Chapter 2: State Differences and Relationships

Chapter 2

State Differences and Relationships

Patterns of Data Analysis

  • Are Some Patterns Evidence of Cause and Effect?

    • Exploring the relationship between various state metrics.

  • Are There Explanations for Patterns in Texas?

    • Estimating the socio-economic factors contributing to data trends in Texas.

Figures and Data Visualizations

  • Figure 2.1: Per Capita Income 2014

    • Income brackets:

    • < $40,000

    • $40,000 - $45,000

    • $45,000 - $50,000

    • $50,000+

  • Figure 2.2: Percentage of Population With High School Completion or Higher 2014

    • Completion categories:

    • < 86%

    • 86%

    • 90%

    • 92%

    • ≥ 92%

  • Figure 2.3: Percentage of Population With Bachelor's Degree or Higher 2014

    • Degree categories:

    • < 26%

    • 26% - 30%

    • 30% - 33%

    • ≥ 33%

Scatterplot Analysis

  • Importance of Scatterplots:

    • Provide more information than simple maps.

    • Enable comparative analysis of Texas to other states.

Correlations in Data

  • Correlations Definition:

    • A technique for expressing relationships in quantitative terms.

    • Defined as the degrees of inherent association between any two variables occurring simultaneously in the same universe. (Source: Abraham N, Franzblau)

Empirical Relationships in Scatterplots

  • Components of Analysis:

    • Minimum Strength Threshold:

    • Determines the minimum degree required to indicate a meaningful relationship.

    • Direction of Relationship:

    • Positive or negative correlation direction between variables.

    • Possible Interpretations:

    • Interpretation of data results can lead to various conclusions.

  • Data Specific to Texas:

    • Correlations observed within Texas' social-economic factors.

Specific Figures on Income and Education

  • Figure 2.4: Per Capita Income and Percent High School Completion 2014

    • Correlation Coefficient: $r = 0.43$

    • Visual representation combining income levels and education statistics.

  • Figure 2.5: Per Capita Income and Percent Bachelor's Degree or Higher 2014

    • Correlation Coefficient: $r = 0.76$

    • Indicates higher educational attainment relates significantly to higher per capita income.

Table of Correlations Over Time

  • Table 2.1: Per Capita Income and Educational Attainment Correlations

    • Yearly Correlation Data:

    • 1950:

      • High School Completion: $r = 0.70$

      • Baccalaureate Degree: $r = 0.52$

    • 1960:

      • High School Completion: $r = 0.66$

      • Baccalaureate Degree: $r = 0.48$

    • 1970:

      • High School Completion: $r = 0.61$

      • Baccalaureate Degree: $r = 0.65$

    • 1980:

      • High School Completion: $r = 0.63$

      • Baccalaureate Degree: $r = 0.64$

    • 1990:

      • High School Completion: $r = 0.44$

      • Baccalaureate Degree: $r = 0.74$

    • 2000:

      • High School Completion: $r = 0.31$

      • Baccalaureate Degree: $r = 0.74$

    • 2010:

      • High School Completion: $r = 0.37$

      • Baccalaureate Degree: $r = 0.79$

    • 2014:

      • High School Completion: $r = 0.43$

      • Baccalaureate Degree: $r = 0.76$

Government Revenue and Expenditure Analysis

  • Figure 2.7: Per Capita Total State and Local Government Revenue and Per Capita Income 2014

    • Correlation Coefficient: $r = 0.69$

    • Examines relationship between government revenue and income.

  • Figure 2.8: State and Local Government Revenue Per Capita and Percent of Population with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher 2014

    • Highlights how educational attainment can influence revenue generation.

  • Figure 2.9: State and Local Government Expenditure Per Capita and Revenue Per Capita 2014

    • Regression line shows equality of expenditure and revenue lines.

Crime and Incarceration Data

  • Figure 2.10: Incarceration Rate and Violent Crime Rate 2014

    • Correlation Coefficient: $r = 0.45$

    • Compares the rate of violent crimes to the incarceration rate across states.

  • Figure 2.11: Poverty and Per Capita Income 2014

    • Examines the relationship between poverty levels and income.

  • Figure 2.12: Life Expectancy and Infant Mortality 2014

    • Correlation Coefficient: $r = -0.78$

    • High correlation indicating that lower infant mortality rates correlate with longer life expectancy.

Issues in Empirical Analyses

  • Measurement of Variables:

    • Correlation between various outcomes such as poverty, crime, and educational achievement needs proper linking.

  • Causal Relationships:

    • Differentiate between true causal relations versus spurious ones, which may seem correlated purely by coincidence.

Patterns in Poverty and Crimes

  • Figure 2.6: Number Living in Poverty Across States

    • Significant correlations between poverty and state populations.

    • Correlation Coefficient: $r = 0.96$ with reference to California.

  • Comparative Analyses:

    • Crime Rates vs Personal Income:

    • Number of property crimes: $r = 0.88$ demonstrates the relationship between economic conditions and crime rates.

Importance of Measurement

  • Using Rates vs Raw Numbers:

    • Accurately reflecting socio-economic conditions requires rate adjustments for population size and inflation factors.

  • Controlling for Influencing Factors:

    • Correct identification of causative versus correlated statistics critical for accurate analysis.

Socioeconomic Trends in Births and Education

  • Births to Teens Age 15-19 and Obese Adults:

    • Analysis of correlations in different demographics across states.

  • Figure: Births to Teens and Obese Adult Rates

    • Correlation showing significant connections between health and teen birth rates ($r = 0.98$).

  • Figure: Christian Population's Influence on Teen Births

    • Underlines demographic factors affecting teenage pregnancies.

Motion Graphs and Animated Scatterplots

  • Utility of Animated Graphs:

    • Motion graphs can dynamically illustrate trends over time, further enriching data understanding.

Educational Attainment by State

  • Percent Population With Bachelor's Degrees (3 Year Average from 1990-2009)

    • Trends of educational achievement are visually compared, emphasizing disparities and progress across states.