GOVT 2306 Political Parties Lecture Notes

Lecture Overview on Political Parties
  • The lecture focuses on the impact of political parties, particularly third parties and independent candidates, on elections.

  • Key concepts introduced include:

    • Definition of political parties

    • Evolution of the two-party system in the U.S.

    • Party identification and voter behavior


Definition of Political Parties
  • A political party is defined as:

    • A group of voters, activists, candidates, and office holders who identify with a particular party label.

    • The main goal is to elect individuals to public office.


Historical Context
  • Key figures in the development of the modern American party system include:

    • Alexander Hamilton (Federalists)

    • Thomas Jefferson (Anti-Federalists)

  • The evolution of the two-party system began shortly after the Constitution was established.

    • Since approximately 18001800, Republicans and Democrats became the two major parties.

  • Overview of presidential elections from 18601860 to the present shows:

    • Dominance by Republicans and Democrats, with a brief period of Republican dominance between 187618961876-1896.

    • Competitive inter-party dynamics in the late 20th20^{th} century.


Major Party Control Timeline
  • Presidential Election Impact:

    • Reconstruction period showed Republican dominance from 187618961876-1896.

    • Competitive elections from 189619291896-1929 leading up to the Great Depression.

    • The 1930s1940s1930s-1940s exhibited Democratic dominance under Franklin D. Roosevelt.

    • Since the 1950s1950s, U.S. politics has been characterized by "closely competitive elections" between the two parties.

  • President Examples:

    • Democratic Presidents:

      • Jimmy Carter (197619801976-1980)

      • Bill Clinton (199220001992-2000)

      • Barack Obama (200820162008-2016)

    • Republican Presidents:

      • Ronald Reagan (188019881880-1988)

      • George H. W. Bush (198819921988-1992)

      • George W. Bush (200020082000-2008)

      • Donald Trump (201620202016-2020)


The Impact of Minor Parties
  • Minor parties, including the Green Party and Libertarian Party, are typically not a threat to the two major parties but have shown significant impact in certain elections:

    • Examples include Ross Perot in 19921992 and Ralph Nader in 20002000.

  • Ross Perot's Campaign (1992):

    • Started as an independent, later formed the Reform Party.

    • Achieved 18.9%18.9\% of the national popular vote, a notable achievement for a minor party.

    • Despite this, he secured 00 electoral votes due to the Electoral College system.

    • Contextual factors influenced perceptions of his impact on Bush and Clinton's votes.


Effects of Ross Perot on 1992 Election
  • Analyzed the swing in voter support during the election:

    • Early polls showed potential success for Perot but were impacted by his campaign suspension.

    • Exit polls indicated that Perot likely siphoned votes away predominantly from George H. W. Bush.

    • Analysts suggest it would have been a "neck-and-neck race" between Bush and Clinton if Perot had not run.


Ralph Nader's Influence on 2000 Election
  • Ralph Nader, running for the Green Party, gained 2.74%2.74\% of the national popular vote.

  • Key points include:

    • Al Gore lost to George W. Bush by a "razor-thin margin" based on the Electoral College ratio of 271:266271:266.

    • In critical states, Nader's presence arguably swayed voters from Gore, particularly in Florida where Bush won by just 537537 votes, while Nader received approximately 97,00097,000 votes.

  • External factors such as ballot confusion (specifically the butterfly ballot) also played a role in the election outcome.


Impact of Jill Stein in 2016 Election
  • Jill Stein's Green Party bid and its minimal impact:

    • Her support was less than Ralph Nader's national support.

    • While some argue she detracted from Hillary Clinton's votes, overall analysis suggests her impact was limited compared to historical third-party runs.

    • Exit polls indicate Clinton might have performed better without Stein, but not enough to definitively change the outcome across all swing states.