The 'Ideal' Victim
Victimhood
Focus on harm
Should be recognised irrespective of CJ engagement or outcomes
Can be a direct or indirect victim
Family and friends may be labelled as secondary victims
People who intervene or assist or are involved in the aftermath may be labelled as tertiary victims
Levels of victims’ guilt
Mendelsohn’s victims typology
Completely innocent
Minor guilt
As guilty as the offender
More guilty than offender
Most guilty victim
Imaginary victim
Von Hentig — psychological calsses of victims
The depressed — lacks ordinary prudence and discretion and has a secret and subconscious desire to be annihilated
The acquisitive — lacks normal inhibitions and well-founded suspicions because of a desire for money
The wanton — feminine foibles play a role such women take the bait of their sensual disposition. Von Hentig explains that the sensuality of a girl is often intensified by climatic influences and the fact that the girl is just indisposed.
Victim culpability
Trying to understand why some people are more likely to be victimised than others. What is it about their behaviour that provokes victimisation
Wolfgang developed a theory measuring victim culpability. The victim and the offender re both separate entities and ‘mutual participants’
While offender / victim dynamics may be worth analysing, the issue with these early theoretical perspectives is: they focus on trying to find what the victim did wrong
These ideas are still used within the CJS in attempts to prove defendants innocent.
Victim blaming approach
Early work in victimology and psychology looking at sexual offences tended to take a victim blaming approach
Amir suggested that offenders and victims are mutually interacting patterns. the female partner sometimes encourages rape when she uses what could be interpreted as indecency in language and gestures, or constitutes what could be taken as invitation to sexual relations
The ideal victim
Christie’s ideal victim — a person or a category of individuals who most readily are given the complete and legitimate status of being a victim
Weak
blameless
engaged in a respectable project
eg charity work
no relationship with offender
Offender is big and bad
The ideal victim and victim blaming
stereotypes of the ideal victim form the foundations of victim myths, such as rape myths
Victims must be weak compared to the offender
In reality offenders are also victims