3.1-3.4
Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC)
High Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC)
Implies the fraction of additional disposable income that a household will spend on consumption.
Example:
If an individual has a propensity to consume of 0.8, this means they consume 80% of their disposable income.
Calculation of Consumption Increase
Given a disposable income increase of $1,200:
Consumption increase = MPC × Increase in disposable income
Consumption increase = 0.8 × 1,200 = $960
Definition of MPC
MPC determines how much of an additional income will be spent on consumption versus saved.
Spending Multiplier and the National Output
Spending Multiplier Calculation:
The formula for the spending multiplier (SM) is:
Example Calculation:
If MPC = 0.75, then:
MPS (Marginal Propensity to Save) = 1 - 0.75 = 0.25
Spending Multiplier =
Government Spending and GDP
If government spending increases by $70 billion:
Maximum increase in GDP = Government Spending × Spending Multiplier
Maximum increase = 70,000,000,000 × 4 = $280 billion
Notation: Look for terms such as "maximum increase", "total change"; this indicates the need to apply the spending multiplier.
Investment Spending Changes
Investment Spending Example:
Given an increase in investment spending of $2 million and an MPC of 0.75:
Calculate MPS = 0.25 and SM = 4
Maximum Change in the Economy = Investment Spending × Spending Multiplier
Maximum Change = 2,000,000 × 4 = $8 million
Changes in Disposable Income: Example of Jane
Jane's Disposable Income Changes:
Disposable income in 2004 = $40,000
Disposable income in 2005 = $50,000
Increase in disposable income = 50,000 - 40,000 = $10,000
With MPC of 0.8, amount consumed = 0.8 × 10,000 = $8,000
Tax Multiplier and its Relation to Spending Multiplier
Tax Multiplier Definition:
The tax multiplier will always be one less than the spending multiplier.
For spending multiplier of 4, tax multiplier = 4 - 1 = 3.
Impact of Tax Changes on Disposable Income:
If the government increases taxes, disposable income decreases.
Result: Consumption decreases, affecting Aggregate Demand (AD) by shifting it to the left.
Conversely, if taxes are decreased:
Disposable income increases, leading to increased consumption and AD shifts to the right.
Inverse Relationship:
There exists an inverse relationship between taxation and GDP:
Higher taxes → Lower consumption → Decreased GDP
Lower taxes → Increased consumption → Increased GDP
Government Spending vs Taxation:
Government spending changes have a more significant impact on GDP compared to tax cuts due to the marginal savings rate.
Example: Tax cut of $2 million may result in increased disposable income, but not all of that will be consumed.
Tax Cuts:
If taxes are cut by $4 million with an MPC of 0.75:
Total increase in consumer spending = 75% of 4 million = $3 million
Remaining = 25% (1 million) is saved
The effective increase in GDP from this tax cut would be less than $4 million due to the marginal consumption.
Tax and Transfer Multiplier
Tax Multiplier Equals Transfer Multiplier:
Both multipliers operate under the same principles of spending/revenue distribution.
When taxes are reduced, it increases disposable incomes similar to direct transfers (e.g., a stimulus check).
Both lead to a portion being spent and a portion being saved.
This demonstrates why transfer multiplier is also considered when examining tax changes.
Conclusion: Understanding the relationship between MPC, spending, and tax multipliers is crucial for analyzing economic policies and their impacts on GDP and consumption.