Maximization and Minimization Interrogation Techniques

Maximization is a technique used in interrogation, akin to the 'bad cop' approach.
It involves presenting overwhelming evidence against the suspect, emphasizing the futility of denial.
The interrogator highlights the negative consequences of not confessing, such as a harsher sentence.
The goal is to increase the suspect's psychological anxiety by emphasizing the adverse outcomes of remaining silent.

Minimization is the opposite of maximization, acting as the 'good cop' approach.
The aim is to provide the suspect with a way out or justification for their actions.
Interrogators may suggest mitigating circumstances, such as implying the victim was partially responsible or that the crime was a momentary lapse.
Examples include suggesting a murder was unintentional or implying the victim provoked the suspect.
It's important to note that interrogators cannot guarantee deals or reduced sentences in some jurisdictions.
Minimization seeks to reduce psychological anxiety by offering a way for the suspect to rationalize their behavior.

Maximization increases psychological anxiety by emphasizing the negative consequences of not confessing.
Minimization decreases psychological anxiety by providing a way out and justification for the suspect's actions.
These techniques can be employed for extended periods (hours or days) until a confession is obtained.