Political Systems in Africa: From Independence to Multiparty Democracy

Expectations and Outcomes of Newly African Independent States

  • The first wave of African States that secured independence from European colonizers inherited political institutions modeled directly after those of their colonial masters.
  • Initial Expectations:
        - It was anticipated that these states would adopt the best institutions from Western democracies.
        - The goal was to establish models for their societies that were efficient, effective, and equitable.
  • Reality of Implementation:
        - It quickly became evident that applying Western institutions and patterns of behavior within the African context was difficult.
        - Consequently, each African state created hybrids of political institutions.
  • Resulting Institutional Hybrids:
        - Dominant political parties often transformed into single-party systems serving authoritarian civilian regimes.
        - In other instances, competitive party systems were replaced by authoritarian military regimes.

The Failure of Politics and Institutional Decay in the 1970s1970s and 1980s1980s

  • Economic Crisis:
        - A prolonged economic crisis experienced by many African countries led to a profound erosion of government revenue bases.
        - This resulted in low or negative per capita growth across many nations.
  • Military Decline:
        - African state armies faced decline due to shrinking budgets and international pressures for downsizing and demobilization.
        - There was a significant lack of freely accessible military assistance.
  • Institutional Crisis:
        - Developmental partners recognized that institutional decay had reached endemic proportions in Africa.
        - Failure occurred across all sectors of the polity, including the political system, public service, economic management, and the military.
        - International assistance during this period remained stagnant or declined.

Major Political Ideologies of the 1970s1970s

  • African states utilized ideology as an instrument to manipulate political behavior, organize society, maintain territorial integrity, and manage political conflicts.
  • African Socialism:
        - Aimed at moving away from foreign exploitation associated with the colonial period.
        - Sought to revive communal and egalitarian elements from the pre-colonial past.
  • Three Predominant Ideological Forms:
        - Populist Socialism:
            - Focused on providing disparate groups with a common focus for unity, independence, and cooperation.
            - Characterized by a radical tone.
            - Example: Tanzania’s Ujamaa socialism, pioneered by Julius Nyerere.
        - African Capitalism:
            - Attempted development using "neo-colonialism as a development strategy."
            - Relied heavily on foreign aid and foreign private investments.
            - Examples: Kenya and Cote d’Ivoire.
        - Afro-Maxism States:
            - Insisted on the necessity of class struggle for historical change.
            - Emphasized international unity of all oppressed classes over national unity alone.
            - Examples: Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Angola.
  • Shift to Pragmatism: Because none of these ideologies successfully saved the failed states, many governments eventually adopted pragmatic approaches.

Dominant Political Systems in the mid-1980s1980s

  • By the mid-1980s1980s, approximately 60%60\,\% of African countries were under military rule.
  • Civilian Regimes with Competitive Party Systems: Only six countries maintained competitive systems:
        - Senegal
        - Swaziland
        - Botswana
        - The Gambia
        - Mauritius
        - Zimbabwe
  • General Characteristics of African Politics in this Period:
        - Compromised elections and democratic structures.
        - Frequent violations of human rights.
        - Official corruption and a systemic lack of governmental accountability.

Transition to Multiparty Democracy in the 1990s1990s

  • Catalysts for Change: Pressure from domestic masses and foreign donors for economic and political liberalization led to the opening of political processes at the dawn of the 1990s1990s.
  • The Norm of Multiparty Politics: Since the early 1990s1990s, multiparty politics and regular elections have become the standard in sub-Saharan Africa.
  • Election Statistics (19891989 to 20002000):
        - Following the 19891989 transition election in Namibia, and by the end of 20002000, approximately 8787 legislative elections involving at least two parties occurred across 4242 of the region’s 4848 states.
        - This reflects an average of over seven elections per year.
        - Over 6565 presidential elections involving more than one candidate were held during this time.
  • Exceptions (Non-Multiparty States): Only seven states did not convene multiparty elections during this period: Eritrea, Rwanda, Sudan, Somalia, Swaziland, Uganda, and Zaire/DRC.

Routinisation and Institutionalisation of Elections

  • A process of institutionalizing regular elections began as many countries held subsequent rounds of voting, usually on schedule at the end of constitutionally fixed terms:
        - 3535 countries convened second elections.
        - 1010 countries convened third elections.
        - Niger conducted its fourth election of the 1990s1990s in November\,1999.

Distinctive Patterns of African Political Parties

  • Role of Founding Elections:
        - Gaining control of the state apparatus during the founding election provided resources and motivation to strengthen party organization.
        - Parties failing to win the presidency were immediately disadvantaged in terms of resources, regardless of their representation in the legislature.
  • Dominant Party Systems:
        - In eight states, the largest party held a simple majority of seats.
        - Average Seat Percentage for the Largest Party:
            - Founding elections (4141 total): 63.1%63.1\,\% of seats.
            - Second elections (3535 total): 69.6%69.6\,\% of seats.
            - Third elections: 64.3%64.3\,\% of seats.
  • Low Ideological Salience:
        - Policy issues are rarely the focus of political competition.
        - Most parties adopt a vague populism, centering campaigns on opposition to corruption, general services for the population, and vague promises for the future.

Structural Obstacles and Influencing Factors

  • Persistent Colonial-Era Obstacles: Problems including poverty, underdevelopment, economic dependence, ethnic and class conflict, and fragile economic/political institutions remained present into the 1990s1990s.
  • Illiberal Democracies: Many new multiparty systems fall short of the liberal democratic ideal. While political freedoms/civil rights are formally recognized, they are often flouted, particularly between elections.
  • Presidentialism:
        - Power is highly centralized around the president, who often sits above the law.
        - The president controls a large portion of state finances with minimal accountability and delegates very little authority on significant matters.
        - Regular ministerial structures are often relegated to a secondary, executant role.
  • Pervasive Clientelism:
        - Characterized by the exchange of gifts, favors, services, and patronage within political systems.
        - Drivers of Clientelism:
            - Strength of clan, ethnicity, and sub-national identities.
            - Predilection for dyadic exchange in rural societies.
            - The necessity for "social insurance" mechanisms in the risky environments of low-income societies.
  • Summary of the Era: While the early 1990s1990s brought hope through the fall of dictators and pro-democracy successes, by the end of the decade, it became clear that the presence of multiple political parties does not, by itself, guarantee true democracy.