International Terrorism
Week 3:
09/10
Strategic Approach
Terrorist groups use terrorism to achieve their goals
Democracies are more likely to be wiling to concede
Terrorism causes psychological and osicla disruption
This can alter public preferences on the conflict issue
Parties need the support of the public to stay in office
Problems
Lack of evidence that terrorism is effective at coercing the government
Terrorism is more likely to backfire and lead to support for harsh government responses
Organizaitonal Approach
Dissent is more likely in democracies
Terrorist violence is one of many strategies groups use to express their grievances
Groups use terrorist violence to recruit and achieve their goals
Problems
Mixed empirical support
Political Approach
Particular types of democracies are more likely to experience terrorism than other types
Characteristics: polititcal ideology, human rights, conflict, foreign policy posititons
Problems
These factors drive some individiuals to engage in terrorism but not the majority
Unclear wheter these factors are a cuase or consequence of terrorism
Post 9/11 Dynamics
Non-democracies experienced more terrorism after 9/11
Terrorist groups stopped by harsh counter-terrorism laws
The global war on terror created conflicts that produce terrorism
Many authoritarian regimes share the characteristics associated with terrorism
These are incentives for Authoritarian regimes to report terrorist attacks
Difficulty in
Week 2:
09/01
What is Terrorism?
“The Systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion” ( Webster)
“The threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation” (Global Terrorism Index)
“Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents” ( U.S. Congress Foreign Terrorist Organization List
Defining Terrorism
Crenshaw
Method/System used for specific political purposes
The treats/use of violence
Causes emotional and physical harm
Socially and politically unacceptable
Unpredictable and arbitrary
Symbolic targets (important to the outcome of the conflict
Psychological and Sociological Effectiveness
Psychological Effects: Aims to create extremem fear or anxiety
Social Effects: Aims to disrupt the social structure that people depend upon and trust
Backfiring:
Sustained/intense terrorism: The public can become desensitized to terrorism
Sporadic terrorism: Unpredictable and more successful
Different audience perceive terrorism and assign blame differently
Framing terrorism:
Ends justify the means
last resort
Week 1:
What is Terrorism?
No agreed defintion of terrorism
Difficult to distinguish terrorism from other political violence/violent crime
To classify an incident as terrorism, the action must be:
Carried out to achieve political, economic, religious, or social aims
Intended for a wider audience beyond the target
Targeting people unrelated to conflict (e.g. civilians or noncombatants)
Perpetrated by an organization or individuals inspired by a a terrorist movement
Conducted by a non-state actor
Defined by violence and its political or social motive
Threat of violence still counts as terrorism
What is the difference between a domestic and transnational terrorism attack?
It involves perpetrators or victims from another country, not just the venue country
What is Counterterrorism?
“Measures designed to combat or prevent terrorism”
“States must ensure that any measures taken to counter terrorism comply with all their obligations under International law, in particular International human rights, refugee, and international humanitarian law”
What are pre-emptive counter terrorism policies?
Proactively seeking to destroy terrorist groups
E.g. dismantling terrorists’ training camps or freezing their assets
Positive effects for all other countries facing terrorism threat
What are defensive counter terrorism policies?
Protecting against domestic threats and agents
E.g. Protecting airports and other infrastructure
Negative effect for other countries, especially those with weaker defensive policies