sorry natagalan
Site of the First Mass
The first documented Catholic Mass in the Philippines was held on March 31, 1521, Easter Sunday.
Conducted by Father Pedro de Valderrama of Ferdinand Magellan's expedition.
Located on the shores referred to as "Mazaua" in Antonio Pigafetta's journals.
Important Attendees
Rajahs Present:
Rajah Kolambu
Rajah Siagu
Magellan asked for a cross to be installed at the highest peak for defense.
Site Confirmation
The National Historical Commission declared Limawasa as the site of the first mass in the Philippines.
Evidence Supporting Limawasa Claim
Pigafetta's testimony regarding the route and his map.
Confirmation from Francisco Albo's logbook about the planting of the cross.
Seven days spent at Mazaua noted.
Pigafetta's Background
Born in 1491 in Vicenza, Republic of Venice, Italy.
Died at age 39-40 around 153.
Italian scholar who studied astronomy, geography, and cartography.
Journey with Magellan
Accompanied Magellan on his journey.
One of 18 men who returned to Spain in 1522.
Details of the Mass
Two native chieftains attended: Rajah of Mazaua and Rajah of Butuan.
A wooden cross was planted after the mass.
Claims from Other Accounts
Historical claims state that the first mass was held in Mazaua, confirmed by several historians.
Jaime de Veyra and Pablo Pastells argued against the Butuan claim, suggesting Mazaua as the true site.
Geography Details
Limasawa is located at a latitude of 9 two-thirds degrees North, fitting the description of Mazaua.
Other claims posit Butuan as the mass location based on geographical features and historical tradition.
Butuan Claim Overview
Initial beliefs favored Butuan due to Catholic traditions.
Maps from 1734 and 1872 document claims of the first mass occurring there.
Excavated balanghay boats suggest local transportation for worship.
Conclusion of Claims
Both claims recognize that Magellan's expedition reached both Limasawa and Butuan.
Limasawa Claim is supported by primary sources from Pigafetta and Albo, while Butuan Claim is viewed as secondary and less reliable.
The clarity of evidence favors the Limasawa Claim, supported by historical accounts and navigation findings.