Risk, Return, CAPM & WACC – Comprehensive Study Notes Definition & Nature of Risk Risk = uncertainty about returns; captures potential variability in outcomes and therefore shapes the cost of capital. Two broad manifestations of risk in markets (illustrative real-world evidence):Bitcoin price path: from $ 123 \$123 $123 (Oct 2012) → $ 1,238 \$1{,}238 $1 , 238 (2013) → $ 20,000 \$20{,}000 $20 , 000 (2017) → < $ 4,000 <\$4{,}000 < $4 , 000 (early 2019) → $ 69,000 \$69{,}000 $69 , 000 (Nov 2021) → < $ 20,000 <\$20{,}000 < $20 , 000 (late 2022) → > $ 75,000 >\$75{,}000 > $75 , 000 (early 2024). Gold, NVIDIA, Nokia shares, Straits Times Index & S&P 500 charts—show long-term up-and-down swings; evidence that risk is omnipresent across assets, sectors, and time. Total (or holding-period) rate of return over period t t t :r < e m > t = C < / e m > t + ( P < e m > t − P < / e m > t − 1 ) P t − 1 r<em>t = \dfrac{C</em>t + (P<em>t - P</em>{t-1})}{P_{t-1}} r < e m > t = P t − 1 C < / e m > t + ( P < e m > t − P < / e m > t − 1 ) C t C_t C t = cash flow received between t − 1 t-1 t − 1 and t t t (e.g., dividend, coupon). Example (DBS share):P < e m > 0 = $ 31 P<em>{0}=\$31 P < e m > 0 = $31 , C = $ 2 C=\$2 C = $2 , P < / e m > 1 = $ 36 P</em>{1}=\$36 P < / e m > 1 = $36 ⇒ r = 2 + ( 36 − 31 ) 31 = 0.1613 = 16.13 % p.a. r = \dfrac{2 + (36-31)}{31}=0.1613 = 16.13\%\,\text{p.a.} r = 31 2 + ( 36 − 31 ) = 0.1613 = 16.13% p.a. (actual/historical return) Expected Return for a Single Asset Based on probabilistic outcomes:E ( R ) = ∑ < e m > i = 1 n p < / e m > i R i E(R)=\sum<em>{i=1}^{n} p</em>i R_i E ( R ) = ∑ < e m > i = 1 n p < / e m > i R i Where p < e m > i p<em>i p < e m > i = probability of state i i i , R < / e m > i R</em>i R < / e m > i = return in state i i i . Coin-toss bet example:Heads + $ 1 +\$1 + $1 (50%), tails − $ 0.50 -\$0.50 − $0.50 (50%). E ( R ) = 1 × 0.5 + ( − 0.5 ) × 0.5 = 0.25 ($0.25 expected gain). E(R)=1\times0.5 + (-0.5)\times0.5 = 0.25\ \text{(\$0.25 expected gain).} E ( R ) = 1 × 0.5 + ( − 0.5 ) × 0.5 = 0.25 ($0.25 expected gain). Measuring Risk: Variance & Standard Deviation Variance: weighted average of squared deviations from expected return.σ 2 = ∑ < e m > i = 1 n p < / e m > i ( R i − E ( R ) ) 2 \sigma^{2}=\sum<em>{i=1}^{n} p</em>i (R_i-E(R))^{2} σ 2 = ∑ < e m > i = 1 n p < / e m > i ( R i − E ( R ) ) 2 Standard deviation: σ = σ 2 \sigma = \sqrt{\sigma^{2}} σ = σ 2 . Higher σ \sigma σ ⇒ higher risk. Worked example (Stock A vs Stock B):State data (recession, neutral, boom) ⇒ E ( R < e m > A ) = 11.25 % E(R<em>A)=11.25\% E ( R < e m > A ) = 11.25% , σ < / e m > A = 19.8 % \sigma</em>A=19.8\% σ < / e m > A = 19.8% E ( R < e m > B ) = 12.5 % E(R<em>B)=12.5\% E ( R < e m > B ) = 12.5% , σ < / e m > B = 14.4 % \sigma</em>B=14.4\% σ < / e m > B = 14.4% Interpretation: B offers slightly higher mean with lower volatility → preferable to risk-averse investor. Portfolio Mathematics Portfolio Expected Return Weighted average of component expected returns:E ( R < e m > p ) = ∑ < / e m > j = 1 m w < e m > j E ( R < / e m > j ) E(R<em>p)=\sum</em>{j=1}^{m} w<em>j E(R</em>j) E ( R < e m > p ) = ∑ < / e m > j = 1 m w < e m > j E ( R < / e m > j ) w j w_j w j = proportion of portfolio value in asset j j j . Example – single-scenario weights:Five-asset portfolio: E ( R < e m > p ) = 10 % E(R<em>p)=10\% E ( R < e m > p ) = 10% when w < / e m > A = 30 % , w B = 17 % , … w</em>A=30\%, w_B=17\%, \dots w < / e m > A = 30% , w B = 17% , … (see data sheet). Example – multi-scenario:For each economy state compute portfolio return R < e m > p , i = ∑ w < / e m > j R < e m > j , i R<em>{p,i}=\sum w</em>j R<em>{j,i} R < e m > p , i = ∑ w < / e m > j R < e m > j , i , then apply probabilities to obtain E ( R < / e m > p ) E(R</em>p) E ( R < / e m > p ) . Portfolio Variance / Standard Deviation Not the weighted average of individual σ \sigma σ ’s. Steps:Calculate R p , i R_{p,i} R p , i per state. Obtain overall E ( R p ) E(R_p) E ( R p ) . Compute deviations D E V < e m > i = R < / e m > p , i − E ( R p ) DEV<em>i = R</em>{p,i} - E(R_p) D E V < e m > i = R < / e m > p , i − E ( R p ) . Square, weight by p < e m > i p<em>i p < e m > i , sum ⇒ σ < / e m > p 2 \sigma</em>p^{2} σ < / e m > p 2 . σ < e m > p = σ < / e m > p 2 \sigma<em>p = \sqrt{\sigma</em>p^{2}} σ < e m > p = σ < / e m > p 2 . Diversification benefit: portfolio σ < e m > p < ∑ w < / e m > j σ j \sigma<em>p < \sum w</em>j \sigma_j σ < e m > p < ∑ w < / e m > j σ j unless all assets perfectly correlated. Systematic vs. Unsystematic Risk Systematic (market) risk: economy-wide forces (inflation, rates, war, pandemics). Cannot be diversified away. Unsystematic (unique) risk: firm or industry specific (strikes, regulation). Diversification can largely eliminate it. Total risk decomposition: Total σ 2 = Systematic σ 2 + Unsystematic σ 2 \text{Total}\ \sigma^2 = \text{Systematic}\ \sigma^2 + \text{Unsystematic}\ \sigma^2 Total σ 2 = Systematic σ 2 + Unsystematic σ 2 . Empirical diversification table: average portfolio σ \sigma σ falls from 49.24 % 49.24\% 49.24% (1 stock) to ≈ 19.2 % \approx19.2\% ≈ 19.2% (1,000 stocks) then flattens (non-diversifiable floor). Beta (β) – Measure of Systematic Risk β < e m > j = % change in R < / e m > j % change in R m \beta<em>j = \dfrac{\%\,\text{change in }R</em>j}{\%\,\text{change in }R_m} β < e m > j = % change in R m % change in R < / e m > j .β m = 1 \beta_m = 1 β m = 1 for market portfolio.Interpretation examples:β = 2 \beta=2 β = 2 ⇒ stock rises 20 % 20\% 20% when market rises 10 % 10\% 10% .β = − 2 \beta=-2 β = − 2 ⇒ stock falls 20 % 20\% 20% when market rises 10 % 10\% 10% . Sample betas: Pfizer 0.63 0.63 0.63 , Apple 1.27 1.27 1.27 , Boeing 1.63 1.63 1.63 etc. Portfolio Beta β < e m > p = ∑ w < / e m > j β j \beta<em>p = \sum w</em>j \beta_j β < e m > p = ∑ w < / e m > j β j (weighted average).Mario’s Portfolios:β < e m > V = 1.20 \beta<em>V=1.20 β < e m > V = 1.20 (riskier), β < / e m > W = 0.91 \beta</em>W=0.91 β < / e m > W = 0.91 (less risky). Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Required/expected return for asset j j j :R < e m > j = R < / e m > F + β < e m > j ( R < / e m > m − R F ) R<em>j = R</em>F + \beta<em>j (R</em>m - R_F) R < e m > j = R < / e m > F + β < e m > j ( R < / e m > m − R F ) Components:R F R_F R F = risk-free rate (e.g., treasury yield).R < e m > m − R < / e m > F R<em>m - R</em>F R < e m > m − R < / e m > F = market risk premium.β < e m > j ( R < / e m > m − R F ) \beta<em>j (R</em>m - R_F) β < e m > j ( R < / e m > m − R F ) = asset-specific risk premium. AZ Corp valuation example:Data: D < e m > 1 = 0.05 D<em>1 = 0.05 D < e m > 1 = 0.05 , g = 0.03 g = 0.03 g = 0.03 , R < / e m > F = 2 % R</em>F=2\% R < / e m > F = 2% , R m = 6 % R_m=6\% R m = 6% , β = 1.30 \beta=1.30 β = 1.30 . Required return: r = 0.02 + 1.30 ( 0.06 − 0.02 ) = 0.072 = 7.2 % r = 0.02 + 1.30(0.06-0.02) = 0.072 = 7.2\% r = 0.02 + 1.30 ( 0.06 − 0.02 ) = 0.072 = 7.2% . Gordon model: P 0 = 0.05 0.072 − 0.03 = 1.19 P_0 = \dfrac{0.05}{0.072-0.03}=1.19 P 0 = 0.072 − 0.03 0.05 = 1.19 . Cost of Capital & WACC Purpose Minimum return a project must earn to increase firm value. Used as discount rate for NPV, performance benchmark, valuation in M&A. WACC = ( w < e m > i × r < / e m > i ) ( 1 − T ) + ( w < e m > p × r < / e m > p ) + ( w < e m > s × r < / e m > s ) \text{WACC} = (w<em>i \times r</em>i)(1-T) + (w<em>p \times r</em>p) + (w<em>s \times r</em>s) WACC = ( w < e m > i × r < / e m > i ) ( 1 − T ) + ( w < e m > p × r < / e m > p ) + ( w < e m > s × r < / e m > s ) wherew < e m > i , w < / e m > p , w s w<em>i, w</em>p, w_s w < e m > i , w < / e m > p , w s = market value weights of debt, preferred, common.r i r_i r i = before-tax cost of debt, adjusted by ( 1 − T ) (1-T) ( 1 − T ) for taxes.r p r_p r p = cost of preferred stock.r s r_s r s = cost of common (retained or new equity).Weights must be based on CURRENT market values, not book. Sources of Long-Term Capital Interest-bearing debt. Preferred stock. Common equity from retained earnings. New issues of common stock. Component Costs Debt Interest tax-deductible → after-tax cost: r < e m > i after = r < / e m > i before ( 1 − T ) r<em>i^{\text{after}} = r</em>i^{\text{before}}(1-T) r < e m > i after = r < / e m > i before ( 1 − T ) . Company Z example: r < e m > i before = 6 % r<em>i^{\text{before}}=6\% r < e m > i before = 6% , T = 17 % T=17\% T = 17% → r < / e m > i after = 0.06 ( 1 − 0.17 ) = 4.98 % r</em>i^{\text{after}} = 0.06(1-0.17)=4.98\% r < / e m > i after = 0.06 ( 1 − 0.17 ) = 4.98% . Preferred Stock r p = D P r_p = \dfrac{D}{P} r p = P D (no tax shield). Example: 2 / 25 = 8 % 2/25 = 8\% 2/25 = 8% .Higher than debt because dividends not tax-deductible and riskier to investors. Common Equity Two estimation methods:Dividend Discount (constant-growth): r < e m > s = D < / e m > 1 P 0 + g r<em>s = \dfrac{D</em>1}{P_0} + g r < e m > s = P 0 D < / e m > 1 + g . CAPM: r < e m > s = R < / e m > F + β ( R < e m > m − R < / e m > F ) r<em>s = R</em>F + \beta (R<em>m - R</em>F) r < e m > s = R < / e m > F + β ( R < e m > m − R < / e m > F ) . Company Z examples:Constant-growth: r = 4 50 + 0.05 = 13 % r= \dfrac{4}{50}+0.05 = 13\% r = 50 4 + 0.05 = 13% . CAPM: r = 0.02 + 2 ( 0.08 − 0.02 ) = 14 % r=0.02+2(0.08-0.02)=14\% r = 0.02 + 2 ( 0.08 − 0.02 ) = 14% . Average for planning: ( 13 % + 14 % ) / 2 = 13.5 % (13\%+14\%)/2=13.5\% ( 13% + 14% ) /2 = 13.5% . Retained earnings cost r < e m > r = r < / e m > s r<em>r = r</em>s r < e m > r = r < / e m > s (opportunity cost to shareholders). Computing WACC – Company Z Capital structure: Debt 100 100 100 , Preferred 50 50 50 , Equity 150 150 150 → weights w < e m > i = 0.3333 , w < / e m > p = 0.1667 , w s = 0.50 w<em>i=0.3333, w</em>p=0.1667, w_s=0.50 w < e m > i = 0.3333 , w < / e m > p = 0.1667 , w s = 0.50 . Plug in:WACC = 0.3333 × 6 % × ( 1 − 0.17 ) + 0.1667 × 8 % + 0.50 × 13.5 % ≈ 9.743 % \text{WACC}=0.3333\times6\%\times(1-0.17)+0.1667\times8\%+0.50\times13.5\% \approx 9.743\% WACC = 0.3333 × 6% × ( 1 − 0.17 ) + 0.1667 × 8% + 0.50 × 13.5% ≈ 9.743% . Key Take-Aways & Exam Reminders Always distinguish between total, systematic, and unsystematic risk; only systematic commands a return premium. Variance/standard deviation quantify volatility; higher σ \sigma σ = greater risk. Portfolio diversification reduces unsystematic risk; cannot remove systematic component. Beta gauges relative systematic risk; feeds directly into CAPM for required return. Total return formula is the foundation for historical performance measurement. WACC blends component costs; correct weights = market-value proportions; debt component must be after-tax. In valuation (e.g., Gordon model) ensure consistent units (decimals vs percentages) and growth g < r. Ethical / practical implications: investors should demand compensation only for non-diversifiable risk; managers must hurdle projects above WACC to create value.