(Svenson) Corruption

Baked into how country works economy, country, culture. Not just bad actors but a symptom of a bad system

(1) What is Corruption?

  • Misusing public office for private gains

  • Outcome: a reflection of a country's legal, economic, cultural and political institutions

  • Response to either beneficial or harmful rules.

  • Examples:

    • Bribes

      • Higher transaction costs than taxes, because of the uncertainty and secrecy that necessarily accompany bribe payments

      • Similar to lobbying to influence decision-making that is firm specific

      • Not the same as rent-seeking

      • Not always public corruption, can be in private sector

    • Also lobbying, campaign contributions, and clientelism Which Countries are the Most Corrupt?

  • Ranked by Transparency international survey index, etc.

    • How reliable each country seems

    • Not hard data

    • How much people trust government

    • different rankings have similar results

    • Consistent naughty list: Somalia, South Sudan, Venzuela, Yemen, Libia, and other countries in chaos, developing, or switching from one type of economy to another

(2) Which Countries are the Most Corrupt?

Main Types of Corruption Indicators:

  1. Indicators of corruption from private risk-assessment firms (International Country Risk Guide)

    • Likelihood of high government officials demanding special payments and the prevalence of illegal payments across government levels

  2. Averages of ratings from perception-based sources (Corruption Perception, Transparency International)

    • Overall extent of corruption and not expected impact. Political risk involved in corruption. Depends on public tolerance towards corruption

  3. Control of Corruption index

  4. Overall extent of corruption and not the expected impact

  5. Firm costs in “unofficial payments”

  6. International Crime Victim Surveys

(3) Common characteristics of countries with high corruption?

Institutional-based characteristics

  • Low Income and education level → low institutional quality → corruption more likely

  • Institutions are persistent and inhertied

    • Designed to benefit colonizers

    • More regulations makes it more likely

    • religious institutions

  • Economic/political institutions restrict market and political competition

    • Economically

      • Openness to external competition from imports

      • Regulation of entry for new businesses

    • Politically

      • Freedom of press

      • Right to re-elect politicians

      • Form

Empirical characteristics

  • Corruption is closely related to GDP per capita and human capita

  • Substantial variation in corruption levels across countries, partially explained by degree of market and political competition

(4) What is the magnitude of corruption?

  • Firm operational costs

    • Uganda: 80% of businesses admitted to paying bribes. Corruption becomes a cost for doing business

  • Price comparisons

    • Millions of dollars that could’ve gone towards helping people

    • Making hospitals and education more expensive than it has to be

  • Public procurement and service delivery


(5) Do Higher Wages for Bureaucrats Reduce Corruption?

  • Sweden had a history of corruption until it increased civil servant pay + deregulated

  • Increased government pay so they’re less tempted by bribes and incentivize honest behavior

  • Theoretically ambiguous and depends on factors such as the presence of third-party enforcement and nature of bribe negotiations

  • Mixed empiricial evidence

  • not a guaranteed solution, esp. for developing countries with weak institutional frameworks

  • Effective monitoring and enforcement mechanisms are crucial for success of anti-corruption strategies

(6) Can competition reduce corruption?

Economic Competition

  • Level of bribes demanded from each firm is determined by how vulnerable those firms are to exiting the market due to increased bribe demands, not the overall number of firms or the natural level of competition.

  • Regulations that restrict market entry empower officials to demand and collect bribes

  • Deregulation may then work, not directly because you’re increasing competition but because you’re limiting officials’ ability to extract bribes

Political competition

  • Deregulation may decrease corruption by reducing officials' ability to demand bribes, rather than by directly increasing competition

  • Potential of people to seek government support through a different official could lower level of bribes

  • However, this only works if multiple officials are required to approve a project, with each having the power to halt it, bribe demands could become exorbitant.

  • Does not guarantee public service delivery

  • But not necessarily because Uganda’s educational system made it so by going to different schools, there was no collective action to address problem

  • No organized resistance = potentially more resources can be gatekept/extracted

(7) Why have there been so few recent successful attempts to fight corruption?

  • Many rely on legal and financial institutions—judiciary, police, and financial auditors— to enforce accountability within the public sector

  • But in developing countries, these institutions themselves are often weak and susceptible to corruption

  • Simply allocating resources to these institutions is not a viable solution for reducing corruption

  • Ex: Russian

    • police given more expensive weapons sold weapons to criminals at higher prices

  • Ex: Singapore and Hong Kong

    1. Establishment of powerful independent anti-corruption agencies

    2. Reform to substantial increase civil servant pay relative to the private sector.

    3. Regular rotation of public officials so they couldn’t build corruption networks

    4. Rewards for officials that refuse bribes and report bribery

    5. Simplification and publication of rules and procedures for fewer loopholes to exploit

    6. Elimination of unnecessary permits and approvals

    7. Reduction/removal of fees (import duties)

  • Alternative strategies for combatting corruption:

    • Public enforcement of public laws

    • Citizen enforcement and access to information

    • Delegation and “integrity for Hire”

      • Outsouring g special functions, liek customes, to private firms with reputation for integrity to avoid bribery

  • Sucessful anti-corruption efforts need a multi-faceted approach that combines robust enforcement with complementary reforms

  • Top political leadership is crucial for successNot just about adding more cops

  • Not just about catching bad guys but changing the whole game

  • Not about government doing more but doing things differently


(8) Does corruption automatically hurt a country’s economic growth?

  • In countries burdened with bureaucratic inefficiencies and rigid regulations, sometimes bribery helps firms expedite processes and bypass obstacles… but those are just symptoms of underlying issues

  • Slower economic growth

    • Discourage entrepreneurship and investment. Reduced profits, incentives, or expanding. Divert towards informal sector wherein not public service relian.

    • “Fly-by-night” technology

    • Misallocation of resources in bribery rather than productivity improvements

    • Erosion of human capital. People will be drawn to use skills careers in private sector where they can exploit and personal gain rather than in private productive sectors of economy

  • Empirical evidence

    • Africa: Subsistence farming to avoid corruption, resulting in lower productivity and living standards.

    • Peru: High start-up costs and corruption forced entrepreneurs into informal sector, limitng growth prospects

    • Indonesia: Firms in political connections and rent-seeking as means of growth

    • Pakistan: Firms connected to politics were more likely to default on loans so that politicians may use business ventures to access public resources through corruption

    • India: Bribes used to allocate water and contracts. Increased competition = multiple officials extract rents

    • Uganda: Bribery has large detrimental effect on firm growth rather than taxation

    • No macro evidence since corruption has various effects on growth

  • BASICALLY

    • Corruption is generally viewed as a detriment to economic growht

    • Micro level supports negative impact of corruption

  • Hidden tax to businesses, adds costs and uncertainties

  • Businesses purposely don’t enhance tech because more success may lead to more bribes

  • therefore, slows down progress and innovation

  • Smart and capable people feel that it’s better to exploit, prevents them from starting business

  • Rewards the wrong kind of behavior

  • Not a clear link because measuring corruption across a whole country is hard + so many factors to growth of an economy

  • But the benefits of removing corruption surpass far beyond numbers but people’s lives

Solutions

  • Block-chain

    • Every government transaction, contract, and permit all for public to see

    • Huge step

    • Ai to flag suspicious data

    • Tech is only a tool, we need to solve things at the root causes

  • Addressing the culture of lack of accountability. Change both minds and systems

  • Back-up people already on the frontlines (data tanks, journalists)

  • Vote for leaders doing the right thing

  • Hold elected officials accountable

  • Silence is corruption’s best friend

  • So baked into the culture it becomes invisible that normalize corruption

  • Conscious choices


Historical Contexts

  • Latin America

    • Corrupt systems set-up by Spain left an institutional precedent

    • Weak governments, constant political turmoil, huge gap between rich & poor = large breeding group for corruption

    • Common: Bribery, embezzlement (huge amounts of money disappearing, cronyism), electoral fraud (rigging systems)

    • Consequences: Undermines people’s trust in government, undermines rule of law, bribe just to have access to basic services (to see doctor, pick up trash, education) → distressed citizenships

    • Poverty makes people vulnerable and corruption keeps them trapped.

    • Anti-corruption agencies

  • Chile really cracked down on corruption, emphasis on accountability mechanisms

  • Africa

    • Corruption is a real plague

    • Common faces: Bribery, embezzlement, cronyism

    • As just the way things work, everyone’s doing it so it’s not really wrong, if normal, where do you draw the line?

    • Erodes basic values of honesty and trust

      • Being honest as the only way to survive

    • Money that goes to roads, healthcare, infrastructure instead goes to public officials and already wealthy

    • Being dishonest as the only way to survive

    • Not just individuals being greedy but a system set-up to only benefit a select few

    • Foreign investors don’t want to invest in countries they dont want to put money where it’ll just disappear

    • People don’t believe in courts and take matters into their own hands

    • Affects everything

    • Rowanda’s 0 corruption policy

      • Strengthened law enforcement to really go after bad guys

      • Pushed hard for transparency and hide shady stuff

      • Role of civil society to make sure public officials are kept an eye on. watchdogs

      • media exposes corruption

  • Scandinivia

    • High levels of trust. Corruption is not only rare but frowned upon. Deep culture of trust in each other and government. Mindset to do everything with honesty. virtuous cycle.

    • zero tolerance. deal with swiftly and efficiently. dont even bother we’ll catch u and it’ll be bad.

    • Strong institutions. rule of law. level playing field. nobody’s above the rules. access to information is the norm. free press. best disinfectant when everyone can see what goes on.

    • Shows it’s possible to build a society where corruption is the exception, not the rule

  • Georgia

    • Peaceful rose revolution (2003). Serious push for change with hard reform.

    • E-governance: Harder to be corrupt by simplifying bureaucracies and institutions and putting everything out in the open. Hard to operate in the shadows.

    • Made police force that served the people, not just those in power

    • also up to people to demand for better

    • Rapid dramatic change i spossible

    • Have clear vision

  • Asia

    • Singapore:

      • Efficient and strict. Low corporation because of tough laws, anti-corruption agency, and culture of honesty. Proof where government is created where corruption isn’t tolerated

        • Comes at the cost of individual rights.

        • Strong centralized government has trade-off

    • India

      • Corruption is deeply rooted

      • Bribery is common practice. Need to grease the wheels

      • Embezzlement, cronyism, complex

      • Any means necessary, even if it’s dishonest

      • People pwoer drives change

  • Can be countered, even in places with strong history embedded in it but strong leadership, need political will and commitment, and citizen’s demand of refusing to tolerate

  • Why believe in anything of leaders are also breaking the rules

  • Rots foundations of a fair society

  • Political and social poison that rots a fair society

  • Each country has different context and history. Not about copying but taking the principles and embodying.


Tools to combat corruption

  1. Education - people to know and understand their rights, what corruption looks like and how to report it safely

  2. Access to information - free press without being threatened or shut down. can report truth without fear

  3. Technology - reporting corruption anonymously, track government spending, leveling playing field, mobile money platform, less f2f interaction, less shady stuff, data analysis tools for shady businesnes

    1. shining a flashlight on dark corners

    2. Ai detect massive data sets as digital detective. more thorough than any human

  4. International groups involvement - Support & funding in anti-corruption programs. Global effort. If corruption surpasses borders, so its solutions have to as well

  5. Strong leadership. Transparency. Strong culture of trust. = Virtuous cycle

  6. Instead of just punishing it when it happens, we focus on preventing it in the first place

  7. Understand why people become corrupt. triggers & motivations: personality, norms, less likely they will choose corruption in the first place. honesty reward. corruption is loser’s choice.


Everyday acts of corruption

  • Starts with small corruption that builds a culture where it’s normalized

  • Allows bigger compromises to slide in later on

  • Gives permission for behavior to send

  • Be willing to said something when it’s awkward