hassett (monke)

Sex Differences in Rhesus Monkey Toy Preferences Parallel Those of Children

Abstract

  • Authors: Janice M. Hassett, Erin R. Siebert, Kim Wallen
  • Affiliations:
    • Emory University Department of Psychology and Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA 30322
    • Summer Undergraduate Research Experience Program, Emory University
  • Key Focus: Investigation of sex differences in toy preferences between rhesus monkeys and children.
  • Main Hypothesis: Toy preferences reflect biologically determined activity preferences, rather than solely socialization.
  • Keywords: sex differences, toy preference, gender, hormones, rhesus monkey, children, socialization

Introduction

  • Toy play is a robust behavioral sex difference with moderate to very large effect sizes (Cohen-Bendahan et al., 2005; Collaer and Hines, 1995).
  • Boys show stronger preferences for masculine-type toys compared to girls who do not show a statistically significant preference for one type over another (Berenbaum and Hines, 1992).
  • Gender socialization theory: Societal endorsement drives conformity to expected gender roles (Martin and Little, 1990).
  • Girls may have flexibility in gender-typed behavior, contrasted with boys who exhibit stronger preferences for gender-specific activities (Bussey and Perry, 1982).

Sex Differences in Toy Preferences

  • Parallels to Activities: Differences in toy preferences may stem from inherent preferences for specific activities (Miller, 1987).
  • Prenatal Hormonal Influence: Differences within biological sex preferences arise from exposure to hormones influencing behavior, as evidenced in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), who show increased boy-typical toy preference (Berenbaum and Hines, 1992; Meyer-Bahlburg et al., 2004).

Methodology

Subjects
  • Sample Size: 34 rhesus monkeys from a 135-member troop living at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center Field Station.
  • Demographics: 21 males, 61 females (aged from infants to adults). Excluded individuals due to hormonal treatment or inability to code interactions.
  • Monkeys housed in species-specific outdoor enclosures, with continual access to water.
Materials
  • Toy Categories: Toys categorized based on object properties, not traditional gender assignments:
    • Wheeled Toys: Comparable to masculine vehicle toys (e.g., truck, car, wagon).
    • Plush Toys: Comparable to feminine dolls (e.g., teddy bear, Scooby-Doo™).
  • Toys designed to reflect features facilitating specific activities.
Data Collection
  • Experimental Design: Conducted seven 25-minute trials where one wheeled and one plush toy were presented simultaneously to monkeys.
  • Behaviors coded from videotapes focusing on interactions with each toy, involving extensive observational protocols to ensure accuracy.

Results

Interaction Analysis
  • Frequency of Interactions:
    • Male monkeys showed a significant preference for wheeled over plush toys.
    • Total Frequencies: Males: 9.77, Females: 6.96.
    • Significant difference: Z = -2.09, p = .04.
    • Female monkeys did not show reliable preference, engaging comparably with both toy types.
Duration of Interactions
  • Total Duration showed similar patterns for preferences with males interacting longer with wheeled toys compared to plush toys.
  • Females showed no significant duration preference either toy type.
Statistical Analyses and Effect Sizes
  • Cohen’s d: Used to measure effect size, suggesting a moderate to strong difference between males and females in toy preference behaviors.
  • Nonparametric tests used to analyze duration due to non-normal distribution.

Discussion

  • Male rhesus monkeys mirrored the strong gender-specific toy preference exhibited in human boys, preferring wheeled toys.
  • Female rhesus monkeys exhibited a more flexible interaction pattern, akin to human girls, with no significant preference.
  • Suggestion that sex differences in toy preferences are not purely influenced by socialization but are also biologically driven by hormonal influences on behavior.
Conclusions
  • Toy preferences reflect deeper activity preferences influenced by hormonal backgrounds rather than solely socialized norms.
  • Complexity of social structure among rhesus monkeys indicates that adult socialization is not the primary factor determining sex differences in toy interaction behavior.

Acknowledgments

  • Contributions from Jessica Raper and Anne Graff in data collection and development.
  • Funding support from Howard Hughes Medical Institute and various NIH grants.

References

  • A comprehensive list of studies and findings relevant to sex differences in play behavior in children and nonhuman primates, providing foundational support to the hypotheses discussed.

Figures and Tables

  • Figure 1: Illustrations demonstrating sex differences in play with stereotypically masculine and feminine toys.
  • Table 1: Overview of monkey demographics sorted by sex and rank.
  • Table 2: Descriptions of coded behaviors for interactions with toys.
  • Table 3: Summary of mean frequencies and durations of interactions with plush and wheeled toys by sex.