In-Depth Notes on Everyday Conversation
Introduction to Everyday Conversation
Conversation as a process of communicative or social actions between participants
Focus on intuitive and analytic understanding of actions rather than mere speech
Pragmatics
The study of language in use, including conversational context and meaning
Language Games
Wittgenstein's perspective on language as a form of game with rules and goals
Strategic Action
People express recognition, make self-disclosures, request information, and offer goods or services through various conversational moves
Conversational Patterns
Examines the nuances in conversation; how different utterances can convey distinct actions (e.g., a statement may function as a complaint or a compliment)
Conversational Action
Speech Acts
Speech Acts described by Austin and refined by Searle
Types: illocutionary acts (social actions)
Example of conversational exchange illustrating complex speech acts
Utterances: Linguistically meaningful messages produced during conversation, distinct from grammatical structures
Illocutionary Acts: The social or communicative actions accomplished through utterances
Perlocutionary Effects: The effects of speech acts on conversational partners (e.g., making someone feel appreciated)
Conventional Foundations of Speech Acts
Constitutive Rules
Rules that define how different speech acts are formed and interpreted in social interactions
Distinction between constitutive rules (what creates an action) and regulative rules (when to enact that action)
Examples of Speech Acts
Promises
Defined by specific propositional content rules requiring a future behavior of the speaker
Example conversation about setting an appointment demonstrates the conditions for an utterance to qualify as a promise
Requests
Propositional content focuses on the future behavior of the hearer
Conditions for interpreting an utterance as a request reflect on what the speaker believes about the hearer's capabilities and willingness to comply
Threats and Offers
Both involve speaker's intent about future behavior; differ in the nature of the commitment and whether the hearer’s acceptance is required
Commands
Calls for clear authority or power from the speaker over the recipient, distinct from requests
Compliments
Defined by the speaker's genuine expression of appreciation
Categories of Speech Acts
Commissives: Commitment to future action (e.g., promises, offers)
Directives: Attempts to get the recipient to perform actions (commands, requests)
Assertives: Claims or statements about the world; meant to display belief in the propositional content
Expressives: Expressions of psychological states or emotions (e.g., apologies, thank-yous)
Declarations: Official acts tied to institutional contexts (e.g., a judge’s verdict)
Conversational Implicature
Grice's cooperative principle assumes participants work towards meaningful and clear communication
Maxims of Conversation
Strength: Say no less than necessary
Parsimony: Say no more than necessary
Truth: Do not say anything you believe to be false
Evidence: Do not say things lacking evidence
Relevance: Be relevant
Clarity: Avoid ambiguity and obscurity
Indirect Speech Acts
Situations where what is said diverges from the intended meaning; relies on context for interpretation
Example: "Can you pass the salt?" as a polite request to pass the salt rather than a question about ability
The Role of Context
Importance of conversational context (previous talk) in interpreting utterances
Concept of indexicality indicating that meaning is deeply related to context
Utterances often function in pairs, affecting understanding and expectations in conversation
Conclusion
Understanding conversation as a complex system of speech acts shaped by conventions and immediate context
Importance of recipient design in shaping conversational actions and interpretations.