International Criminal Courts and Tribunals Study Notes

Course Logistics and Final Examination Information

  • Final Exam Schedule: The final examination is scheduled for Wednesday, April 29, 2026, from 1:00 PM to 3:50 PM.

  • Examination Format:     * The exam is comprehensive in nature.     * It consists of 100 questions including Multiple Choice (M/C) and True/False (T/F).

  • Required Materials: Students must obtain a Scantron from the Student Union Information Desk or the Student Government Office (Suite 346) prior to the exam date.

  • Open Notes Policy: This is an open-notes examination. Students are permitted to bring unlimited printouts of class materials and personal notes.

  • Class Schedule Update: There will be no in-person class on Wednesday, April 15. A video lecture will be posted as a replacement.

Interactive Exercise: Vladimir Putin Indictment Scenario

  • Scenario Overview: Vladimir Putin was recently indicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for crimes against humanity, specifically regarding the deportation and transfer of Ukrainian children.

  • Small Group Roles (Groups of 5):     * Representative of Russia.     * Representative of the USA.     * Representative of Ukraine.     * The ICC Prosecutor.     * The UN General Assembly.

  • Objective: Groups must debate whether to assist the ICC in arresting Putin based on specific legal and political considerations.

  • Key Questions for Consideration:     * What is the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC)?     * What defines International Criminal Law?     * What are the specific definitions of war crimes and crimes against humanity?     * What is the underlying purpose of prosecuting individuals for human rights violations during war?     * What challenges are faced when attempting to pierce state sovereignty (the concept of "Principle vs. Power")?     * What is "Victor’s Justice?"     * Do certain offenses transcend sovereign boundaries?     * How do international criminal tribunals balance the need for efficiency with the requirement for independence?

Fundamental Principles of the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC)

  • Distinction: The requirement to distinguish between combatants and civilians/civilian objects.

  • Proportionality: The principle that the anticipated loss of life or damage to property incidental to attacks must not be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.

  • Necessity: Military necessity requires that force be used only to achieve a legitimate military objective.

  • Unnecessary Suffering: Prohibits the use of weapons or methods of warfare of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering.

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY): 1993–2017

  • Establishment: Formed pursuant to United Nations Convention Article VII authorities; the updated statute was released in 2009.

  • Competence and Jurisdiction:     * Scope: The court can prosecute serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia beginning January 1, 1991.     * Grave Breaches of Geneva Conventions of 1949:         * Wilful killing.         * Torture or inhumane treatment.         * Wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health.         * Extensive destruction and appropriation of property not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.         * Conscripting a prisoner of war or civilian into military service.         * Depriving a prisoner of war or civilian of a fair trial.         * Unlawful deportation, transfer, or confinement of a civilian.         * Taking civilians as hostages.     * Violations of Laws or Customs of War:         * Unnecessary suffering.         * Wanton destruction not justified by military necessity.         * Seizure of, wilful damage to, or destruction of cultural, religious, or educational civilian sites.         * Plunder of private property.     * Genocide: Prohibits acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. Specific acts include:         * Killing members of the group.         * Causing serious bodily or mental harm.         * Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction.         * Measures intended to prevent births.         * Forcibly transferring children to another group.         * Jurisdiction covers intentional acts, conspiracy, incitement, attempt, and complicity.     * Crimes Against Humanity: Defined as acts directed against a civilian population during armed conflict (International Armed Conflict or Non-International Armed Conflict), including murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, rape, persecutions on political/racial/religious grounds, and other inhumane acts.

  • Liability and Responsible Parties:     * Official position (e.g., Head of State) does not alleviate liability.     * Acting under orders is not a valid defense.     * Superiors are responsible for the acts of their subordinates.

  • Jurisdiction Particulars:     * The ICTY has concurrent jurisdiction with national courts but maintains primacy.     * Double jeopardy is prohibited.     * Temporal limitation: Crimes must have occurred after January 1, 1991.     * Geographic limitation: Territory of the former Yugoslavia.

  • Structural Organization:     * Chambers: Three trial chambers and one appellate chamber.     * The Prosecutor: Responsible for investigations and indictments.     * The Registry: Handles administration.

  • Composition of the Court:     * Maximum of 16 permanent judges; only one from each state.     * 12 ad litem judges; only one from each state.     * Trial chambers consist of 3 permanent and 6 ad litem judges.     * Appeals Chamber consists of 7 permanent members (5 sit on any particular appeal).     * Judges serve 4-year terms and are eligible for re-election.     * Nominations are provided by states (up to 2 per state); the final list of nominees must be between 28 and 42 individuals, selected by absolute majority vote.

  • The Prosecutor’s Role:     * Appointed by the Security Council on nomination by the Secretary-General.     * Initiates investigations, conducts on-site inquiries, and seeks state support.     * Seeks indictments, arrest warrants, and transfer orders from the Trial Chamber.

  • Rights of the Accused:     * Right to counsel during questioning.     * Right to equal protection and a public hearing.     * Protection from undue delay.     * Right to cross-examination and presence at trial.     * Right against self-incrimination.

  • Verdicts and Penalties:     * Rendered by a 3-judge panel.     * Penalties are limited to imprisonment and return of property.     * Sentences are served in designated states.

  • State Cooperation Requirements: Member states must assist in identifying/locating persons, taking testimony, producing evidence, service of documents, arrest, and transfer of accused individuals.

  • Administrative Notes: Members enjoy diplomatic privileges and immunities; the budget is handled by the UN.

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR): 1994–2015

  • Establishment: Formed under Chapter VII of the UN Security Council.

  • Temporal Jurisdiction: Offenses committed between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1994.

  • Crimes and Competence:     * Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity are defined identically to the ICTY.     * Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II: Includes violations such as violence to life/health, murder, torture, mutilation, collective punishments, hostage-taking, act of terrorism, outrages upon personal dignity (rape, humiliating treatment), pillage, and executions without regular courts.

  • Tribunal Commonalities: Both the ICTY and ICTR shared the same prosecutor for many years and have identical rules regarding individual liability, concurrent jurisdiction/primacy, and composition of chambers.

The Rome Statute and the International Criminal Court (ICC)

  • Foundation: Adopted July 17, 1998; entered into force July 1, 2002.

  • Nature: A permanent court separate from (but tied to) the UN, seated at The Hague, Netherlands.

  • Jurisdiction Philosophy: Universal jurisdiction tied to specific subject matter (limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community).     * Specific Crimes (Art. 5-8): Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes, and the Crime of Aggression.

  • Definitions under the Rome Statute:     * Genocide (Art. 6): Intentional acts to destroy national, ethnical, racial, or religious groups (Killing, bodily/mental harm, inflicting conditions for destruction, preventing births, transferring children).     * Crimes Against Humanity (Art. 7): Acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population with knowledge of the attack. Includes murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence (rape, forced pregnancy, sterilization), persecution, apartheid, and other inhumane acts.     * War Crimes (Art. 8): Specifically when committed as part of a plan or policy or large-scale commission; includes grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions.     * Crime of Aggression (Art. 8bis): Planning/execution by a person in control of a state's military/political action that constitutes a manifest violation of the UN Charter (use of armed force against sovereignty/territorial integrity).

  • Criminal Liability: Includes joint commission, ordering/inducing, aiding/abetting, group enterprise, incitement (for genocide), and attempt.

  • Applicable Persons: Includes military commanders and supervisors for subordinate actions; superior orders are not a defense.

  • Mens Rea: Requires intent and knowledge (meaning to commit the act and meaning to cause the outcome or understanding the likely effect).

  • Amendments: Any state party, a majority of judges, or the prosecutor can propose new offenses via 2/3 majority approval.

  • Complementary Nature: The ICC is a court of last resort. Cases are inadmissible if:     * A state is willing and able to prosecute.     * A state decides not to prosecute (unless it is unwilling/unable).     * Double jeopardy applies.

ICC Structure and Personnel

  • Organs: The Presidency; Appellate, Trial, and Pre-Trial Divisions; Office of the Prosecutor; The Registry.

  • Judiciary:     * 18 judges total, serving 9-year terms (not eligible for re-election).     * 1/3 of the judiciary is elected every 3 years.     * Elected by secret ballot (2/3 majority) of member states.     * Must be a national of a member state party.     * The Presidency (President, 1st VP, 2nd VP) is elected by judges for 3-year terms.

  • Judicial Independence: Judges cannot engage in occupations or actions that interfere with duties or impartiality.

  • Office of the Prosecutor:     * An independent organ elected by secret ballot of member states.     * Prosecutor and Deputy Prosecutors serve 9-year terms (no re-election).     * The Prosecutor has discretion to initiate investigations but must receive authorization from the Pre-Trial Chamber.

ICC Process, Rights, and Penalties

  • Initiation: A state party or the prosecutor initiates cases. If the prosecutor declines, the referring state or Security Council must be informed and can request a review by the Pre-Trial Division.

  • Warrants: Issued by the Pre-Trial Chamber at the prosecutor's request.

  • Rights Ensured (Art. 67):     * Right against self-incrimination.     * Right against coercion, duress, or arbitrary arrest.     * Right to an interpreter and legal assistance.     * Right to remain silent and to be questioned with counsel present.     * Right to a public trial in the defendant's presence.     * Right to cross-examine witnesses and protection from undue delay.

  • Penalties (Art. 77):     * Imprisonment up to 30 years or life sentences (if justified by gravity).     * Fines.     * Forfeiture of property/assets.

  • International Cooperation:     * States are expected to comply with arrest warrants, searches, seizures, and witness protection.     * If a state refuses, the court may refer the matter to the Assembly of States Parties or the Security Council.

Recent Notable ICC Indictments

  • Vladimir Putin (2023): Accused of war crimes involving the unlawful deportation and transfer of Ukrainian children. Note: Russia is not a member state, but Ukraine is.

  • Benjamin Netanyahu (2024): Accused of war crimes (starvation), crimes against humanity, and directing attacks on civilians. Note: Israel is not a member state, but Palestine is.

  • Rodrigo Duterte (2025): Accused of crimes against humanity for murder and attempted murder; arrested by the Philippines.

Scholarly Perspectives and Theoretical Frameworks

  • Gary J. Bass (War Crimes Tribunals, 2009):     * Legal norms in war date back to antiquity.     * Laws of war are ambitious and precarious because they aim to limit how states fight.     * The Challenge of "Victor’s Justice": Law may only matter when backed by politics. Prosecution may be seen as applying foreign ideology to serve national interests (e.g., American prosecution at the Tokyo Trials).     * Tribunals face a trade-off between effectiveness/legitimacy and state power/impartiality.     * Prosecution threats can sometimes hinder diplomatic solutions to catastrophes.

  • Baroni (2000) on the ICTY and Peace:     * International Humanitarian Law (IHL) is the "human rights component of the law of war."     * Shift since WWII from state-centric focus (internal sovereignty) to individual accountability.     * Three Roles of the ICTY:         1. Truth: Establishing humanitarian facts to prevent the revival of animosities.         2. Individualization of Guilt: Prevents atrocities from being blamed on collective groups or "ethnic rivalries," thereby reducing resentment and vengeance.         3. Deterrence: شامل Specific deterrence (deterring the individual) and General deterrence (signaling accountability to society). Even with few convictions early on, it establishes a "culture of compliance."     * Challenges: The ICTY face limited state support and questions about whether alternative justice (truth commissions/amnesty) might be more effective.