Risk, Return, CAPM & WACC – Comprehensive Study Notes

Definition & Nature of Risk

  • Risk = uncertainty about returns; captures potential variability in outcomes and therefore shapes the cost of capital.
  • Two broad manifestations of risk in markets (illustrative real-world evidence):
    • Bitcoin price path: from $123\$123 (Oct 2012) → $1,238\$1{,}238 (2013) → $20,000\$20{,}000 (2017) → <$4,000<\$4{,}000 (early 2019) → $69,000\$69{,}000 (Nov 2021) → <$20,000<\$20{,}000 (late 2022) → >$75,000>\$75{,}000 (early 2024).
    • Gold, NVIDIA, Nokia shares, Straits Times Index & S&P 500 charts—show long-term up-and-down swings; evidence that risk is omnipresent across assets, sectors, and time.

Total Return Formula

  • Total (or holding-period) rate of return over period tt:
    • r<em>t=C</em>t+(P<em>tP</em>t1)Pt1r<em>t = \dfrac{C</em>t + (P<em>t - P</em>{t-1})}{P_{t-1}}
    • CtC_t = cash flow received between t1t-1 and tt (e.g., dividend, coupon).
  • Example (DBS share):
    • P<em>0=$31P<em>{0}=\$31, C=$2C=\$2, P</em>1=$36P</em>{1}=\$36r=2+(3631)31=0.1613=16.13%p.a.r = \dfrac{2 + (36-31)}{31}=0.1613 = 16.13\%\,\text{p.a.} (actual/historical return)

Expected Return for a Single Asset

  • Based on probabilistic outcomes:
    • E(R)=<em>i=1np</em>iRiE(R)=\sum<em>{i=1}^{n} p</em>i R_i
    • Where p<em>ip<em>i = probability of state ii, R</em>iR</em>i = return in state ii.
  • Coin-toss bet example:
    • Heads +$1+\$1 (50%), tails $0.50-\$0.50 (50%).
    • E(R)=1×0.5+(0.5)×0.5=0.25 ($0.25 expected gain).E(R)=1\times0.5 + (-0.5)\times0.5 = 0.25\ \text{(\$0.25 expected gain).}

Measuring Risk: Variance & Standard Deviation

  • Variance: weighted average of squared deviations from expected return.
    • σ2=<em>i=1np</em>i(RiE(R))2\sigma^{2}=\sum<em>{i=1}^{n} p</em>i (R_i-E(R))^{2}
  • Standard deviation: σ=σ2\sigma = \sqrt{\sigma^{2}}.
  • Higher σ\sigma ⇒ higher risk.
  • Worked example (Stock A vs Stock B):
    • State data (recession, neutral, boom) ⇒
    • E(R<em>A)=11.25%E(R<em>A)=11.25\%, σ</em>A=19.8%\sigma</em>A=19.8\%
    • E(R<em>B)=12.5%E(R<em>B)=12.5\%, σ</em>B=14.4%\sigma</em>B=14.4\%
    • Interpretation: B offers slightly higher mean with lower volatility → preferable to risk-averse investor.

Portfolio Mathematics

Portfolio Expected Return

  • Weighted average of component expected returns:
    • E(R<em>p)=</em>j=1mw<em>jE(R</em>j)E(R<em>p)=\sum</em>{j=1}^{m} w<em>j E(R</em>j)
    • wjw_j = proportion of portfolio value in asset jj.
  • Example – single-scenario weights:
    • Five-asset portfolio: E(R<em>p)=10%E(R<em>p)=10\% when w</em>A=30%,wB=17%,w</em>A=30\%, w_B=17\%, \dots (see data sheet).
  • Example – multi-scenario:
    • For each economy state compute portfolio return R<em>p,i=w</em>jR<em>j,iR<em>{p,i}=\sum w</em>j R<em>{j,i}, then apply probabilities to obtain E(R</em>p)E(R</em>p).

Portfolio Variance / Standard Deviation

  • Not the weighted average of individual σ\sigma’s.
  • Steps:
    1. Calculate Rp,iR_{p,i} per state.
    2. Obtain overall E(Rp)E(R_p).
    3. Compute deviations DEV<em>i=R</em>p,iE(Rp)DEV<em>i = R</em>{p,i} - E(R_p).
    4. Square, weight by p<em>ip<em>i, sum ⇒ σ</em>p2\sigma</em>p^{2}.
    5. σ<em>p=σ</em>p2\sigma<em>p = \sqrt{\sigma</em>p^{2}}.
  • Diversification benefit: portfolio σ<em>p<w</em>jσj\sigma<em>p < \sum w</em>j \sigma_j unless all assets perfectly correlated.

Systematic vs. Unsystematic Risk

  • Systematic (market) risk: economy-wide forces (inflation, rates, war, pandemics). Cannot be diversified away.
  • Unsystematic (unique) risk: firm or industry specific (strikes, regulation). Diversification can largely eliminate it.
  • Total risk decomposition: Total σ2=Systematic σ2+Unsystematic σ2\text{Total}\ \sigma^2 = \text{Systematic}\ \sigma^2 + \text{Unsystematic}\ \sigma^2.
  • Empirical diversification table: average portfolio σ\sigma falls from 49.24%49.24\% (1 stock) to 19.2%\approx19.2\% (1,000 stocks) then flattens (non-diversifiable floor).

Beta (β) – Measure of Systematic Risk

  • β<em>j=%change in R</em>j%change in Rm\beta<em>j = \dfrac{\%\,\text{change in }R</em>j}{\%\,\text{change in }R_m}.
    • βm=1\beta_m = 1 for market portfolio.
  • Interpretation examples:
    • β=2\beta=2 ⇒ stock rises 20%20\% when market rises 10%10\%.
    • β=2\beta=-2 ⇒ stock falls 20%20\% when market rises 10%10\%.
  • Sample betas: Pfizer 0.630.63, Apple 1.271.27, Boeing 1.631.63 etc.

Portfolio Beta

  • β<em>p=w</em>jβj\beta<em>p = \sum w</em>j \beta_j (weighted average).
  • Mario’s Portfolios:
    • β<em>V=1.20\beta<em>V=1.20 (riskier), β</em>W=0.91\beta</em>W=0.91 (less risky).

Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

  • Required/expected return for asset jj:
    • R<em>j=R</em>F+β<em>j(R</em>mRF)R<em>j = R</em>F + \beta<em>j (R</em>m - R_F)
  • Components:
    • RFR_F = risk-free rate (e.g., treasury yield).
    • R<em>mR</em>FR<em>m - R</em>F = market risk premium.
    • β<em>j(R</em>mRF)\beta<em>j (R</em>m - R_F) = asset-specific risk premium.
  • AZ Corp valuation example:
    • Data: D<em>1=0.05D<em>1 = 0.05, g=0.03g = 0.03, R</em>F=2%R</em>F=2\%, Rm=6%R_m=6\%, β=1.30\beta=1.30.
    • Required return: r=0.02+1.30(0.060.02)=0.072=7.2%r = 0.02 + 1.30(0.06-0.02) = 0.072 = 7.2\%.
    • Gordon model: P0=0.050.0720.03=1.19P_0 = \dfrac{0.05}{0.072-0.03}=1.19.

Cost of Capital & WACC

Purpose

  • Minimum return a project must earn to increase firm value.
  • Used as discount rate for NPV, performance benchmark, valuation in M&A.

WACC Formula

  • WACC=(w<em>i×r</em>i)(1T)+(w<em>p×r</em>p)+(w<em>s×r</em>s)\text{WACC} = (w<em>i \times r</em>i)(1-T) + (w<em>p \times r</em>p) + (w<em>s \times r</em>s) where
    • w<em>i,w</em>p,wsw<em>i, w</em>p, w_s = market value weights of debt, preferred, common.
    • rir_i = before-tax cost of debt, adjusted by (1T)(1-T) for taxes.
    • rpr_p = cost of preferred stock.
    • rsr_s = cost of common (retained or new equity).
  • Weights must be based on CURRENT market values, not book.

Sources of Long-Term Capital

  1. Interest-bearing debt.
  2. Preferred stock.
  3. Common equity from retained earnings.
  4. New issues of common stock.

Component Costs

Debt
  • Interest tax-deductible → after-tax cost: r<em>iafter=r</em>ibefore(1T)r<em>i^{\text{after}} = r</em>i^{\text{before}}(1-T).
  • Company Z example: r<em>ibefore=6%r<em>i^{\text{before}}=6\%, T=17%T=17\%r</em>iafter=0.06(10.17)=4.98%r</em>i^{\text{after}} = 0.06(1-0.17)=4.98\%.
Preferred Stock
  • rp=DPr_p = \dfrac{D}{P} (no tax shield). Example: 2/25=8%2/25 = 8\%.
  • Higher than debt because dividends not tax-deductible and riskier to investors.
Common Equity
  • Two estimation methods:
    1. Dividend Discount (constant-growth): r<em>s=D</em>1P0+gr<em>s = \dfrac{D</em>1}{P_0} + g.
    2. CAPM: r<em>s=R</em>F+β(R<em>mR</em>F)r<em>s = R</em>F + \beta (R<em>m - R</em>F).
  • Company Z examples:
    • Constant-growth: r=450+0.05=13%r= \dfrac{4}{50}+0.05 = 13\%.
    • CAPM: r=0.02+2(0.080.02)=14%r=0.02+2(0.08-0.02)=14\%.
    • Average for planning: (13%+14%)/2=13.5%(13\%+14\%)/2=13.5\%.
  • Retained earnings cost r<em>r=r</em>sr<em>r = r</em>s (opportunity cost to shareholders).

Computing WACC – Company Z

  • Capital structure: Debt 100100, Preferred 5050, Equity 150150 → weights w<em>i=0.3333,w</em>p=0.1667,ws=0.50w<em>i=0.3333, w</em>p=0.1667, w_s=0.50.
  • Plug in:
    • WACC=0.3333×6%×(10.17)+0.1667×8%+0.50×13.5%9.743%\text{WACC}=0.3333\times6\%\times(1-0.17)+0.1667\times8\%+0.50\times13.5\% \approx 9.743\%.

Key Take-Aways & Exam Reminders

  • Always distinguish between total, systematic, and unsystematic risk; only systematic commands a return premium.
  • Variance/standard deviation quantify volatility; higher σ\sigma = greater risk.
  • Portfolio diversification reduces unsystematic risk; cannot remove systematic component.
  • Beta gauges relative systematic risk; feeds directly into CAPM for required return.
  • Total return formula is the foundation for historical performance measurement.
  • WACC blends component costs; correct weights = market-value proportions; debt component must be after-tax.
  • In valuation (e.g., Gordon model) ensure consistent units (decimals vs percentages) and growth g < r.
  • Ethical / practical implications: investors should demand compensation only for non-diversifiable risk; managers must hurdle projects above WACC to create value.