The Great Compromise
The Great Compromise and the Constitutional Convention
At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, US lawmakers resolved the issue of state representation in the federal government with the Great Compromise.
This compromise shaped the current US government structure.
The Connecticut Plan (Great Compromise) and its authors
Authored by Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, it's also known as the Connecticut Plan.
It merged concepts from the Virginia Plan (population-based representation) and the New Jersey Plan (equal state representation).
This led to a bicameral legislature.
Structure of Congress under the Great Compromise
Congress is bicameral with two chambers:
House of Representatives: Representation proportional to state population.
Senate: Equal representation with senators per state.
This design balances the influence of large and small states.
Significance
Resolved tensions between large and small states, enabling a functioning national government.
Integrated federalism and checks and balances, ensuring balanced legislative power.
Current Representation
The Great Compromise persists; census data determines House representation (e.g., California has members, seven states have only one).
Every state maintains senators.
Practical and Ethical Implications
Aims to balance effective governance with fair representation for all states.
Shapes policy priorities by distributing legislative power.
Raises ethical questions regarding fairness between populous and smaller states, and state sovereignty.
Connections to Broader Principles
Federalism: Divides power between national and state governments.
Checks and balances: Distributes legislative power across chambers.
Underpins foundational principles of representation, legitimacy, and the balance between democracy and equality.