GOVT 2306 Political Parties Lecture Notes
Lecture Overview on Political Parties
The lecture focuses on the impact of political parties, particularly third parties and independent candidates, on elections.
Key concepts introduced include:
Definition of political parties
Evolution of the two-party system in the U.S.
Party identification and voter behavior
Definition of Political Parties
A political party is defined as:
A group of voters, activists, candidates, and office holders who identify with a particular party label.
The main goal is to elect individuals to public office.
Historical Context
Key figures in the development of the modern American party system include:
Alexander Hamilton (Federalists)
Thomas Jefferson (Anti-Federalists)
The evolution of the two-party system began shortly after the Constitution was established.
Since approximately , Republicans and Democrats became the two major parties.
Overview of presidential elections from to the present shows:
Dominance by Republicans and Democrats, with a brief period of Republican dominance between .
Competitive inter-party dynamics in the late century.
Major Party Control Timeline
Presidential Election Impact:
Reconstruction period showed Republican dominance from .
Competitive elections from leading up to the Great Depression.
The exhibited Democratic dominance under Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Since the , U.S. politics has been characterized by "closely competitive elections" between the two parties.
President Examples:
Democratic Presidents:
Jimmy Carter ()
Bill Clinton ()
Barack Obama ()
Republican Presidents:
Ronald Reagan ()
George H. W. Bush ()
George W. Bush ()
Donald Trump ()
The Impact of Minor Parties
Minor parties, including the Green Party and Libertarian Party, are typically not a threat to the two major parties but have shown significant impact in certain elections:
Examples include Ross Perot in and Ralph Nader in .
Ross Perot's Campaign (1992):
Started as an independent, later formed the Reform Party.
Achieved of the national popular vote, a notable achievement for a minor party.
Despite this, he secured electoral votes due to the Electoral College system.
Contextual factors influenced perceptions of his impact on Bush and Clinton's votes.
Effects of Ross Perot on 1992 Election
Analyzed the swing in voter support during the election:
Early polls showed potential success for Perot but were impacted by his campaign suspension.
Exit polls indicated that Perot likely siphoned votes away predominantly from George H. W. Bush.
Analysts suggest it would have been a "neck-and-neck race" between Bush and Clinton if Perot had not run.
Ralph Nader's Influence on 2000 Election
Ralph Nader, running for the Green Party, gained of the national popular vote.
Key points include:
Al Gore lost to George W. Bush by a "razor-thin margin" based on the Electoral College ratio of .
In critical states, Nader's presence arguably swayed voters from Gore, particularly in Florida where Bush won by just votes, while Nader received approximately votes.
External factors such as ballot confusion (specifically the butterfly ballot) also played a role in the election outcome.
Impact of Jill Stein in 2016 Election
Jill Stein's Green Party bid and its minimal impact:
Her support was less than Ralph Nader's national support.
While some argue she detracted from Hillary Clinton's votes, overall analysis suggests her impact was limited compared to historical third-party runs.
Exit polls indicate Clinton might have performed better without Stein, but not enough to definitively change the outcome across all swing states.