Goodman
Introduction
Different kinds of memory are mediated by dissociable neural systems.
Extinction learning involves suppressing a previously acquired memory in the absence of its original reinforcer.
Behavioral demonstration of extinction learning occurs when previously reinforced behavior declines, e.g., a rat stops running toward food when it's no longer provided.
Extinction Learning
Definition: Extinction is defined as learned suppression of a previously acquired memory (Bouton, 2004; Myers and Davis, 2007).
Extinction shows a response decrement in the behavior that was reinforced earlier.
Response decrement is the primary measure of extinction learning in studies.
Historical Perspectives on Extinction
Learning Theory Views
Stimulus-Response (S-R) View:
Proposed by Clark L. Hull, suggests initial memory acquisition is akin to a reflex, where stimuli activate automatic responses.
During extinction, stimuli elicit a "no response".
Cognitive View:
Championed by Tolman, states that animals learn meaningful relationships between stimuli, producing a cognitive expectation for reinforcement.
Extinction occurs when the expectation of reinforcement changes.
The Multiple Memory Systems Approach
Suggests distinct learning mechanisms coexist and contribute to extinction learning.
Recent maze learning experiments support the hypothesis of multiple memory systems in extinction.
Key Brain Structures in Extinction Learning
Hippocampus and Dorsal Striatum (DLS)
Hippocampus:
Mediates stimulus-stimulus associations.
Involvement in spatial learning and context-related memories.
Dorsal Striatum (DLS):
Mediates stimulus-response associations.
Activates learned behaviors without conscious expectation of reinforcement.
Findings show that both systems likely play different roles in extinction.
Experimental Paradigms in Studying Extinction
Two Types of Extinction Protocols
Response Extinction Protocol:
Allows subjects to perform learned behavior without reinforcement.
Example: A rat runs to the goal but finds no food.
Latent Extinction Protocol:
Prevents execution of the learned behavior.
Example: A rat is confined to the goal box without reinforcement, learning that the goal no longer contains food.
Evidence from Experiments
Both extinction protocols produce effective extinction learning, with different underlying mechanisms related to the involved neural systems:
DLS is necessary for response extinction; hippocampus is critical for latent extinction.
Contextual cues enhance latent extinction but have little effect on response extinction.
Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Extinction
Impact of Memory Type on Extinction
The effectiveness of extinction depends on whether the learned memory is cognitive or response-based.
Evidence indicates that response extinction is effective for DLS-dependent response memories, while latent extinction is more suited for hippocampal-dependent memories.
Implications for Understanding and Treatment of Psychopathologies
Extinction protocols may inform treatment approaches for maladaptive memories in disorders like PTSD, anxiety disorders, and addiction.
Understanding the specific neural and memory systems involved can guide therapeutic strategies.
Conclusion
The multiple memory systems framework is instrumental in understanding extinction.
Different extinction protocols engage distinct neural substrates resulting in unique extinction learning processes based on the type of memory involved.
Future treatment strategies can leverage these insights to address specific memory-related psychopathologies effectively.