Power-Sharing in Modern Democracies

Ethnic Composition and Tensions in Belgium

  • Demographics: Belgium is a European country with a population of over 11 crore. Its ethnic makeup includes 59%59\% Dutch-speakers in the Flemish region, 40%40\% French-speakers in the Wallonia region, and 1%1\% German-speakers.

  • Brussels: In the capital city, 80%80\% are French-speaking and 20%20\% are Dutch-speaking.

  • Tensions: During the 1950s and 1960s, tensions arose because the minority French-speaking community was relatively rich and powerful, causing resentment among the Dutch-speaking majority who gained economic benefits later.

Majoritarianism in Sri Lanka

  • Demographics: Sri Lanka has a population of about 22 crore. Major groups include Sinhala-speakers (74%74\%) and Tamil-speakers (18%18\%). Tamils include 'Sri Lankan Tamils' (13%13\%) and 'Indian Tamils'.

  • Majoritarian Policies: After independence in 19481948, the Sinhala-led government established Sinhala supremacy through the 19561956 Act (making Sinhala the only official language) and preferential policies for university and government jobs.

  • Consequences: These measures alienated Sri Lankan Tamils, leading to demands for an independent 'Tamil Eelam' and a bloody civil war that ended in 20092009.

The Belgian Model of Accommodation

  • Constitutional Amendments: Between 19701970 and 19931993, Belgium amended its constitution four times to ensure inclusive governance.

  • Power Distribution:     - Equal number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers in the Central Government.     - State Governments are not subordinate to the Central Government.     - Brussels has a separate government with equal representation for both communities.

  • Community Government: A third tier of government elected by people belonging to one language community (Dutch, French, or German) to handle cultural, educational, and language issues.

Reasons for Power-sharing

  • Prudential Reasons: Power-sharing is desirable because it reduces the possibility of conflict between social groups, ensuring political stability and national unity.

  • Moral Reasons: Power-sharing is the "very spirit of democracy." It emphasizes that a legitimate government involves citizens' participation and their right to be consulted on governance.

Questions & Discussion: Khalil's Dilemma

  • The Scenario: In Beirut, Lebanon, a power-sharing pact requires the President to be a Maronite Catholic, the Prime Minister a Sunni Muslim, the Deputy Prime Minister an Orthodox Christian, and the Speaker a Shi'a Muslim.

  • The Debate: Khalil, born to parents of different communities, opposes this system and favors a 'regular' democracy where whoever wins the most votes becomes President. However, elders support the pact as it ended a bitter civil war and guarantees peace.

  • Vetal's Question to Vikram: "If you had the power to rewrite the rules in Lebanon, what would you do? Would you adopt the 'regular' rules… or stick to the old rules?"

Forms of Power-sharing

  • Horizontal Distribution: Power is shared among different organs of government (Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary), creating a system of "checks and balances."

  • Vertical Division: Power is shared among governments at different levels, such as the Central/Union Government, State/Provincial Governments, and local bodies like Municipalities and Panchayats.

  • Social Groups: Sharing power among religious and linguistic groups, such as the "community government" in Belgium or "reserved constituencies" for weaker sections and women.

  • Political and Interest Groups: Power-sharing through competition between political parties, coalition governments, and the influence of pressure groups or movements (e.g., traders, farmers, industrial workers).