FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY: (W25):
‘application of pscyhological research, methods and practice in the legal system’
FORENSIC PSYCH:
APPLIES: police, investigating, clinical, prison
ACADEMIC: biological, developmental, cognitive, social
(NEURO)PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF CRIME:
SLT, Bowlby attachment, Eysenck personality theory, Freud psychoanalysis, neuropsychological, intelligence, genetics
BRAIN STRUCTURE:
insular cortex → ‘social’ emotions, disgust, guilt, shame, lust, pride, moral inhibition
orbital prefrontal → emotional regular, expectations of others
anterior cingulate cortex → communication, cooperation, empathy, attention
amygdala → arousal, control of fear
antisocial personality disorder (ASPD)
11% reduction in grey matter of OPFC
conduct disorder (CD)
small grey matter volumes in the OPFC + temporal lobes
psychopaths have reduced activity in the limbic-prefrontal, less likely to recognise fear
murderers/violent offenders, reduced glucose metabolism in prefrontal + frontal cortex
children/young people with CD have reduced activity in amygdala
LIMITATIONS:
brain damage, abnormalities or offending first?
does not provide clinicians with preventing/reducing immediately
INTELLIGENCE:
lower levels of intelligence = more likely to offend (Finnish males, 1987 born)
link is flawed
weak correlation, social factors, another facet of impulse control
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:
SLT, Bandura, Miller, Rotter, Patterson
Bandura = learning aggression through imitation and vicarious reinforcement
Patterson = observed parent-child interactions (longitudinal), parenta style plays a role in child behaviour
EVIDENCE:
evidence from longitudinal
bad parenting predicts adult conviction
SLT - cyber deviance
STRENGTHS: SLT:
explains crime in a ‘normal’ process
effective training programs
WEAKNESSES: SLT:
those who don’t offend
PERSONALITY (EYSENCK):
personality is genetically and socially determined
criminality is linked to psychoticism, neuroticism + extraversion
little empirical support
PSYCHOPATHY:
personality disorder
pathological lying, manipulation, lack of remorse + empathy, impulsivity, boredom, poor behavioural
psychopaths can be made and altered
assosicated with crime
MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODELS OF CRIME:
DIAGRAM
EPISODIC:
memory for specific events, encoding, storage + retrieval
LIMITATIONS:
memory is unreliable → blurred, fill in gaps, personal changes
accurate encoding is faulty always
Loftus + Palmer - car crash experiment
EYE WITNESS IDENTIFICATION:
encoding: stress witnessing a crime, divided attention, other factors
storage: post-event discussion
retrieval: stress due to police interview, misonformation, sugestibility, line-ups, encoding-retrieval delay
ESTIMATOR VARIABLES - ATTENTION (ENCODING):
DIAGRAM
COGNITIVE INTERVIEW:
1) report everything
2) context reinstatement
3) different perspective recall
4) reverse order recall
EVAL:
+ standard interview vs CI, more correct info (Geiselman)
+ independent replication, CI more correct info (Ascherman)
- change of perspective may mislead (Meman)
- improved recall due to rapport (Kebbel)
CI: ENHANCED:
1) greet + personalise interview, establish rapport
2) explain aims of interview, retrieval, report everything, concentrate, no guessing
3) initiate free report, context reinstate, open-ended question, pauses, non-veral behavior
4) questioning, report everything, no guess, is ok to not know, image, open + closed
5) varied + extensive retrieval, change order, perspective, focus on senses
6) summary
7) closure
EVAL:
+ produced 47% more correct info than CI (Fischer)
+ increase amount of info, maintian accuracy
CI/ECI TECHNIQUES WITH VUNERABLE WITNESS:
adapted for use with children, not effective
problems with components, change of perspective
older witness more pliable with 4 techniques
HOLISTIC CI:
visualisation + report everything → character + personality of face
asks: each characteristic, rate on a sclae of high, medium, low
intelligence, health + extraversion
MINDFULNESS IN EYEWITNESS PROCESS:
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION:
completed trait mindfulness questoinnaire (FFMQ - SF)
selected target image
encoded selective image for 30 seconds
briefly introduced to EVOFIT process
face composite construction
debrief
COMPOSITE NAMING:
asked to name 10 face composites
asked to name 10 target footballers
CRIMINAL PROFILING:
profiler = examines evidence from crime scene , victims + witnesses to try and construct accurate psychological and demographic description of the criminal
emphasises personality, motives + characteristics
physical characteristics
elements of crime scene that would indicate more about the situation
cross-situational consistency
offender-consistency hypothesis
homology assumption
ISSUES:
not an established science
more art than science, based on intuition
little empirical evidence, rarely solves the crime
Snook et al
anecdotes are compelling (failures underreported)
repetition of message
profilers seen as experts
reasoning errors, confirmation bias
media influence
CLINICAL CRIME PROFILING:
literature review, develop suggesting characteristics
focus on congition, effect emotion
works wirh police
custom made, reflexive
Clarke + Carter
UK sex offenders
4 profiles for types of sexual murders
sexually motivated = sadistic with a primary motive to kill
sexually triggered murder = killing to keep victim quiet
grievance motivated murder = no prior intent to kill, loss of control
neuropsychological dysfunction sexual murder = unclear motivation
STATISTICAL PROFILING:
provide more objective measures of offending behaviour
nonphysical interactions vs sexual + physical violence
almost all serial murderers show a level of organisation
GEOGRAPHICAL PROFILING:
criminal investigative methodology - analyses the location of a connected series of crimes, determine residence of offender
familiarity with cases, crime scene investigation, neighbourhood demographics
UK: BEHAVIOURAL INVESTIGATIVE ADVISORS: (BIA):
does not focus on personality, not extablished science, does not aim to solve crime
crime scene analysis
VECTOR, HOODHAMS + BEECH: