COST ASSIGNMENT METHODS: JOB COSTING

COST ASSIGNMENT METHODS: JOB COSTING

OVERVIEW

  • Introduction to Job Order Costing

    • Job-order costing is identified as one of the simplest cost assignment systems.

    • This method focuses on tracing and assigning costs directly to identifiable batches or lots of cost objects.

    • Contrast with process costing, which traces and associates costs according to processes rather than products.

    • Both methodologies aim to gather costs and divide them among a set of goods under production.

    • Job-order costing simplifies bookkeeping aspects related to inventory accounts, mimicking the physical flow of goods in manufacturing.

    • This approach is relevant for various types of services, not just manufacturing.

    • The document compares different overhead costing methods: actual, normal, and standard.

  • Applications of Job-Order Costing

    • Job-order costing is developed for:

    • Custom production environments

    • Job-shop production

    • Batch production

    • Process costing is suited for continuous, uniform products.

    • Job-order costing groups costs by production batches, which can vary by customer, specification, or convenience.

    • Example: Computer diskette manufacturing may employ both job-order and process costing.

    • Job-order costing is mandatory when products vary significantly, typical in custom manufacturing like construction or certain service industries.

    • It can apply universally across diverse manufacturing and service situations.

PRODUCTION ACTIVITY AND JOB-ORDER COSTING

  • Job-order costing involves production batches:

    • Batches can consist of 1 to many product units.

    • Batches may vary due to customer needs, specifications, seasonal demands, or production logic.

Production Examples
  • Example of mixed-costing environments:

    • Computer diskette manufacturers using both job-order costing (for assembly) and process costing (for internal components).

    • Job-order costing suits unique products and services like construction projects or bespoke service jobs (e.g., legal services, software installation).

    • Aircraft assembly and book printing serve as further job-order costing examples.

FLOW OF COSTS THROUGH INVENTORIES

  • Cost accounting systems record production costs as assets pre-sale.

  • Three basic inventory classifications:

    • Raw Materials Inventory: Costs associated with purchased materials pre-production.

    • Work-in-Process Inventory (WIP): Adjusted costs as goods progress through production.

    • Finished Goods Inventory: Costs exiting WIP, aligned with the physical goods process.

JOB-ORDER COSTING PROCESS

  • Cost accumulation process documents production costs:

    • Costs associated with individual batches are gathered and assigned via WIP accounts.

    • Job-order costing compiles direct material and labor costs by batch, allocating overhead costs based on established procedures.

Materials and Labor Cost Tracking
  • Job Cost Sheet:

    • Records costs of materials withdrawn from raw materials for job use.

    • Reflects costs debited to the job's work-in-process (WIP) account and credited to the raw materials inventory.

    • While traditional sheets may be digital today, the concept remains a ledger for inventory tracking.

    • Costs are updated as materials and labor are used, requiring accurate job-related activity records.

Overhead Cost Assignment
  • Overhead cost determination:

    • An allocation measure tied to job costs (e.g., direct labor hours).

    • The overhead rate is calculated based on a period's total overhead costs divided by the chosen allocation basis.

CALCULATING OVERHEAD COSTS

  • Overhead Calculation Steps:

    1. Calculate Overhead Rate (OHr):
      OHr=racTotalextOHTotalextBasisOHr = rac{Total ext{ }OH}{Total ext{ }Basis}

    2. Calculate Overhead Assigned:
      OverheadextAssigned=OHrimesBasisextinextJobOverhead ext{ }Assigned = OHr imes Basis ext{ } in ext{ } Job

    • Example using direct labor hours as allocation basis.

Example: Framingham Framis Company
  • Context of production for job 930503:

    • Total direct material issued: 5,000 pounds of resin (value: $11,200).

    • Direct labor: 4,200 hours (cost: $49,000).

    • Total prime costs: $60,200 (direct material + direct labor).

  • Actual overhead applied after final calculations:

    • Total direct labor hours for the month: 16,800 hours.

    • Overhead calculation based on using a percentage of total labor hours for job completion.

  • Total cost determined:

    • Sum of direct material, labor, and calculated overhead.

APPROACHES TO OVERHEAD COSTING

  • Actual Costing: Costs are computed post-job completion using recorded overhead.

  • Normal Costing: Overhead is calculated based on estimates prior to actual job costs being realized:

    • Example parameters used for estimates in Framingham Framis include total manufacturing overhead and annual labor hour estimates.

    • Predetermined overhead rate formulation:
      PDOR=racTotalextEstimatedextAnnualextOHTotalextEstimatedextAnnualextDLHPDOR = rac{Total ext{ }Estimated ext{ }Annual ext{ }OH}{Total ext{ }Estimated ext{ }Annual ext{ }DLH}

  • Overhead assigned under normal costing allows quicker job costing without waiting on final overhead documentation.

PRACTICAL EXAMPLES OF JOB COSTING

  • Analyzing January orders at Light-Pro Custom Replacement Window factory:

    • Specific job data including direct materials, direct labor hours, and intended calculations by either costing method.

    • Costs computed using both actual and normal costing methods differ only in overhead rates.

    • Usage of machine hours compared to direct labor hours may yield varying cost outputs, determined by the selected allocation basis.

PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN JOB COSTING

  • Problem Scenarios:

    • Jobs with actual versus normal costing comparison challenge the understanding of overhead application and efficiency reporting.

    • Financial Implications: Overapplied or underapplied overhead may indicate discrepancies between estimated and actual performance metrics, not efficiency directly.

Conclusion
  • Job-order costing provides a simplistic yet effective means to track production costs by gathering pertinent data leading up to a unit’s production completion.

  • Differences in accounting outcomes shine light on various costing methodologies employed depending on corporate needs or managerial decisions regarding budgeting and forecasting.
    -Customary variations may not reflect genuine mismanagement but instead may pinpoint inaccuracies in overhead estimations or allocation methods.

Summary of Key Points
  • Job-order costing focuses on gathering costs related directly to specific job outputs.

  • Accounting treatment of overhead and consistent methodology application maintains integrity across financial reporting, ensuring accurate representation of production expenses for defined job activities.