Genotypic Sex Determination and Analysis

Genotypic Sex Determination

  • Genotypic sex (ZZ or ZW) was determined using a PCR test on DNA from tail tips or blood.
  • The PCR test followed the method described by Holleley et al. (2015) using sex-linked markers identified by Quinn et al. (2010).
  • PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel.
  • ZW females had two bands, while ZZ individuals had only one band.
  • Internal ZZ and ZW control samples were run on every gel.
  • Animals with genotype-phenotype discordance were classified as sex-reversed, according to Holleley et al. (2015).
  • Sex-reversal was reported in two ways:
    • Sex-reversal rate: proportion of all ZZ individuals that are female (pZZpZZ) (Grossen et al., 2011; Schwanz et al., 2020).
    • Proportion of all females that are sex-reversed (pfp_f) (Holleley et al., 2015; Castelli et al., 2021).
  • Chi-square tests were used to determine the association between sex-reversal (pZZpZZ) and sampling year, aggregated into 8-year periods (2003-2011 and 2012-2019).

Genotype by Sequencing and Population Genetic Analysis

  • Reduced representation sequencing (Kilian et al., 2012) was used to genotype individuals.
  • This was done to determine levels of population genetic structure (as an indicator of gene flow) across the study area.
  • Genomic DNA was extracted from tail tissue and blood samples using:
    • Qiagen's Gentra Puregene DNA purification kit for tail tips.
    • Whatman Elute quick extraction protocol for blood on Whatman FTA Elute Cards.
  • DNA was extracted, sequenced, and informative SNP markers identified using Diversity Arrays Technology (DART Pty Ltd.).
  • SNP genotyping was performed using complexity reduction with restriction enzymes, implicit fragment-size selection, and next-generation sequencing (Kilian et al., 2012).
  • The restriction enzyme combination of PstI (5'-CTGCA | G-3') and SphI (5'-GCATG | C-3') was used for complexity reduction by double digestion of genomic DNA.
  • Sequences were processed using proprietary DART analytical pipeline (Kilian et al., 2012) to yield polymorphic SNPs.
  • Calling quality was assured by high average read depth per locus (medium coverage, average ca 10×).
  • Approximately one-third of samples were processed twice from DNA to allelic calls as technical replicates.
  • Scoring consistency (repeatability) was used as the main selection criteria for high-quality and low error-rate markers.
  • For further detail refer to Georges et al (2018).
  • Sequences were then filtered using the R package dartR (v.1.1.11; Gruber et al., 2018).
  • Loci were removed with a call rate of less than 95%.
  • Loci were removed with repeatability less than 99%.
  • Loci were removed if they were sex-linked across all individuals.
  • Secondary SNPs residing on a single sequence tag were filtered, retaining only one at random.
  • After filtering loci, individuals with a call rate of less than 95% were removed.

Population Genomic Analyses

  • The R package dartR (Gruber et al., 2018) was used for population genomic analyses of the DARTseq SNP data.
  • Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and F statistics (F<em>ISF<em>{IS}, F</em>ITF</em>{IT}, FSTF_{ST}) were used to identify population structure across the study area.
  • Isolation by distance was used to assess the relationship between genetic and geographic distance.
  • Genetic distance between demes was estimated using FSTF_{ST} among the sexes and using the proportion of shared alleles between pairs of individuals.
  • A Mantel test in the R package adegenet (Jombart, 2008) was used to test for an association between genetic distance and geographic distances.
  • Pairwise analysis of FSTF_{ST} was used to examine populations for sex-biased dispersal.
  • A redundancy analysis (RDA) was applied to decompose the contribution of geographical coordinates (latitude and longitude) and sex on allele frequencies (Meirmans, 2015).

Study Site, Frequency of Sex-Reversal, and Morphometrics

  • An exhaustive survey of I. vitticeps was conducted at one site within the area described in Section 2.1.
  • A population of P. vitticeps was studied continuously from September 2018 to March 2020 at Bowra Wildlife Sanctuary (a 14,000 ha property).
  • Operational sex ratio and rates of sex-reversal were quantified.
  • Vegetation type at Bowra was determined using a stereoscopic photo interpretation of 2015 aerial photography (1:30,000, resolution 0.21 m), with ground truthing by vegetation surveys.
  • Vegetation was classified into six types (woodland, grassland, mixed forest woodland, claypan/herbland, shrubland, and other) based on dominant vegetation (Table S1).
  • Surveys for lizards were conducted by foot and by vehicle within the property, timed to match the diurnal activity patterns of the lizards during their most active months (October-December).
  • Foot and road surveys were standardized by the number of hours and observers.
  • Foot surveys included all vegetation types at least once each week and all roads driven at least once each week (Figure S1).
  • Capture effort for each lizard was estimated as the sum of total search hours (or driving hours) divided by the total number of lizards captured.
  • Capture effort was then compared by survey method (search/vehicle count) and compared across sex classes.
  • Chi-square tests were used to estimate if sex-ratio was biased in the population between males (ZZm) and females (ZZf +ZWf).
  • Upon capture, each lizard was sexed phenotypically and a blood sample taken for genotyping (following procedures outlined in Section 2.1).
  • Snout-vent length (SVL) was measured using a ruler (±1 mm) and mass was measured using an Optek digital scale (±0.5 g).
  • Body condition index (BCI) was calculated for each lizard as the residual from an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression of SVL and mass (after Schulte-Hostedde et al., 2005).
  • ANOVA was used to compare how morphometric data (SVL, mass, and body condition index) varied among sex classes.

Radiotelemetry and GPS Tracking

  • Adult lizards were tracked from September 2018 to March 2020 to determine how movement rates, space use, survival, and growth vary among sex classes.
  • Each lizard was fitted with a Pinpoint Beacon 250 (Lotek Ltd.) using a custom-fit backpack harness.
  • Each unit housed a GPS logger, a single stage VHF transmitter (150-151 Hz) and 3-axis accelerometer.
  • The unit and harness did not exceed 5% of the animal's body mass.
  • Dilution of precision (DOP; Langley, 1999) was recorded for every GPS fix as an indicator of quality of GPS position (≤5 m accuracy).
  • Estimates of movement and space use were calculated from GPS data only (DOP ≤3).
  • Lizards were located using a VHF receiver and Yagi antenna.
  • GPS points were acquired every day in spring (September-November), summer (December-February), and autumn (March-May), and once every three days in winter (June-August).
  • The status of animals (dead or alive) was determined by relocating all individuals once per week (September-December) and a minimum of once per month for the remainder of the year (January-August).
  • Females were palpated every two weeks during the breeding season (October-December) and monthly when lizards were handled to change telemetry equipment, to determine reproductive status.

Movement and Space Use Estimates

  • Movement rate (metres moved per day, m/d) was calculated as the straight-line distance between consecutive GPS locations divided by the number of days elapsed between relocations.
  • A linear mixed-effects model was used to test the effect of season, sex class, and their interaction on movement rate with individual lizard as a repeated (random) effect.
  • Within-individual variability of movement between gravid and non-gravid periods was compared by recording distance moved per day for gravid females (2 weeks pre/post lay date) with the distances moved while non-gravid (2-6 weeks post lay date).
  • The effect of reproductive status on distance moved per day (response variable) was tested, with reproductive status (gravid or not gravid) as a fixed effect, and female ID as a repeated effect.
  • Two home range estimates were used to compare space use:
    • 100% minimum convex polygons (MCP; Burt, 1943; Row & Blouin-Demers, 2006).
    • 95% fixed kernel density estimators (KDE; Worton, 1989; Young et al., 2018) using the adehabitatHR package (Calenge, 2006).
  • Least square cross validation was used to select a kernel-smoothing parameter for KDE.
  • Space use was estimated only for animals that had a minimum of 15 GPS locations, and estimates were log10-transformed for both 100% MCP and 95% KDE to fit normality assumptions.
  • A linear mixed-effects model was used to test the effect of season, sex class, body size (SVL) and their interaction on space use estimates with individual lizard as a repeated (random) effect.
  • Equations for each movement and space use model used can be found in Supplementary Table S2.

Survival and Growth Rate Estimates

  • In cases where a tracked lizard was found dead, the date of death was determined using the last movement recorded by the accelerometer housed on the GPS units or abnormal large-scale movements (>1 km) over a short period of time.
  • Maximum likelihood survival probabilities were estimated using known fate models in the program MARK (White & Burnham, 1999).
  • Akaike Information Criteria (AICc) was used to correct for small sample sizes and models with delta AICc of <2.0 from the best model were considered to have support.
  • Growth rates were calculated by dividing the change in SVL between the initial capture and subsequent re-captures by the total number of days elapsed (>20 days).
  • Differences in SVL growth rates across sex classes were determined using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with sex class as a fixed (3-level) factor, growth rate as the response variable and initial log10-transformed SVL as a covariate.

Results

Frequency of sex-reversal across populations

  • A total of 207 lizards were captured during sampling trips across the study area (excluding individuals captured at Bowra).
  • Once individuals were genotyped for their chromosomal sex this amounted to:
    • ZZf (n = 18)
    • ZWf (n = 98)
    • ZZm (n = 91)
  • Sex-reversal was documented in three out of four demes that were sampled.
  • Overall, the proportion of females (pfp_f) that were sex-reversed was 16%.
  • The rate of sex-reversal (pZZpZZ) was 17% when considering all animals captured during the 16-year sampling period.
  • A decline in the rate of sex-reversal (pZZpZZ) from 24% to 6% (χ2\chi^2 = 5.36, df = 1, p < .05) was observed between the first half of that sampling period (2003-2011) to the second (2012-2019).