Constitutionalism:
Introduction to Constitutionalism
- Definition: Constitutionalism refers to the principle that governments must operate within a framework established by a constitution, which serves as a foundational legal agreement outlining governmental powers and limitations.
- Context: This discussion builds upon previous knowledge from the video on legislation, outlining advantages and disadvantages of constitutionalism.
Three Limitations in the Discussion of Constitutionalism
- Perspective as a Social Agreement
- Focus on constitutions as social contracts rather than divine or immutable laws.
- Comparison with Legislation
- Analyze the effectiveness of legislation with constitutionalism versus without.
- Focus on Modern Constitutions
- Consider modern constitutions rather than ancient ones, which were often seen as unchangeable laws.
Nature and Function of a Constitution
- Purpose: Constitutions specify which persons or bodies have governmental powers and establish limits on those powers.
- Authorization of Legislative Power: Examples include:
- Parliament in England
- Congress in the United States
- State legislators (e.g., Arizona)
- Limits on Lawmaking: These limits can be both practical and procedural,
- Written vs. Unwritten Constitutions:
- The United States has a written constitution.
- The United Kingdom has an unwritten constitution.
Advantages of Constitutionalism
- Key Function: Prevents the legislature from enacting detrimental laws.
Types of Limitations:
Substantive Limitations: Prohibits the passing of certain types of laws.
- Examples:
- Congress cannot make laws abridging freedom of speech.
- Restrictions against laws requiring individuals to house soldiers.
- Categories of Limitations:
- Limitations on Goals: U.S. government can't pass laws promoting a single religion.
- Limitations on Means: Government cannot restrict public speech under the guise of promoting certain perspectives.
- Limitations on Forms:
- Ex post facto laws (retroactively making actions illegal) are not permissible.
- Laws must generally have uniform applicability without exempting certain groups (e.g., Congress cannot exempt itself).
Structural Limitations: Admission procedures impact law feasibility.
- Example: Laws favoring a specific region (like New England) may not pass through the Senate.
- Formal Requirements:
- Federal tax laws must originate in the House of Representatives.
- Certain legislative actions require a two-thirds majority.
Benefits of These Limitations
- Protection of Rights: Safeguarding essential rights such as free speech and assembly.
- Prevention of Shortsighted Decisions: Protecting against immediate whims that could undermine society in the long term.
Disadvantages of Constitutionalism
- Primary Disadvantage: Constitutionalism may obstruct the legislature from enacting beneficial laws, making it challenging to adapt to evolving circumstances.
- Entrenchment of Injustice: Existing unjust laws may persist due to the rigidity of constitutional provisions.
Walden's Argument Against Constitutionalism
- Analogy: Constitutionalism likened to binding oneself to the mast in the context of decision-making, which prevents impulsive actions.
- Odyssey Example: Odysseus binds himself while his crew is instructed to ignore his future commands, preventing him from succumbing to the sirens' call.
- Application: Individuals can make decisions in advance to prevent future harmful impulses (notably analogous to gambling).
Key Differences Between Constitutions and Typical Binding Cases
- Multiple Stakeholders: Unlike individual contracts, constitutions impose agreements upon future generations, including those who did not consent.
- Ambiguous Harms: Recognizing that potential harms of constitutional restraints can be less clear compared to direct harms, like financial ruin from gambling.
- Lack of Clear Obstacles: Presence of general human fallibility rather than identifiable factors affecting decision-making capacity.
Conclusion and Further Consideration
- Self-Enforcement Issues: Constitutions do not enforce themselves; enforcement requires willing agents with authority, as discussed in relation to judicial review.