Chapter 19: Employment Discrimination

  • the courts have interpreted these provisions to prohibit employment discrimination by federal, state, and local governments

  • civil rights act, 1866: prohibit racial discrimination in both private and public employment (does not apply to the federal government)

  • equal pay act, 1963: a worker may not be paid at a lesser rate than employees of the opposite sex for equal work

    • unequal pay is legal if it is the result of:

      • seniority

      • merit

      • quantity or quality of work

      • any other factor than sex

      • note: unlike the civil rights act of 1964, the epa does not require a plantiff to prove that her employer intended to discriminate

  • civil rights act, 1964: it is illegal for employers with 15 or more employees to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin

    • protected categories: race, color, religion, sex, national origin

  • prohibited activities

    • disparate treatment: the plaintiff must show that she was treated less favorably than others because of one of the protected classes

      • requirements are:

        • the plaintiff myst show evidence that:

          • she belongs to a protected category

          • she suffered adverse employment action

          • this action occurred under conditions giving ride to an inference of discrimination

        • the defendant must present evidence that its decision was based on legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons

        • to win, plaintiff must prove that the employer intentionally discriminated (this motive can be inferred from differences in treatment)

    • disparate impact: if the employer has a rule that, on its face, is not discriminatory, but in practice excludes too many people in a protected category

      • requirements are:

        • plaintiff must present a prima facie case

        • defendant must offer some evidence that the employment practice was a job-related business necessity

        • to win, plaintiff must prove either that the employer’s reason is a pretext or that the other, less discriminatory, rules would achieve the same results

    • hostile work environment: if they permit a work environment that is so hostile toward people in a protected category that it affects their ability to work

      • sexual harassment

        • quid pro quo: a latin phrase meaning “one thing in return for another”

        • hostile work environment

      • same-sex harassment

      • hostile environment based on race

      • hostile environment based on color

      • hostile environment based on national origin

      • employer liability for harassment unless:

        • the company is liable if it knew or should have known about the conduct and failed to stop it

        • even if the company was unaware of the behavior, it is still liable if the victimized employee suffered a “tangible employment action” (firing, demotion, reassignment)

          • it used reasonable care to prevent and correct harassing behavior

          • the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of the complaint procedure

      • retaliation: prohibits employers from retaliating against workers who oppose discrimination, bring claim under the statute, or take part in an investigation hearing. defendant can defeat a retaliation claim by showing that there were other, nondiscriminatory reasons for this action

  • religion: employers cannot discriminate against a worker because of his religious beliefs

    • note: employers must make reasonable accommodations for a worker’s religious practices unless the request would cause undue hardship on the business

  • sex: “gender must be irrelevant to employment decisions”

  • appearance

    • must have the same standards for men and women

    • unattractiveness is not a protected category

    • generally, employment decisions based on weight are legal

  • parenthood

    • pregnancy: the pregnancy discrimination act (pda) is an amendment to the civil rights act, which prohibits employers from firing, refusing to hire, or failing to promote a woman because she is pregnant

    • equal employment opportunity commission (eeoc): the agency charged with enforcing federal discrimination law

    • parental status: discrimination based on parental status is illegal, involving treating men and women differently

  • sexual orientation and transgender: supreme court recently ruled as protected classes

  • background and credit checks: eeoc regulations prohibit companies from using criminal history information in a way that has a adverse impact on employees in a protected category if the background information is irrelevant in determining whether the employee is appropriate for the job

    • employers may not consider arrest records

    • eeoc discourages the use of credit checks because minorities tend to have worse credit than whites

  • immigration: it is illegal for employers to discriminate against noncitizens because “national origin” is a protected category

  • reverse discrimination: making an employment decision that harms a white person or a man because of his gender or race

    • affirmative action: programs that remedy the effects of past discrimination

      • three different sources:

        • litigation

        • voluntary action

        • government contracts

  • defenses to charges of discrimination

    • merit: a defendant is not liable if he shows that the person he favored was the most qualified

    • seniority

    • bona fide occupational qualification: permitted to establish discriminatory job requirements if they are essential to the position in question

  • age: an employer with 20 or more workers may not fire, refuse to hire, fail to promote, or otherwise reduce a person’s employment opportunities because he is 40 or older

    • to prove this, he must show:

      • he is 40 or older

      • he suffered adverse employment actions

      • he was qualified for the job for which he was fired or not hired

      • he was replaced by a younger person

    • the employer must present evidence that its decision was based on nondiscriminatory reasons

    • plaintiff must show that:

      • employer’s reasons are pretext

      • the employer intentionally discriminated

      • if not for the plaintiff’s age, the employer would not have taken these same actions

    • disparate impact: arise when an employer’s actions do not explicitly discriminate, but have an adverse impact on people aged 40 and over

  • rehabilitation act, 1973: prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by the executive branch of the federal government, and entities that receive federal funds

  • american’s with disabilities act

    • disability: someone with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits major life activity or the operation of major bodily function or someone who is regarded as having such an impairment

    • once it is established that a worker is disabled, employers may not discriminate on the basis of disability as long as the worker can, with reasonable accommodation, perform the essential functions of the hob