Southeast Asia
Article Overview
Title: Authoritarian Innovations: Crafting Support for a Less Democratic Southeast Asia
Authors: Nicole Curato & Diego Fossati
Published: Democratization, 27:6, 1006-1020 (2020)
Keys to Access: DOI link provided for citation
Introduction
Contemporary Democratic Backsliding:
Often occurs gradually.
Elected officials subvert democratic institutions subtly.
Requires a focus on new tactics used by authoritarians to stifle dissent and undermine democratic frameworks.
Concept of Authoritarian Innovations:
Describes sophisticated practices used to erode democracy in Southeast Asia, with specific case studies from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore.
Characteristics of Authoritarian Innovations
Innovation vs Traditional Tactics:
Traditional authoritarian behaviors: Press censorship, imprisonment of opposition, etc.
Modern innovations are more subtle, using new governance styles and technologies to maintain power while appearing democratic.
Impact of Authoritarian Practices:
Serves to dilute accountability and silence dissent.
Can happen in both democratic and authoritarian contexts.
Structural and Contextual Dynamics
Influence of Broader Changes:
Structural changes prompt the adaptation of new authoritarian practices.
Importance of understanding the conditions enabling these innovations.
Dimensions of Authoritarian Control:
Innovations can manifest as policies, legal tools, technical methods, or rhetorical changes.
Implications for Democratic Studies
Rethinking Democratic Backsliding:
Calls for more nuanced understandings of democracy beyond traditional indicators (e.g., elections).
Need for a focus on informal practices and public participation constraints.
Research Directions:
Emphasizes analyzing specific cases and practices shaping the erosion of democracy, rather than relying on generalized theories.
Regional Focus: Southeast Asia
Diversity and Patterns:
The region exhibits various authoritarian practices and democratic erosion.
Cases in Thailand, Cambodia, Indonesia, and the Philippines illustrate diverse authoritarian strategies.
Contextual Features:
Political and cultural diversity informs strategies used by authoritarian actors.
New data suggests a shift from overt repression to more sophisticated forms of control.
Case Studies in Authoritarian Innovations
Indonesia:
Analysis of policies that reduce electoral competition and increase participation costs.
Malaysia:
Examination of how longstanding authoritarian practices adapt in an increasingly competitive political environment.
Singapore:
Use of social media strategies to bolster government support while undermining political competition.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Challenges to Democracy:
Innovations create complex challenges requiring vigilant observation of political practices.
Implications for Policy:
Importance of developing nuanced strategies to counter authoritarian practices and foster democratic values.