table: opposition to the Terror
opposition | what happened to this opposition? describe events | consequences of the removal of opposition on the cps: did it strengthen or weaken the cps? explain your view |
|---|---|---|
left-wing: herbert and his followers, the hebertistes, used to support the radical ideas of the revolutionary government. hebert’s left-wing newspaper ‘Le Pere Duchesne’ advocated the execution of more hoarders and the redistribution of property. the hebertistes didn’t have many supporters in the actual convention but did amongst the paris commune, the revolutionary armies and the sans-culottes. robespierre resented their political extremism and even felt their leading part in the de-christianisation measure of the ‘Religious Terror’ had taken things too far, turning Catholics against the Republic |
|
|
right-wing: opposition from the right, centred around georges danton, a former colleague of robespierre in the cps and a leading montagnard/jacobin, and camille desmoulins, a jacobin journalist. danton headed up a new movement known as the indulgents, who wished to see a relaxation of the Terror and end the centralisation of power imposed during this period. to do this, danton argued that the revolutionary wars must come to an end, as they were a primary cause of the Terror. in desmoulins’ newspaper ‘Le Vieux Cordelier’, he called for the release of ‘200,000 citizens who are called suspects’. danton had a far larger following in the convention than hebert and there were worries that his call for an end to the Terror and the wars might pave the way for the return of the monarchy. |
|
well