Helping and Withholding Help
Helping and Withholding Help
Chapter 14
Prosocial Behavior
Definition: Prosocial behavior refers to actions that are intended to help or benefit others immediately.
Decisions Leading to Help
Is Help Needed?
Key Considerations:
Noticing the Need
The Mood of the Helper
Reactions of Others
Is Help Deserved?
Key Considerations:
Norms of Social Responsibility: The societal judgment about responsibilities to help others.
The Nature of the Relationship: The bond between the helper and the person in need affects the decision to help.
Attribution of Controllability: Understanding whether the person's situation is due to factors within their control.
Who is in Need?: Identifying the individual or group needing help.
Emotional Response Evoked: The emotions that arise regarding the situation guide the decision-making process.
The Bystander Effect
Case Study: Kitty Genovese
Concept: This phenomenon illustrates apathy or diffusion of responsibility, where individuals do not offer help when others are present.
Empirical Study – Darley and Latané (1968)
Findings:
A study measuring the percentage of participants who offered help based on the number of bystanders perceived to be present.
Results:
With 1 other believed present: 100% immediate attempt to help.
With 2 others believed present: 80% any attempt to help, immediate or delayed.
With 5 others believed present: 60% any attempt to help, immediate or delayed.
Conclusion: The more bystanders present, the less likely individuals were to assist, illustrating the bystander effect.
Decision Tree of Helping
Steps:
Notice the situation.
Define it as an emergency.
Take responsibility for providing help.
Make a decision to intervene.
Implement the decision to help.
Reversed Bystander Effect
Research: Philpot et al. (2020)
Findings showed that in public conflicts, 9 out of 10 people helped as documented by surveillance cameras in the UK, Netherlands, and South Africa.
Conclusion: An increase in the number of bystanders led to a higher likelihood of help.
Group Identity and Bystander Effect
Findings: Levine (2002, 2005)
Group identity influences the bystander effect.
Identification with the Victim: Reduces bystander effect.
Identification with the Perpetrator: Increases bystander effect.
Norms of Helping
Inappropriate Norms
Examples:
Norm of family privacy.
Observing others' failure to help can foster a norm of not helping.
Appropriate Norms
Examples:
Descriptive Norm: Observing that others are helping may encourage individuals to help.
Personal Norms of Helping: Derived from individual attitudes and values.
Legal Approach to Helping: Understanding legal obligations to assist.
Religious Teachings: Many faiths promote the act of helping others.
Biological Perspectives on Helping
Viewpoint: Humans may be seen as inherently selfish, weighing the costs and benefits of helping.
Key Factors:
Genetic survival.
Benefit to groups through helping and cooperation.
The concept of reciprocity, where helping others benefits the helper in return.
Cooperative groups tend to be more successful.
Economic Explanations for Helping
Considerations:
Victim’s Gratitude: Anticipated appreciation from the person receiving help.
Mastery: Ability to help or intervene effectively.
Recognition: When bystanders notice the act of helping.
Positive Emotional State: Feelings that accompany helping.
Cost-Benefit Analysis:
Costs: Time, physical threat, negative feedback.
Rewards: Emotional satisfaction, social approval.
Emotional Rewards in Helping
Insights:
Happier individuals are generally more likely to engage in helping behavior.
The Negative-State Relief Model of Helping (Schaller & Cialdini, 1988) suggests that helping can improve one’s mood.
Motivations for Prosocial Behavior
Types of Motivation:
Prosocial behavior may stem purely from the desire to help others (altruism).
It may also be motivated by personal rewards (egoism).
Empathy-Altruism Model
Developed By: Batson (1981)
Components:
Empathic Concern: Feelings of sympathy and compassion arise from understanding others’ experiences.
Personal Distress: Feelings of anxiety, upset, or fear in response to the plight of others.
Outcomes:
Egoistic helping: Helping to alleviate personal distress.
Altruistic helping: Helping out of genuine concern for the other.
Potential for Escape: Avoiding discomfort associated with witnessing suffering.
The Limits of Empathy
Challenges:
Ingroup Bias: Preferences for helping those within one’s own social group can lead to hostility towards outgroups.
Empathy can be regulated and is not inherently a moral emotion.
Challenges also arise when feeling empathy for multiple victims rather than a single individual.
Valuing In-group Relationships
Factors:
Similarity and interaction with in-group members fosters helping behaviors.
Communal Relationship: A relationship characterized by mutual concern for each other's welfare.
Social Norms in Helping
Influence Mechanism: Social norms of a group become individual norms through processes of social identification, which can lead to increased help towards outgroup members.
Processing in Helping Behavior
Superficial Processing
Characteristics:
Emergencies may limit cognitive processing due to factors such as arousal and emotions leading to split-second decision making.
There is a limited ability to think critically and analyze situations during high-stress moments.
Systematic Processing
Characteristics:
Planned and long-term helping allows for systematic processing, fostering a reflective approach.
Repeated helping leads to a self-perception of being a helpful person, driven by both egoistic and altruistic concerns and group identification.
Strategies for Increasing Prosocial Behavior in Society
Recommendations:
Reduce ambiguity in emergencies to facilitate decision-making.
Increase internal attributions for helping by framing helping behaviors positively.
Make prosocial norms more accessible to the public.
Avoid diffusion of responsibility amongst bystanders.
Promote identification with those in need to increase empathetic responses.
The Help Recipient
Outcomes:
Help recipients often experience gratitude, which can convey messages of caring or create expectations of owing a favor.
Their thankfulness also communicates a sense of power to the helper by reinforcing their positive role in the interaction.
Forms of Help (Nadler, 2006)
Categories:
Dependency-Oriented Help: Support that may foster reliance on the helper.
Autonomy-Oriented Help: Support that encourages independence and self-sufficiency.