Overview of Trials & Evidence
CRJU 430 Spring 2026: Overview of Trials and Evidence
Learning Objectives
Explain the different types of trials.
Define 'Stare decisis' and 'precedent'.
Define 'Evidence'.
Explain the roles of the judge and jury.
Define 'Burden of proof'.
Types of Trials
Civil Trials
Definition: Dispute between private parties (e.g. employee vs. employer).
Litigation: The case is identified as Plaintiff v. Defendant.
Liability: The plaintiff must prove liability by the preponderance of the evidence.
Criminal Trials
Definition: Government charges a person with violating a criminal law.
Prosecution: The case is identified as Government v. Defendant.
Culpability: The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Comparison of Civil and Criminal Trials
Decision Requirement:
Civil: A unanimous decision is not required.
Criminal: A unanimous decision is required.
Judgment Outcomes:
Civil:
For Plaintiff: Typically, the Defendant is ordered to pay compensatory and/or punitive damages.
For Defendant: The judgment is that the defendant is not liable.
Criminal:
For Defendant: Guilty or Not Guilty.
Guilty: Defendant is sentenced.
Not Guilty: Protects against double jeopardy by the government.
Appeals in Civil and Criminal Trials
Civil: Either party may appeal the outcome.
Criminal:
The defendant may appeal a guilty verdict (conviction).
The prosecution cannot appeal a not-guilty verdict.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus: A formal legal request asking a court to determine whether a person is being lawfully detained or imprisoned, particularly concerning violations of constitutional rights.
California State Judicial System
Comprises:
Trial courts
Appellate courts
California Supreme Court
Stare Decisis
Definition
A doctrine that requires courts to follow precedent set by previous legal decisions.
Importance of Stare Decisis and Precedent
Function: Ensures consistency, stability, and predictability in the law.
Precedent: A prior court decision that serves as an example or authority in deciding later cases involving similar facts or legal issues.
Legal Principle: Courts that adhere to stare decisis honor past rulings, thus providing guidance in legal determinations.
Roles of the Judge and Jury
Jury
Defined as the fact-finder in a trial.
Jurors apply the law to the factual determinations made within the case.
Responsibilities:
Must decide which of two conflicting narratives presented is more credible.
Required to reach a conclusion based on the evidence presented in court.
Judge
Functions as a neutral authority applying the law and safeguarding constitutional rights.
Also referred to as the 'law giver' in a courtroom setting.
responsibilities include:
Oversees trial procedures.
Imposes lawful sentences if applicable.
In bench trials (without a jury), serves as both trier of law and fact-finder.
Judge’s Responsibilities in Criminal Court
Protects defendants’ constitutional rights.
Oversees pretrial proceedings (including warrants, bail, and motions).
Maintains order in the courtroom during trials.
Interprets and applies relevant law.
Acts as a fact-finder in bench trials.
Oversees jury selection and the trial process.
Handles post-conviction matters, including appeals and habeas corpus requests.
What is “Evidence”?
Definition
According to Section 140 of the California Evidence Code: “testimony, writings, material objects, or other things presented to the senses that are offered to prove the existence or nonexistence of a fact.”
Relevant Case Law
Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The U.S. Supreme Court extended the exclusionary rule to the states; thus, evidence collected unconstitutionally is excluded from trial.
Fourth Amendment
Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures:
People have the right to feel secure in their persons, homes, and belongings.
A warrant, requiring probable cause, backed by oath or affirmation, is necessary for searches.
Warrant must specify the location and items to be seized.
Burden of Proof
The prosecution is responsible for proving the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
In most cases, the prosecution has the burden of production, which entails presenting evidence to advance the case.
Judge's Role in Evidence
Judges rule on what evidence will be introduced at trial.
Rules of Evidence
Overview
Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE): Adopted by 42 states; applicable to federal criminal cases irrespective of state jurisdiction.
California's Approach: California does not follow the FRE; it adopts its California Evidence Code, which adheres to most fundamental principles of FRE.
Purpose of Rules of Evidence
To maintain fairness during trials by ensuring that rights are upheld within legal proceedings.
Objectives of Rules of Evidence
Equality: Ensures both prosecution and defense adhere to the same evidentiary standards and rules, thereby preventing any party from having an unfair advantage.
Values: Promotes societal values by recognizing testimonial privileges (e.g., spouses, clergy-penitent, doctor-patient).
Fairness: Guarantees no party holds an undue advantage, facilitating cross-examination capabilities.
Efficiency: Aims to exclude cumulative evidence that provides no additional information, preventing unnecessary use of time and resources.
Quality: Encourages submission of the “best evidence,” such as original documents over copies.
Emotion: Limits evidence presentation to prevent jurors from making decisions based on emotional responses instead of factual analysis.
Improper Conduct: Restricts lawyers from using abusive language towards witnesses or misrepresenting facts during the trial process.