Rubí Expedition and the Texas Frontier (1767-1800) Notes
Context and Aftermath ( 1767-1800 )
- Aftermath of the Seven Years' War ( 1756-1763 ) creates frontier land-control problems; increased British merchants lessen Spanish influence; Enlightenment era weakens Church power; Criollo population grows; José de Gálvez restructured taxation to raise revenue; peace with Apaches leads to conflicts with other tribes; neglect of colonial defenses identified as a major weakness.
- Rubí expedition ordered to inspect presidios and auxiliary areas for defense improvements; aim to tighten control and curb abuses
- Key locations: Paso del Norte (flourishing), La Junta (strategic), San Sabá (no longer useful), El Cañon (Apache settlement efforts failed), Béxar (backwards, lacking protection), Los Adaes (unfit capital), La Bahía (eastern anchor)
- Reform: Reglamento of 1772 establishes single unit control over local interests; cost savings and better soldiery conditions; election of a commissary officer to curb abuses.
Frontier Dynamics and Native Relations
- Rise of the Comanches along the Texas frontier; Comanches become primary aggressors targeting Apaches; flexible leadership and strong kinship networks
- Environmental pressures of the Little Ice Age increase competition for land and food; wealth tied to buffalo and horses; bridewealth practiced; women process hides for wealth
Women in Frontier Society
- Encouraged married soldiers to move to Texas to bear children and avoid natives; high infant mortality (~50%)
- Status defined by marriage/work; widows become sole providers; legal rights include property, trials, and divorce
- Some women become notable ranchers/farmers; women could own property via inheritance or marriage
The First Capital is Abandoned (1770s)
- Second-largest settlement with diverse population; decision to close mission and relocate to San Antonio
- Residents petition for an intermediate area; policy favors alliances with native tribes for trade
- Viewed by some tribes as evidence of Apache-Spanish alliance; led by Antonio Gil y Barbo who emphasized Eastern Texas presence, broad trade networks, and better communication between establishments
- Mission Nacogdoches move yields administrative reform: commandant general acts with military/political authority independent of viceroy
- Athanase de Mézières leads efforts to pacify Northern Nations and Comanches; war on Apaches
- Apaches blamed for Texas problems; Governor Cabello seeks to avoid taking sides, but intertribal tensions persist
- Smallpox, drought, and trade disruptions facilitate peace negotiations with the Comanches; peace by purchase replaces raids as wealth redistribution; long peace lasts until late 1870s
Mission System in Decline
- Religious control shifts toward secular/economic approach to natives
- Only Béxar and La Bahía remain as active missions in early 1770s; land, livestock disputes fuel tensions with Hispanics and friars
- Key flaws: insufficient Native populations; diseases and hygiene issues reduce immunity; European labor/sexual norms drive native flight from missions
- Civilian pressures and land redistribution weaken mission authority; gradual shift away from mission-based governance in the 1780s–1790s
Secularization Begins ( late 18th century )
- Nine friars for the province; few missions with 100+ native residents; native labor and capital for projects decline
- Secularization transitions missions to parish status; natives gain Gente de Razón status with rights
- 1793: San Antonio de Valero civilian community established; 1794: Decree to secularize all missions older than ten years
- Crown saves money; friars retain control of native labor and subsistence farming; petitions to reprieve resettlement due to readiness concerns
The Birth of the Texas Ranches ( 1720-1780 )
- Stock raising becomes vital, led by Franciscan missions; Mesteña Fund taxes unbranded livestock to reduce disputes
- Missions placed on par with ranchers, undermining mission authority; murder of Espada herdsmen highlights labor challenges
- Mission Valero able to organize a roundup/branding beyond private farmers
Triumph of the Civilian Ranchers ( 1780-1800 )
- End of mission system accelerates as private stockmen rise; attempts for equal ownership fail (Espiritu Santo cattle capture)
- Vaqueros’ absence from mission ranching prompts compromises with encroaching stockmen
- Deals yield eventual civilian ownership; grazing lands return to common use; land-control equity pursued for over a generation
- Ranching becomes the principal economic activity in the region; cattle numbers grow significantly
A Ranching Empire in the Lower Rio Grande Valley ( key families )
- Region ideal for stock-farming; haciendados establish sheep and cattle operations; missions no longer block occupation
- Captain Juan José Hinojosa builds a major ranch from land grants; José María Ballí also prominent
- Marriage between Ballí and Hinojosa’s daughter Rosa María Hinojosa cements control
- Rosa María: education and business training; becomes matriarch (La Patrona) with vast landholdings (~1,000,000 acres); serves as community pillar and lender; sons contribute to land expansion
- Areas controlled span across present-day Reynosa, Padre Island interests, and multiple counties; region land-rich but capital-poor
A Ranching Empire cont. ( social structure )
- Difficulty coordinating herds among several ranches; land leasing to acquire water access
- Wealth unevenly distributed; small cadre of powerful Patrones vs large group of landless stock owners and peones
- Patrones provide for labor needs in exchange for loyalty; peones rely on patron protection and aid
Conclusion
- 1700s are pivotal for Texas development; Rubí reforms and mission redistribution create space for civilian communities and wealth
- War against Apaches evolves into peaceful relations with Norteños and Comanches, revitalizing livestock and trade
- Cattle industry emerges as a lasting legacy; a permanent bridge across the Rio Grande is established
- Transition from mission economy to private-sector ranching; increased regional stability and economic activity into the 19th century