Chapter 10 – Externalities and Public Goods (Vocabulary Review)

1. Identifying Externalities

  • Key definition
    • Externality: A side effect of an activity that affects bystanders whose interests are not factored into the decision-making process.
    • Leads to market failure → outcomes are inefficient from society’s perspective.
  • Types
    • Negative externality → harms bystanders; examples: double-parking, secondhand smoke, in-class phone scrolling.
    • Positive externality → benefits bystanders; examples: exercising, advance study-group prep, flower gardens.
  • Consequences for market quantities
    • Negative externalities: “Too much” activity vs. social optimum.
    • Positive externalities: “Too little” activity vs. social optimum.
  • Price changes vs. externalities
    • A price change itself is not an externality; buyers & sellers are not bystanders.
  • Private vs. social interests
    • Private interest = personal costs/benefits.
    • Social interest = all costs/benefits, including those accruing to others.
    • If choices have external effects, private ≠ social → market failure.

Cost & benefit language

  • Marginal Private Cost (MPC): extra cost to producer.
  • Marginal External Cost (MEC): extra cost to bystanders.
  • Marginal Social Cost (MSC): MSC = MPC + MEC
  • Marginal Private Benefit (MPB): extra benefit to consumer.
  • Marginal External Benefit (MEB): extra benefit to bystanders.
  • Marginal Social Benefit (MSB): MSB = MPB + MEB

Graph illustrations (verbal)

  • Gasoline negative externality
    • Example numbers: At 20 m gallons, MPC = 3, MEC = 2 ⇒ MSC = 5.
  • Vaccine positive externality
    • Example numbers: At 10 k doses, MPB = 40, MEB = 30 ⇒ MSB = 70.

Key take-aways

  • Externalities create a wedge between private & social curves.
  • Negative: MSC > MPC → overproduction.
  • Positive: MSB > MPB → underproduction.

2. The Externality Problem

  • Markets are usually efficient if only buyers & sellers matter.
  • When bystanders are affected, equilibrium ignores them → inefficient.

Socially optimal quantity (Q*)

  • Apply marginal principle: Produce more while MSB \ge MSC.
  • Hence Q^* occurs where MSB = MSC.

Four-step recipe for analysis

  1. Predict market equilibrium (set supply = demand).
  2. Identify externality (positive/negative, magnitude).
  3. Locate socially optimal quantity (set MSB = MSC).
  4. Compare equilibrium vs. Q^* → diagnose over- or under-production.
Gasoline case study (negative)
  • MEC ≈ 2.10 per gallon.
  • Equilibrium Q exceeds Q^* → overproduction.
  • Zero pollution not optimal; seek balance of convenience vs. harm.
Flu-shot case study (positive)
  • MEB ≈ 10 per shot.
  • Equilibrium Q below Q^* → underproduction.

Summary table

  • Negative ext. → harm → MPC understates MSC → too much.
  • Positive ext. → help → MPB understates MSB → too little.

3. Solving Externality Problems

Goal: Internalize the externality so decision makers feel full costs/benefits.

3.1 Private Bargaining (Coase theorem)

  • Conditions: Clear/enforced property rights, negligible bargaining costs.
  • Side payments align incentives.
    • Loud music: Pay neighbor 5 to reduce volume.
    • Humana Go365: Insurer pays clients to exercise, internalizing health benefit.
  • Effectiveness > fairness; both parties end up better off.

3.2 Corrective (Pigovian) Taxes & Subsidies

  • Tax for negative ext.: set Tax = MEC.
    • Gasoline: Tax = 2.10 moves supply vertically → new supply = MSC; quantity falls to Q^*.
  • Subsidy for positive ext.: set Subsidy = MEB.
    • Examples: Insurance discounts for alarms, COVID gift cards, Pell Grants.

3.3 Cap and Trade

  • Quantity regulation: issue limited pollution permits (cap) that can be traded.
  • Efficient firms buy permits, concentrating production among cleaner producers.
  • Set cap = Q^* emissions.
  • Firm-to-firm permit trading yields cost-minimization (dirty firm sells, clean firm buys).

3.4 Laws, Rules, Regulations

  • Direct restrictions: noise ordinances, speed limits, fuel-efficiency standards, workplace safety rules, antivirus requirements.
  • Purpose: prohibit or limit behavior creating negative externalities.

Key take-aways (solutions)

  • Private bargaining: uses mutually beneficial deals.
  • Taxes/Subsidies: make actors face social cost/benefit.
  • Cap & trade: fixes quantity, lets price adjust via permits.
  • Regulation: outright limit or mandate behaviors.

4. Public Goods & the Tragedy of the Commons

4.1 Classifying goods

  • Excludability: feasible to prevent access?
  • Rivalry: does one person’s use subtract from another’s?
RivalNon-rival
ExcludablePrivate goods (cars, cupcakes)Club goods (HBO, cable, email)
Non-excludableCommon resources (fish, some parks)Public goods (national defense, NPR)

4.2 Externalities from Non-excludability

  • Non-excludable means users who don’t pay still benefit ⇒ externalities.
  • If non-rival (public good) → positive externality to bystanders → free-rider problem → underproduction.
  • If rival (common resource) → negative externality (each user imposes cost on others) → overuse (tragedy of the commons).

4.3 Free-Rider Problem & Public Goods

  • Free riders consume without paying; market ignores their benefits.
  • Result: too little or zero supply from private sector.
  • Government solutions:
    • Direct provision financed by taxes (military, parks, public schools).
    • Government purchase from private producers (COVID vaccines).

4.4 Tragedy of the Commons & Common Resources

  • Rival + non-excludable; users don’t bear full social cost.
  • Example: Overfishing—private catch, shared ecosystem damage.
  • Solution: Assign ownership rights
    • Convert common resource into property; owner internalizes costs/benefits.
    • Analogous to fencing rangeland, ITQ (individual transferable quotas) for fisheries.

5. Synthesis & Exam Pointers

  1. Diagnose externality: positive or negative?
  2. Predict direction of market failure: too much vs. too little.
  3. Choose remedy: bargaining, tax/subsidy, cap-and-trade, regulation, government provision, property rights—context matters.
  4. Quantitative toolkit: apply MSC = MPC + MEC and MSB = MPB + MEB; set MSB = MSC for social optimum.