Chapter 10 – Externalities and Public Goods (Vocabulary Review)
1. Identifying Externalities
- Key definition
- Externality: A side effect of an activity that affects bystanders whose interests are not factored into the decision-making process.
- Leads to market failure → outcomes are inefficient from society’s perspective.
- Types
- Negative externality → harms bystanders; examples: double-parking, secondhand smoke, in-class phone scrolling.
- Positive externality → benefits bystanders; examples: exercising, advance study-group prep, flower gardens.
- Consequences for market quantities
- Negative externalities: “Too much” activity vs. social optimum.
- Positive externalities: “Too little” activity vs. social optimum.
- Price changes vs. externalities
- A price change itself is not an externality; buyers & sellers are not bystanders.
- Private vs. social interests
- Private interest = personal costs/benefits.
- Social interest = all costs/benefits, including those accruing to others.
- If choices have external effects, private ≠ social → market failure.
Cost & benefit language
- Marginal Private Cost (MPC): extra cost to producer.
- Marginal External Cost (MEC): extra cost to bystanders.
- Marginal Social Cost (MSC): MSC = MPC + MEC
- Marginal Private Benefit (MPB): extra benefit to consumer.
- Marginal External Benefit (MEB): extra benefit to bystanders.
- Marginal Social Benefit (MSB): MSB = MPB + MEB
Graph illustrations (verbal)
- Gasoline negative externality
- Example numbers: At 20 m gallons, MPC = 3, MEC = 2 ⇒ MSC = 5.
- Vaccine positive externality
- Example numbers: At 10 k doses, MPB = 40, MEB = 30 ⇒ MSB = 70.
Key take-aways
- Externalities create a wedge between private & social curves.
- Negative: MSC > MPC → overproduction.
- Positive: MSB > MPB → underproduction.
2. The Externality Problem
- Markets are usually efficient if only buyers & sellers matter.
- When bystanders are affected, equilibrium ignores them → inefficient.
Socially optimal quantity (Q*)
- Apply marginal principle: Produce more while MSB \ge MSC.
- Hence Q^* occurs where MSB = MSC.
Four-step recipe for analysis
- Predict market equilibrium (set supply = demand).
- Identify externality (positive/negative, magnitude).
- Locate socially optimal quantity (set MSB = MSC).
- Compare equilibrium vs. Q^* → diagnose over- or under-production.
Gasoline case study (negative)
- MEC ≈ 2.10 per gallon.
- Equilibrium Q exceeds Q^* → overproduction.
- Zero pollution not optimal; seek balance of convenience vs. harm.
Flu-shot case study (positive)
- MEB ≈ 10 per shot.
- Equilibrium Q below Q^* → underproduction.
Summary table
- Negative ext. → harm → MPC understates MSC → too much.
- Positive ext. → help → MPB understates MSB → too little.
3. Solving Externality Problems
Goal: Internalize the externality so decision makers feel full costs/benefits.
3.1 Private Bargaining (Coase theorem)
- Conditions: Clear/enforced property rights, negligible bargaining costs.
- Side payments align incentives.
- Loud music: Pay neighbor 5 to reduce volume.
- Humana Go365: Insurer pays clients to exercise, internalizing health benefit.
- Effectiveness > fairness; both parties end up better off.
3.2 Corrective (Pigovian) Taxes & Subsidies
- Tax for negative ext.: set Tax = MEC.
- Gasoline: Tax = 2.10 moves supply vertically → new supply = MSC; quantity falls to Q^*.
- Subsidy for positive ext.: set Subsidy = MEB.
- Examples: Insurance discounts for alarms, COVID gift cards, Pell Grants.
3.3 Cap and Trade
- Quantity regulation: issue limited pollution permits (cap) that can be traded.
- Efficient firms buy permits, concentrating production among cleaner producers.
- Set cap = Q^* emissions.
- Firm-to-firm permit trading yields cost-minimization (dirty firm sells, clean firm buys).
3.4 Laws, Rules, Regulations
- Direct restrictions: noise ordinances, speed limits, fuel-efficiency standards, workplace safety rules, antivirus requirements.
- Purpose: prohibit or limit behavior creating negative externalities.
Key take-aways (solutions)
- Private bargaining: uses mutually beneficial deals.
- Taxes/Subsidies: make actors face social cost/benefit.
- Cap & trade: fixes quantity, lets price adjust via permits.
- Regulation: outright limit or mandate behaviors.
4. Public Goods & the Tragedy of the Commons
4.1 Classifying goods
- Excludability: feasible to prevent access?
- Rivalry: does one person’s use subtract from another’s?
| Rival | Non-rival |
---|
Excludable | Private goods (cars, cupcakes) | Club goods (HBO, cable, email) |
Non-excludable | Common resources (fish, some parks) | Public goods (national defense, NPR) |
4.2 Externalities from Non-excludability
- Non-excludable means users who don’t pay still benefit ⇒ externalities.
- If non-rival (public good) → positive externality to bystanders → free-rider problem → underproduction.
- If rival (common resource) → negative externality (each user imposes cost on others) → overuse (tragedy of the commons).
4.3 Free-Rider Problem & Public Goods
- Free riders consume without paying; market ignores their benefits.
- Result: too little or zero supply from private sector.
- Government solutions:
- Direct provision financed by taxes (military, parks, public schools).
- Government purchase from private producers (COVID vaccines).
4.4 Tragedy of the Commons & Common Resources
- Rival + non-excludable; users don’t bear full social cost.
- Example: Overfishing—private catch, shared ecosystem damage.
- Solution: Assign ownership rights
- Convert common resource into property; owner internalizes costs/benefits.
- Analogous to fencing rangeland, ITQ (individual transferable quotas) for fisheries.
5. Synthesis & Exam Pointers
- Diagnose externality: positive or negative?
- Predict direction of market failure: too much vs. too little.
- Choose remedy: bargaining, tax/subsidy, cap-and-trade, regulation, government provision, property rights—context matters.
- Quantitative toolkit: apply MSC = MPC + MEC and MSB = MPB + MEB; set MSB = MSC for social optimum.