Impact Origin of the Domaine du Meteore Crater

Introduction

  • Small impact craters (< 300m) are rare, making proof of impact origin difficult, especially without remnants of the impactor.
  • The EarthImpactDatabase (EID) lists only three confirmed high-velocity impact craters in West and Central Europe:
    • Rochechouart (France)
    • Nördlinger Ries (Germany)
    • Steinheimer Becken (Germany)
  • Despite the expected higher frequency of smaller impact structures, there's a lack of confirmed small crater structures.
  • This contribution presents mineralogical and geophysical evidence for a small crater structure (about 200m wide) in Southern France, potentially part of the Herault impact structure.
  • The data was collected for the "Domaine du Meteore"-crater, formally known as "le Clot".

Domaine du Meteore Crater

  • First mentioned over 70 years ago, the 200m wide crater south of Cabrerolles in southern France was largely ignored.
  • Gezè and Cailleux (1950) first suggested an impact origin based on its shape and a strong magnetic anomaly.
  • Janssen (1951) supported this idea, noting similarities to lunar craters.
  • Beals (1964) rejected the impact origin based on:
    • Absence of an elevated rim.
    • Lack of evidence for a magnetic anomaly.
  • This rejection led to the crater being largely ignored for half a century, with no mineralogical or geophysical work conducted until recently.
  • Recent detailed fieldwork was initiated following promising preliminary findings.

Topography

  • The current crater is 200m wide and about 30m deep, with a circular shape crosscut by two stream beds.
  • Assessing the original crater size is difficult due to complex topography and erosion from the Montagne Noire.
  • The impact may have occurred on already shaped terrain.
  • The distribution of crater infall breccia suggests the original size wasn't much larger.
  • The size-to-depth ratio fits closely with the mean values of simple impact craters worldwide.

Geophysical Study

  • The geophysical study included radar (GPR), geoelectric, and geomagnetic measurements.
  • GPR results were inconclusive due to intensive folding of the schist-quartzite unit during regional metamorphism.
  • Geoelectric data processing is ongoing.
  • Measurements of the magnetic field within and around the crater yielded the most interesting data.

Magnetic Structure

  • The most striking geophysical feature is the spatial distribution of geomagnetic field strength, showing a systematic decrease towards the crater bottom.
  • Measurements were taken along several profiles from the surrounding area, through the crater rim, and towards the center.
  • Data were corrected for time variations of Earth's magnetic field.
  • A significant magnetic low of about 100 nT was found within the crater, which is typical for small impact craters.

Mineralogical Study

  • Impact spherules are rare in small craters.
  • A study of magnetic spherules in the Kamil crater in Egypt showed their potential for detecting and confirming new impact craters.

Impact Spherules

  • Screening of soils using high-energy magnets isolated over a hundred Fe-oxide spherules.
  • These spherules exhibited a variety of textures (dendritic, ashlar, smooth) and sizes (few 10s of microns to over 1 mm, mean size ~200 microns).
  • Compound spherules were detected, potentially indicating high-speed collisions.
  • Larger spherules, when broken apart, showed a core-rim structure.
  • A 1.2 mm-sized spherule was polished for further study.
    • Rim: Si, Al-bearing Fe-oxides with remnants of Ni-rich Fe-metal.
    • Core: Fragments of quartz, feldspar, mica, carbonate, TiO2, and carbonaceous material, similar to mineral phases in the target rocks.
    • Micro-diamonds were detected between these minerals via Raman spectroscopy.
    • Peak broadening and shift towards lower wave numbers indicate a shock origin.
    • No other high-pressure polymorphs have been detected so far.

Impact Breccia

  • Pieces of impact breccia were found near the crater.
  • Quartzite fragments show a high degree of deformation, including undulatory extinction, subgrain formation, and mosaicism.
  • Narrow crosscutting planar features in quartz might indicate planar fractures and planar deformation features.
  • Melt pockets around quartzite fragments contain nano-graphite and shock diamonds.

Schist-Quartzite Unit

  • No clear evidence of shatter cones has been found so far.
  • A piece of schist found near the crater center shows numerous crosscutting cataclastic to pseudotachylite veins, potentially representing shock veins.

Conclusions

  • The magnetic low inside the crater, along with impact spherules containing target fragments in a shock diamond matrix surrounded by Si, Al-containing Fe-oxide and Ni-rich Fe-metal, confirms the impact origin of the "Domaine du Meteore"-Crater.
  • Further evidence includes shock diamonds, mosaicism, planar fractures, and planar deformation features in quartz of impact breccia.

Acknowledgments

  • Thanks to Paul Jenkins, Paul Jarman, and Simon Frech for access to the vineyard.
  • Thanks to students for help during fieldwork.
  • Special thanks to C. Ogunjobi for discovering an important impact spherule.

References

  • [1] Folco, L. et al. (2022) GCA 335, 297-322.
  • [2] Fazio, A. et al. (2014) M&PS 49, 2175-2222.
  • [3] Folco, L. et al. (2014) Geology 39, 179-182.
  • [4] French, B.M. and Koeberl, C. (2010) Earth-Science Reviews 98, 123–170.
  • [5] Losiak, A. MetSoc 2022, #6272.
  • [6] Osinski, G.R. et al. (2022) Earth-Science Reviews 232, 104112, 1-48.
  • [7] Kenkmann, T. (2021) M&PS 56, 1024-1070.
  • [8] Gezè, B. and Cailleux, A. (1950) C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 230, 1534.
  • [9] Janssen, C. L. (1951) Jour. R.A.S.C. 9, 190-198.
  • [10] Beals, C. S. (1964) Meteoritics, 2, 85-91.
  • [11] Pilkington, M. and Grieve, R.A.F. (1992) Reviews of Geophysics 30, 161-181.
  • [12] Folco, L. et al. (2022) GCA 335, 297–322. 54th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2023 (LPI Contrib. No. 2806) 1910.pdf