Lecture 7: Comprehensive Notes on Bond Price Relationships, Convexity, and Valuation
Evaluation of Bond Price and Yield Relationships
The primary relationship explored in bond metrics is the investment relationship between bond price and yields.
This understanding arises from both a mathematical perspective and the application of the law of one price.
An inverse relationship exists between bond price and yield; as yields increase, bond prices decrease, and vice versa.
Bond Price and Face Value Relationships Relative to Coupon Rates
Understanding how bonds with different coupon rates trade at the same yield is critical for evaluating bond returns.
The relationship between bond price and face value depends on the comparison between the coupon rate () and the yield to maturity ().
Bonds Trading at Par:
Occurs when the coupon rate is equal to the yield to maturity ().
Example: If investors require a return and the bond offers a coupon, the bond provides exactly what is required.
The bond does not need to offer extra incentives like discounts; therefore, price equals face value.
Bonds Trading at a Discount:
Occurs when the coupon rate is lower than the yield to maturity (CR < YTM).
If the coupon rate is and investors require a total return of , the coupon alone is insufficient.
The bond must offer a discount to close the gap in return. This discount acts as a capital gain for the investor.
Example calculation:
Face Value:
Price:
Discount (Capital Gain):
This capital gain, when added to the coupon, brings the total return to the required .
Specifically, the present value of the missing return (e.g., on a face value) over years at equals exactly , the amount of the discount.
Bonds Trading at a Premium:
Occurs when the coupon rate is higher than the yield to maturity (CR > YTM).
Example: The bond pays an coupon when investors only require a total return.
The bond price will be greater than the face value because it offers more than the market requires.
Example calculation:
Coupon:
Yield:
Time: years
Price:
The premium is the difference between price and face value: .
The premium effectively acts as a built-in capital loss over the life of the bond. Paying today to receive at maturity ensures the total return is capped at despite the higher coupon payments.
This mechanism ensures the bond's total return remains in line with similar market instruments.
Positive Convexity in Bonds
The relationship between bond prices and yields is not linear; it is convex. This feature is known as positive convexity.
Positive convexity means that an equal change in yield up and down will result in a price change of different magnitudes:
Price appreciation (when yields drop) is greater than price depreciation (when yields rise) for the same basis point change.
Numerical Summary of Convexity Example:
Starting Point: , , Price = .
Yield increases to (): Price drops to , a decrease of .
Yield decreases to (): Price rises to , an increase of .
Result: The price increase () is larger than the price decrease () for the same yield move.
Graphical Characteristics:
The price-yield curve is steeper at low interest rate levels and flatter at high interest rate levels.
This asymmetry makes bonds with high convexity attractive to traders, as it offers more upside for falling rates than downside for rising rates.
Time Path of a Bond and Time Decay
Time decay, or "pull to par," refers to how a bond price changes as it approaches maturity, assuming the yield to maturity remains constant.
Par Bonds: The price remains constant at face value until maturity.
Discount Bonds: The price increases toward face value over time as the discount is realized gradually as a capital gain.
Premium Bonds: The price decreases toward face value over time as the premium is realized gradually as a capital loss.
Decomposition of Bond Price Changes
There are two primary reasons a bond price changes:
The change in the yield to maturity ().
The change in time (time decay/pull to par).
It is essential to decompose these changes to evaluate a manager's skill. Price appreciation due to time decay on a discount bond is passive, whereas appreciation due to correctly anticipating yield changes is considered a skill.
Case Study for Decomposition:
Given: A -year bond (initially years in description), Face Value = , Coupon = (paid twice a year, so per period), Initial Yield = ( per period).
Initial Price: .
Scenario after 4 years: Time left = years ( periods), New Yield = ( per period).
Price after 4 years:
Total Price Change: .
Decomposition Steps:
To find the price change due only to time, calculate the bond's value after years using the original yield ().
Price after years at yield: .
Change due to Time: .
Change due to Yield Support: .
Pricing Bonds Between Coupon Dates
Pricing bonds at a specific coupon date occurs rarely in practice. Most bonds trade between coupon dates, introducing two complications:
Fractional Periods: Time to maturity is not a whole number (e.g., years, months, days).
Accrued Interest: The next coupon payment must be shared between the buyer and the seller.
Accrued Interest and the "Give to Caesar" Principle:
Accrued interest is interest earned but not yet collected. It is shared based on the number of days each party held the bond.
Example: If a bond's annual coupon is and the seller held it for days, they are entitled to .
Clean and Dirty Prices:
Dirty Price: The total price the buyer pays, which includes the clean price plus any accrued interest.
Clean Price: The price of the bond excluding accrued interest.
Cum-Coupon vs. Ex-Coupon:
Cumulative Coupon (Cum Coop): The next coupon payment goes to the buyer. The buyer must then compensate the seller for the portion the seller earned during their holding period.
Ex-Coupon (Ex Coop): The next coupon payment goes to the seller. The seller must then compensate the buyer for the buyer's portion of the coupon period.
Questions & Discussion
Question: Does it make sense to pay a premium for a bond, such as paying for a face value?
Response: Yes, because the return matters more than the nominal price. Even if a capital loss is incurred, the buyer receives a higher coupon ( vs market rate) that offsets the loss, resulting in the desired yield of . Evaluation based on price alone is insufficient for bonds; the return (yield) is the defining metric.
Question on Manager Performance: Who did a better job: Manager A, whose portfolio increased by due to time decay, or Manager B, whose portfolio increased by due to anticipating a yield change?
Response: Manager B. Anticipating yield changes requires significant skill and market insight, whereas time decay is an automatic function of holding a discount bond. It is critical to decompose performance to distinguish between "real meat" (skill-based gains) and passive gains.