especially improved pastures
- Seeds are transported in shipments of hay
- Estimated DE + LEO = NZ$13 million
Giant Buttercup
- Important weed of dairy pastures
- Dairy products represent significant part of New Zealand’s export economy
- LEO - NZ$145 million in 2002
- Resistant to herbicides
- Fungus developed as bioherbicide
Alternate Funding
- Alternatives to general taxation include extensive weed control efforts on conservation lands
- Taxation
- Volunteer labor; DOC covers travel expenses
- Levy tax on horticulture producers
- Kiwi fruit - New invader
- Growers pay control costs before releasing new crop and ornamental plants, more likely to protect native biodiversity
Summary
- Total costs for DE is about NZ$276 million
- LEO for uncontrolled weeds about NZ$302 million
- Average cost/weed species is about NZ$1.5 million
- Based on 200 weeds intensively controlled
- DOC spends NZ$20.3 million
- 328 plants on 33% of New Zealand’s landscape
- Costs should be borne by growers of cultivated plants that later become invasive
- There are enormous costs for weeds in New Zealand when biodiversity losses are included
- Investment in biological research and implementation is paying off
Module 4
Alien Invertebrates in New Zealand
Introduction
- About 2200 alien invertebrate species established
- 90% of invertebrate pests are alien species
- Significance of problem resulted in new legislation
- Biosecurity Act of 1993
- Establishment of government post, which is Biosecurity Minister
- New Zealand’s definition of biosecurity
- “Protection from risks posed by organisms to the economy, environment, and people’s health, through exclusion, eradication and control
- Vespit wasp and clover root weevil
- Two most significant invaders since early 1970s
Ecolgical Impacts
- In general, few alien invertebrates have a significant effect on native biota
- “...Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence…”
- Some exceptions
- Introduced social wasps
- Argentine ant
- Hybridization of native and introduced blue butterflies
- Parasitism of red admiral butterfly by ichneumon wasp
- Certain biological control agents
- Direct economic losses (LEO) from 4 key invertebrate pests equal to NZ$195 million - NZ$380 million
- About 55% total losses from all pests
- Total DE is $242 million
- Specific examples
- Successful biocontrol of Argentine stem weevil decreases losses to about $80 million
- Clover root weevil is about $300 million
- Total cost for all alien invertebrate pests calculated to be about $880 million
- Livestock invertebrate parasites
- Intestinal nematodes and sheep flystrike cause flesh-feeding fly maggot infestation
- DE ($145 million) + LEO ($1.2 billion) = $1.36 billion
Features of Invertebrates Incursions
- Numerous alien invertebrate pests, about 2 per year
- Pastures - Clover root weevil, Argentine stem weevil, New Zealand grass grub, lucerne aphid, black beetle, lucerne flea beetle
- Horicultural pests - Codline moth, European red mite, light-brown apple moth
- Succesful border interceptions
- Asian gypsy moth and Mediterranean fruit fly
- “Hitchhikers” not associated with commodities elude detection
- Certain pests caused < damage than expected due to climate limitations
- Black beetle from South Africa, tropical grass webworm
- Climate change could increase pest distributions
Examples
Argentine Ant
- Discovered in 1990
- Impacts in the U.S., Australia, and South Africa
- Disrupts ecological/symbiotic relationships
- Possible international trade bans
- New Zealand government funding for national survey of ant distribution and control options
Mediterranean Fruit Fly
- Monitoring system using pheromone traps in place before pest intercepted
- Successfully eradicated in 1996 with insecticide-laced protein baits at DE $5.3 million
White-Spotted Tussock Moth
- Unexpected, since it’s not a pest in its native range
- Eradication program using Btk implemented to protect forests
- Cost of eradication is about $12 million
Painted Apple Moth
- Detected in 1999, native to Australia
- Wide host range impacts natural areas, forestry, and horticulture
- Localized spraying with insecticide; infested vegetation destroyed
- DE - $2.5 million
- Threat to native Kowhai tree
- Biosecurity lessons learned
- No contingency funds for emergency response
- Risk analysis needed for native flora and fauna
- Communication among agencies needed
- Role of public in discovering invaders
Mosquitoes
- Southern Salt Marsh Mosquito
- Discovered in 1999
- Vector of Ross River Virus
- Asian Tiger Mosquito
- Vector of dengue fever
- Eradicated
Varroa Mite
- Discovered in 2000
- Brood parasite of Asian hive bee
- Eradication rejected in favor of management plan
Case Study Incursions
- Lucerne pests like weevil and aphid
- Analysis focused on spread rather than local densities
- Two key features
- Latent period typically exhibited by plants
- Outbreak followed by decline are typical of animals, follows boom-and-bust pattern
Lucerne Root Weevil
- Discovered in 1974, came from Australia via Europe
- High initial density followed by decrease
- Drought followed by classical biocontrol from parasitoid introduced in 1982
- Decline in lucerne production
Blue-Green Aphid
- Similar pattern but reasons for decrease not clear
- Density-dependent, decrease in host plant condition after 1st season
- Effect of parasitoids (1977) minimal
- Ditto generalist predators
- Aphid-resistant lucerne varieties
- Decline in lucerne abundance
Common Wasp
- Discovered 1983
- Probably arrived 19702
- Most widespread of 4 established species
- Displacing German wasp (introduced 1943)
- Success of social wasps as invaders
- Queens are transportable goods
- Globalization of trade
- Production of 1000s of workers following single mating
- Short generation time and high reproductive rate
- High dispersal capacity
- Survival in range of habitats and climates
- Lack of natural enemies
- Broad host range
- Absence of competing queens during invasion process
- Invasion process and German wasp displacement
- 1991 - German species widespread but common wasp generally more abundant
- Co-exist generally, common wasps are better competitors
- Beech forests support highest common wasp populations
- Trees attacked by scale insects and produce honeydew
- Niche partitioning means common wasps forages on plants, German wasp in forest litter
- 1991 - German wasp species widespread but common wasp generally more abundant
- Co-exist generally, common wasps are better competitors
- Honeydew better source of protein, making higher queen quality
- Common wasp renews honeydew more efficiently before fermentation
- Ecological impacts
- Compete with native birds and invertebrates for food
- Native bird species are Kaka, Tui, Bellbird
- Population reduction of native invertebrates
- Populations of native caterpillars and spiders at risk
- Honeydew removal affects nutrient cycling and perhaps tree health
- Reduction in carbon flow from honeydew to soil microorganisms
- Microorganism composition altered at base of trees
- Compete with native birds and invertebrates for food
- Wasp management response
- Threat to conservation and ecotourism
- Major wasp control effort
- Protein-based poison bait effective if reinvasion occurs
- Biocontrol attempted by introducing parasitoid is unsuccessful
- Beauvaria fungus bait shows promise
- GMO wasp gut bacteria increases pathogenicity
- SIT approach under consideration to irradiate queens to make them infertile
Clover Root Weevil
- Discovered in 1996 but arrived in 1994
- Overlooked dur to similarity to lucerne weevil
- Discovered by accident and has different pheneology
- Lucerne weevil is univoltine
- Clover weevil is bivoltine
- Explained higher population densities
- High densities from wet spring conditions
- Greater damage and higher overwintering population
- Implications for irrigation schedules
- Economic impact
- Damage white clover because larvae feed on roots
- Threat to clover pastures and seedling survival
- N-fixation by roots increase protein levels
- Implications for grazing industries, especially dairy
- Clover replaced animal-based protein feed
- Prevent mad cow disease
- Economic cost of loss of clover N-fixation is NZ$300 million
- Management response
- Develop management program with 3 components
- Short-term cultural practices by farmers
- Examine cultivation and fallow periods
- Testing insecticide exclusion barriers are ineffective
- Methods of clover re-establishment by over-drilling because weevils relish seedlings
- Coating seeds with pesticides is ineffective
- Clover-resisant varieties
- 250 lines selected and evaluated for 3 years
- Some indication of resistance or tolerance to weevil
- Biological control is classical or pathogens
- Lucerne weevil parasitoid tested, ineffective
- Recent surveys in Europe show different lucerne weevil parasitoid ecotype, promising candidate
- Pathogen research
- Beauveria fungus, bacillus bacterium
- Combine with aggregation pheromones for developing “Attract and infect” technology
- Develop management program with 3 components
Summary
- Need for better interception and monitoring programs
- Developing research and management programs is difficult
- Involving farmers early on garners support
- Recognition of importance of collaborative research with Europe
- Abundance of clover resource indicator of potential pest problems
Environmental and Economic Costs of Alien Vertebrates in New Zealand
Introduction
- Isolation is extreme flora and fauna endemism
- Dominated by birds and reptiles
- Except for birds, no native land mammals except for bats, which can fly
- Last habitable land mass for humans
- Polynesian settlers brought ecological disaster
- Maori people brought dogs and rats
- 35 bird species were hunted to extinction
- Rats eliminated flightless insects and reptiles
- Later, Europeans introduced over 90 vertebrates
- 32 mammals, 36 bids, 19 fish
- Sheep and cattle beneficial
Ecological Costs
- About 9 native bird species now extinct
- Predation by introduced mammals (rats, cats, stoats)
- Predation and competition by mammals threaten native reptiles and frogs
- Introduced salmon and rainbot negatively impacting native fish pops
- Largely ignored popularity of fishing
- Illegally introduced rudd and koi carp which are noxious and under management
- Possums, deer, and goats impacting flora
- Selective browsing of native plants
- Rats, cats, and stoats are agents of faunal changes
- Target vulnerable and slow-breeding animals by large invertebrates, ground feeding birds
- Large flightles birds are especially vulnerable like the brown kiwi, New Zealand’s national bird
- IUCN Red List shows 69 of 287 birds (24%) threatened
- Highest of any country
- Surviving only on mammal-free islands
- Bertram’s approach - Review
- DE (Cost of prevention and control)
- LEO (Loss of economic output)
- Welfare loss (New category)
- Pest presence + impact on conservation lands
- Devensive expenditures (DE)
- Prevention includes quarantine and border-control cost
- Control includes research, pest control, and surveillance
- New pest introductions rare
- Investment in prevention (NZ$184 million)
- Surveillance/Response (NZ$45 million)
- Includes plant diseases, invertebrates, and vertebrates
- Large central government expenditure for controlling established vertebrate pests
- Bushytail possums are vectors of bovine TB
- Total cost for possum TB research for 2008 - 2009 - NZ$82 million
- Major programs include eradicating alien mammals from large islands - NZ$2.1 million
- Campbell Island - Cattle, sheep, and rats
- Raoul Island - Goats, rats
- Kapiti Island - Possums, rats
- Codfish Island - Possums, rats
- Enderby Island - Rabbits and mice
Production Losses
Possums
- Losses to agriculture, forestry, and erosion control plantings - NZ$52 million
- 5% loss of pine plantings - $282/ha
- Immense potential damage to economy from transmission of bovine tuberculosis
- Exports of produce, beef, and venison threatened from import restrictions of trading partners
- Dairy produce earns > $3 billion
Rabbits and Hares
- Losses ot agricultural production, horticulture, and forestry - $6.8 million
- Displacement of sheep - $50 illion
- Illegal introduction of Rabbit Calicivirus Disease (RCD) in 1996 temporarily shrank rabbit populations
- Hare populations up as rabbit populations decline
- One alien lagomorph displacing another
- Hares damage forestry plantations through seedling browsing
Other Vertebrates
- Pigs, ferrets, rodents, and certain birds impact local production
- Pigs prey on lambs, minor bovine TB vector
- Ferrets are minor bovine TB vector
- Rats and mice are pests of stored products; food industries and households
- Sparrow, starlings, rooks, blackbirds, mynas, finches damage fruit and other crops
- Total production losses from minor pests (and insects) is NZ$10 million
- Alien vertebrates threaten natural environment and native species
- Accumulation in food chain of toxins control vertebrates
- Conflicting interests with hunting and other groups (e.g. deer, chamois, wild horses)
- Public resistance means use of anticoagulants
- Fear that toxins used on possums and rats will accumulate in deer and pig pose risk to hunters and dogs
- Deliberate introduction of “biocontrol agents” to control alien vertebrates
- Rabbits controlled by weasels, myxomatosis, RCD
- Vectors of human disease
- Possums, rodents, and hedgehogs carry Leptospirosis, Salmonella
- Possums carry Ross River Virus carried by Aedes mosquito
- DE (medicines, sanitation)
- LEO (lost working time)
Summary
- Estimated costs from all pests and weeds is NZ$3.4 billion
- DE - $1 billion
- LEO - $2.4 billion
- Alien vertebrates is $845+ million
- 25% of LEO ($600 million)
- 20.7% of DE ($245 million)
- Major drain on New Zealand’s economy
- 0.48% of GDP
- Intoducing alien species should never be taken lightly
- Follow “precautionary principle” - Alien introductions harmful unless proven otherwise
Module 5
Alien Plants in the British Isles
Introduction
- Only one previous attempt quantified native and invasive weed costs
- Based primarily on herbicide costs
- 2 new approaches
- Study on how to measure alien species impacts
- Application of GISP economics program
- Critical aspect
- Understanding how costs arise and policy options for minimizing them
- Less emphasis on actual dollar values
Number of Alien Plant Taxa
- Exact numbers of alien and native plants unknown
- Hybrids and microspecies exacerbate problem, make it worse
- Many fertile hybrids
- Critical species are more difficult to identify
- Rubus fruticosus has about 400 microspeices
- Hieracium complex has about 250 microspecies
- Number of “native macro species”
- Range from 1311 - 1552
- Reasonable estimate, 1400 - 1500, consistent with ecological flora database
- Uncertainty about nativity of some plants
- Those “invading” 5000 - 10000 years before present time
- Presence of pollen grains in post-glacial deposits suspect
- E.G., corn flower, Centaruea cyanus
- Uncertainty of alien status
- Difficulties with terminology
- E.G., casual vs. established vs. persistent
- Adoptiong of “10s rule”
- 10% of alien plants become casual
- 10% of casuals become established
- 10% of established become persistent
Equating Impacts with Costs
- Lonsdale Equation: I = R x A x E
- I = overall impact, R = Range size, A = Abundance, E = Effect per unit
- When one of the 3 equation components is negligible, overall impact and total cost will also be negligible
- Applicable to many alien plants
- Other quantifiable measures - Weediness
- Perception by scientists
- Cost of herbicides
- Incidence
Overview of Alien Plant Taxa
- Based on 30 non-indeginous plants
- “Prus cost” is cost estimate for these plants
- Costs are pounds sterling/year and its natural logarithm, e.g. 1 million or 13.816
- Species costs based on 3 variables
- Value of herbicide sales
- Cost of application
- Cost of cultivation
- Species costs based on 3 variables
- Control costs for all plant species, not just agricultural weeds
- Fundamentally, Prus cost
- Derived from herbicide costs
- Rate of spead calculated from sample survey estimates
- Only 9 weed species of the 30 (about 30%) of national importance
- About 99% of Prus costs attributed to 3 arable weeds
- Avena spp., Veronica persica
- Other species are cause for concern
- Crassula helmsii - Aquatic weed
- Buddleja davidii - Potential environmental weed
Impact and Cost Estimates
- Abundance
- Measured by Sheffield survey method
- Stratified random sampling
- Presence of each species in 1m^2 quadrats
- Identified 3 plant categories
- Native
- Planted
- Introduced
- A is log of abundance plotted against rank
- Therefore, costs for both categories the same
- Measured by Sheffield survey method
- Range size
- Distribution of alien plants typically smaller than natives, implies its still spreading
- More restricted range for aliens, making impact costs less than natives
- Rate of spread
- 100 to 200 years to reach maximum spread not uncommon
- Forest trees take 1000 to 2000 years
- Order of magnitude difference depends on effectiveness of human dispersal
- 2 extensive surveys on 30 species over 30-year period
- 10 non-significant, 6 significant at 5%, 2 at 1%, and 12 at 0.1%
- Six most aggressive species in Figure 5.1 of course textbook
- Thus, current cost estimates underestimate future costs
- Since 1960 - 16 species expanding ranges
- Epilobium, Heracleum, Fallopia, Elodea, Buddleja
- 100 to 200 years to reach maximum spread not uncommon
Summary
- Impact of alien plants same as native when measured by abundance or weediness
- Range of aliens less than native, but still spreading
- About 9 species account for major costs
- Weed control costs over 200 million points
- Most agricultural weeds
- Costs for natives are double that for aliens
Non-Native Invasive Arthropods and Plant Pathogens in the British Isles
Introduction
- About 30,000 non-native species brought by humans over a span of 10,000 years
- Some exotic species cause major losses to agriculture, forestry, and the environment
- 26,000 plants introduced into Britain
- Native flora comprises only 1600
- Most plant and vertebrate introductions intentional
- Arthropod and microbe introductions accidental
- About 5000 - 10,000 invertebrates representing 150 species imported annually
- Origin: Philippines, Costa Rica, Madagascar, El Salvador
- Since 1970s, rate of biotic invasions up significantly
- Causes: Human population growth, rapid modes of travel, environmental disturbances, increased international trade
- Impacts difficult to assess, meaning about 50% of native species undescribed
- Over 40% of threatened and endangered species are at risk of extinction due to competition and predation by non-native species
- Estimating economic impacts of non-native arthropods and plant pathogens difficult
- Sufficient data available to quantify impacts on agriculture and forestry
Insects and Mites
- About 1500 insect and mite pests cause economic damage
- About 30% non-native
- Insects and mites damage about $3.2 billion in crops annually
- Alien arthropods cause 30% of losses, about $960 million
- Several recent examples of non-native arthropods impacting British Isles
Mediterranean Climbing Cutworm
- Introduced on Chrysanthemum cuttings
- Native to subtropical areas of Africa, Europe, and near east
- Caterpillars grow to 5 cm
- Consume large amounts of vegetation
Western Flower Thrips
- Attacks over 244 plant species (polyphagous)
- Major pest of greenhouse crops
- Difficult to control due to insecticide resistance
- Geographic range expanding
Tobacco Whitefly
- Endemic to Central and South America
- Also, polyphagous (attacks about 500 crops)
- Poinsettias often infested
- Targeted for biological control with parasitic wasps
Leaf Miner
- 2 exotic species established in Britain
- Exhibiting resistance to pyrethroid insecticides, which is a cause for concern
Colorado Potato Beetle
- Native to the Western US
- Pest in potato production areas
- Resistant to most insecticides
- Global warming could increase damage to potatoes
- Predicted to increase range by over 100%
- Damage expected to increase by 76%
Cynipid Gall Wasps
- 4 exotic species attack native and introduced oaks
- Damage to oaks is serious
- Larvae create a gall on plant tissue and steal nutrients from gall
- Gall wasps attacked by native parasitic wasps
- Provide some level of control
Forest Pests
- In total, 29 insect pests attack forest trees
- 18 species (62%) non-native
- Major effort underway to employ different control technologies
- Adopting IPM practices should decrease damage and losses from insect pests
- Estimated losses of forest products attributed to invasive insects, about $2 million
Plant Pathogens
- About 74% of crop plant pathogens introduced
- Hitchhikers on seeds and other plant parts
- Economic loss from pathogens $2 billion
Fireblight Disease
- Bacterial pathogen native to North America
- Attacks following plant genera
- Chaenorneles, Cotoneaster, Cretaegus, Cydonia, Malus, Pyracantha, Pyrus, Sorbus, and Stranvaesia
Potato Late Blight
- Responsible for Irish potato famine
- Causative agent: Phytophthora infestans
- Introduced into Ireland in 1845
- Caused 25% yield loss
- Following year, disease was severe
- 80% of potato crop destroyed
- During this time, about 25% of Irish population died from starvation, equaling 2 million people
- Another 1 million emigrated to the US
Summary
- About 26,000 plants, animals, and microbes introduced to Britain
- Not much known about environmental and economic impacts
- Invading insect pests and pathogens cause estimated $5 billion damage to crops and forests
- Climate change may increase attacks on crops by non-native and native pests
Module 6
Economic, Environmental, and Social Dimensions of Alien Vertebrates in Britain
Alien Species and Invasion Process
- Reasons for importing alien vertebrates
- Sport (fishing, hunting)
- Domestication as pets
- Livestock for food, fur
- Most vertebrate introductions intentional
- Most vertebrates introduced for acclimatization
- Enriching the fauna of Britain, animals and plants from around the world
Alien Species and Invasion Process - Determinants of Invasion Success
- Arrival and establishment
- Effect of invasion pressure especially relevant
- Number of individual introduced and number of introductions
- Propagule pressure
- Effect of invasion pressure especially relevant
- Spread
- Dispersal ability, intrinsic rate of increase
- Mobility
- Climate and habitat matching
Alien Species and Invasion Process
- General rules for vertebrate invasions
- Islands more susceptible than continents
- Simple communities more vulnerable than diverse complex communities
- Invasions are natural processes and deliberate/accidental introductions
- Indegenous species enhanced or replaced by non-indegenous species
- Accidental escapees
- Deliberate releases of animals in captivity
- Supplementing species for conservation purposes
- Impacts of alien vertebrate species
- Consumption of other species via predation or herbivory
- Competition with other species
- Introduction or maintenance of disease
- Interbreeding with native species
- Physical/chemical environmental disturbance
Overview of Vertebrate Introductions
Mammals
- Introduced terrestrial mammals account for about 46% of extant terrestrial mammals in Great Britain
- Introduced early in human history, then later by Romans and Normans
- Introductions are accidental or deliberate
- Majority of introductions during late 19th - 20th centuries
- “Ornamental” escapees from private estates
- Fur production
- Deliberate introductions
Birds
- Mobility makes it hard to determine origin
- Uncertainty about native range
- Problem worsened by supplementing native populations, eg. waterfowl
- British Ornithologists’ Union Records Committee (BOURC) avoids native vs. introduced terms
- Preference for apparently natural state
- Introduced species are 10% of breeding bird fauna
- Pheasant for food and sport
- Little owl for biocontrol of small mammals
Reptiles and Amphibians
- Introduced species comprise 33% and 57% of total fauna of each group
- Virtually all pet escapes
- Reptile species
- Red-eared terrapin
- Wall lizard
- Aesculapian snake
- Amphibian species
- Midwife toad
- Edible and marsh frogs
- Alpine and Italian crested newts
- African clawed and yellow-bellied toads
- Bullfrog
Fish
- In total, 55 fish species found in Britain
- 13 established species (24%) introduced
- Sunbleak introduced in 1990s for ornamental purposes and escaped
- As a group, most affected by introductions
- Native ranges of some species obscured
- Genetic diversity compromised
- Major conservation issue
- Sport and/or ornamental purposes are main reasons of deliberate introductions
- Examples of fish introduced for sport
- Rainbow trout, brook charr, carp, ide, wels, zander
- Examples of ornamental introductions
- Goldfish, koi carp
- Accidential introductions
- Bitterling, tilapia, and guppy
Economic Impacts
- Consumption of other species or crops
- Rabbit, grey squirrel, fallow and sika deer, reeves muntjac impact forestry and agricultural crops
- Rats and house mouse contaminate stored food
- Mink prey on poultry, gamebirds and fish stocks
- Canada geese consume and trample crops and grasslands
- Exotic fish (wels and zander) prey on smaller native fish
Economic Impacts - Disease Introduction or Maintenance
- Rats and house mouse most important
- Historically, ship rats vectored bubonic plague
- Important vector of human and livestock diseases
- Common rat - Salmonellosis, leptospirosis, cryptosporidiosis, toxoplasmosis, yersiniosis and foot-and-mouth disease
- Sika, fallow and muntjac deer - Bovine tuberculosis, foot-and-mouth disease
- Ferrets, mink, native badger, and common rat - Bovine tuberculosis
- Feral sheep and goats - Foot-and-mouth disease
Economic Impacts
- Interbreeding with native species
- Sika deer and native red deer - Reduction in size of hybrid
- Gray squirrel, house mouse and fat dormouse
- Fat dormouse - Damage electric cables, roofing, and ceiling plaster
- Gray squirrel - Enter loft spaces and cause similar damage
- Rabbit, fallow deer, common rat, feral pig and canada goose
- Feeding activities damage agricultural crops
Environmental Impacts
Environmental Impacts - Consumption of Other Species
- Herbivory by mammals detrimental to native vegetation, especially woodlands
- Heavy deer browsing removes middle layer of regenerating trees
- Detrimental to small mammals and invertebrates but possibly beneficial to birds, causing creation of ecotone
- Heavy deer browsing at low densities (5/km^2) inhibits natural woodland regeneration
- Coppice woodland especially vulnerable
- Areas subjected to regular cutting to encourage suckering
- Flow-on effects on invertebrate populations
- Rabbits, if not excluded, negatively impact land restoration projects
- Mink implicated in decrease of water voles, coots, moorhens, and ground-nesting seabirds
- Predation on seabird nests and chicks leads to breeding failures of native gulls, terns, lapwings and redshanks
- Feral cats significantly impact bird populations, decimate 33% of house sparrows
- Overgrazing by Canada geese hurts reed beds and salt marshes
- Introduced fish hurt native newt, frog and toad larvae, some mammals, and diving birds
- Heavy deer browsing removes middle layer of regenerating trees
Environmental Impacts - Competition with Other Species
- Native red squirrel and grey squirrel
- Red squirrels < efficient foragers in deciduous woodlands
- Grey squirrels attain higher densities due to faster breeding rates
- Grey squirrel removal causes increase in number and distribution of red squirrel
- Competition between introduced mink and native otters are beneficial to otters
- Introduced trout and carp impacts aquatic communities
Environmental Impacts - Introduction/Maintenance of Disease
- In general, no evidence that introduced vertebrates transmitted new diseases
- Exceptions
- Alien fish species introduced to supplement native stocks for recreation increased disease in fish populations
- Parasitic worms in pheasants harmful to native gray partridge
Environmental Impacts - Interbreeding with Native Species
- Three introduced mammals implicated: Feral ferrets, cats, and sika deer
- Ferrets and native European polecat
- Feral cats and native wildcats
- Hybridization occurring for several hundred years
- Does not appear to have bad effect on population persistence
- Sika deer and native red deer
- Able to maintain species integrity where allopatric populations occur
- Hybrids better competitors in dense woodland, may replace red deer
- Ring-necked pheasant and lady Amherst’s pheasant
- Both introduced, not conservation threat
- Ruddy duck and native white-headed ducks
- Fertile hybrids lead to extinction of white-headed ducks
- Italian crested newt and great crested newt
- Viable hybrids but low fertility, making it a dead end
- Marsh/edible frogs and pool frogs
- Pool frogs may not be native
- All 3 capable of interbreeding
- Male pool and female marsh frogs make edible frogs
- Edible and pool frogs make green frogs
- Fish hybridization is a frequent occurrence
- Movment of native and introduced species helped by humans
- 3 hybrids
- Brook charr and native trout
- Ide and native bream
- European carp and native crucian carp
Environmental Impacts - Environmenal Disturbance
- Rooting behavior of feral pigs affects ground cover flora and diversity
- In Hawaii, feral pigs feed on invasive strawberry guava, spread seeds
- Invasive fruit flies feed on rotting fruits
- High pheasant populations disturb soil and increase nutrient loads, causing more weeds
- Feeding behavior of carp increases water turbidity, reduces light available to aquatic plants
Environmental Impacts - Environmental Benefits
- Rabbits
- Significantly increase floral diversity and rare butterfly population
- Provide 75% of diet of mammalian predators
- Mandarin duck - Britain provides refuge for alien populations of this bird
- Brown hare has action plan developed to increase numbers and range
Social Dimensions
Cultural Associations
- Public bias towards charismatic pests makes invasive species management contentious
- Perception is some invasive species more desirable to save than others
- Hedgehog
- Wading bird populations in Scotland leads to egg predation
- Protected species in Britain
- Hedgehog culling raises outcry from animal rights groups and public
- Popularity of hedgehogs ended culling project in Scotland
- Wild boar
- Extinct in Britain about 700 years ago from overhunting, habitat loss
- Re-established for hunting, leading to escapees, wild boar farms
- Negative public response due to fear of human attacks, although no confirmed reports
- Fear of wild boars subsided due to decrease in hunting opportunities
Public Attitudes
- Cultural background affects how humans perceive the natural world
- Bias in conservation research/management projects
- Knegtering et al. (2002) study
- Birds more likeable than mammals
- Invertebrates least liked
- Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) give species characteristics, taxon and relative size in support for/against conservation
- Attitudes towards invasive species based on species type, impact, and proposed control method
- Response to lethal control methods mixed
- Acceptable if controlling livestock predators
- Aversion for hunting, justifiable for protecting rare speices
- Negative effects of non-lethal methods make lethal methods justifiable
- Separation of society from processes of food production affects emotional repsonse to wildlife
Social Benefits
- Improving community wildlife awareness
- Re-establish children’s connection with nature and wildlife conservation for future generations
- Positive promotion of environmental awareness is important for increasing urban populations
- Aesthetic characteristics of invasive species
- Invasive grey squirrels promoted for community wildlife awareness instead of native red squirrel
- Media plays role in shaping attitudes
- Recreational activities
- Hunting birds and mammals for food and sport
- Pheasant, red-legged partridge, Canada goose
- Sika deer, rabbit, wild boar
- Pheasant hunting is a multi-billion-pount sport industry
- Hunting birds and mammals for food and sport
Analysis and Conclusions
Impact of Environmental Change
- Native speices 15,000 years ago
- Vertebrate fauna species poor in ice age
- Native mammalian fauna, mixture of European and Scnadavian origins
- Number of mammalian introductions over all other taxa
- Birds more abundant
- Crane in Britain, 1981
- Habitat change is most important driver of invasive species populations
- Increase in broad-leaved scrub and woodland cover from biomass energy sources
- Improved habitat for deer populations
Anthropogenic Native Species Extinctions
- Extinction of about 33% of Britain’s native fauna caused by human actions
- E.g., reindeer, elk, brown bears, lynx, wild boars, beaver, and wolf
- Effects of competition
- Non-native birds, amphibians, and fish faring better than mammal invaders
- Control and mitigation costs
- Environmental damage difficult to quantify
Control and Mitigation Costs
- Deer is 2.5 million pounds
- Shooting more cost-effective than fencing
- Rabbits 30 million pounds per year
- Rodents 15.3 million/year (rodenticides)
- Feral cats 2.6 million (trapping, neutering)
- Game birds
- Canada goose, primarily shooting (license fees)
- Ruddy ducks 3.4 million pounds for eradication
- Pheasants, sport shooting generates about 800 dollars per day/hunter
- Amphibians and fish have no relevant data
Vertebrates and Invasion Theory
- Invasion pressure affects number of introductions
- Populations often enhance artificially through rearing programs
- Pheasants, carp, rainbow trout
- Tens rule: 10% of introduced establish, 10% of those become pests
- Curent vertebrate populations exceed rule if environmental impacts added to economic
- Rabbits impact British ecosystems
- Other vertebrate populations increase thanks to habitat and climate change
Changing Attitudes About Nature
- Current thinking is that humans are part of the natural world, not separate from it
- Increase concern for animal welfare
- By working class, not aristocracy
- Disdain for scientific use or leisure purposes
- Anti-hunting and fishing
- Formation of numerous animal rights groups
- Consequence of less emphasis on eradication of invasive species
- Public concern for squirrel and rabbit control
Future of Britain’s Alien vertebrates
- Alien species compromise about 50% of current mammalian and avian faunas
- Some species positively contribute to environment and economy
- Others impose significant costs
- 230 million pounds
- Rabbits cause most damage
- Monitoring is necessary for other species that may be increasing
Invasive Plant Pathogens in Europe
Introduction
- Late 19th century, grapevines and potatoes destroyed by pathogens
- Great invasions lead to development of the field of plant pathology
- First, regulatory measures considered
- 1891, Danish plant pathogen first to propose measures prohibiting importation of contaminated plants and seeds
- 1951, IPPC established framework for phytosanitary measures against invasive species, formation of EPPO
- EPPO developed international strategy preventing introduction and spread of plant pests affecting agricultural and natural areas
- EU established in 1993, integrated quarantine pest lists and phytosanitary measures
- Currently, about 300 quarantine pests identified, many are plant pathogens
- IUCN invasive species: Species with potential impact on biodiversity (excludes pathogens affecting crops)
- Recognizes only 3 pathogens
- Dutch elm disease
- Phytopthora disease, which affects 900 trees
- Chestnut blight
- Does not include pine canker disease (DAISIE only)
- Recognizes only 3 pathogens
Recent Pathogen Inventories
- Reencounter effect
- Pathogens introduced decades/centuries after crop plant leads to loss of resistance
- Exemplified by potato blight in Ireland
- Narrowing of genetic diversity in crop plants, which favors fungal attacks
- New pathogens emerge as virulent pathotypes of established species
- Examples
- Yr17 yellow ruse in Europe
- Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe (DAISIE) consortium
- First inventories of alien species in Europe
- Highest number of pathogens in France, UK, Germany, Italy
- Level of imported goods is best predictor
- Origin of pathogens is North America and Asia
- French inventory
- About 230 fungi recorded since 1800
- Ecological categories: Plant pathogens > mycorrhiza > sapotrophs
- >50% attack woody plants
- 3 important disease groups have wind-borne dispersal and visible damage
- Downy mildews
- Powdery mildews
- Rusts
- UK inventory - 1970 - 2004
- About 230 fungi, bacteria, phytoplasma, viruses
- About 80% fungi, most on ornamental species
- About 230 fungi, bacteria, phytoplasma, viruses
- New detections in greenhouses and protected agriculture
- Transport of contaminated plant material from the Netherlands
Cultivated Plants - Downy and Powdery Mildew
- Introduced from US in the 19th century
- Threaten grapevine and wine production
- Fungicide use mandatory, up to 90% usage
- Total cost for France >180 million french dollars for 600,000 ha
Cultivated Plants - Potato Late Blight
- Main potato disease in Europe
- Fungicide use 59% of total worldwide
- Yield losses about 35% without fungicides
- Annual losses in Ireland about 8 million pounds annually
- 4 countries account for most potatoes
- UK, Belgium, France, Netherlands
- First observed in 1870 and then in 1883
- Carried on potatoes imported by Europeans
- Can cause about 70% reduction in susceptible potato varieties
Economic Impacts
Fungi and Oomycetes
- Forestry and amenity trees
- 4 fungi attack trees with significant impacts
- Dutch elm disease 124 million
- Unspecified pathogens 1.8 billion
- Canker stain of plane trees (sycamores)
- Introduced by American military in WWII
- Highly virulent, affects urban plantings
- Tree removal mandatory for infected tree and two neighboring trees, replant with resistant trees
- Economic impact 1700 per tree
- Spreading to natural forests in Italy
- 4 fungi attack trees with significant impacts
Bacteria and Phytoplasma - Flavescenece doree
- Phytoplasma disease of grapevines
- Vectored by beetle Scaphoideus titanus
- Effects magnified by wine production loss
Bacteria and Phytoplasma - Potato Brown Rot
- Bacterium, Ralstonia solanacearum R3 B2
- Quarantinable ad mandatory eradication
- Native alternate host, Solanum dulcamara in UK
Bacteria and Phytoplasma - Fire Blight
- Bacterium attacking fruit tree orchards
- Introduced from North America during 20th century
- Introduced in Switzerland about 1989
Viruses - Plum Pox (Sharka Disease)
- Threatens prunus spp.
- Plums, cherries, peaches, apricots, and almonds
- Discovered in Switzerland in 1967
- Cost of 1st eradication campaign cost 340 million
- Estimated fruit losses
- Europe last 30 years, 5.4 million
- Mediterranean last 20 years, 576 million
- Worldwide costs 10 billion
Ecological and Predicted Pathogen Impacts
Ecological Impacts
- Natural tree area underestimated
- Mortality caused by Dutch elm disease in the UK
- About 50 million elm trees (mature and young)
- Comparable losses in Europe, Asia, and North America
- Costs of losing irreplaceable species
- Loss of ecological services and biodiversity difficult to quantify
- Economic and ecological impacts are highly correlated, should be assessed together
- Data available for provisional impacts, data on cultural impacts scarce
- 20% loss of ecosystem services in France
- 1.4% loss in “forest value” from fungi
- 400-800 million annually
- Mortality caused by Dutch elm disease in the UK
Predicted Pathogen Impacts - Pest Risk Analysis
- Pest Risk Analysis: Process of evaluating evidence to determine whether a particular organism is a pest, whether to regulate it, and strengthen phytosanitary measures
- ISPM provides guidance for PRA
- EFSA performs PRAs for EU
- PRAs often lack transparency and repeatability
- Wheat Karnal bunt fungus, EPPO A1 list
- Potato spindle tuber viroid, “A2”
- Detected in solanaceous ornamentals, Brugmansia, S. Jasminoids
- Pepino mosaic virus on glasshouse tomatoes
- PRATIQUE - 2008
- Translation - enhancements of pest risk analysis techniques
- EU funded project to overcome lack of sufficient data to conduct PRAs
- Objective is to enhance techniques for assessing economic, environmental, and social impacts of quarantinable pathogens
Predicted Pathogen Impacts
- Future prospects
- Drivers of increase in invasion rates
- UK - Number of ornamental and crop pathogens introduced since 1970s not increasing over 5-year periods
- France has lower invasion rates, 2 new species annually
- Species alien to UK are indigenous to EU
- Rate of introductions exponential since 1800s for all of EU
- Drivers of increase in invasion rates
Emerging Plant Pathogens
- Bacterial watermelon fruit blotch
- Seed-borne disease
- Reported from Greece, Israel, Hungary, Turkey
- Common ash dieback
- Fungus of ash trees discovered in Poland
- Pine wood nematode
- Native to North America
- Threatens European forests
- Currently impacting forests in Asia
- Intercepted in packing material
- Disease outbreak on Portugal’s maritime pines
- Sudden oak death fungus
- Spreading in commercial nurseries and forests
- Riparian alder fungus
- Virulent hybrid of 2 less aggressive forms
- Tomato yellow leaf curl virus
- Vectored by whiteflies
- Damage vegetable crops, especially tomatoes
- Outbreaks result in total crop failure
- Linked to spread of whiteflies, range expansion via global warming and international trade
Plant Pathogens Absent From Europe
- Citrus greening (HLB)
- Severe citrus disease
- Vectored by Asian citrus psyllid
- Poses high risk to the Mediterranean
- Citrus canker
- Prohibition on importation of citrus plants
- Pierce’s disease
- Primary disease of grapevines
- Threatens grape and wine production
- Insect vector (glassy-winged sharpshooter) not present in Europe, transmission not vector specific
- Prohibition on importation of grapevines
Summary
- Invasive plant pathogens threaten cultivated and native plants
- Old pathogens still have major impacts
- Less fungicide use and more sustainable methods of disease management required
- Native plant communities vulnerable due to increased international trade
- Strict enforcement of quarantine rules
- Quarantine lists on PRAs must be updated
- Need to consider pathway approach for preventing pest and pathogen movement
Module 7
Invasive Patterns of Alien Terrestrial Invertebrates in Europe
Introduction
- Invertebrates are the majority of living organisms and major invasive species problem
- Compared to other major countries, Europe is not concerned about invertebrates
- No checklists of alien species produced until last decade
- Recently introduced economic pests raising awareness of problem
- Corn rootworm, Asian long-horned beetles, Asian tiger mosquito, pine wood nematode, horse chestnut leaf miner
Key Factors
- Weakening customs and border controls within EU facilitate spread between countries
- DAISIE project
- Initiated in 2005
- Compiled a pre-2008 inventory of alien species in Europe
- Revealed dominance of alien plants (55%) followed by invertebrates (23%)
- In 2010, a total of ~1,600 alien arthropods identified
Asian Connection
- Asian insect herbivores are better colonizers
- Arthropods (mainly insects) comprise ~94% of alien fauna
- ~14% cryptogenic
- Cosmopolitan species of uncertain origin
- Most invertebrates unintentionally introduced
- Ornamental and aquarium plants, cut flowers, stored products, fruits and vegetables, wood products, soil, animal husbandry, used tures, etx.
- E.g., Asian tiger mosquito
- Only 14% of alien arthropods purposefully introduced
- Silk production, pet arthropods, food for pets
- Biocontrol agents
- Harlequen and ladybeetle
- Parasitic wasps
Trophic Patterns
- Trophic: Feeding patterns
- Herbivorous insects are the dominant group
- ~50% via explosive plant trade
- Establishment of alien vertebrates
- Exponential increase since 16th century
- Acceleration since late 20th century
- Disestablishment of internal customs procedures following 1993 formation of EU records introduction and spread
- Major groups of woody plant invaders largely undetected
Asian Connection Redux
- Asia is a major source of alien invertebrates since early 20th century
- Moths and bugs originate from Asia
- Mites, wasps, and flies from North America
- In general, dispersal of detritivores is greater than herbivores, predators, and parasitoids
- Once established, spread of alien invertebrates surprisingly slow
- On average, dispersal linearly correlated with establishment duration
- Exception in subterranean termite
- Still only present in France after 200 years
Alien Vertebrate Distribution
- European countries differ in total numbers of alien invertebrates
- Italy, France, and Great Britain lead all other countries
- Number reported, positively correlated with key factors
- Surface area
- Macroeconomic variables
- Road network size
- Volume of merchandise and agricultural imports
- National wealth and human population density
- Intensively disturbed habitats
Human Role
- Alien invertebrates and human-modified habitats
- Disturbed urban areas have lower resistance to invasion
- Lack of natural enemies
- Less vigorous host plants
- Some species prefer human habitats in native range
- Example Asian long-horned beetle
- Restricted to urban areas planted with poplar
- Found in natural forests dominated by maples
Impacts of Alien Invertebrates
- Modified composition of European fauna
- 30 new families since alien arrival
- Dramatic change in guild composition likely to affect ecosystem structure and function
- Phytophagous insects dominate alien fauna, some with serious consequences
- Pine wood nematode threatening pine forests
- Emerald ash borer threatens ash forests in Russia
- Red palm weevil attacks endangered palm species
- Seed wasps reduce yield of rose seeds
- Biocontrol non-target impacts
- North American aphid parasitoid displacing 2 Mediterranean congeners
- Asian ladybeetle harmonia reducing niches of native ladybeetles
- Beekeeper impacts
- Hornet serious bee predator in France
- Varroa mite is a bee parasite
- Economic impacts
- Serious pests of agricultural, horticultural, and forestry
- In the UK, US $960 million
- Fore the entire EU, estimated losses of 10 billion
- Regulatory measures exclude Colorado potato beetle and Western flower thrips
Colorado Potato Beetle
- Defoliator: Removes leaf tissue from the plant
- Global warming could exacerbate damage to potatoes
- Predicted to expand range by >100%
- Damage expected to increase by 76%
Western Flower Thrips
- Causes curling in leaf tissue prevents plant from completing development
- Attacks >244 plant species (polyphagous)
- Major pest of greenhouse crops
Impact of Alien Vertebrates - Human and Animal Health
- Asian tiger mosquito nuisance and disease
- Rat fleas transmit viruses and bacteria
- Chewing lice are cryptogenic pests of poultry and mammals (skin infections in dogs and sheep)
- Ticks cause irritation and are disease vectors
- Spiders bite humans
- Endoparasites of veterinary importance
- Nematodes and flatworms affect livestock, game animals, and humans
- Mites affect birds and humans
- Cockroaches cause asthma and diarrhea, and transmit diseases
Impact of Alien Invertebrates
- Since 2010, ~1400 alien insects recorded in Europe
- Three alien insect orders dominate the landscape
- Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera account for ~75% of total
- Taxonomic composition of alien fauna differs
- From native fauna
- Hemiptera 3x more represented in alien than native
Module 7
Impacts of Alien Vertebrates in Europe
Introduction
- Alien species imported for various purposes
- Domestic pets
- Recreation (hunting, fishing)
- Food
- Once introduced
- Reproduce
- Establish self-sustaining populations
- Disperse
- Expand populations
- Without natural enemies, impact invaded ecosystems and humans
Mammalian Introductions
- Began in Neolithic period (9000 - 8000 years BC), wild animals associating with humans
- Since 1500, ~88 alien mammals introduced to Europe
- ~20 native to some other part of Europe
- ~70 native to Asia and North America
- 72% alien mammals established
- Introductions increased exponentially since mid-1800s
- Majority introduced for hunting
- Improvement of local fauna
- Currently, 59 species invasive in Europe
Alien Mammal Impacts
- Economic
- Damage crops, impact livestock, humans
- Ecological
- Competition, hybridization, predation
- Rats, mink, and nutria cause highest environmental impact
- Economic impacts evenly distributed among 15 families
- Health impacts include disease transmission
- Environmental impacts include herbivory
- Economic impacts include livestock and forestry
Alien Mammal Impacts - Biodiversity Impacts
- American mink and raccoon dog
- Carnivore and omnivore
- Prey on native birds, mammals, and amphibians
- Compete with native mammals for food and den sites
- Mink linked to decline of 30 native species
- Sika deer
- Introduced for hunting and ornamental value
- Heavy foliage browsing decreases understory biodiversity
- Hybridization with native red deer
- Transmission of nematode parasites to native deer
- Grey squirrel
- Rapidly expanding population in Italy
- Outcompetes native red squirrel
Alien Mammal Impacts - Economic Impacts
- Muskrats and nutria burrow into riverbanks and damage sugar beet crops
- ~12 million in Germany and Italy
- Mink impacts chicken production and fisheries
- Raccoon dog damages vineyards in Ukraine
- Sika deer damages oats, soybean, and corn crops in UK and Switzerland
- Also, forest plantations
- Fallow deer likewise damage vegetable, fruit, grain crops, tree plantations
- Gray squirrel strip off tree bark
- Tree death or inferior wood products
- Damage to broad-leaved trees > conifers
- ~87% tree stands affected
- European rabbit
- 11th century, Romans and Normans
- Damage to crops, tree plantations, vineyards
- In 1980s, total damage in UK 130 million pounds
Alien Mammal Eradications
- Most control and eradication efforts target mammals
- Cause greater impacts than other vertebrates
- Several successful eradications
- Coastal islands of Britain, Spain, Portugal, France, Italy
- Species targeted include rats, mink and rabbits
- 4-point global strategy
- Description of problem
- Performing and monitoring eradication efforts
- Assessing impacts on native species
- Establishing protocol for preventing new invasions
- Fewer eradications on mainland Europe
- Legal support, public awareness and funding inadequate
- Grey squirrel eradication opposed by PETA groups in Italy and Great Britain
- Successful eradication of nutria in Britain
- 1929 - Introduced for fur farming
- 1950s - Populations up to tens of thousands
- 1981 - Successful trapping program
- Legal support, public awareness and funding inadequate
Predicted Impacts and Management
- 35% range expansion of several mammals since 2000
- Mink, nutria, sika deer, raccoon
- Species with localized distributions good candidates for eradication
- Siberian chipmunk impacts grain and nut crops in Italy, UK, Germany, Netherlands, and France
- Well-organized eradication programs could be effective
- Preventing sale of potential invaders in pet shops limits new introductions
Bird, Reptile, and Amphibian Introductions
- ~200 bird species introduced since 1850
- Most species since 1940s
- In total, 55 reptiles and amphibian species, slower rate than birds
- Highest numbers of non-mammalian vertebrates in western Europe
- Many introductions intentional
- Hunting and fishing
- Improving local fauna
- Escaped pets and zoo animals
Impacts of Birds
- Documented impacts for ~46% of alien breeding bird populations
- Economic includes agricultural damage (grains, fruits)
- Biodiversity includes competitive interactions
- Declines, predation or hybridization with natives
Impacts of Birds - Examples of Biodiversity Impacts
- Ducks, geese, and swans
- Damage shoreline habitats
- Pollution of water bodies
- Competition for breeding sites
- Hybridizing with native waterfowl
- Genetic introgression meaning extinction
- Ruddy duck and white-headed duck
- Sacred ibis
- Predator of water birds and amphibians
- Rose-winged parakeet
- Displaces native cavity nesting birds
- House crow and common myna
- Both listed as “100 of world’s worse alien species”
- Native species declines via predation and competition
- Disease vectors of humans and wildlife
Impacts of Birds - Examples of Economic and Human Impacts
- Canada geese
- Reduce crop yields by 20%
- Airplane collisions
- Pheasants
- Introduced for hunting - Positive impact
- Damage grain crops - Negative impact
- Alien bird eradications
- Ruddy duck and myna targeted
Future Predicted Impacts
- Major impact associate with certain traits
- Invade variety of habitats
- Produce > 1 brood per season
- Form large feeding or roosting flocks
- Future bird, amphibian, and reptile introductions
- Consequence of pet trade
- Imported wild-caught birds infected with Avian flu banned in 2005
- To date, only 12% of alien birds established in 1 country have spread beyond that country
- Effect of climate change
- Most introduced as pets or food
- Major impacts include loss of biodiversity
- Predation
- Competition
- Pathogen transmission
- Impacts of amphibians 2x that of reptiles
- American bullfrog
- Invades wide range of habitats
- Feeds on native frogs, snakes, and turtles
- Vectors fungus responsible for amphibian
- Declines worldwide
- Successful local eradications in UK, Germany
- Common slider turtle
- Feeds on native reptiles, amphibians, small mammals, birds
- Competes with native turtles for resting and basking sites
Prioritizing Alien Invasive Birds
- Impacts on biodiversity
- Impacts on economic resources
- Impacts on human health and well-being
- Quantifying impacts
- Minor impact
- Major impact
Summary
- Advantages of objective ranking system
- Prioritize species with limited funding
- Rankings can be updated when new information becomes available
- Species with limited distributions have eradication that is feasible and cost-effective
- Widespread species require coordinated effort between countries and public education
Module 8
Alien Plant Pathogens in Brazil
Introduction
- First crop plants introduced by Portugese explorers in 16th century - Citrus, sugarcane, wheat
- Cultivation of other crops occurred later - Coffee, bean, maize, fruits, vegetables, grain
- Seedlings of these and other crops - Introduced over the next 400 years without phytosanitary standards
- Biotic causes of diseases not understood until late 19th century - Koch’s postulates
- Koch’s postulates
- 1890, Robert Koch, German bacteriologist
- Cause-and-effect relationship between pathogen and disesase
- Procedure
- Pathogen - Isolated from host with disease and grown in pure culture
- Disease - Reproduced when pure culture pathogen is inoculated into susceptible host
- Pathogen - Recoverable from experimentally infected host
- Favorable environment and susceptible hosts - Introduction and establishment of numerous pathogens
- Fungi, bacteria, nematodes, and viruses
- Consequences of pathogens
- Yield losses, increased production costs, environmental pollution, toxicants, lower crop market value
- Energy loss, low seed emergence, decreased nutritional value, long fallow periods
- Total losses ~$6.9 billion
Impacts
Agricultural Practices
- Low crop productivity
- Social and economic considerations
- Substinence growers account for 80% of rural farms
- Lack of technical assistance and resources
- Poor disease management - Large yield differences for bean crops (>2.5x)
- Small farms - 700 kg/ha
- Commercial farms - 1800 kg/ha
Cultural Practices
- Contribute to pathogen spread, soil degradation, and environmental pollution
- Practices include
- Intensive soil use, poor sanitation, planting monocultures, insufficient crop rotation, and inefficient irrigation
- Create ideal conditions for air and soil-borne pathogen epidemics
- Higher disease intensity from minor pathogens
Major Crop Pathogens in Brazil
Soybean Pathogens
- Soybeans cover 40% of grain area
- >40 pathogens cause $1 billion in losses
- Yield reduction, decreased quality, poor seed emergence
- Major diseases include soybean stem canker, cyst nematode, and late foliar disease complex
- Stem canker discovered in 1988 - Resistant varieties
- Cyst nematode detected in 1992 - Improved cultivation practices
- Foliar diseases - Fungicides
Maize Pathogens
- Demand for animal feed increased maize crop areas and second harvest (safrinha)
- Safrinha - High inoculum pressure
- Plant diseases main constraint to crop production and yield loss
- Phaeosphaeria maydis discovered in 1902
- Key pathogen due to crop residues, susceptible varieties
- Kills smaller maize plants, reduces kernel size
- Since 1995, increase in maize and bushy stunt, fine stripping disease
- New cercospera leaf spot recorded
Common Bean Pathogens
- Grown year-round with short continuous rotations
- Intensive cropping creates ideal conditions for foliar diseases
- Anthracnose, angular leaf spot, rust fungus
- Increasing dependency on foliar fungicides leads to problems with soil pathogens
- Sclerotinia sclerotiorum most important soil-borne pathogen
- First recorded in 1920
- Severe epidemic in 1976 in Parana state
- Present in all bean crop areas
- Can cause 100% yield loss
Rice, Wheat, and Small Grain Pathogens
- Rice blast - Most important disease of rice
- Yield loss - Can reach 100% if not managed
- Found infecting wheat and rye in 1985
- Small grain diseases increased during transition from traditional to no-till systems
- Crop residue accumulation on soil surface, increase in leaf spotting pathogens
- Seed treatment with fungicides and crop rotation - Effective in controlling speckled leaf blotch (Septoria tritici)
Vegetable Pathogens
- Solanaceious, cucurbits, carrot, and lettuce crops intensively cultivated year-round
- High production costs, susceptibility to pathogens and chemical dependency
- Leading vegetable crop is potatoes
- Susceptible to major alien pathogens
- Tomato varieties and hybrids also vulnerable
- Poorly adapted to Brazil’s environment
- Disease outbreaks - Poor sanitation, improper chemical spraying, continuous production
- Viruses and nematodes - Tropics
- Increase in tomato Geminivirus diseases since 1997 - Spread of whitefly (Bemisia spp.)
- Low productivity from Geminivirus infection - Tomato pinworm problems
- Greenhouse crops - Monocultures and high plant density, vulnerable
- Eggplant and bell pepper crops - Weekly fungicide sprays to manage powdery mildew
Tropical and Temperate Fruit Pathogens
- Fruit spot and decay diseases from pathogens - Major constraints to fruit exports
- Leaf and fruit spots - Native pathogens
- Nematode and protozoa - Examples of alien pathogens affecting coconuts
- Grape vine canker detected in 1998
- Infects red globe and seedless grape varieties
Orange Pathogens
- Citrus production since 1930s
- 80% of orange crop - San Paolo and Minas Gerais states
- Main diseases A2 pathogens
- Limited distribution and under control
- Citrus canker, variegated chlorosis and black spot
- Chlorosis disease discovered in 1987
- Spread by leafhoppers and infected seedlings
- Fruit with no market value, $130 million in losses
- Genome sequencing to control disease, $15 million
- Citrus canker first reported in 1957
- Infected stems introduced via Southeast Asia
- Spread exacerbated by citrus leaf minder
- Caused $500 million loss from 1998 - 1999
- Tree removal required for disease eradication
- December 2000 - Disease foci reduced from 4,000 to only 67; 98.3% reduction
Banana Pathogens
- Brazil is 2nd leading producer and 1st consumer
- Black Sigatoka disease found in 1998
- Most destructive disease of bananas and plantains
- Spread by infected plants, fruits, or conidia on tires, wood, and clothes
- 100% yield losses for high-priced banana cultivars and 60% for plantains
- Controlled by fungicinddes but requires 40 spray applications at $1000/ha
- Restriction on movement of infected fruit best tactic
Phytosanitary Standards, Chemical Control, and Future Trends
Phytosanitary Standards
- Rigid federal laws to prevent entry and spread of exotic pathogens in Brazil
- No laws establishing seed health
- Legislation held up by seed industry lobby
- Tolerance levels to adventive pathogens
- Individual states - Make and enforce laws
- Intraspecific pathogen diversity and high inoculum levels decrease viability of resistant varieties - Breaks down in 2 - 5 years
Chemical Control
- All fungicide and antibiotic sales target alien pathogens
- Southern and southeast regions - 72% of fungicide consumption
- Sao Paulo state responsible for 33%
- Many growers began chemically treating seed in 1990s
- Increases crop yields and reduced need for field spraying
- Field spraying - Economically feasible for small grain crops
- Multiple sprayings - High-value potato crops
- Inadequate training of growers
- Spraying without establishing disease thresholds
- Use of non-registered fungicides
- Wrong spray nozzles/no calibration of sprayers
- Container storage and disposal guidelines ignored
- 1990 - Potato and tomato crops - 41% of fungicides sold, followed by citrus (19.6%) and coffee (11.3%) - High risk of environmental pollution
- Illegal practice of “chemigation” - Threat to environment
Future Trends
- Prevent entrance of new pathogens
- Improve nation’s plant inspection system
- Develop efficient methods for detection
- Establish laws to regulate plant transport
- Improve control of established pathogens
- Adopt efficient IPM practices - Disease resistant varieties, improved cultivation techniques, and proper fungicides
- Expanding organic market - Reduction and/or elimination of pesticides
Invasive Vertebrates in Brazil
Introduction
- Brazil is characterized by six diverse ecosystems
- Amazon (forest)
- Cerrado (grassland)
- Caatinga (desert)
- Pantanal (wetlands)
- Pampas (open-field)
- Atlantic rainforest
- Suffer from human disturbance and loss of biodiversity from habitat fragmentation and invasive species
- Interchange of flora and fauna since the 1500s
- Invasive species defined by CBD (1992)
- Introduced species - Spread without human assistance and threaten natural environments outside original range
- First documented invasive species
- Insect: African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae
- Reptile: House gecko, Hemodactylus mabouia
- Fish: Carp, cyprinus carpio
- Establishment of government and non-governmental databases to document invaders
Invasive Fish, Amphibians, and Reptiles
Invasive Vertebrates
- Fish and mammals compromise the highest proportion of Brazil’s invasive vertebrates
- ~138 (2.1%) non-marine vertebrates considered invasive in Brazil
- Fish (4.3%)
- Mammals (2.5%)
- Reptiles (0.7%)
- Amphibians (0.4%)
- Birds (0.2%)
Fish
- 9% of all freshwater fish species worldwide - Native to Brazil (233 species)
- 109 species of freshwater bony fishes - Invasive in Brazil
- Main causes for exotic introductions
- Improvements of culture ponds, aquariums
- Sport fishing and mosquito control
- Unintentional elimination of natural barriers from hydropower impoundments
- Life history attributes - Affect invasion and establishment success
Invasive Fish Families - Characidae
- Most abundant family; neotropicla origin
- In total, 17 species invasive in upper Parana basin, both lentic and lotic habitats
- Lentic - Lakes, ponds, etc.
- Lotic - Rivers, streams, etc.
- Exceptional swimming ability contributes to invasiveness
Invasive Fish Families - Cichlidae
- Cosmopolitan group
- Second most important invasive freshwater
- Fish group with 15 species
- Mainly lentic species
- Introduced into Brazil for aquaculture
Invasive Fish Families - Cyprinidae
- Third most important invasive freshwater
- Fish group with 14 species
- Worldwide distribution - Native to Eurasia, Africa and North America
- Also introduced into Brazil for aquaculture
Invaisve Fish
- In total, 26 species of extra-neotropical origin stocked as sport fish or dish culture
- Guppies (Poecilia) and Ramirezi (Mikrogeophagus) introduced as aquarium fish
- Widespread in 6 hydrographic regions
- Guppy introduced into Brazil for mosquito control
- Currently, stocking of non-native fish in public waters forbidden
- Tilapia and African sharp tooth catfish - Most widespread exotic fish in Brazil
- Important in fish culture and adaptable to tropical climates
Native Transposed Fish
- Many native species transposed since 1960s
- Movement from amazon basin into other regions of Brazil
- Example: Golden dorado
- Drastic consequences for native species displacement
- Voracious feeding habits impacting 2 native Brycon species
- Hydropower impoundments often associated with biological invasions
Amphibians
- 3 frog species considered invasive in Brazil
- Labyrinth frog
- Common bullfrog - Introduced for raniculture
- Pipid frog - Pet trade
- Exotic species but invasive status debatable
- These frogs constitute ~33% of Brazilian amphibian fauna
- Labyrinth frog of neotropical origin, whereas other 2 species of extra-neotropicla origin
- Overall, number of invasive amphibians - Low relative to other vertebrates
Reptiles
- In total, 5 invasive species in Brazil - Represent <1% of reptile fauna
- Gekkonid lizard
- Most widespread in urban areas
- Host for parasites of native fauna
- Sand lizard
- Widespread in Restingas (sand-dune habitats)
- Well-established populations
- Teiid lizard
- Introduced in 1950 for biocontrol of mice and rats
- Poses threat to terrestrial birds (egg predator)
- Water tortoises (2 species)
- Former pets - Escaped or released into natural areas
Invasive Birds and Mammals
Birds
- 4 bird species invasive in Brazil
- Blue fronted parrot (Amazona aestiva) - Population established on Santa Catarina island
- Pigeon (Columbia livia)
- Common waxbill (Estrilda astrild) - Native to South Africa, introduced by merchant sailors
- Sparrow (Passer domesticus) - Established on all continents, introduced to Brazil in 1906 to control mosquitoes in Rio de Janiero
- Pigeons and sparrows - Ecosystem impacts
Mammals
- In total, 16 invasive species, primarily from Asia and Europe
- Rodents (rats and mice) - Introduced via ships during the discovery and colonization period
- Dogs and cats - Introduced and widespread
- Eradication feasible - Castration combined with other lethal methods
- Prey poisoning and viral disease
- Problems with lethal control methods
- Non-target impacts
- Rejection by local residents
Mammals - Feral Cat Impacts
- Cause major declines in small vertebrate populations
- Reservoir host for several diseases
- Carnivore tapeworm, Toxoplasmosis (native species)
- Sarcosporidiosis (sheep)
Mammals - European Hare
- Introduced in S. America - Late 19th century
- Competes with native rabbit species
Mammals - Feral Pigs
- Introduced by settlers in 16th century and/or late 19th century during Paraguayan war
- Recognized as pests worldwide
- Negatively impact ecosystems
- Transmit diseases
- Potential to displace native Brazilian Peccaries
- Considered wildlife and protected by law
Mammals - Goats
- Arrival in Brazil not by European settlers
- Introduction occurred via 2 steps
- Undefined breeds - 16th to 18th centuries
- Arrival of modern breeds - Late 19th century
- Largest populations in Northeast Brazil
Mammals - Water Buffalo
- Introduced in late 19th century
- Used for meat and diary production
- 1.6 million heard in Brazillian Amazon
- Environmental wetland damage
- Government ignored risks associated with water buffalo in Pantanal region
Mammals - Invasive Mammals Native to Brazil
- How can there be invasive mammals invasive to Brazil?
- They were moved from one region of the country to another (transposition)
- Common and black-tufted marmoset
- Captured and sold as pets
- Negatively impact bird populations, lizards, tree frogs and mammal infants
- Destroy native forests
- Hybridize with 6 native congeners
- Leads to extinction by loss of gene pool
- Golden-headed lion tamarin
- Listed by IUCN as endangered species in Bahia state
- Survival depended on captive breeding program started by a veterinarian
- After his death - Captives released into local municipal park in Rio de Janeiro State
- Now, native congener threatened with extinction
- Compete for resources and hybridize with native congener - Weakening gene pool
- Rock cavy
- Introduced on the island of Fernando do Noronha in the 1960s as wild game for military
- Feeds on fruits, seeds, and roots
- Destroys entire bushes or trees by gnawing at base
- Exposes soil to erosion and/or establishment of invasive plants
Pooled Vertebrate Effects, Economic Impacts, and Summary
Pooled Vertebrate Effects
- Only ~2% of Brazil’s vertebrates invasive
- Lack of good data
- Population sizes
- Distribution
- Effects on native organisms
- Invasive species documented in all states
- Invasive species highest in states of eastern Brazil
- Most vertebrate invasions result from - Intentional introductions, watershed alterations, or adventive occurrences
Economic Impacts
- To date, no comprehensive economic estimates of invasive species impacts in Brazil
- Ecosystem damage caused often exceeds economic benefit
- Invasive species often harbor/vector human and animal diseases
- Increases health care costs
Summary
- Development of strategies for coping with invasive species problems crucial
- Development of action plan
- Identification, monitoring, eradication, and control
- Strict control of alien species entering country
- Governmental regulations for propagation
- Investment in research
- Mapping and distribution studies
- Develop eradication techniques
- Economic analyses
Module 9
Invasive Plants on the Indian Subcontinent
Introduction
- Frequency of plant invasions accelerated and human-driven
- In practice, hardly any barriers to prevent plant invasions
- Plants moved from one region to another
- Food, medicine, timber, furniture, ornament
- Demand for international trade in plants
- Two examples native to tropical America
- Lantana camara - Intentionally moved for ornamental value
- Parthenium hysterophorus - Human-aided unintentional introduction
- Climate change, habitat disturbance exacerbate problem
- Alien plants threaten native ecosystems
- Alter plant communities
- Reduce biodiversity
- Change soil structure
- Impact human health
- Invasive plants adaptable and undergo genetic changes from selection pressure
- Invasive plants: Ecological and economic impacts
- Species and communities
- Species composition
- Community composition
- Abundance
- Habitat structure
- Rare and threatened species
- Hybridization
- Ecosystem properties
- Fire
- Alternative states
- Biogeochemistry
- Nutrient cycling and mineralization
- Detritus
- System drivers
- pH
- Geomorphology
- Ecosystem services (Social - Ecological)
- Water: Quality, quantity, retention, floods
- Wood
- Tourism and wilderness
- Other resources
- Economic impacts
- Direct economic loss
- Costs of control
- Species and communities
Indian Subcontinent and Plant Invasion
- India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and the Island of Maldives
- Largely tropical with diverse flora and fauna
- 3 major regions of biodiversity - Himalayas, western ghats, Indo-Burma region
- Great diversity of ecosystems and habitats - Grasslands, forests, wetlands, aquatic, and marine
- ~18% of flora alien, ~50% new world origin - In total, 173 invasive alien species, 117 genera, 44 families
- Origin - Tropical America, Africa, and Europe
- Several terrestrial and aquatic plants - Highly invasive and impact native ecosystems
Pathways of Invasion
- Globalization - Increased trade and travel
- 2nd most populated country
- Recent rapid economic development
- 3 general pathways
- Importation of commodities
- Arraival of transport vector (via humans)
- Natural spread from adjacent regions
- Other pathways
- Ship ballast
- Crop seed contaminants
- Carried by humans/animals
- Intentional introductions
- Contaminated machinery
Prominent Invasive Plants
- ~55 alien plants identified
- Represent all plant forms
- Herbs, shrubs, trees, grasses, vines, and aquatic plants
- Most native to tropical America
- Primarily members of the Asteraceae
- Several species - Widespread and create problems
- Giant reed, Arundo donax
Parthenium hysterophorus
- Entered India in contaminated cereal grains imported from U.S.
- Colonizes wide habitats and forms huge monocultures
- Invaded almost every Indian state
- Impacts
- Reduces native plant diversity
- Major cause of fodder famine
- Toxic to livestock
- Causes respiratory problems in humans
- Recognized as biological pollutant
- Health problems in humans and livestock
Ageratum conyzoides
- Billy goat weed
- Introduced in 1860s as ornamental
- One of the worst invaders of agricultural lands
- Invasive properties
- Fast growth rate
- Vegetative reproduction via stolons
- Produces numerous seeds
- Allelopathic
Chromolaena odorata
- One of top 100 species listed by GSID
- Introduced as ornamental in 1940s
- Interferes with crop production in Northeastern India
Lantana Camara
- One of top 100 species listed by GSID
- Introduced to India in early 19th century as ornamental
- Rapidly spreading into high altitudes - Especially Himalayas
- Invades variety of habitats - Forests, grasslands, agricultural fields, urban, and protected areas
- Strongly allelopathic and interferes with growth of various native plants
Mile-A-Minute Weed
- Creeping vine that smothers native vegetation
- Discovered in south Florida in November 2009
- Intentionally introduced to India
- Camouflage for airfields during WWII
Aquatic Weeds
- Water hyacinth, salvinia, alligator weed, water spinach
- Invaders of freshwater ecosystems and wetlands
- Water hyacinth, salvinia, and alligator weed native to South America
Invasive Trees and Shrubs
- Lead tree (Leucaena leucocephala)
- Leguminous shrubs introduced to India for agroforestry
- Form dense monocultures
- Enormous seed production
- Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora)
- Introduced to India for afforestation
- Prolific seed producer
- Form dense monocultures
Prominent Invasive Plants
- Several species purposely introduced
- Ornamental value
- Essential oils
- Timber production
- Medicinal purposes
- Chinese tallow (Triadiaca sebiferum)
- Native to China
- Spreading rapidly in the Himalayan region
- Listed by GSID as serious invader
Environmental Impacts
- Fast growth and rapid spread of alien plants alter ecosystem structure and function
- Nutrient cycling and fire regimes
- Little data in India to support ecosystem impacts
- Three examples from NW Himalayas
- Lantana, Parthenium, billy goat weed
- Jatropha
- Newly introduced biodiesel production major threat to agriculture and livestock
- Highly toxic to humans and livestock
Economic Harm
- Alien plants contribute to losses in agricultural production and control costs
- Market and non-market impacts
- Losses from Lantana - US$924 million
- Economic costs higher - Environmental impacts
- Habitat damage
- Loss of threatened and endangered species
- Extinctions
- Loss of ecosystem services
- Very few published studies quantifying economic costs of invasive plants
Future Outlook
- Several weeds widely established
- Others emerging as new problems
- Indian government - Developing new control and regulatory measure for excluding new species
- Preparing national databases
- Raising awareness of invasive species problem
- Determining pathways of invasion
- Coordinating efforts of government and NGOs for early detection
- Following international standards for excluding potential invaders
Alien Plant Pathogens in India
Introduction
- >70% of India’s human population - Agriculture/agriculturally based professions
- Plant diseases - Impact people and animals
- Modify habits, affect standard of living, impact India’s economy
- India’s famines - Crop diseases caused by introduced pathogens
- 1943 Bengal famine most devastating
- Caused by rice blight fungus
- >2 million humans died of starvation
- Plant pathogens - Introduced with seeds and propagation materials
- Some regulatory measures adopted to avoid introduction
- 1914 - Destructive Insect and Pest (DIP) Act
- Intended to prevent and eradicate alien diseases
- 1930 - 1956 - DIP Act revised 8 times
- 1914 and after - 13 diseases introduced
India’s Key Plant Pathogens
Plant Pathogens
- Impacts
- ~74% of crop plant pathogens introduced
- Hitchhikers on seeds and other plant propagation materials
- Economic loss from pathogens - $2 billion
- ~74% of crop plant pathogens introduced
Fungal Pathogens - Potato Late Blight
- One of the worst potato diseases worldwide
- 1845 - Potato famine, Ireland
- First observed in 1870, then in 1883
- Carried on potatoes imported by Europeans
- Can cause ~70% reduction in susceptible potato varieties
- Epiphytotics common in Punjab
- Weather conditions conducive to disease outbreaks
- Tuber yield reduced by 15% - 100%
- Disease still prevalent in Tamil Nadu state
Fungal Pathogens - Potato Wart
- Thought to be native to South America
- Also known as black wart, black scab, potato canker, and cauliflower disease
- 2nd most important potato disease
- 1952 - First reported on imported potato variety (furose) in Darjeeling, West Bengal
- Steps to eradicate disease (burning crops and chemical disinfection of soil) failed
- 1958 - ~50% of potato-growing area invaded
- 1959 - Ban on potato movement from West Bengal
Fungal Pathogens - Wheat Flag Smut
- Disease prevalent in wheat-growing regions worldwide
- 1868 - First identified in Australia
- 1918 - First reported from West Punjab (Pakistan), probably introduced from Australia
- Disease not widespread but important
- Persistent and under suitable conditions, disease becomes virulent
- Impacts - Reduced yield to crop failure
- Disease incidence up to 75% in northern India
Fungal Pathogens - Rice Brown Leaf Spot
- Disease prevalent in rice growing areas along the East coast subjected to monsoons
- Causes enormous losses
- 1919 - First reported from Madras (Chennai)
- Prevalent in all rice-growing areas
- Major epidemics
- 1943 - West Benhal had 90% yield losses
- Most devastating epiphytotic ever recorded
- Current yield losses range from 22,000 - 28,000 tons
Fungal Pathogens - Rice Blast
- Disease occurs worldwide ever since rice cultivated
- Earliest records from China, Japan, Italy
- Globally, considered most important rice disease due to huge yield losses
- 1913 - First reported in India
- 1919 - Major epidemic in Tamil Nadu
- Disease prevalent in coastal areas and upland rice most susceptible
- 1960 - Disease became insignificant in Northern India after introduction of semi-dwarf, high-yielding varieties
Fungal Pathogens - Sunflower Downy Mildew
- Introduced in India and other countries via seed trade
- Most important constraint to sunflower production
- 1984 - First detected in 1984
- Seedborne, soilborne, and airborne - Difficult to eradicate after establishment
Fungal Pathogens - Maize Downy Mildew
- 1967 - First reported
- In total, 9 different Sclerophthora spp.
- 5 species cause economic losses in SE Asia
- Disease caused by S. Rayssiae var. Zeae restricted to India
Fungal Pathogens - Tobacco Black Shank
- First detected in Dutch East Indies
- 1938 - Introduced
- Sporadically infects all types of tobacco grown under high rainfall or irrigated conditions
- Disease first appears on lower leaves during rain season
Bacterial Pathogens - Rice Bacterial Blight
- First reported from Philippines ~60 years ago
- Minor disease until 1950 when it impacted rice production in Japan
- First reported in India in 1951
- Disease most commonly affects foliage
- Major hurdle to increasing rice cultivation
- Crop losses can reach 50%
Viral Pathogens - Banana Bunch Top Virus
- Introduced from Sri Lanka ~1940
- Invaded large area
- Initially southern tip of India (Kerala)
- Spread northward along east coast (Assam)
- Virus restricted to this region
Viral Pathogens - Cotton Leaf Curl Virus
- Discovered in 1994 northwest region
- Punjab and Rajasthan
- Introduced from Pakistan
- At least 2 alternative hosts
- Indian mallow, Abutilon indicum (L.) Sweet
- Disease widespread throughout cotton growing region - Vectored by whiteflies
- Managed by planting resistant varieties
Viral Pathogens - Peanut Stripe Virus
- Seed-borne virus of quarantine importance
- Imported from China
- Responsible for significant crop losses
- Alternate hosts include soybean and cowpeas
- Vectored by an aphid, a sucking insect
Nematode Pathogens - Potato Cyst Nematode
- Golden nematode
- Important potato pest worldwide
- 1961 - First detected in southern India
- Apparently introduced from Britain in tubers and weed hosts
- Confined to potato growing region in Southern tip of India
Summary
- India is an agriculture-based country
- 5 - 10% crop losses attributed to introduced diseases
- Ministry of Agriculture formulated new policies for intercepting new diseases to prevent introduction/establishment
Module 10
Introduction
- Human activities promote intentional or accidental spread of invertebrates
- Agriculture
- Forestry
- Transporation
- 3 criteria for invasive species
- Must be introduced
- Must establish viable populations
- Cause economic or environmental harm
- 2 famous examples of invertebrate Indian introductions (biocontrol agents):
- Prickly pear cactus - Cochineal scale
- Cottony cusion scale - Beetle and fly
- Laid foundation for promoting interaction of invasive species
- Increased globalization leads to introduction of alien invertebrates into vulnerable agriculture and natural areas, increasing
- Climate leads to increased importance in limiting invasive species distributions
- Invasive species establishment occurs when
- Climate suitable
- Sufficient nutrients
- Opportunities for reproduction
- Alien invertebrates considered top 2 or 3 forces driving other species to extinction
- Cause negative impacts to
- Human health
- Economy
- Biodiversity
- Ecosystems
Economic Implications
- Without biocontrols, invasive species populations increase to damaging levels
- Susceptible habitat characteristics
- Provide food and climate like invader’s native range
- Characterized by disturbance (ruderal)
- Those with less biotic resistance factors
- Islands with fewer species
- Examples
- Luprops beetle in rubber plantations of Wester Ghats and northeaster India
- Invasions predicted by tracking leaf drop phenology
Economic Impacts - Examples
- Eucalyptus plantations invaded by gall-forming wasp from Australia
- Gall impacts tree species with long-rotation cycles
- Problem exacerbated by transporting infected seedlings to new areas
- Coconut eriophyid mites introduced in 1990s
- Gall-forming pest
- Coconut hispine beetle, a new pest
- Cotton mealybug
- Impacts cotton and other crops and ornamentals
- Papaya mealy bug, discovered 2008
- Wide host range
- Coral tree gall wasp, discovered in 2004
- Attacks ornamental and shade coral trees
- Provides support for black pepper vines
- High infestations cause tree mortality
- Golden apple snail
- Native to Brazil
- Invades rice paddies
- Intermediate host for parasitic nematode
- Causes EME in humans
- Emerging rice pests
- Rice water weevil is native to US and Canada
- Rice black bug
- Rice panicle
Economic Impacts - Important Agricultural Pests
- Leucaena psyllid, whiteflies, coffee berry borer
- Capable of migrating long distances
- Ecological and intrinsic factors influencing crop pest distributions
- Climate, soil, host plants, vectors, natural enemies, competition, genetic adaptability, and reproductive plasticity
- Bemisia Type B whitefly
- Attacks over 900 host plants
- Transmits over 10 plant viruses
- Serpentine leaf miner
- Introduced 1990
- Attacks over 100 hosts
- Pest of vegetables, castor bean, and ornamentals
- Green and brown leafhoppers
- Migrate long distances
- Invade virtually all suitable habitats
- Cashew thrips
- Native to South America
- Pest of cashew and mango
- Giant snail
- Worst pest of agricultural crops
Summary
- Invasive species important in structuring natural communities
- Invertebrates threaten ecological communities and global biodiversity
- Ecologist Donald Strong, biological control may be the only option for pests of grave environmental concern
UF/IFAS Weed Risk Assessment
How to Complete
- Collect as much data as possible before answering any questions
- BEWARE THE GOOGLE-HOLE!!!!
- Start with website searches
- Search Google up to 10 pages deep (5 is usually enough)
- Search journal articles with Web of Science and/or Google Scholar
- Open Excel
- Click ignore links
- NOTHING EVER GOES IN COLUMN D
- Answer questions in column C
- Y
- N
- UNK
- Score will automatically appear in Column D
- Give citations in “Reference”
- Provide date you accessed websites
- Put supporting data in “Source data” column
- Try to avoid direct quotes, summarize the data and put in your own words
Module 11
Economic Consequences of Environmental Impacts of Alien Plant Invasions in South Africa
Introduction
- ~9,000 plants introduced in South Africa
- Crops, timber and firewood, ornamentals, sand stabilization, and barrier/hedge plants
- ~750 trees, 800 shrubs, succulents, and herbs
- ~1,000 naturalized and ~200 invasive
- 161 plants (110 woody, 13 succulent, 38 herbaceous) highly invasive
- Concern about biodiversity conservation
- ~17,000 endemic vascular plants
- Contributing factors
- 350-year long colonial history
- Well-developed infrastructure
- Thriving agriculture and forestry sectors
- Until recently, emphasis on the history, ecology and management of invasive plants
- Little interest in economic aspects and invasion consequences
- Important milestone - Current and potential impacts on water resources
- Demonstrated economic benefits of intervention
- Establishment of a ‘working for water’ program emphasized control of alien plants to protect water
- Current and future water supplies
- Invested > $657 million from 1995 - 2009
Extent of Problem - Surveys in 1996 - 1997 to Map Invasive Plants
- ~10 million ha (1 ha = 2.47 acres) invaded by ~180 species
- Western Cape’s most invaded region
- Invasions concentrated in wetland regions
- Fynbos biome (Mediterranean-type shrubland) most invaded area, mainly acacia, hakea, and minus species
- Forest, grassland, and savanna biomes also heavily invaded
- Riparian systems invaded by syringa and jacaranda trees
- Nama karoo (semi-desert shrubland) invaded by mesquite, cactus, saltbush species
- Aquatic weed species include water hyacinth, water lettuce, Kariba weed, parrot’s feather, red water fern, and hydrilla
- Only water hyacinth and hydrilla not effectively controlled biologically
Environmental Impacts
- Most analyses anecdotal or correlative
- Comparing invaded with uninvaded sites or one site over time
- Few detailed studies, no manipulative experiments
- Chapin et al. (1996) invader categories
- Discrete-trait invaders (DTIS) - Add new function, e.g., N fixation, alleopathy
- Continuous-trait invaders (CTIS) - Differ only in traits (e.g., growth rates, litter quality) distributed among species
- Generally, greater ecosystem-level impacts from DTIS
Environmental Impacts - Most dramatic impacts in South Africa from DTIS
- Nitrogen fixing acacia trees altered nutrient cycling regimes in Fynbos
- Added new life form in a treeless region
- Caused ecosystem-level changes in
- Biomass distribution
- Plant density and height
- Leaf area index
- Litter fall and decomposition rates in stream flow
- Use ~10% of surface water runoff
- Threaten endangered plant species and altered bird distributions
- Other DTIS having major ecosystem impacts
- Chromolaena, schinus molle, prosopis
Environmental Impacts - DTI impacts in South Africa not only terrestrial
- Aquatic invaders grow rapidly, forming dense mats
- Examples: Water hyacinth and red water fern
- Negative impacts include
- Water loss via evotranspiration
- Oxygen depletion
- Reducing potable water quality and quantity
- Impeding navigation, blocking flood control structures and collapsing bridges
- Clogging irrigation and hydropower pumps
- Limiting access for recreation and fisheries
- Decreasing property values
- Mosquito breeding
Environmental Impacts
- Positive impacts - Water hyacinth
- Feed for livestock
- Mulch for crop production
- Fiber for paper and weaving baskets
- Biological filtration/nutrient removal
- Drawbacks
- Plant contains 96% water
- Harvesting expensive
- Promoting utilization leads to further spread
Economic Impacts - Cause of alien plant invasions
- Unintended consequence of economic activity
- Globalization of world economy
- Liberal trade laws and regulations
- Human behavior primary driver of plant invasions
- Facilitates establishment and spread
- Modern transportation, promoting trade of goods
- Large-scale conversion of natural vegetation (disturbance)
- Plant invasion tied to economics and ecology
- Credible economic assessments involve both market and non-market impacts
- Results must enable decision-makers to make the right decisions
Economic Impacts - Key elements for invasive plant control
- Institutional regulation of human behavior
- Appropriate policies and strategies
- Complications and challenges
- Difficulty quantifying invasions in economic terms
- Tendency to avoid problem until crisis occurs
- Conflict of interest species - beneficial and deleterious impacts
- Variability of net economic impact estimates - Scale, scope, timing, and approach
- Public good issue - Control measures under applied
Approaches to Economic Evaluation
- Invasive plants have both positive and negative impacts
- Need to identify who’s affected and whether effects are positive or negative
- In the 1990s, invasive woody plant impacts - Quantified in terms of effects on water resources
- Persuaded government to take the problem seriously
- Water in South Africa limiting factor
- Most studies report positive return on investment, especially role of biocontrol research
- Acacia industry - US$1.4 billion in water loss vs. less value of wood chips, etc
- Studies show invasive plant control makes economic sense
- Most benefits derived from curtailing spread, reducing densities, and mitigating future impacts
- Challenge for “conflicting interest” species
- Mesquite, positive and negative impacts - Loss of groundwater vs. livestock fodder, shade, shelter, and biofuel
Approaches to Economic Evaluation - Framework for Mathematical Model
- PVC = DBC - DCC + PEoBC - NEoBC
- PVC = Present Value of Integrated Control
- DBC = Present Value of Direct Benefits of Control
- DCC = Direct Costs of Invasive Plant Control
- PEoBC = Present Value of + Control Externalities
- NEoBC = Present Value of - Control Externalities
National Scale Assessment
- Alien plants degrade rangelands
- Replace palatable with unpalatable species
- Restrict access by livestock and ranchers
- Livestock carrying capacity decreased by 123 K LSU
- Invasive plant cost summaries
- Water-related losses - US$773 million
- Livestock grazing losses - US$45 million
- Biodiversity losses - US$57 million
- Total - US$867 million
Dealing with the Problem - Working for Water program
- Invasive plant control and social development
- Employs poorest people in communities nearest to alien plant infestations
- Increased income and nutrition
- Provided better clothing
- Increased educational opportunities
- Provided small business training
- Procurement of protective clothing, tools, and equipment
- Raised public awareness
- Social development program
- Child-care program for working women
- HIV/AIDS awareness campaign
- Prisoner release rehabilitation
Perscription for Success
- Actively manage invasive plant spread
- Use non-invasive species when possible, introduce biocontrol agents early on
- Use biocontrol to limit seed production of otherwise invasive species
- Recognize potential invaders early and implement precautionary measures
- Educate public about dangers and invasive species costs
- Encourage use of non-invaders for ornamentals
- “Alter-natives”
Case Study
- Economic Benefits of Red Water Fern Biocontrol
- Complete control in 2 years
Economic Advantages of Biocontrol
- Labor intensive clearing of invaders in the working for water program not sustainable
- Needed to develop program components to prevent reinvasion
- Biocontrol - One of the most cost-effective tactics for reducing invader impacts
- Of 46 weed species, 22 under complete or sustantial biocontrol
- Total cost for biocontrol from 1997-2000 - Only $3 million
- Returns on investment unprecedented - 50:1 - lantana, caesalpinia, chromolaena - 3726:1 - Australian acacias
- Including biocontrol as component of working for water program expected to reduce costs from $60 to $20 million per year - 67% cost reduction
Conclusions
- Alien plant invasions severe in South Africa and intervention programs justified
- Reduced biodiversity
- Changes in water flow
- Genetic hybridization
- Changes in fire regimes
- Loss of grazing lands
- Increase disease vectors
- Impacts pervasive and have important implications for humans and environment
- Unique aspect is ability to leverage further
- Benefits from control programs
- Funds for working for water program sourced from poverty relief budget
- Convincing economic assessments needed to maintain support
- Biocontrol offers considerable benefits, which significantly outweigh costs
- Most cost-effective intervention
- Subject of debate because introducing more alien species with some degree of risk
Alien Invertebrate Animals in South Africa
Introduction
- Compared to plants and animals, alien invertebrates are not well studied in South Africa
- ~56 insects introduced for biocontrol of weeds, >50% have documented impact
- Impacts on non-targets not well studied
- Invasive invertebrates causing large-scale negative environmental and health impacts
- Yet to invade South Africa, escaping notice, or not investigated
- Introduced crop pests receive considerable attention, $1 billion in losses
- Red scale, Mediterranean fly, and codling moth
Mediterranean Fly
- Ceratitis capitata - One of the most economically costly pest species
- Spread from native Afrotropical range to main fruit-producing regions
- First confirmed presence in South Africa - Late 1800s
- Successful establishment
- Polyphagous life-history
- Short development time
- High population reproductive potential
- Broad climate niche
- Larvae and probing by adult females cause most damage
- Fruit vulnerable to secondary infections by pathogens and pests
- Can lead to 100% crop losses
Argentine Ant
- Native to Argentina and Brazil
- Arrived ~1898 in cattle fodder
- Globally, invaded Bermuda, Mediterranean Europe, Southwest U.S., Chile, Western Australia, New Zealand, and Hawaiian Islands
- Established in Cape Peninsula
- Generally found in lower altitude sites and areas with established roads
- Not found in sites accessible only on foot
Argentine Ant - Environmental Impacts
- Displace native ants by aggressive behavior, chemical defense, abundance, and interference competition
- A few native species co-exist due to differences in foraging patterns, small body size, and stealth
- Disrupt mutualism by interfering with plants relying on native ants for seed dispersal (myrmecochory)
- Obligate Myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly caterpillars at risk
- Impact fynbos by affecting pollination
- Impacts on ground inhabiting insects unknown
Argentine Ant - Agricultural and Household Impacts
- Attracted to honeydew produced by Hemiptera
- Mealybugs, scale insects, and aphids
- Protect pest Hemiptera from natural impacts
- High densities in citrus and guava
- Presence of ants deters pollinators
- Beehives attacked and destroyed
- Outcompete bees for nectar by nocturnal activity
- Invade homes to forage for food and water
Varroa Mite
- Most serious 20th century bee pest
- Spread from Asia, benign on natural host Apis cerana
- A. Mellifera unable to tolerate ectoparasite
- Capable of killing entire honeybee colony
- Unique life cycle adaptations
- Fertile female invades uncapped cell and feeds on bee larva
- First egg is male, remainder female
- Male mates with sisters and dies
- Mother and daughters emerge with bee
- Drone (male) brood preferred over workers
- Spread between colonies by flight
Varroa Mite - Environmental and Agricultural Impacts
- Brood death and developmental abnormalities
- Virus also implicated in colony death
- Wild bee populations in Europe and US - Mite mortality
- May be less virulent to African honeybees
- Shorter post-cell capping developmental period - Limits mite reproduction
- African bees exhibit defensive behavior
- Less damaging under tropical conditions in South Africa
- Greatest impact on wild bee populations
- Implications for biodiversity
- Loss of plant species - Affects herbivores
- No natural enemies for mite
Varroa Mite - Economic Impacts
- So far, extremely damaging to colonies
- Loss of pollination to commercial crops and associated job losses
- Beekeeping will become difficult and expensive
- Reduction in colonies and wild bees available to commercial beekeepers
- Major impact on small-scale rural beekeeping
Spotted Stem Borer
- Chilo pertellus
- Native to Asia and India subcontinent
- First discovered in South Africa in 1958 after invading African continent in 1932
- Dominant in humid, coaster regions
- Recently, higher-altitude grain growing areas
- Displacing Busseola fusca
Spotted Stem Borer - Agricultural Impacts from Native and Introduced Stalk Borers
- Major pest of cereal crops
- Maize and grain sorghum
- Bivoltine (2+ generations) during summer periods
- Cereal crop losses between 10-100%
Spotted Stem Borer - Economic Impacts
- 44th out of 101 most important crop pests
- 7th most important lepidopteran pest
- High yield losses and control costs
- Insecticide costs - $2.5 to $7 million
- Effective only against first instar (exposed)
- High cost and limited effectiveness of pesticides led to the adoption of alternative methods
- Culturla control - Tillage control, interplanting with Napier grass (trap crop) - Reduction in maize (89%) and sorghum (94%)
- Biological control with parasitoids - None established, ineffective
Red Scale
- Native to Central Asia and India
- Major pest of citrus
- Introduced > 100 years ago
- Life cycle
- Female lives under a circular, reddish-brown covering
- First instars (crawlers) leave covering and infest fruits, leaves, twigs, and branches
- Become sessile
- Up to 3 generations annually
Red Scale - Agricultural Impacts
- Globally, most important pest in terms of control costs and research
- Attack various fruits and ornamentals heavy infestations on citrus and roses
- Losses based on severity
- Light infestation - Rejection of fruit for export
- Moderate - Fruit rejection, leaf and fruit drop
- Heavy - Unsalable fruit, defoliation and death
- Infestations tied to history of insecticide use
- Sprayed with organophosphates (OPS) in 1948
- Developed resistance to OPS in 1974
- OPS replaced with oils, natural enemy resurgence
- Current IPM systems effective
Red Scale - Economic Impacts
- Damage peaked with OPS resistance and absence of natural enemies
- Demand for blemish-free fruit high, small-scale infestations not tolerated
- During 1966 - 1967, red scale caused 50% of the 25% of fruit crops not acceptable for export
- During same time, cost of chemical control on citrus grove - $1 million
- Switch to IPM
- 6X reduction in spray costs
- Doubled the amount of exported fruit OPS replaced with oils, natural enemy resurgence
Snail Pests
- Two invasive species from North America introduced via aquarium trade
- Widespread occurrence in rivers and catchments, especially near urban centers
- Life history attributes conducive to invaders
- Tolerate wide range of temperatures of aquatic habitats - Mud and vegetation, rivers, streams, lakes, and containers
- One species capable of self-fertilization
- Colonization of disturbed habitats
- High dispersal and reproductive rates
- Short generation times
- Low susceptibility to predators
Snail Pests - Environmental and Economic Impacts
- Info on ecological impacts lacking
- Predation on at least one native snail
- Threaten health of livestock and wild ungulates
- Intermediate hosts for two liver fluke species
- Ability to survive out of water may increase transmission to fluke to definitive host (cattle) - Parasite encysts on forage grass
- Economic impact to small farmers high
- One species intermediate host of rat lung nematode - Causes human meningitis
Mediterranean Mussel
- Most widespread, successful marine alien
- Probably introduced in 1970s by humans
- Early 1990s, spread as far East as Port Alfred
- Dominant intertidal organism along the entire West Coast
- Biomass ~194 tons/km
Mediterranean Mussel - Ecological Impacts
- Rapid growth, high reproduction, and tolerance to desiccation
- Three major impacts
- Compete for substrate space - Displace native species
- Provision habitat for other species - Support denser invertebrate fauna
- Increase food for predators - Oystercatcher birds switched diet away from limpets
Mediterranean Mussel - Economic Impacts
- Fouling of ships’ hulls and intakes
- Mechanical removal - Mussel beds established on mudflates
- Mariculture industry within Salanha Bay
- 2,145 tons
- $3.5 million
- Benefit likely outweighs cost
Summary
- Range of realized and potential impacts
- Human activities - Dispersal and spread of invertebrates
- New invaders - Affect environmental and economic interests
- Argentine ant and varroa mite - Global threat to world’s rarest plant biome
- Mussel introduction - Positive economic impact
Module 12
Invasive Vertebrates of South Africa
Introduction
- Ecotourism South Africa’s newest economic growth factor
- Important to preserve protected areas and landscapes
- Benefits of maintaining biodiversity
- Ecological services
- Harvesting game
- Aesthetic and cultural values
- Challenge - Establishing balance between economic development and conservation policies
- Introducing potentially invasive vertebrates alters valuable environments
- E.g., human introduction of ungulates for food and sport
- Introduction of 21 invasive fish species
- Profound on aquatic ecosystems
- Extinction of native fish, amphibians, and invertebrates, but alien fish - Drivers of economically important fisheries industry
- Implementation of laws restricting importation and movement must balance trade-offs between economic gain and biodiversity loss
- Understanding kep factors of invasion biology crucial - e.g., dispersal ecology
- No consistent pattern for introductions
- Despite freshwater hot-spot, no marine fish
- Number of alien bird, reptile, and amphibian species intermediate to low, perhaps merely undetected
- “Absence of evidence not evidence of absence”
- Number of introduced mammals high but number of invasive species low
- Alien bird establishment on islands not > mainland
- Runs counter to island biogeography theory
- Evidence-based evaluation of each major taxon regarding environmental, agricultural, and economic impacts
- Consideration for new research directions
- General examination of legislation governing alien species importation and movement
- Extralimital: Invasion by indigenous species outside native range but within given geopolitical boundary
Freshwater Fishes
Freshwater Fishes
- South Africa hot spot for alien fish invasions
- Started in early 18th century with goldfish for ornamental purposes
- Currently, 24 alien and 19 native species introduced in South Africa’s water bodies
- 21 species documented as invasive (~ 49%)
- Humans responsible for introduction and spread
- Propagation occurred at state-funded hatchery in Cape region
- Distributed to other provincial hatcheries via formal stocking programs
- Reasons for Introductions
- Angling or fishing
- Biocontrol programs
- Pet trade
- Unintentional extralimital movement via inter-basin water transfers
- Angling
- Introductions during late 19th and early 20th centuries focused on recreational angling
- Rainbow and brown trout
- Successful establishment in cool, clear oxygen-rich waters in high-altitude or temperature areas
- Common carp and trench-coarse fish
- Stocked in warmer, lowland rivers
Angling
- Demand for predatory species caught with lures
- Large-mouth bass
- Warm slow lentic/lotic water
- Small-mouth bass
- Cooler lentic/lotic water
- Spotted bass
- Turbid and flood waters
- Bluegill sunfish
- Predator and food for bass
- Banded and Mozambique tilapia
- Extralimital food for bass
Biological Control
- Several species distributed from fish hatcheries for mosquito control in 1930s - 1940s
- Mosquitofish, guppy, and goldfish
- Feral guppy and goldfish populations - limited to urban streams and reservoirs
- Mosquitofish widely distributed
- ~ 50 of South Africa’s river systems
- Asian grass carp - introduced into farm dams for aquatic weed control
- Diploid carp widely established in river systems
- Considered a pest in Vaal River due to high densities
Aquaculture
- Escape from aquaculture operations resulted in 4 species invasions
- Rainbow trout
- Common carp
- Nile tilapia
- Silver carp
- Silver carp imported from Israel in 1975, thought unable to spawn
- Viable populations in Olifants-Limpopo River system
Ornamental Fish Trade
- Aquarists likely responsible for unwanted release of 4 species in South African lakes and streams
- Feral guppy
- Swordtail
- Goldfish
- Armored catfish
Inter-Basin Water Transfers (IBTs)
- Establishment of Orange River (OR)
- Fishes in Sundays and Great Fish Rivers
- Orange/Great Fish River IBT scheme completed in 1975
- 82 km tunnel
- Facilitated transfer of smallmouth yellowfish, mudfish, and sharptooth catfish
Extent of Problem
- Alien (17%) and extralimital (71%)
Module 9
Invasive Plants on the Indian Subcontinent
Introduction
- Frequency of plant invasions accelerated and human-driven
- In practice, hardly any barriers to prevent plant invasions
- Plants moved from one region to another
- Food, medicine, timber, furniture, ornament
- Demand for international trade in plants
- Two examples native to tropical America
- Lantana camara - Intentionally moved for ornamental value
- Parthenium hysterophorus - Human-aided unintentional introduction
- Climate change, habitat disturbance exacerbate problem
- Alien plants threaten native ecosystems
- Alter plant communities
- Reduce biodiversity
- Change soil structure
- Impact human health
- Invasive plants adaptable and undergo genetic changes from selection pressure
- Invasive plants: Ecological and economic impacts
- Species and communities
- Species composition
- Community composition
- Abundance
- Habitat structure
- Rare and threatened species
- Hybridization
- Ecosystem properties
- Fire
- Alternative states
- Biogeochemistry
- Nutrient cycling and mineralization
- Detritus
- System drivers
- pH
- Geomorphology
- Ecosystem services (Social - Ecological)
- Water: Quality, quantity, retention, floods
- Wood
- Tourism and wilderness
- Other resources
- Economic impacts
- Direct economic loss
- Costs of control
- Species and communities
Indian Subcontinent and Plant Invasion
- India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and the Island of Maldives
- Largely tropical with diverse flora and fauna
- 3 major regions of biodiversity - Himalayas, western ghats, Indo-Burma region
- Great diversity of ecosystems and habitats - Grasslands, forests, wetlands, aquatic, and marine
- ~18% of flora alien, ~50% new world origin - In total, 173 invasive alien species, 117 genera, 44 families
- Origin - Tropical America, Africa, and Europe
- Several terrestrial and aquatic plants - Highly invasive and impact native ecosystems
Pathways of Invasion
- Globalization - Increased trade and travel
- 2nd most populated country
- Recent rapid economic development
- 3 general pathways
- Importation of commodities
- Arraival of transport vector (via humans)
- Natural spread from adjacent regions
- Other pathways
- Ship ballast
- Crop seed contaminants
- Carried by humans/animals
- Intentional introductions
- Contaminated machinery
Prominent Invasive Plants
- ~55 alien plants identified
- Represent all plant forms
- Herbs, shrubs, trees, grasses, vines, and aquatic plants
- Most native to tropical America
- Primarily members of the Asteraceae
- Several species - Widespread and create problems
- Giant reed, Arundo donax
Parthenium hysterophorus
- Entered India in contaminated cereal grains imported from U.S.
- Colonizes wide habitats and forms huge monocultures
- Invaded almost every Indian state
- Impacts
- Reduces native plant diversity
- Major cause of fodder famine
- Toxic to livestock
- Causes respiratory problems in humans
- Recognized as biological pollutant
- Health problems in humans and livestock
Ageratum conyzoides
- Billy goat weed
- Introduced in 1860s as ornamental
- One of the worst invaders of agricultural lands
- Invasive properties
- Fast growth rate
- Vegetative reproduction via stolons
- Produces numerous seeds
- Allelopathic
Chromolaena odorata
- One of top 100 species listed by GSID
- Introduced as ornamental in 1940s
- Interferes with crop production in Northeastern India
Lantana Camara
- One of top 100 species listed by GSID
- Introduced to India in early 19th century as ornamental
- Rapidly spreading into high altitudes - Especially Himalayas
- Invades variety of habitats - Forests, grasslands, agricultural fields, urban, and protected areas
- Strongly allelopathic and interferes with growth of various native plants
Mile-A-Minute Weed
- Creeping vine that smothers native vegetation
- Discovered in south Florida in November 2009
- Intentionally introduced to India
- Camouflage for airfields during WWII
Aquatic Weeds
- Water hyacinth, salvinia, alligator weed, water spinach
- Invaders of freshwater ecosystems and wetlands
- Water hyacinth, salvinia, and alligator weed native to South America
Invasive Trees and Shrubs
- Lead tree (Leucaena leucocephala)
- Leguminous shrubs introduced to India for agroforestry
- Form dense monocultures
- Enormous seed production
- Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora)
- Introduced to India for afforestation
- Prolific seed producer
- Form dense monocultures
Prominent Invasive Plants
- Several species purposely introduced
- Ornamental value
- Essential oils
- Timber production
- Medicinal purposes
- Chinese tallow (Triadiaca sebiferum)
- Native to China
- Spreading rapidly in the Himalayan region
- Listed by GSID as serious invader
Environmental Impacts
- Fast growth and rapid spread of alien plants alter ecosystem structure and function
- Nutrient cycling and fire regimes
- Little data in India to support ecosystem impacts
- Three examples from NW Himalayas
- Lantana, Parthenium, billy goat weed
- Jatropha
- Newly introduced biodiesel production major threat to agriculture and livestock
- Highly toxic to humans and livestock
Economic Harm
- Alien plants contribute to losses in agricultural production and control costs
- Market and non-market impacts
- Losses from Lantana - US$924 million
- Economic costs higher - Environmental impacts
- Habitat damage
- Loss of threatened and endangered species
- Extinctions
- Loss of ecosystem services
- Very few published studies quantifying economic costs of invasive plants
Future Outlook
- Several weeds widely established
- Others emerging as new problems
- Indian government - Developing new control and regulatory measure for excluding new species
- Preparing national databases
- Raising awareness of invasive species problem
- Determining pathways of invasion
- Coordinating efforts of government and NGOs for early detection
- Following international standards for excluding potential invaders
Alien Plant Pathogens in India
Introduction
- >70% of India’s human population - Agriculture/agriculturally based professions
- Plant diseases - Impact people and animals
- Modify habits, affect standard of living, impact India’s economy
- India’s famines - Crop diseases caused by introduced pathogens
- 1943 Bengal famine most devastating
- Caused by rice blight fungus
- >2 million humans died of starvation
- Plant pathogens - Introduced with seeds and propagation materials
- Some regulatory measures adopted to avoid introduction
- 1914 - Destructive Insect and Pest (DIP) Act
- Intended to prevent and eradicate alien diseases
- 1930 - 1956 - DIP Act revised 8 times
- 1914 and after - 13 diseases introduced
India’s Key Plant Pathogens
Plant Pathogens
- Impacts
- ~74% of crop plant pathogens introduced
- Hitchhikers on seeds and other plant propagation materials
- Economic loss from pathogens - $2 billion
- ~74% of crop plant pathogens introduced
Fungal Pathogens - Potato Late Blight
- One of the worst potato diseases worldwide
- 1845 - Potato famine, Ireland
- First observed in 1870, then in 1883
- Carried on potatoes imported by Europeans
- Can cause ~70% reduction in susceptible potato varieties
- Epiphytotics common in Punjab
- Weather conditions conducive to disease outbreaks
- Tuber yield reduced by 15% - 100%
- Disease still prevalent in Tamil Nadu state
Fungal Pathogens - Potato Wart
- Thought to be native to South America
- Also known as black wart, black scab, potato canker, and cauliflower disease
- 2nd most important potato disease
- 1952 - First reported on imported potato variety (furose) in Darjeeling, West Bengal
- Steps to eradicate disease (burning crops and chemical disinfection of soil) failed
- 1958 - ~50% of potato-growing area invaded
- 1959 - Ban on potato movement from West Bengal
Fungal Pathogens - Wheat Flag Smut
- Disease prevalent in wheat-growing regions worldwide
- 1868 - First identified in Australia
- 1918 - First reported from West Punjab (Pakistan), probably introduced from Australia
- Disease not widespread but important
- Persistent and under suitable conditions, disease becomes virulent
- Impacts - Reduced yield to crop failure
- Disease incidence up to 75% in northern India
Fungal Pathogens - Rice Brown Leaf Spot
- Disease prevalent in rice growing areas along the East coast subjected to monsoons
- Causes enormous losses
- 1919 - First reported from Madras (Chennai)
- Prevalent in all rice-growing areas
- Major epidemics
- 1943 - West Benhal had 90% yield losses
- Most devastating epiphytotic ever recorded
- Current yield losses range from 22,000 - 28,000 tons
Fungal Pathogens - Rice Blast
- Disease occurs worldwide ever since rice cultivated
- Earliest records from China, Japan, Italy
- Globally, considered most important rice disease due to huge yield losses
- 1913 - First reported in India
- 1919 - Major epidemic in Tamil Nadu
- Disease prevalent in coastal areas and upland rice most susceptible
- 1960 - Disease became insignificant in Northern India after introduction of semi-dwarf, high-yielding varieties
Fungal Pathogens - Sunflower Downy Mildew
- Introduced in India and other countries via seed trade
- Most important constraint to sunflower production
- 1984 - First detected in 1984
- Seedborne, soilborne, and airborne - Difficult to eradicate after establishment
Fungal Pathogens - Maize Downy Mildew
- 1967 - First reported
- In total, 9 different Sclerophthora spp.
- 5 species cause economic losses in SE Asia
- Disease caused by S. Rayssiae var. Zeae restricted to India
Fungal Pathogens - Tobacco Black Shank
- First detected in Dutch East Indies
- 1938 - Introduced
- Sporadically infects all types of tobacco grown under high rainfall or irrigated conditions
- Disease first appears on lower leaves during rain season
Bacterial Pathogens - Rice Bacterial Blight
- First reported from Philippines ~60 years ago
- Minor disease until 1950 when it impacted rice production in Japan
- First reported in India in 1951
- Disease most commonly affects foliage
- Major hurdle to increasing rice cultivation
- Crop losses can reach 50%
Viral Pathogens - Banana Bunch Top Virus
- Introduced from Sri Lanka ~1940
- Invaded large area
- Initially southern tip of India (Kerala)
- Spread northward along east coast (Assam)
- Virus restricted to this region
Viral Pathogens - Cotton Leaf Curl Virus
- Discovered in 1994 northwest region
- Punjab and Rajasthan
- Introduced from Pakistan
- At least 2 alternative hosts
- Indian mallow, Abutilon indicum (L.) Sweet
- Disease widespread throughout cotton growing region - Vectored by whiteflies
- Managed by planting resistant varieties
Viral Pathogens - Peanut Stripe Virus
- Seed-borne virus of quarantine importance
- Imported from China
- Responsible for significant crop losses
- Alternate hosts include soybean and cowpeas
- Vectored by an aphid, a sucking insect
Nematode Pathogens - Potato Cyst Nematode
- Golden nematode
- Important potato pest worldwide
- 1961 - First detected in southern India
- Apparently introduced from Britain in tubers and weed hosts
- Confined to potato growing region in Southern tip of India
Summary
- India is an agriculture-based country
- 5 - 10% crop losses attributed to introduced diseases
- Ministry of Agriculture formulated new policies for intercepting new diseases to prevent introduction/establishment
Module 10
Introduction
- Human activities promote intentional or accidental spread of invertebrates
- Agriculture
- Forestry
- Transporation
- 3 criteria for invasive species
- Must be introduced
- Must establish viable populations
- Cause economic or environmental harm
- 2 famous examples of invertebrate Indian introductions (biocontrol agents):
- Prickly pear cactus - Cochineal scale
- Cottony cusion scale - Beetle and fly
- Laid foundation for promoting interaction of invasive species
- Increased globalization leads to introduction of alien invertebrates into vulnerable agriculture and natural areas, increasing
- Climate leads to increased importance in limiting invasive species distributions
- Invasive species establishment occurs when
- Climate suitable
- Sufficient nutrients
- Opportunities for reproduction
- Alien invertebrates considered top 2 or 3 forces driving other species to extinction
- Cause negative impacts to
- Human health
- Economy
- Biodiversity
- Ecosystems
Economic Implications
- Without biocontrols, invasive species populations increase to damaging levels
- Susceptible habitat characteristics
- Provide food and climate like invader’s native range
- Characterized by disturbance (ruderal)
- Those with less biotic resistance factors
- Islands with fewer species
- Examples
- Luprops beetle in rubber plantations of Wester Ghats and northeaster India
- Invasions predicted by tracking leaf drop phenology
Economic Impacts - Examples
- Eucalyptus plantations invaded by gall-forming wasp from Australia
- Gall impacts tree species with long-rotation cycles
- Problem exacerbated by transporting infected seedlings to new areas
- Coconut eriophyid mites introduced in 1990s
- Gall-forming pest
- Coconut hispine beetle, a new pest
- Cotton mealybug
- Impacts cotton and other crops and ornamentals
- Papaya mealy bug, discovered 2008
- Wide host range
- Coral tree gall wasp, discovered in 2004
- Attacks ornamental and shade coral trees
- Provides support for black pepper vines
- High infestations cause tree mortality
- Golden apple snail
- Native to Brazil
- Invades rice paddies
- Intermediate host for parasitic nematode
- Causes EME in humans
- Emerging rice pests
- Rice water weevil is native to US and Canada
- Rice black bug
- Rice panicle
Economic Impacts - Important Agricultural Pests
- Leucaena psyllid, whiteflies, coffee berry borer
- Capable of migrating long distances
- Ecological and intrinsic factors influencing crop pest distributions
- Climate, soil, host plants, vectors, natural enemies, competition, genetic adaptability, and reproductive plasticity
- Bemisia Type B whitefly
- Attacks over 900 host plants
- Transmits over 10 plant viruses
- Serpentine leaf miner
- Introduced 1990
- Attacks over 100 hosts
- Pest of vegetables, castor bean, and ornamentals
- Green and brown leafhoppers
- Migrate long distances
- Invade virtually all suitable habitats
- Cashew thrips
- Native to South America
- Pest of cashew and mango
- Giant snail
- Worst pest of agricultural crops
Summary
- Invasive species important in structuring natural communities
- Invertebrates threaten ecological communities and global biodiversity
- Ecologist Donald Strong, biological control may be the only option for pests of grave environmental concern
UF/IFAS Weed Risk Assessment
How to Complete
- Collect as much data as possible before answering any questions
- BEWARE THE GOOGLE-HOLE!!!!
- Start with website searches
- Search Google up to 10 pages deep (5 is usually enough)
- Search journal articles with Web of Science and/or Google Scholar
- Open Excel
- Click ignore links
- NOTHING EVER GOES IN COLUMN D
- Answer questions in column C
- Y
- N
- UNK
- Score will automatically appear in Column D
- Give citations in “Reference”
- Provide date you accessed websites
- Put supporting data in “Source data” column
- Try to avoid direct quotes, summarize the data and put in your own words
Module 11
Economic Consequences of Environmental Impacts of Alien Plant Invasions in South Africa
Introduction
- ~9,000 plants introduced in South Africa
- Crops, timber and firewood, ornamentals, sand stabilization, and barrier/hedge plants
- ~750 trees, 800 shrubs, succulents, and herbs
- ~1,000 naturalized and ~200 invasive
- 161 plants (110 woody, 13 succulent, 38 herbaceous) highly invasive
- Concern about biodiversity conservation
- ~17,000 endemic vascular plants
- Contributing factors
- 350-year long colonial history
- Well-developed infrastructure
- Thriving agriculture and forestry sectors
- Until recently, emphasis on the history, ecology and management of invasive plants
- Little interest in economic aspects and invasion consequences
- Important milestone - Current and potential impacts on water resources
- Demonstrated economic benefits of intervention
- Establishment of a ‘working for water’ program emphasized control of alien plants to protect water
- Current and future water supplies
- Invested > $657 million from 1995 - 2009
Extent of Problem - Surveys in 1996 - 1997 to Map Invasive Plants
- ~10 million ha (1 ha = 2.47 acres) invaded by ~180 species
- Western Cape’s most invaded region
- Invasions concentrated in wetland regions
- Fynbos biome (Mediterranean-type shrubland) most invaded area, mainly acacia, hakea, and minus species
- Forest, grassland, and savanna biomes also heavily invaded
- Riparian systems invaded by syringa and jacaranda trees
- Nama karoo (semi-desert shrubland) invaded by mesquite, cactus, saltbush species
- Aquatic weed species include water hyacinth, water lettuce, Kariba weed, parrot’s feather, red water fern, and hydrilla
- Only water hyacinth and hydrilla not effectively controlled biologically
Environmental Impacts
- Most analyses anecdotal or correlative
- Comparing invaded with uninvaded sites or one site over time
- Few detailed studies, no manipulative experiments
- Chapin et al. (1996) invader categories
- Discrete-trait invaders (DTIS) - Add new function, e.g., N fixation, alleopathy
- Continuous-trait invaders (CTIS) - Differ only in traits (e.g., growth rates, litter quality) distributed among species
- Generally, greater ecosystem-level impacts from DTIS
Environmental Impacts - Most dramatic impacts in South Africa from DTIS
- Nitrogen fixing acacia trees altered nutrient cycling regimes in Fynbos
- Added new life form in a treeless region
- Caused ecosystem-level changes in
- Biomass distribution
- Plant density and height
- Leaf area index
- Litter fall and decomposition rates in stream flow
- Use ~10% of surface water runoff
- Threaten endangered plant species and altered bird distributions
- Other DTIS having major ecosystem impacts
- Chromolaena, schinus molle, prosopis
Environmental Impacts - DTI impacts in South Africa not only terrestrial
- Aquatic invaders grow rapidly, forming dense mats
- Examples: Water hyacinth and red water fern
- Negative impacts include
- Water loss via evotranspiration
- Oxygen depletion
- Reducing potable water quality and quantity
- Impeding navigation, blocking flood control structures and collapsing bridges
- Clogging irrigation and hydropower pumps
- Limiting access for recreation and fisheries
- Decreasing property values
- Mosquito breeding
Environmental Impacts
- Positive impacts - Water hyacinth
- Feed for livestock
- Mulch for crop production
- Fiber for paper and weaving baskets
- Biological filtration/nutrient removal
- Drawbacks
- Plant contains 96% water
- Harvesting expensive
- Promoting utilization leads to further spread
Economic Impacts - Cause of alien plant invasions
- Unintended consequence of economic activity
- Globalization of world economy
- Liberal trade laws and regulations
- Human behavior primary driver of plant invasions
- Facilitates establishment and spread
- Modern transportation, promoting trade of goods
- Large-scale conversion of natural vegetation (disturbance)
- Plant invasion tied to economics and ecology
- Credible economic assessments involve both market and non-market impacts
- Results must enable decision-makers to make the right decisions
Economic Impacts - Key elements for invasive plant control
- Institutional regulation of human behavior
- Appropriate policies and strategies
- Complications and challenges
- Difficulty quantifying invasions in economic terms
- Tendency to avoid problem until crisis occurs
- Conflict of interest species - beneficial and deleterious impacts
- Variability of net economic impact estimates - Scale, scope, timing, and approach
- Public good issue - Control measures under applied
Approaches to Economic Evaluation
- Invasive plants have both positive and negative impacts
- Need to identify who’s affected and whether effects are positive or negative
- In the 1990s, invasive woody plant impacts - Quantified in terms of effects on water resources
- Persuaded government to take the problem seriously
- Water in South Africa limiting factor
- Most studies report positive return on investment, especially role of biocontrol research
- Acacia industry - US$1.4 billion in water loss vs. less value of wood chips, etc
- Studies show invasive plant control makes economic sense
- Most benefits derived from curtailing spread, reducing densities, and mitigating future impacts
- Challenge for “conflicting interest” species
- Mesquite, positive and negative impacts - Loss of groundwater vs. livestock fodder, shade, shelter, and biofuel
Approaches to Economic Evaluation - Framework for Mathematical Model
- PVC = DBC - DCC + PEoBC - NEoBC
- PVC = Present Value of Integrated Control
- DBC = Present Value of Direct Benefits of Control
- DCC = Direct Costs of Invasive Plant Control
- PEoBC = Present Value of + Control Externalities
- NEoBC = Present Value of - Control Externalities
National Scale Assessment
- Alien plants degrade rangelands
- Replace palatable with unpalatable species
- Restrict access by livestock and ranchers
- Livestock carrying capacity decreased by 123 K LSU
- Invasive plant cost summaries
- Water-related losses - US$773 million
- Livestock grazing losses - US$45 million
- Biodiversity losses - US$57 million
- Total - US$867 million
Dealing with the Problem - Working for Water program
- Invasive plant control and social development
- Employs poorest people in communities nearest to alien plant infestations
- Increased income and nutrition
- Provided better clothing
- Increased educational opportunities
- Provided small business training
- Procurement of protective clothing, tools, and equipment
- Raised public awareness
- Social development program
- Child-care program for working women
- HIV/AIDS awareness campaign
- Prisoner release rehabilitation
Perscription for Success
- Actively manage invasive plant spread
- Use non-invasive species when possible, introduce biocontrol agents early on
- Use biocontrol to limit seed production of otherwise invasive species
- Recognize potential invaders early and implement precautionary measures
- Educate public about dangers and invasive species costs
- Encourage use of non-invaders for ornamentals
- “Alter-natives”
Case Study
- Economic Benefits of Red Water Fern Biocontrol
- Complete control in 2 years
Economic Advantages of Biocontrol
- Labor intensive clearing of invaders in the working for water program not sustainable
- Needed to develop program components to prevent reinvasion
- Biocontrol - One of the most cost-effective tactics for reducing invader impacts
- Of 46 weed species, 22 under complete or sustantial biocontrol
- Total cost for biocontrol from 1997-2000 - Only $3 million
- Returns on investment unprecedented - 50:1 - lantana, caesalpinia, chromolaena - 3726:1 - Australian acacias
- Including biocontrol as component of working for water program expected to reduce costs from $60 to $20 million per year - 67% cost reduction
Conclusions
- Alien plant invasions severe in South Africa and intervention programs justified
- Reduced biodiversity
- Changes in water flow
- Genetic hybridization
- Changes in fire regimes
- Loss of grazing lands
- Increase disease vectors
- Impacts pervasive and have important implications for humans and environment
- Unique aspect is ability to leverage further
- Benefits from control programs
- Funds for working for water program sourced from poverty relief budget
- Convincing economic assessments needed to maintain support
- Biocontrol offers considerable benefits, which significantly outweigh costs
- Most cost-effective intervention
- Subject of debate because introducing more alien species with some degree of risk
Alien Invertebrate Animals in South Africa
Introduction
- Compared to plants and animals, alien invertebrates are not well studied in South Africa
- ~56 insects introduced for biocontrol of weeds, >50% have documented impact
- Impacts on non-targets not well studied
- Invasive invertebrates causing large-scale negative environmental and health impacts
- Yet to invade South Africa, escaping notice, or not investigated
- Introduced crop pests receive considerable attention, $1 billion in losses
- Red scale, Mediterranean fly, and codling moth
Mediterranean Fly
- Ceratitis capitata - One of the most economically costly pest species
- Spread from native Afrotropical range to main fruit-producing regions
- First confirmed presence in South Africa - Late 1800s
- Successful establishment
- Polyphagous life-history
- Short development time
- High population reproductive potential
- Broad climate niche
- Larvae and probing by adult females cause most damage
- Fruit vulnerable to secondary infections by pathogens and pests
- Can lead to 100% crop losses
Argentine Ant
- Native to Argentina and Brazil
- Arrived ~1898 in cattle fodder
- Globally, invaded Bermuda, Mediterranean Europe, Southwest U.S., Chile, Western Australia, New Zealand, and Hawaiian Islands
- Established in Cape Peninsula
- Generally found in lower altitude sites and areas with established roads
- Not found in sites accessible only on foot
Argentine Ant - Environmental Impacts
- Displace native ants by aggressive behavior, chemical defense, abundance, and interference competition
- A few native species co-exist due to differences in foraging patterns, small body size, and stealth
- Disrupt mutualism by interfering with plants relying on native ants for seed dispersal (myrmecochory)
- Obligate Myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly caterpillars at risk
- Impact fynbos by affecting pollination
- Impacts on ground inhabiting insects unknown
Argentine Ant - Agricultural and Household Impacts
- Attracted to honeydew produced by Hemiptera
- Mealybugs, scale insects, and aphids
- Protect pest Hemiptera from natural impacts
- High densities in citrus and guava
- Presence of ants deters pollinators
- Beehives attacked and destroyed
- Outcompete bees for nectar by nocturnal activity
- Invade homes to forage for food and water
Varroa Mite
- Most serious 20th century bee pest
- Spread from Asia, benign on natural host Apis cerana
- A. Mellifera unable to tolerate ectoparasite
- Capable of killing entire honeybee colony
- Unique life cycle adaptations
- Fertile female invades uncapped cell and feeds on bee larva
- First egg is male, remainder female
- Male mates with sisters and dies
- Mother and daughters emerge with bee
- Drone (male) brood preferred over workers
- Spread between colonies by flight
Varroa Mite - Environmental and Agricultural Impacts
- Brood death and developmental abnormalities
- Virus also implicated in colony death
- Wild bee populations in Europe and US - Mite mortality
- May be less virulent to African honeybees
- Shorter post-cell capping developmental period - Limits mite reproduction
- African bees exhibit defensive behavior
- Less damaging under tropical conditions in South Africa
- Greatest impact on wild bee populations
- Implications for biodiversity
- Loss of plant species - Affects herbivores
- No natural enemies for mite
Varroa Mite - Economic Impacts
- So far, extremely damaging to colonies
- Loss of pollination to commercial crops and associated job losses
- Beekeeping will become difficult and expensive
- Reduction in colonies and wild bees available to commercial beekeepers
- Major impact on small-scale rural beekeeping
Spotted Stem Borer
- Chilo pertellus
- Native to Asia and India subcontinent
- First discovered in South Africa in 1958 after invading African continent in 1932
- Dominant in humid, coaster regions
- Recently, higher-altitude grain growing areas
- Displacing Busseola fusca
Spotted Stem Borer - Agricultural Impacts from Native and Introduced Stalk Borers
- Major pest of cereal crops
- Maize and grain sorghum
- Bivoltine (2+ generations) during summer periods
- Cereal crop losses between 10-100%
Spotted Stem Borer - Economic Impacts
- 44th out of 101 most important crop pests
- 7th most important lepidopteran pest
- High yield losses and control costs
- Insecticide costs - $2.5 to $7 million
- Effective only against first instar (exposed)
- High cost and limited effectiveness of pesticides led to the adoption of alternative methods
- Culturla control - Tillage control, interplanting with Napier grass (trap crop) - Reduction in maize (89%) and sorghum (94%)
- Biological control with parasitoids - None established, ineffective
Red Scale
- Native to Central Asia and India
- Major pest of citrus
- Introduced > 100 years ago
- Life cycle
- Female lives under a circular, reddish-brown covering
- First instars (crawlers) leave covering and infest fruits, leaves, twigs, and branches
- Become sessile
- Up to 3 generations annually
Red Scale - Agricultural Impacts
- Globally, most important pest in terms of control costs and research
- Attack various fruits and ornamentals heavy infestations on citrus and roses
- Losses based on severity
- Light infestation - Rejection of fruit for export
- Moderate - Fruit rejection, leaf and fruit drop
- Heavy - Unsalable fruit, defoliation and death
- Infestations tied to history of insecticide use
- Sprayed with organophosphates (OPS) in 1948
- Developed resistance to OPS in 1974
- OPS replaced with oils, natural enemy resurgence
- Current IPM systems effective
Red Scale - Economic Impacts
- Damage peaked with OPS resistance and absence of natural enemies
- Demand for blemish-free fruit high, small-scale infestations not tolerated
- During 1966 - 1967, red scale caused 50% of the 25% of fruit crops not acceptable for export
- During same time, cost of chemical control on citrus grove - $1 million
- Switch to IPM
- 6X reduction in spray costs
- Doubled the amount of exported fruit OPS replaced with oils, natural enemy resurgence
Snail Pests
- Two invasive species from North America introduced via aquarium trade
- Widespread occurrence in rivers and catchments, especially near urban centers
- Life history attributes conducive to invaders
- Tolerate wide range of temperatures of aquatic habitats - Mud and vegetation, rivers, streams, lakes, and containers
- One species capable of self-fertilization
- Colonization of disturbed habitats
- High dispersal and reproductive rates
- Short generation times
- Low susceptibility to predators
Snail Pests - Environmental and Economic Impacts
- Info on ecological impacts lacking
- Predation on at least one native snail
- Threaten health of livestock and wild ungulates
- Intermediate hosts for two liver fluke species
- Ability to survive out of water may increase transmission to fluke to definitive host (cattle) - Parasite encysts on forage grass
- Economic impact to small farmers high
- One species intermediate host of rat lung nematode - Causes human meningitis
Mediterranean Mussel
- Most widespread, successful marine alien
- Probably introduced in 1970s by humans
- Early 1990s, spread as far East as Port Alfred
- Dominant intertidal organism along the entire West Coast
- Biomass ~194 tons/km
Mediterranean Mussel - Ecological Impacts
- Rapid growth, high reproduction, and tolerance to desiccation
- Three major impacts
- Compete for substrate space - Displace native species
- Provision habitat for other species - Support denser invertebrate fauna
- Increase food for predators - Oystercatcher birds switched diet away from limpets
Mediterranean Mussel - Economic Impacts
- Fouling of ships’ hulls and intakes
- Mechanical removal - Mussel beds established on mudflats
- Mariculture industry within Salanha Bay
- 2,145 tons
- $3.5 million
- Benefit likely outweighs cost
Summary
- Range of realized and potential impacts
- Human activities - Dispersal and spread of invertebrates
- New invaders - Affect environmental and economic interests
- Argentine ant and varroa mite - Global threat to world’s rarest plant biome
- Mussel introduction - Positive economic impact
Module 12
Invasive Vertebrates of South Africa
Introduction
- Ecotourism South Africa’s newest economic growth factor
- Important to preserve protected areas and landscapes
- Benefits of maintaining biodiversity
- Ecological services
- Harvesting game
- Aesthetic and cultural values
- Challenge - Establishing balance between economic development and conservation policies
- Introducing potentially invasive vertebrates alters valuable environments
- E.g., human introduction of ungulates for food and sport
- Introduction of 21 invasive fish species
- Profound on aquatic ecosystems
- Extinction of native fish, amphibians, and invertebrates, but alien fish - Drivers of economically important fisheries industry
- Implementation of laws restricting importation and movement must balance trade-offs between economic gain and biodiversity loss
- Understanding kep factors of invasion biology crucial - e.g., dispersal ecology
- No consistent pattern for introductions
- Despite freshwater hot-spot, no marine fish
- Number of alien bird, reptile, and amphibian species intermediate to low, perhaps merely undetected
- “Absence of evidence not evidence of absence”
- Number of introduced mammals high but number of invasive species low
- Alien bird establishment on islands not > mainland
- Runs counter to island biogeography theory
- Evidence-based evaluation of each major taxon regarding environmental, agricultural, and economic impacts
- Consideration for new research directions
- General examination of legislation governing alien species importation and movement
- Extralimital: Invasion by indigenous species outside native range but within given geopolitical boundary
Freshwater Fishes
Freshwater Fishes
- South Africa hot spot for alien fish invasions
- Started in early 18th century with goldfish for ornamental purposes
- Currently, 24 alien and 19 native species introduced in South Africa’s water bodies
- 21 species documented as invasive (~ 49%)
- Humans responsible for introduction and spread
- Propagation occurred at state-funded hatchery in Cape region
- Distributed to other provincial hatcheries via formal stocking programs
- Reasons for Introductions
- Angling or fishing
- Biocontrol programs
- Pet trade
- Unintentional extralimital movement via inter-basin water transfers
- Angling
- Introductions during late 19th and early 20th centuries focused on recreational angling
- Rainbow and brown trout
- Successful establishment in cool, clear oxygen-rich waters in high-altitude or temperature areas
- Common carp and trench-coarse fish
- Stocked in warmer, lowland rivers
Angling
- Demand for predatory species caught with lures
- Large-mouth bass
- Warm slow lentic/lotic water
- Small-mouth bass
- Cooler lentic/lotic water
- Spotted bass
- Turbid and flood waters
- Bluegill sunfish
- Predator and food for bass
- Banded and Mozambique tilapia
- Extralimital food for bass
Biological Control
- Several species distributed from fish hatcheries for mosquito control in 1930s - 1940s
- Mosquitofish, guppy, and goldfish
- Feral guppy and goldfish populations - limited to urban streams and reservoirs
- Mosquitofish widely distributed
- ~ 50 of South Africa’s river systems
- Asian grass carp - introduced into farm dams for aquatic weed control
- Diploid carp widely established in river systems
- Considered a pest in Vaal River due to high densities
Aquaculture
- Escape from aquaculture operations resulted in 4 species invasions
- Rainbow trout
- Common carp
- Nile tilapia
- Silver carp
- Silver carp imported from Israel in 1975, thought unable to spawn
- Viable populations in Olifants-Limpopo River system
Ornamental Fish Trade
- Aquarists likely responsible for unwanted release of 4 species in South African lakes and streams
- Feral guppy
- Swordtail
- Goldfish
- Armored catfish
Inter-Basin Water Transfers (IBTs)
- Establishment of Orange River (OR)
- Fishes in Sundays and Great Fish Rivers
- Orange/Great Fish River IBT scheme completed in 1975
- 82 km tunnel
- Facilitated transfer of smallmouth yellowfish, mudfish, and sharptooth catfish
Extent of Problem
- Alien (17%) and extralimital (71%) fishes common inhabitants of all major river systems
- Continued spreading by IBTs and angler illegal stocking exacerbates problem
- Sharptooth catfish - large predator - EA urgently needed
- Nile tilapia - increasing its range
Environmental Impacts to Indigenous Fish Species
- Transfer of parasites
- Grass carp tapeworm - 2 yellowfish
- Direct predation
- Bass and trout - Extirpation of threatened and endangered minnows, and major trophic shifts
- Ecosystem effects
- Common carp increases turbidity
- Linked to decline of largemouth yellowfish
- Hybridization between
- Mozambique and Nile tilapia
- Genetic integrity threatened
Economic Impacts
- 2007 survey - 1.5 million freshwater anglers
- Large recreational fishery depends on alien fishes
- Carp, trout, and bass
- Fishing expenditures contribute significantly to national economy
- ~US$1,000/angler/year
- Total economic impact for 10% - US$11.2 million
- Bank angling for carp - 40%
- Fly fishing for trout - 40%
- Bass angling - 13%
- Food security in rural communities
- Aquaculture - US$5 million
- Pet trade, tilapia, trout
Dealing with the Problem
- Once established, impossible to eradicate
- Eradication with icthyolites possible
- In large systems, removal impractical/unfeasible
- Future management - Exclusion from sensitive areas and limiting spread
- Areas for use of alien species - Compromises between recreational, economic and conservation interests
- Enforcement of new regulations - education campaigns crucial to increasing awareness and compliance
Reptiles and Amphibians
- Few well-known invasive species, but several examples causing significant impacts in other countries
- Brown tree snake - Guam
- Cane toad - Australia
- Biggest threat - Increasing importance of global economies
- Pet trades - Deliberate
- Cargo and nursery trades - Accidental
- Diverse reptile fauna in southern South Africa
- South African Reptile Conservation Association (SARCA) - Reported 500 species
- High diversity of lizards and turtles
- Gutteral toad
- Extralimital range expansion - North and East South Africa to West Cape province, 1997
- Painted reed frog
- Similar jump dispersal and multiple introductions in West Cape province via nursery, fruit, and vegetable trades
- Spreading in agricultural and natural areas
- African clawed toad
- Extensive translocations in South Africa via irrigation canals and ditches
- Range expansion and hybridizations with native clawed toad - Predation and resource competition
- Flowerpot snake
- Adventive since 1800
- Arrived with plants from East Indies
- To date, no reported negative impacts in Cape Town gardens
- Geckos - 2 species
- Cape day gecko
- Tropical house gecko
- Displacement of native geckos
- Impacts or potential impacts
- No evidence of economic, environmental, or agricultural impacts from alien introductions
- With increasing trade, important to predict negative impacts in context of impacts identified elsewhere
- Hybridization
- Genetic introgression - Legitimate concern
- Loss of unique adaptation and diversity
- Within pet trade, deliberate production of novel color morphs
- Native Natal python x alien Burmese python
- Genetic introgression - Legitimate concern
- Competition
- Between native and alien species especially South Africa’s diverse reptile fauna
- Ecological niche displacement - Vulnerable frogs, red-eared slider
- Novel pathogens
- African clawed toad vector of amphibian Chytridiomycosis
- Causes mass mortality and population declines
- Chytrid organism endemic to South Africa, native frogs resistant
- Introduction of novel strains could devastate South Africa’s native frogs
- African clawed toad vector of amphibian Chytridiomycosis
Novel Pathogens
- Inclusion body disease in boas
- Potentially catastrophis effects on natal python
- Ticks of reptiles and amphibians
- Vectors of reptile and other diseases
- Heartwater disease in livestock
- Ranaviruses
- Affect fish, amphibians, and reptiles
- Linkage between aquatic and terrestrial organisms
- Implicated in amphibian declines
- African clawed toad - Potential reservoir species
- Aquaculture and pet trade introductions increase disease risk
Human Health Risks
- Salmonella
- Spreads from pet slider turtles to humans
- Parasites
- Ticks from turtles
- Tapeworms from cane toads
- Venomous and constricting snakes
- In US, 9 people killed by pet pythons, 1993 - 2009
- 3 constrictors recently banned by USFWS
- Opportunity costs
- Lack of species ecology info presents a challenge for detecting invasion impacts
- Kraus (2009) - Must understand species interactions before introduction, opportunity lost
Dealing with the Problem
- South Africa’s regulatory framework
- Comprehensive and involved input from pet, aquaculture, and nursery trades
- Costs of controlling invasive species always > prevention
- Focus on drivers and pathways
- Biological control unlikely pathway
- Global awareness of negative vertebrate impacts
Birds
- Long history of alien bird introductions
- 1652 - Europeans began introducing birds
- To date, 77 alien species recorded in South Africa
- 12 species potentially invasive based on population current densities and distribution
- 7 species permanently established
- Mallard duck, rose-ringed parakeet, rock dove, Indian house crow, starling, myna, and sparrow
- Associated with humans
- No evidence of environmental impacts
- Landscape changes - Negative impacts to economy, agriculture, and environment
Drivers of Invasion
- Urbanization - Favors cliff nesters
- Swallows, martins, swifts, starlings and raptors
- Afforestation - Favors woodland species
- Raptors, doves
- Impoundments - Favor fish eaters
- Waterbirds, waders, kingfishers
- Climate change - Range shifts
- Seabirds
- Species of special concern
- Require monitoring and management
- Guinea fowl, ibis, Egyptian goose, red-billed quelea
- Abundance, sociability, and large biomass - Potentially invasive outside native range
Invader Comparisons
- Extralimital species - Self driven
- Alien species - All introduced by humans
- Exception - Indian house crow
- 69% (53 of 77) imported for pet trade - Escapees and/or deliberate releases
- Only mallard, parakeet, and myna established persistent populations
Extent of Problem
- Multiple introductions and high dispersal rates
- Rock dove and sparrow
- Major range extensions
- Myna and starling
- Complex factors
- Mallard and parakeet
Extent of Problem - General Trends
- Urbanization, commercial afforestation, and alien plant spread - Range expansion of northern species southward
- Power poles for nesting increased crow densities - Increased seed dispersal and spread of alien cactus
- Creation of livestock and farm dams - Dispersal of aquatic birds to arid areas
- Irrigated agriculture - Food source for invasive crop pests
- Other contributing factors - Climate change and changes in landscape cover
Impacts
- Native and extralimital birds more detrimental than alien species
- Starling, myna, quelia, and sparrows - Fruit crops and cereal pests
- Interspecific competition and predation
- Myna and starling
- Alien plant dispersal
- Myna, starling, and cape crow - Spread seeds of bugweed
- Pathogen and parasite spread to humans
- Myna and starling
- Chemical/physical damage to buildings
- Rock doves and house sparrows
- Aircraft collisions
- Hybridization
- Alien rock dove x native speckled pigeon
- Alien mallard x native domestic ducks
- Mallard known to hybridize with 50 waterfowl
Dealing with the Problem
- Data on monetary cost and ecological impacts limited
- Environmental costs probably insignificant
- Bird banding to improve knowledge of avian biology and management
Mammals
- Introduced into South Africa for various reasons
- Wool, food - Sheep and rabbits
- Fur - Nutria and mink
- Biocontrol and pets - Feral cats
- Hunting and ornament - European wild boar and fallow deer
- Escape from captivity - Himalayan Tahr
- Private landowner releases
- Human-mediated introductions
- Stowaways on boats/planes - Brown rat, house mouse, roof rat, and oriental house rat
- Game industry - Alien and extralimital
- Hunting - Addax, oryx, fallow, and red deer
Extent of Problem
- ~ 50 species introduced, only small number invasive
- Invasive species - Ornamentals, game animals, feral domestic animals, livestock, and escapees from captivity
- Introduced mammals invasive on islands - Fallow deer, feral cats, European rabbits, and house mouse
- Fallow deer and red lechwe - Highly invasive on mainland
- Feral pigs, rats, goats, and donkeys causing problems
- Genus Rattus - Largest mammalian genus of invasive and commensal rodents
- First recorded occurrence of oriental house rat in South Africa
- New molecular data show
- South Africa population originated from Far East
- Important implications for epidemiological, agricultural, and conservation biology research
- Game mammal introductions extensive in South Africa - Second only to US
- Range expansion by extralimital species leading to substantial range changes
Impacts
- Himalayan Tahr - Damages vegetation and soil erosion
- Feral domestic and livestock animals - Compete with or prey on native species
- Feral pigs - Prey on threatened and endangered tortoises and small livestock, rooting, wallowing damages agricultural fields and natural areas
- Fallow deer - Better adapted to C3 grasses/climate change
- Other rat problems
- Murine typhus, rat-bite fever, salmonella, RHF
- Diseases may increase due to HIV/AIDS compromised immune systems in South Africa
- Threaten native flora and fauna, especially on islands
- Effects on agriculture/public health
- Rats - Carriers of zoonotic diseases, destroy grain crops and human structures, and transmit leptospirosis, plague, toxoplasmosis
House Mouse
- Introduced on Marion island by sealers in 1800s
- House cat released for biocontrol, but eradicated in 1990s
- Mouse populations increasing with ecosystem impacts
- Biomass of invertebrate decomposers declining
- Population decline of lesser sheathbill, invertebrate consumer
- Potential predation on albatross and other seabird chicks
- Positive contributions
- Albino mice/rats - Models for medical experiments
- Rats - Studies on tracing
Domestic Cat
- Derived from Egyptian wild cat - 4000 BC
- Human-assisted spread
- Most widespread carnivore
- Impacts
- Hybridization with African wild cat
- Rabbit and bird predation on Dassen Island
- Ecosystem effects of predatory and scavenger habits
Grey Squirrel
- Introduced to South Africa in ~1900
- Restricted to urban areas with large seed-producing exotic trees - Oaks, pines
- Some fruit and nut damage - Overall impact minimal
- Potential threat to garden birds and native squirrels
Extralimital Species
- Potential impacts on biodiversity
- Herbibory, hybridization, and competition
- Nyala outcompeting bushbuck
- Altering vegetation and risk of hybridization
- Giraffes altering tree structure/composition
- Blue and black wildebeest hybridization
- Springbok infected bontebok with Lungworm parasite
- Warthog invading nature reserve - East Cape province
- Impala outcompeting reedbuck in East Cape province
- Impact of small mammals unknown
Legislation and Policy
- Best science must be incorporated - Defining and agreeing on main objectives
- Commitment to bridging research and raising sufficient funds
- Constraints for policymakers
- Staying on top of recent science developments
- Lack of opportunities for communication between scientists and decision-makers
Legislation and Policy - Gaps in Current Knowledge
- Treating species that pose greatest biodiversity threat
- Establishing current distributions and pathways
- Characterizing cryptic invasive species with molecular data
- Integrating invasive species management plans through IDP process
- Increasing use of niche models for projecting impacts of global change
Environmental and Economic Costs Associated with Alien Invasive Species in the U.S.
Introduction
- ~50,000 non-native species introduced into US
- Corn, wheat, rice, cattle, poultry - Beneficial
- Account for 98% food production, valued at $800 billion
- Other exotic species introduced for landscaping, biological control, sports, pets, etc.
- Some non-indigenous species - Major economic and environmental losses
- ~$100 - $200 billion damages report from exotic species
- ~40% of threatened and endangered species at risk from competition/predation
- Worldwide, ~80% impacted by invasive species
Environmental Damages and Control Costs
- Estimating economic impacts of non-native species on agriculture, forestry and public health difficult but quantitative data available
- Most plant and vertebrate introductions intentional whereas most invertebrates and microbes accidential
- Since the 1960s, biotic invasions increasing
- Population growth
- Rapid transportation
- Environmental degradation
Plants
- Introduced for food, fiber or ornaments
- ~5,000 introduced species escaped vs. 17,000 native species
- Non-native weeds invading ~700,000 ha of natural areas
- Florida, 900 of 25,000 (~4%)
- Hawaii, 950 of 2,700 (~35%)
Key Examples - Terrestrial Weeds
- Purple loosestrife - National parks, successful biocontrol
- Yellow star thistle - California, grassland invader
- European cheat grass - Idaho, Utah, alters fire regimes
- Salt cedar
- Brazillian peppertree
- Melaleuca
Key Examples - Aquatic Weeds
- In Florida, alien species altering biodiversity, navigation, nutrient cycles, recreation
- Hydrilla
- Water hyacinth
- Water lettuce
- Hygrophila
- ~$100 million spent controlling aquatic weeds
- ~$20 million in Florida for hydrilla
Mammals
- ~30 domestic species introduced into US - Dogs, cats, horses, burros, cattle, sheep, pigs, goats, and deer
- Prey on native animals and plants, impact threatened and endangered species and contribute to soil erosion
- Small mammals also cause problems - European and Asiatic rats, house mouse, and European rabbit
- Pests on farms, industries, and homes
- Rats
- Cause fires and transmit diseases (Salmonella, plague)
- Prey on native vertebrates and invertebrates
Mammals - Indian Mongoose
- Introduced into the Caribbean and Hawaii in the late 19th century for control of rats in sugarcane
- One of the first biocontrol failures
- Controlled Asiatic rat but not European rat
- Preyed on native ground-nesting birds, amphibians, and reptiles
- Led to the extinction of several herps in Puerto Rico
- Major vector of rabies and leptospirosis
- Total cost ~$50 million in Puerto Rico and Hawaii
Mammals - Pet and Feral Cats
- Threat to native birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles
- ~9 birds killed/cat annually
- Total loss - 480 million birds and ~$18 billion
Mammals - Wild Dog Packs
- ~1 billion pet and feral
- Kill deer, rabbits, cattle, sheep and goats
- Major livestock problem in Florida and Texas
- Total livestock losses nationwide ~$10 million
- ~5 million humans attacked by wild and pet dogs
- Cost for treatment + LEO = $250 million
- Dogs kill 15 to 20 children annually
Birds
- ~10% of US birds exotic
- ~56% pests
- Pigeon is prime example in US
- Myna bird in Hawaii - Major disperser of invasive weed lantana
Birds - English House Sparrow
- Introduced in 1853 to control cankerworm
- By 1900, became pest of homes, buildings, and agriculture
- Harass native birds (e.g. robins and orioles) and displace bluebirds, wrens, and purple martins
- Vector of 29 human and livestock diseases
Birds - Common Pigeon
- Most important bird pest in US
- Cause ~$2.2 billion in damages annually
- Feeds on grain
- Reservoirs and vectors of human and livestock diseases, e.g. Encephalitis
- Fouls buildings, cars, and statues by nesting habits
Reptiles and Amphibians
- 53+ species introduced
- Found in subtropical states and US territories - Florida, Hawaii, and Guam
Amphibians and Reptiles - Brown Tree Snake
- Introduced into Guam after WWII in military goods
- Densities increased to 100 per ha
- Devastated native birds, mammals, and lizards
- Attack chickens and eggs, impacting farmers
- Causes public health problems
- Children susceptible to snake’s venom
- Climbs power poles causing power outages - ~90 outages per year, costing ~$1 billion
- Total control and research costs ~$16 billion
Fish
- ~150 species introduced into US
- Greatest impacts in states with mild climates
- Florida - 50+ species
- California - 56 species
- Hawaii - 33 species
- ~70 native species threatened by invaders
- Grass carp and common carp
- Alter ecology of aquatic ecosystems by reducing vegetation and increasing turbidity
- Causes extinctions of some native fish
- Some economic benefit via sport - Fishing, $70 billion annually
Arthropods and Invertebrates
- ~4,500 arthropods introduced into US
- 11 earthworms, 100 aquatic invertebrates
- ~95% adventive via plants and ballast water
- Hawaii accounts for > 50% or ~2,600
- Examples
- Wooly adelgid - Past 20 years destroyed 95% Fraser firs, loss of 2 native birds
- Red imported fire ant - Kill chickens, snakes, bobwhite quail, Texas - $300 million in damages
- European green crab - Impacts native oysters and softshell crabs, economic impact - $44 million
Mollusks
- ~88 adventive species in US
- Zebra mussel
- First discovered in Detroit’s Lake St. Clair
- Arrived from Europe in ship ballast water
- Widely established in Eastern US
- Quagga mussel
- Displacing zebra mussels - $2 billion in damages
- Clog water intake pipes, filtration and power plant
- Asian clam
- Grows and spreads less rapidly but causes similar damage - $1 billion per year
- Shipworm - Introduced in San Francisco Bay
- Damages estimated at ~$400 million
Weeds
- ~500 introduced plants are weeds
- Several introduced as crops, trees, crop seeds, and ship ballast
- Johnson grass, kudzu, cogon grass, melaleuca, yellow rocket (Barbarea vulgaris), and Canada thistle
- Reduce crop yields by ~12% or $33 billion
- 50% - 73% of weeds non-indigenous
- ~$4 billion spent on herbicides
- Lawn, garden, and golf course weeds
- Control costs ~$36 billion
Vertebrate Pests
- Horses, burros in Western US - Graze on native vegetation, annuals replace native perennials
- Reduce available food for bighorn sheep, birds
- ~$5 million in forage losses
- Feral pigs - Alternative vegetation, contribute to invasions by annuals and soil erosion, damage field crops, and disease reservoirs
- Serious problem in California, Hawaii, Florida, and Texas
- In US, damages estimated at $1 billion
- European starlings - Threaten crop production, displace native birds, and transmit diseases
- Total crop losses ~$800 million
Insect and Mite Pests
- ~500 non-native arthropod crop pests in US
- Insects destroy ~13% crop production and ~9% forest products
- Introduced pests cause ~$21 billion in total losses
- Gypsy moth intentionally introduced for silk production in the Northeast - ~$11 million for control
- Emerald ash borer ~$1 billion - No known control
Plant Pathogens
- ~20,000 microbes invaded US
- Losses ~$16 billion crop, ~$9 billion forests
- 65% due to non-native diseases - Chestnut blight, Dutch elm disease, citrus greening, laurel wilt
Livestock Pests - Arthropods, Microbes, and Parasites
- Losses ~$9 billion
- Key example
- Face fly
Human Diseases
- Increasing threat from exotic diseases
- Rapid transportation, encroachment of civilization into new ecosystems, and increasing environmental degradation
- Major non-native diseases with greatest impacts
- Syphilis
- Outbreaks still occur due to resistance to antibiotics
- Exacerbated by HIV infection
- Influenza
- ~550 deaths
- Hospitalizations $300 million
- HIV/AIDS
- ~105,000 cases and ~37,000 deaths
- Health care costs ~$11 billion
Summary
- >50,000 non-native species in US
- Factors contributing invasion success
- Lack of natural enemies
- Development of new associations
- Effective predators in new ecosystems
- Artificial or disturbed habitats
- Illegal immigration
- Total economic damages - ~$219 billion
- Costs of extinctions, losses of biodiversity and ecosystem services impossible to estimate
- Greatest challenge
- Prevent further damage to US ecosystems
Module 13
Rodents and Other Vertebrate Invaders in the United States
Introduction
- Most invasive vertebrates arrived in the U.S. via human activity or range expansion
- Direct introductions
- Accidental transport
- Not immediately recognized as harmful
- Often championed as beneficial or having redeeming value
- Results in conflicting interests
- Eradication vs. damage management
- Issues raised concerning
- Economic damage, ecosystem degradation, competition with rare or desirable native species or perceived threat
- Organization structure for dealing with problem still evolving
- National invasive species council (NISC)
- Created by Clinton EO, 1999
- Co-chaired by the Secretary of Agriculture, Commerce, and Interior
- Involvement by 13 federal agencies/depts.
- Developed National Invasive Species Management Plan
- Individual states also developed their own plans
- Invasive vertebrate breakdown
- Mammals - 81
- Birds - 99 (total 792)
- Reptiles - 69
- Amphibians - 11
- Fish - 533
Rodents and Other Vertebrate Impacts
- U.S. vertebrate invaders leading cause of environmental change and global biodiversity loss
- Clear link between ecological and economic systems
- Primary negative economic effects
- Disease transmission and predation causes mortality in humans, livestock, wildlife
- Environmental destruction leads to habitat losses, restoration costs
- Secondary negative economic effects cause ecosystem damages, causing ecotourism losses
Rodents and Other Vertebrate Impacts - Challenges for Policymakers
- Developing sustainable methods for invasive species prevention, control, and damage mitigation
- Benefit-cost analysis essential for determining most economically efficient techniques
- Development of Impact Measurement Techiniques
- Damage - avoided method
- Uses value of resources protected as measure of benefits provided
- Measured as cost savings from diminished disease, predation, environmental destruction
- Costs derived from labor and materials used to mitigate damage
- Total economic benefits = Primary + Secondary effects “saved”
Species Accounts
Norway Rat
- Introduced to North America via Transatlantic shipping - 1775
- Established throughout country, Alaska, Hawaii
- Causes damage to crops and stored products
- Closely tied to human settlements
- Dramatic reproductive potential
- Gestation period - 3 weeks
- Sexual maturity - 3 weeks after
- Associated with poor sanitation, trash in inner cities
- Impacts
- Farms - Damage stored food and grains, egg and chick predation
- Structures - Damage roads, buildings, bridges, railroads
- Reservoir hosts of human and domestic animal diseases like salmonellosis, leptospirosis, and trichinosis
- Rat bites to babies and children
- Management
- Environmental control and sanitation
Roof Rat
- Also known as black or ship rats
- Establish in Virginia 1600s
- Inhabit port and shore areas Southeast and West North America, Hawaiian islands
- Recently discovered inland - Phoenix, AZ
- Poor competitors with larger, aggressive Norway rats
- Commensal with man and invades landscapes (forests)
- Impacts
- Damages orchard, grain and sugarcane crops
- Preys on ground-nesting birds, nestlings, eggs
- Caused bird extinctions on islands of Hawaii
- Reservoir of bubonic plague - Outbraks in California in the 1900s
- Management
- Same as Norway rat
- Targeted eradication programs on islands to protect seabird populations
Polynesian Rat
- Native to Southeast Asia
- Not present on U.S. mainland, only Hawaii islands
- Smallest member of genus Rattus
- Primarily nocturnal, like most rats
- Breed year-round, lifespan ~1 year
- Adapted to wide range of habitats - Omnivores
- Forests, grasslands, sugarcane, seed crops, fruits
- Preyed on by cats, mongooses, other rodents
- Food for Polynesians
- Predators of seabirds, lizards, insects, plants
- Management
- Rodenticides, trapping, biocontrol by mongoose (failed)
Nutria
- Semiaquatic rodents native to South America
- Invasive in Southeastern U.S.
- Introduced in 1899 for fur production
- Dispersal via fur harm escapees, hurricanes, floods
- Pests of crops, aquatic vegetation, rice, sugarcane
- Alter aquatic ecosystems and marshlands
- Loss of marshes impacts waterfowl, wading birds, muskrats
- Burrowing weakens irrigation structures, levees
- Host for several diseases
- Management
- Hunting, trapping - Bounty of $4-5 / tail
Gambian Giant Pouched Rat
- Native to Central and South Africa
- Popular pet escaped on Florida Keys
- Concern for impact to fruit industry on Florida peninsula
- Reservoirs of monkeypox and other diseases
- Large rodent, ~1 meter (3 ft)
- Management
- Live-trapping
- Rodenticides
Feral Swine
- Established populations in 33 states, estimated 4 million
- Origin - Escaped domestic swine or releases
- Exceptional high reproductive rate
- Breed at 6 months, large litter size, year-round
- Impacts
- Damage property, agriculture, and natural resources via rooting, wallowing, and digging activities
- Rooting damages equipment, injures livestock, soil erosion
- Destruction of fencing, predation on wildlife
- Transmit diseases - Brucellosis, rabies, flu
- Management
- Fencing, trapping, shooting
- Developing contraceptive vaccines
Small Indian Mongoose
- Native to Pakistan, India, China, and Indonesia
- Introduced for biocontrol of rats and snakes in sugarcane fields, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and Hawaii
- Predation not high enough to affect control
- Opportunistic omnivores
- Few predators or competitors to impact populations
- Inhabit a variety of habitats, breed year-round
- Impacts
- Damage to agriculture and natural resources
- Poultry, egg, and game bird populations
- Linked to extirpation of ground-nesting birds
- Reservoir hosts of rabies, leptospirosis
- Damage to agriculture and natural resources
- Management
- Traps, poison baits, or combination
Rock Pigeon
- Known as feral pigeon, rock dove
- Native from Britain to India and North Africa
- Oldest non-native bird species in U.S. - 1600s
- Found throughout U.S., including Hawaii
- Impacts
- Damage costs ~$1 billion annually
- Soil buildings, consume and spoil grain
- Harbor/transmit >40 zoonotic diseases
- Food for urban-nesting peregrine falcons
- Popular in parks
- Management
- Repellants, toxicants, sound/visual devices, trapping, contraception and shooting
House or English Sparrow
- 16 birds released in New York City in 1850s
- Considered “most deplorable event in American ornithology”
- Primarily seed feeders
- Extensive native range - Europe and Asia
- Commensal with humans
- Impacts
- Consume livestock/poultry grain
- Create unsanitary conditions
- Transmit 25+ diseases affecting humans/livestock
- Harbor numerous ectoparasites, e.g., bed bugs
- Management
- Combination of trapping, exclusion and nest destruction leading to populations in decline
European Starling
- Listed as one of the top 100 invaders worldwide
- 100 released in New York City Central Park - Early 1890s
- Today, found throughout North America - ~200 million
- Nest in natural and artificial cavities
- Form large breeding flocks
- Impacts
- Annually causes ~$800 million of agricultural damage
- Consume fruits and grains, contaminating feedlots
- Transmit ~25 diseases - Toxoplasmosis, salmonella
- Deface buildings, inhabit electrical substations
- Pose a major risk to aircrafts, >2000 collisions since 1990
- Population in decline
Monk Parakeet
- Native to South America in croplands, savannahs, and woodlots
- Imported into U.S. via pet trade in 1960s
- Largest populations found in Southwest Florida, primarily in urban/suburban areas, steady decline 2005
- Impacts
- Considered a major crop pest South America, not U.S.
- Construct nests in substations, towers, and poles
- Management
- Nest removal but costly $1.5 - $5 million
- Contraceptives
Brown Tree Snake
- Native to Australia, New Guinea, and Solomon Islands
- Introduced to Huam as stowaways after WWII
- Attained high population densities 50-100 / ha
- Slightly venomous, nocturnal, and arboreal
- Impacts
- Extirpated native bird and lizard populations
- Children susceptible to snake bites
- Loss of pets, poultry, and tourism
- Management
- Prevent cargo and aircraft entry - Detector dogs
- Live trapping, hand capture, toxicants, repellants, fumigants, contraceptives
Burmese Python
- Introduced to Florida via illegal pet releases
- Native from Thailand to Vietnam
- Generalist feeders, primarily on birds and mammals
- Unlikely to establish outside Florida
- Impacts
- Predation on native vertebrates and endangered species, causing severe ecosystem impacts
- Management
- Strategies for controlling pythons still developing
- Include capture mechanisms, detection methods, reproductive baits, toxicants
Coqui Frog
- Terrestrial tree frog introduced to Hawaii from Puerto Rico in 1980s
- Widespread on Big Island and Maui - 50K/ha
- Small populations in Florida, California, Guam, and Virgin Islands
- Distinctive call - “ko-kee” produced by males
- No tadpole stage, froglets hatch from eggs
- Impacts
- Sheer numbers reduce invertebrates, compete with birds, alter food webs and nutrient cycling
- Reduce real estate values
- Increased floriculture costs
- Carrier of chytrid fungus - Linked to frog declines worldwide
Sea Lamprey
- Primitive boneless fish
- Native to the Atlantic Ocean but introduced to Great Lakes
- Possess sucking disk mouth with sharp teeth
- First observed in Lake Ontario - 1830s
- Construction of Welland canal, 1919, facilitated spread in Great Lakes
- Impacts
- Attach to fish, rasp soft tissues, feed on fluids often with lethal effects
- Collapse of fishing industry in 1940s-1950s
- Management
- IPM using lampricides, barriers, sterile males
European and Asian Carp
- European carp: Introduced by U.S. Fish Commission in the 1800s as food fish
- Damages wetlands and aquatic ecosystems
- Increases turbidity, competes with native species, predation
- Targeted as sport fish or for bow hunting
- Asian carp: Escaped aquaculture in 1960s-1970s
- Resource competition
- Predation on fish larvae
- Boating and skiing hazards
Summary
- Worldwide, rodents and other vertebrates impacted humans and quality of life
- Vertebrates - Major cause of invasions
- Disease transmission amplified
- Avoid short-term thinking/planning
Global Threats from Exotic Diseases
HIV/AIDS - Origins
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- Causative agent for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)
- Originated from African continent
- Cross-species infections from primates
- Primates hunted for food
- Main AIDS pandemic subtype (HIV-1) originated from chimps in Central America
- HIV-2 subtype originated from sooty mangabey monkey in West Africa
- Pandemic effects from unprotected sexual contact and unsanitary syringes
HIV/AIDS - Surveillance and Response
- Greatest impact on sub-Saharan Africa
- About 67% of the 39 million people living with HIV globally (2022) are from sub-Saharan Africa
- In 2022, around 1.3 million people became HIV-positive and 630,000 people died of AIDS-related illnesses
- Projected funds needed for AIDS response in low-and middle-income countries in 2025 - $29 billion
HIV/AIDS - South Africa
- One of the countries with the highest rates of infection
- In 2021, 51,000 AIDS deaths
- Businesses impacted due to loss in workforce, productivity, lost skills, and absenteeism
- Initiated 5-year national HIV/AIDS program to address problem
- ~2006, South Africa successful in controlling HIV and AIDS epidemics
HIV/AIDS - India
- Low HIV infection rate (0.2%)
- Poverty, illiteracy, migrant labor, and socio-economic conditions contribute to spread
- Ministry of Health created national AIDS control organization (NACO) to implement AIDS prevention, education, surveillance and research programs
HIV/AIDS - USA
- HIV infection rate low (0.4%)
- HIV diagnoses decreased 12% from 2017 to 2021
- In 2019, U.S. federal funding to combat HIV totaled $36.8 billion
HIV/AIDS - Brazil
- Highest prevalence of HIV infection in Latin America
- Spread by unprotected sexual contact and drug use
- Intravenous drug use - Linked HIV infections declining from drug prevention programs established by the Ministry of Health
- “Needle exchange program” highly successful
- Risk of HIV transmission reduced by MOH’s program to practice safer sex via condom use
- Socialized health program distributes free generic antiretroviral therapies to patients
HIV/AIDS - United Kingdom
- Spread mainly through unprotected sexual contact
- High HIV infections in intravenous drug use community declined
- Department of Health adopted needle exchange program
HIV/AIDS - Australia
- Aboriginal populations experiencing HIV epidemics
- 2011-2016, HIV notification rate among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
- Increased from 3.6 to 6.3 per 100,000 and then declined to 2.3 per 100,000 in 2021
- 1.7 per 100,000 among non-Indeginous people
- Low HIV infections in intravenous drug use community
- Adopted needle exchange program
HIV/AIDS - New Zealand
- One of the world’s lowest incidence of AIDS cases
- Government aggressive in adopting various response programs
- Needle exchange
- National media campaigns
- HIV testing
- Blood supply screenings
Tuberculosis - Origins
- Uncertain origin
- Evidence of humans infected since Neolithic period (ca. 10,000 BC)
- Perhaps even prevalent in prehistoric populations
- No definitive early evidence of TB in China and India
- TB endemic in migrating European populations but not epidemic in the Americas until Europeans arrived in 1492
Tuberculosis - Surveillance and Response
- Main cause of death among people with HIV/AIDS
- WHO declaered TB global threat in 1993
- 3 TB bacterial strains, only 1 infects humans
- About 23% of world’s population infected
- Annual incidence of TB highest in Southeast Asia (46%) compared to sub-Saharan Africa (23%) and Western pacific (18%)
- HIV/AIDS epidemic and drug-resistant TB strains responsible for increasing number of TB infections
Tuberculosis - India
- Accounts for 26% of world cases
- Kills more people than malaria and leprosy
- DOTS TB control program second largest
- $100 million lost annually due to TB
Tuberculosis - South Africa
- One of the highest incidences of TB worldwide
- HIV/AIDS epidemic contributes to high infection rates
- National health priority
- Provide accessible and adequate treatment for poor
- Successful treatment rate of 77%
Tuberculosis - United Kingdom
- Low priority until recently
- Re-emergence of TB cases from 1982-1993
- Men aged 25-64, frequent travelers to India and Africa
- Focus on effective treatment of known TB cases, screening high-risk individuals, improving surveillance and research
Tuberculosis - Brazil
- Ranks 10th worldwide in TB cases
- TB bacterium introduced during 1980s gold rush
- 35% of the population are carriers
- Indeginous human populations (Yanomami Indians) vulnerable
- TB at epidemic levels in this group
- DOTS program expects to increase the diagnosis rate to 92% and successful treatment rate to 85%
- Created “bonus program” for public health facilities to treat and cure TB
Tuberculosis - Australia and New Zealand
- Australia
- Highest incidence in northern territories
- Major health threat to elderly, immigrants and native tribes
- Providing assistance in combating TB in neighboring countries
- Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Indonesia, East Timor
- New Zealand
- TB incidence increasing due to immigrants
- Control dependent on early reporting and diagnosis, thorough treatment
Malaria - Origins and Surveillance
- Parasitic disease caused by four plasmodium protozoans
- P. falciparum, P. malariae, P. ovale, P. vivax
- P. falciparum most important
- Origin - Southeast Asia and Africa
- Molecular evidence points to Africa
- Re-emergence of malaria due to several factors
- Climate change, wars, drug resistance, poor sanitation, and environmntal destruction
- Anopheles mosquitos, primary vectors
- Affects 40% of world’s population in >90 countries
Malaria - Surveillance and Response
- Accounts for 5x number of cases than AIDS, TB, measles, and leprosy combined
- Africa especially hard hit
- Responsible for 95% of global malaria cases and 96% of global malaria deaths
- Pregnant women and children under 5 years vulnerable
- Imported malaria cases increasing from globalization
- “Airport and weekend” malaria
- Drug-resistant malaria strains increasing
- Especially Southeast Asia
- Preventable disease
- Organizations - RBM, MIM, WHO, MMV
Malaria - India
- Until recently, P. vivax more prevalent than P. falciparum
- Confined to rural areas until urbanization
- Four large epidemics in the 190s
- 25% of health budget spent on prevention and management
- Rise in incidence
- Drug-resistant malaria strains
- Urbanization of mosquitos
- Emergence of P. falciparum
Malaria - Brazil
- Accounts for ~50% of Latin American malaria cases
- ~99% of cases from the Amazon basin
- P. vivax, P. falciparum, and P. malariae
- High incidence attributed to environmental degradation from 1980s gold rush mining
- Infection rates high in mining communities and native tribes
- High-risk groups in the Amazon basin
- Efforts and funding concentrated on preventative treatment
Malaria - South Africa
- Increasing since 1995 due to migrating populations
- Neighboring countries and international travelers
- P. falciparum dominant strain
- Cost of malaria ~$300 billion a year
- Estimated GDP $100 billion higher if eradicated
- One of best programs in South Africa
- GIS mapping and modeling used to predict outbreak areas
Malaria - Australia, New Zealand and UK
- No endemic malaria in Australia since 1981
- Imported cases predominantly P. vivax (46%) and P. falciparum (25%)
- Proximity to neighboring countries with malaria and suitable climate conducive to re-emergence
- New Zealand and UK cases also acquired from above
- All 3 countries advise travelers to use “caution” before, during, and after travel overseas
Cholera - Origins
- Causative agent - Vibrio cholerae
- Evolved on Indian subcontinent
- Endemic to Bangladesh and deltas of Gange and Brahmaputria rivers
- Thrives in coastal marine environments
- Enabled rapid spread worldwide
- 7 pandemics during 19th century
- 6 originated from Bangladesh - V. cholerae strain O1
- 1 from Indonesia still spreading
- V. cholerae strain O1 biotype El Tor
- New strain from Bay of Bengal - V. cholerae O139
- Still contained in Asia
Cholera - Surveillance and Response
- International trade and travel increase risk for epidemics
- Unsanitary conditions, poor hygiene, overcrowding, and climate conditions contribute to outbreaks
- Affects poor countries with suitable climate for malaria - Subtropical and tropical
- Major problem in sub-Saharan Africa
- For countries with cholera outbreaks, emphasis on sanitation and hygiene
- WHO implemented cholera control program
- Emphasis on clean water, sewage control, and personal hygiene
- 3 vaccines available, 95% effective after 1st injection
Cholera - South Africa and India
- South Africa
- Highest number of infections during past 20 years
- Main contributing factors
- Lack of clean running water and sanitation
- Shortages of health care workers, medical facilities, and lack of community awareness
- European Union providing funds for purchasing and installing toilets
- India
- Seasonal outbreaks
- Underreporting of infections and deaths
- Emergence or drug resistance and V. cholerae O139 Bengal strain adding to problem
Cholera - Latin America, Europe, and Oceania
- Latin America
- 1991 epidemic in Latin America caused high number of infections and deaths
- Infections increasing in Brazil
- Implementing small-scale water treatment programs
- Chlorine tablets for treating household water
- Europe and Oceania
- Nearly all cases reported in the UK, Australia, and NZ imported, acquired overseas
Influenza - Origins
- Evolved in Eurasian or North American birds and passed ot humans 10,000 years ago
- 3 types - A, B, C
- Type A (and its subtypes) and Type B impact humans
- Type A and subtypes infect birds, pigs, horses, and other mammals
- 1918 Spanish Flu worst pandemic disease in history - 20-40 milion deaths
- Type A (H1N1) caused pandemic
Influenza - Surveillance and Response
- WHO established a network of 110 flu centers in 83 countries
- Emphasis on extensive surveillance and vaccine development
- Vaccination most effective means of prevention
- Type A virus causes the majority of outbreaks and cases
- Individuals at greatest risk - Elderly, pregnant women, individuals with compromised immune systems, and people exposed to high-risk groups
Influenza - UK, Australia, New Zealand
- Australia and NZ infections caused by Type A (H3N2)
- Highest infection rates in infants <1 year old and lowest in elderly
Hepatitis - Origins
- One of the oldest human diseases
- Main viruses affecting humans
- Types A, B, and C
- Hepatitis B probably originated in African primates, close contact with humans facilitated cross-species transmission
- Hepatits A (HAV)
- Identified in 1973
- Spread by contact with feces, semen, saliva, and blood of infected people
- Medical expenses and financial losses due to HAV high
- Hepatitis B (HBV)
- People suffering from chronic infections suceptible to cirrhosis and liver cancer
- In Africa, Asia, and South Pacific, HBV contracted during childhood
- Spread via perinatal and child-to-child transmission, sexual contact, transfusions, and intravenous drug use (IDU)
- Hepatitis C (HCV)
- Infects only 3% of world’s population
- Modes of HCV infection - Unscreened blood products, IDU, promiscuity and non-sterlized instruments
- No HCV vaccine available yet
Hepatits - South Africa and Australia
- South Africa
- HAV endemic to South Africa
- Increase in infections prompted the government to improve sanitation, hygiene, and socioeconomic conditions
- Australia
- HAV outbreaks high in poor socioeconomic groups
- Largest outbreak occurred by oyster consumption
- Government promotes vaccination and hygiene
Hepatitis - India, UK, Brazil
- India
- Blood transfusions main route of infection
- Professional blood donors - Major HBV risk
- UK
- Low prevalence of HBV
- Transmission, mainly by sexual contact and intravenous drug use
- Needle exchange program reduced HBV infections
- Universal vaccination program needed to lower infection rate
- Brazil
- High incidence in Western Amazon basin
- Infections higher in immigrants than in natives
Hepatits - South Africa, Australia, New Zealand
- HBV infection rate in South Africa higher in rural areas
- Universal immunization program targets newborns and infants up to 1 year old
- Infections in Australia and New Zealand low
- Most infections found in native tribes, immigrants, intravenous drug users